When the Supreme Court legalized a new era of unrestrained corporate campaign spending, the court made a point of upholding disclosure of donors as an alternative safeguard for voters and the democratic process.
President Obama should take the court up on its transparency blessing forthwith and sign a proposed executive order that would require government contractors to disclose their donations to groups that support or oppose federal candidates. If they win, those would-be legislators or policy deciders will be able to reward these contractors with millions or even billions in government largess. The taxpayers have a right and need to know what favors are being curried.
The court’s Citizens United decision inspired a $138 million binge of hidden donors in last year’s midterm elections. It was a mere down payment by political machines that will flood the 2012 campaign with anonymous cash from corporations, unions and nonprofit groups.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, an accomplished conduit for secret donors, is crying foul about the proposed executive order. But clearly the measure is needed to combat pay-to-play campaign abuses.
Democrats came close to passing a new disclosure law last year, but were stopped when Senate Republicans — who will benefit the most from stealth corporate donations — stood fast. The prospects with this Congress are, of course, far worse, and the checkbooks are already out.
Mr. Obama vowed to rein in campaign abuses. Now is not the time for him to flinch before noisy threats from the chamber and other deep-pocketed players.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/01/opini … ntemail1=y
Good to see you're reading the NYTimes, Oly.
Morning Ralph, I was in hopes this would meet approval.
I am bouncing around with different issues and places because, I do not wan't to post a lot of issues you guys have already read.
That is the hard part and every now and again I fall off, but, some of the ding dong issues I post do make for good debating
by Holle Abee 6 years ago
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 … 24916.htmlMan, if that isn't the pot calling the kettle black! What about Obama's donors and bundlers? I really thought Obama was above something like this.
by Ralph Deeds 5 years ago
Worried about Obama's publicity on relief effort in New Jersey the Romney camp cooked up a phoney hurricane relief effort with supplies purchased with campaign funds at WalMart which were given to supporters who brought them in to a staged donation at a Romney campaign headquarters. Romney is less...
by ahorseback 2 years ago
A question for our independents and conservatives;We already know what the left thinks .In the nomination of Trump for the republican party are we not symbolically AND technically nominating exactly that which we have said for years in America ? That Corporate America has had way...
by Peeples 2 years ago
Are Go Fund Me campaigns ever successful for normal people without hundreds of friends?Or is it really just for churches, people wanting to make potato salad, and viral people?
by GA Anderson 4 years ago
Strictly a "lets talk about it" opinion topic. No turf to defend, no deep background needed.Everybody invited. The old guard and regular participants of this Politics and Social Issues forum are great, but it appears our ranks are thinning.We need some new blood in these discussions - so...
by OLYHOOCH 7 years ago
INVESTIGATION REPORTEDLY LAUNCHED IN 2008(Apr. 18, 2011) — It has been reported that the Federal Election Commission began an investigation into the campaign contributions taken in by Barack Hussein Obama in 2008 over “allegations of improper contributions.” The FEC website states: In 1975,...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|