Right wing religious wackos would make up ANY story to protect their family's truth from coming out! They're good at it too -you know, the lying & deceiving. We've seen 8 years of it in the White House, so why wouldn't John McCain pick one to run alongside him?
Source
Hi PT - this is the way to do it huh?
Hmmm interesting. So Bristol gave birth to Trig when she was almost 1 month pregnant with the baby she is carrying now. Those Republicans are very good if they can pull that one off!
http://all4gals.blogspot.com/2008/04/we … palin.html
That rumour has been refuted by almost everyone now...including most "left wing" blogs.
I think the truth of this story is juicy enough so we don't need to sensationalize it by suggesting that Governor Mom didn't really have a baby and that it was actually Bristol's. The fact remains that she's 17, she got pregnant, and now looks to be heading down the aisle with a shotgun aimed at daddy. I just wonder if it will be Sarah holding the trigger!
The babies are victims here. They get tossed into the limelight before they are even born. Look what happened to the Spears clan. I ownder what would have happned if this was Chelsea ten years ago. We would never hear the end of it
Well, Chelsea herself *was* made fun of, viciously, by the Republicans. Even John McCain had a joke about her. Keep in mind this was when she was a young teenager.
The scandal about Palin's son & daughter have nothing to do with them. No one has attacked them. The issue has been Sarah Palin's judgment, her reluctance to share things with the press, and her senseless opposition to sex ed in schools.
Sarah Palin has really shown what a cut throat she can be. She chose to inject her daughter into this campaign by announcing that Bristol is pregnant. She could have chosen not to say anything, refute the obvious errors about her new baby really being Bristol's, but now she's dragged her daughter and future son-in-law into the debate. Plus, assuming that Bristol and the father did, in fact, appear on stage with her, it seems now that Bristol is fair game. What parent would do such a thing? I sure wouldn't!
The babies won't know what hit them, so I feel less bad for them than I do for Bristol.
And by the way, what kind of parent names their daughter Bristol?
That is seriously stupid. I can't believe that people are making a bigger deal out of the fact that Palin's daughter is pregnant than they ever did about the seriously questionable associations Obama has had with Bill Ayers and Tony Rezko. More questions and accusations have been thrown around about Palin, her daughter and her son than have been raised about serious issues of Obama's assoication with corrupt individuals in Chicago political circles. That makes no sense to me. Isn't corruption in politics a bigger issue than a seventeen year old girl?
As far as I've hear, she has her fair share of shady dealings with shady people.
I think that any time there is a sex scandal, the press will cover it with equal vim and vigor, regardless of which party happens to be at the center of it. It becomes a salient political issue, however, when you have someone who is passionately conservative who would presume to tell men, women and children that they will burn in hell for living in sin, and we find out that not all is prim and proper in the Palin household. I get the same kind of feeling when I think about Dick Cheney with a lesbian daughter. Personally I have no problem with people who are gay or lesbian, but just knowing how nuts it must be making Cheney makes me giggle!
I don't recall Sarah Palin telling anyone they were going to burn in hell. As for everything being prim and proper in the Palin household, I can assure you, as a parent, and someone who still remembers what her teenage years were like, I know for a fact that no matter how close Sarah Palin is with her kids, how early and often she had talks with them about sex, and other subjects, teenagers will do what they want to do. Someone recently posted a hub on the truth about teenage mothers, and I thought it raised a lot of good points.
by Leta S8 years ago
Currently under 13 ethics investigations...McCain and staff now full-on against her.Aren't you glad we voted Obama in?
by Stacie L6 years ago
Alaska set to release thousands of Sarah Palin emails"The messages date from Palin's first days in office in December 2006 through September 2008�a period that covers most of the presidential election, but...
by rhamson8 years ago
This past election there was a lot of energy created in the choice by John McCain to have Sarah Palin as his running mate. What do you feel was the reason for this choice and how do you think she was qualified to...
by rhamson7 years ago
With all the excitement generated by Sarah Palins new book "Going Rogue" and what some say is an obvious run at the White House, could she be the answer the Rebublican party is looking for?
by Alem Belton6 years ago
These supporters of Sarah Palin must know something I don't know, if so please enlighten me. Otherwise all I have seen from this women is incompetence. In my opinion, this women might be the most unqualified...
by Stump Parrish7 years ago
http://www.alternet.org/story/149522/is … her?page=2Mark Green in the Huffington Post declared Palin's candidacy, and even perhaps her future as a pundit dead. He wrote:Because she has not shown any of the...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
terms of use privacy policy (0.32 sec)