Did Sarah Palin fake her last pregnancy to cover up her daughter's?

1. 60

   Mark Knowlesposted 9 years ago

   
   
   Right wing religious wackos would make up ANY story to protect their family's truth from coming out! They're good at it too -you know, the lying & deceiving. We've seen 8 years of it in the White House, so why wouldn't John McCain pick one to run alongside him?
   
   Source
   
   Hi PT - this is the way to do it huh?

   replyreport
2. 55

   allshookupposted 9 years ago

   Hmmm interesting. So Bristol gave birth to Trig when she was almost 1 month pregnant with the baby she is carrying now. Those Republicans are very good if they can pull that one off! 
   
   
   http://all4gals.blogspot.com/2008/04/we … palin.html

   replyreport
   1. 84

      Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      That rumour has been refuted by almost everyone now...including most "left wing" blogs.

      replyreport
3. 76

   Mishaposted 9 years ago

   Ummm, they are both cute

   replyreport
4. 55

   allshookupposted 9 years ago

   And the baby is precious.

   replyreport
5. 74

   crashcromwellposted 9 years ago

   I think the truth of this story is juicy enough so we don't need to sensationalize it by suggesting that Governor Mom didn't really have a baby and that it was actually Bristol's. The fact remains that she's 17, she got pregnant, and now looks to be heading down the aisle with a shotgun aimed at daddy. I just wonder if it will be Sarah holding the trigger!

   replyreport
6. 0

   roddmaposted 9 years ago

   The babies are victims here. They get tossed into the limelight before they are even born. Look what happened to the Spears clan. I ownder what would have happned if this was Chelsea ten years ago. We would never hear the end of it

   replyreport
   1. 93

      livelongerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      Well, Chelsea herself *was* made fun of, viciously, by the Republicans. Even John McCain had a joke about her. Keep in mind this was when she was a young teenager.
      
      The scandal about Palin's son & daughter have nothing to do with them. No one has attacked them. The issue has been Sarah Palin's judgment, her reluctance to share things with the press, and her senseless opposition to sex ed in schools.

      replyreport
7. 74

   crashcromwellposted 9 years ago

   Sarah Palin has really shown what a cut throat she can be. She chose to inject her daughter into this campaign by announcing that Bristol is pregnant. She could have chosen not to say anything, refute the obvious errors about her new baby really being Bristol's, but now she's dragged her daughter and future son-in-law into the debate. Plus, assuming that Bristol and the father did, in fact, appear on stage with her, it seems now that Bristol is fair game. What parent would do such a thing? I sure wouldn't!
   
   The babies won't know what hit them, so I feel less bad for them than I do for Bristol.
   
   And by the way, what kind of parent names their daughter Bristol?

   replyreport
8. 91

   Anna Marie Bowmanposted 9 years ago

   That is seriously stupid.  I can't believe that people are making a bigger deal out of the fact that Palin's daughter is pregnant than they ever did about the seriously questionable associations Obama has had with Bill Ayers and Tony Rezko.  More questions and accusations have been thrown around about Palin, her daughter and her son than have been raised about serious issues of Obama's assoication with corrupt individuals in Chicago political circles.  That makes no sense to me.  Isn't corruption in politics a bigger issue than a seventeen year old girl?

   replyreport
   1. 84

      Uninvited Writerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      As far as I've hear, she has her fair share of shady dealings with shady people.

      replyreport
   2. 93

      livelongerposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      You can't possibly be serious.

      replyreport
9. 74

   crashcromwellposted 9 years ago

   I think that any time there is a sex scandal, the press will cover it with equal vim and vigor, regardless of which party happens to be at the center of it. It becomes a salient political issue, however, when you have someone who is passionately conservative who would presume to tell men, women and children that they will burn in hell for living in sin, and we find out that not all is prim and proper in the Palin household. I get the same kind of feeling when I think about Dick Cheney with a lesbian daughter. Personally I have no problem with people who are gay or lesbian, but just knowing how nuts it must be making Cheney makes me giggle!

   replyreport
   1. 91

      Anna Marie Bowmanposted 9 years agoin reply to this

      I don't recall Sarah Palin telling anyone they were going to burn in hell.  As for everything being prim and proper in the Palin household, I can assure you, as a parent, and someone who still remembers what her teenage years were like, I know for a fact that no matter how close Sarah Palin is with her kids, how early and often she had talks with them about sex, and other subjects, teenagers will do what they want to do.  Someone recently posted a hub on the truth about teenage mothers, and I thought it raised a lot of good points.

      replyreport