What are they Called?

1. 60

   Mister Veritisposted 13 years ago

   This is a rough paraphrase from a delightful book I am reading:
   
   A baby turkey is called a poultA baby fish is a fry.
   A baby kangaroo is a Joey.
   A group of lions is called a pride.
   A group of hogs is a herd.
   A collection of geese on the ground is a gaggle.
   A collection of geese in the air is a skein.
   A gathering of foxes is a skunkel (unless they are all one one beach...oh, never mind).
   A gathering of quails are a covey.
   
   What is a gathering of Obama supporters called?

   replyreport
   1. 59

      nightwork4posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      non-racists who are sick of bush-like politics.

      replyreport
   2. 0

      Texasbetaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Thinkers

      replyreport
      1. 60

         Mister Veritisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         

         replyreport
   3. 61

      Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      I'm not sure what you would presently call them, but in November of 2012 you may correctly call them a victory party.

      replyreport
      1. 60

         Mister Veritisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         I suppose it depends on what the meaning of "victory" is. Right now redistricting is going on all over the country. Republicans are in charge this time in a majority of states. That is going to make it much harder for the Democrats to cheat and steal the election. So this time it is not a sure bet. Granted, the Democrats will still get nearly all of the dead and the illegals. So it could be close. There are plenty of dead. And illegals.

         replyreport
         1. 61

            Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            DEMOCRATS steal the election? 
            
            Like they stole 2000?

            replyreport
            1. 60

               Mister Veritisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

               Just because the effort is made in every election is no guarantee that you will succeed every time. But Democrats do make every effort to steal any election they can. Don't you agree?
               
               Redistricting will make that just a bit harder.

               replyreport
               1. 0

                  Texasbetaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Nuh-uh responses won't fly pal.
                  
                  Do you even know the specifics of the 2000 election and what happened? If you don't just let me know my man, I'll either give you the exact story, or give you points so you can go research it for yourself. If you want to ride the name Veritis, you are going to have to earn it around me sir. I've already done the legwork and put in the effort.

                  replyreport
                  1. 61

                     Evan G Rogersposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                     BAH!! NAUGHT BUT A CONSPIRACY, FROM A NUT WITH A SHELL AS THICK AS A COCONUT!!!

                     replyreport
         2. 0

            Texasbetaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            Veritis, my man, you are proving daily that the irony of your handle. First of all, Republicans are ALWAYS in charge during redistricting...look back, that is when they do the big pushes. They realize the way to win isn't over issues, but if you gerrymander the districts. If you disagree, I'll start posting all of the cases involving Republicans and their illegal gerrymandering, THEN post the ones that weren't technically illegal but were so obvious, that a 10 yr old would catch it. The only people stealing elections are on the right wing of the political line right now.
            If you want to go back to the 60s, then I'll give it to you, but that was a LONG LONG time ago.

            replyreport
   4. 71

      Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Inept? Smart? Foolish?
      
      I guess you could call them plenty of things. There are enough words in the English language to be considered ample for the task.
      
      However, the bigger picture actually shows that Obama, as an individual isn't up to the task he originally planned. He underestimated the power of the people or is just ignorant.
      
      It's unfortunate that the original goal isn't going to happen. It just means that there are too many people creating means for decisiveness. Divide and conquer, and it's working. It's a shame.

      replyreport
   5. 66

      Greek Oneposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      they are called "The majority of voters"

      replyreport
      1. 84

         lovemychrisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         good one.

         replyreport
         1. 60

            Mister Veritisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            It was clever.

            replyreport
   6. 0

      BRIAN SLATERposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Lonely, helpless, rejected and dismayed.

      replyreport
      1. 61

         Ron Montgomeryposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Yes, being in the majority does make me lonely.

         replyreport
   7. 59

      elenoxposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Drones or sycophants.

      replyreport
   8. 68

      AnnCeeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Did someone already say a swarm of Obamazombies?

      replyreport
      1. 60

         John Holdenposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Well, I realise that amazombies are Amazon sellers, but what does the Ob mean?

         replyreport
         1. 68

            AnnCeeposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            
            
            An implausibility of Obamagnus?

            replyreport
2. 84

   lovemychrisposted 13 years ago

   Smarter than your average bear BooBoo.
   
   MOS DEF smarter than a Koch-S*cker!
   
   Ooooh---what's a group of Tea-Baggers called?? see above.

   replyreport
3. 84

   lovemychrisposted 13 years ago

   "American Conservatism: Where guns don't kill people, but gays can kill the sanctity of marriage"

   replyreport
   1. 60

      DTR0005posted 13 years agoin reply to this

      THat's Excellent LMC!!!! Your quote or someone else's?

      replyreport
4. 84

   lovemychrisposted 13 years ago

   9/11:
   
   “A shocking crime was committed on the unscrupulous initiative of few individuals, with the blessing of more, and amid the passive acquiescence of all.”
   
   –Tacitus, First Century Historian and Senator in the Roman Empire
   
   History repeats. Over and over...it's always the same psy-op.
   
   But this time, we don't get fooled again.
   
   Stealth-people can never be trusted.
   
   A hidden agenda is the work of the Devil.

   replyreport
5. 84

   lovemychrisposted 13 years ago

   "A hidden agenda is the work of the Devil."
   
   "What is a gathering of Obama supporters called?"
   
   
   EXORCISTS!!!

   replyreport
   1. 60

      Mister Veritisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      LOL.

      replyreport
6. 59

   hottopicsposted 13 years ago

   Lost !!

   replyreport
7. 73

   Reality Bytesposted 13 years ago

   A herd.

   replyreport
8. 75

   Mighty Momposted 13 years ago

   True Americans!

   replyreport
9. 60

   DannyMaioposted 13 years ago

   BOZOBAMA'S

   replyreport
10. 60

    Moderndayslaveposted 13 years ago

    Just remember: 911 happened on Bushes watch and Obama got Bin Laden

    replyreport
    1. 60

       DannyMaioposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       yes because of bushes policies with terrorist! Obama the first day in office stopped the CIA from interrogating and we have not received any new info since! well no good info.

       replyreport
       1. 84

          lovemychrisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          "yes because of bushes policies with terrorist!"--
          
          Exactly. The neo-con Zionists and Mossad.

          replyreport
       2. 0

          Texasbetaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Danny, you do realize that cannot construct a sentence correctly? I have a 3 month old puppy who is better at grammar than you are.

          replyreport
          1. 60

             DannyMaioposted 13 years agoin reply to this

             Did you read what you wrote? Your sentence is incorrect. And I see the only way to get someone is to attack them! your a great guy, I guess that is why a few people let me know your the Mr. Know it all and some other pretty funny things. Strange thing is your the only one these few people complained about? Hmmmm

             replyreport
             1. 0

                Texasbetaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                "You're" would be the appropriate verbiage in that context. I am sure they complained...I rarely let blatant lies be passed along in these forums. I am sure that annoys both you, and them. It amuses me.
                It is easy to fight...bring up actual facts with real resources and put in the effort in the debate. I seriously doubt you will do so, however.

                replyreport
                1. 60

                   DannyMaioposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                   I have with your half truths with Israel. You never responded? why not? You just talk a lot of...Whatever.

                   replyreport
                   1. 60

                      John Holdenposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                      That reminds me, I'm still waiting for a response from you to several points that I made several days ago.

                      replyreport
                   2. 0

                      Texasbetaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                      I must have missed them Danny, tried to look back but can't find the response you were talking about. Dish it out and I'll address it. I love rallies.
                      
                      John, me or Danny? Sorry boys, I got banned for 2 days...not sure why on this one, and drifted away, as ya do. Tell me what thread and I'll go address.

                      replyreport
                      1. 60

                         John Holdenposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                         Oh, Danny, always Danny. He accuses me of twisting but when he's caught out, he just clams up.

                         replyreport
    2. 73

       Reality Bytesposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       I think that might have been the Navy Seals that actually got Bin Laden.
       
       Barry did give the order though.

       replyreport
11. 84

    lovemychrisposted 13 years ago

    I don't think so.
    
    I think he's got a double-triple-whammy going on. I know it sounds nuts, but I think he's going after the REAL al-queda...which is the CIA inside our own country and that of others, who are really out to destroy America.
    
    And you see--he can do it playing their game...since they set up muslims as the boogey-man...he can get all the CIA-planted ones he wants!
    
    It's quite ingenious really....I always thought he was a mad genius.
    
    And if the Koch-Suc*ers complain, why they'll look un-American!
    
    The ole double-triple cross.
    Or, a more congenial term: Hoisted on their Own Petard!!

    replyreport
    1. 60

       DannyMaioposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       GOD if you put the energy into something truly productive and had the drive you do with Obama you would be a zillionaire!

       replyreport
       1. 84

          lovemychrisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Who says I'm not?
          
          I might be playing the ole double-triple-cross myself

          replyreport
       2. 0

          Texasbetaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Some people actually care about the country, the people in it, and the future generations as opposed to their personal fortunes. I know, that is a foreign concept to you neocons.

          replyreport
    2. 59

       elenoxposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       Perhaps you might pay some mind to Occam's Razor instead of playing mental twister to figure out that everyone but terrorists were involved in 9/11.
       
       But you do have Rosie O' Donnell on your side, so you have that going for you.

       replyreport
       1. 84

          lovemychrisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

          Oh, I never said they weren't terrorists.....just not the ones you have in mind.

          replyreport
12. 59

    hottopicsposted 13 years ago

    Not likely

    replyreport
    1. 84

       lovemychrisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       Why would you say that?

       replyreport
13. 59

    hottopicsposted 13 years ago

    In order to be sucessful in life, business or financial, one must look at all the evidence, weight both sides of the fence, then form an intelligent decision. By your own admission several times, you said you will not look at evidence presented to you based in facts. Being that closed minded one could not be successful to become even a thousandaire

    replyreport
    1. 84

       lovemychrisposted 13 years agoin reply to this

       Russshhhhhhhhh and Beckles both got rich by lying, spin and propaganda...
       
       Your premise is ehhhhhhhhhhhhh: wrong.
       
       Which btw....their "facts" are! Lies, propaganda and spin.
       
       That is why I do not pay them ANY mind.
       Nor any right-wing machine.
       
       Pullease--we have LIVED it for 38 of the past 50 years. I know what the Flip it is when I see it.

       replyreport
14. 59

    hottopicsposted 13 years ago

    How do you know "what the flip it is" when you once again admit you do not see or read it? You cannot know what it is until you see or read it. just thinking its so does not make it so. By your thought process, a criminal in jail who thinks he is not guilty,"Which btw....their "facts" are Lies, propaganda and spin", should be let go despite all the factual evidence that shows he is in fact guilty. I bet you are the kind of person that looks at a food like a veggie and says you do not like it or hate it without even tasting it. Know way to know unless you taste it.

    replyreport
15. 59

    hottopicsposted 13 years ago

    Pullease--we have LIVED it for 38 of the past 50 years.
    
    Actually we have lived it for 50 out of 50 years. They ALL lie in Washington. Thats why people need to look up the facts in what they say. If you think the Dems do not lie and are 100% truthful lets see, Obama, Me Clinton, Mrs Clinton, Edwards, Kerry, Biden, Patrick Kennedy, Ted Kennedy, Pelosi, Reed and the list can go on, but it would take up too much space. I can also make a list as long of Repubs. So as I sadi, they all lie

    replyreport