There are many millions of people who are born in poverty, live in poverty, die in poverty, and leave their children in poverty. Getting out of poverty by individual effort is theoretically possible, and there are people who have broken out of poverty.
A bit of bad luck can derail anyone's plans. The poor get more bad luck than the rest of us because they do not have resources to cushion any difficulties. Finding mone=y for a pair of shoes for your growing child can derail the household budget for months.
And do not be sick in America - it can crucify you with expense and pain.
I believe that the countries with the most poverty are capitalist and the countries with the least are more socialist.
I just believe that we all can help those in poverty no matter what country it is we live in. We can help out in some way, as I have stated in some of my hubs. It is a growing problem in America at the moment, and hopefully there a generous people out their that will give someone the chance to work, or help them in some other way!
I think socialist countries are outliers at both the high (NZ, much of Scandinavia) and low (Cuba, Ethiopia) end.
Ultimately you have good or bad government. I am not sure exactly how they go about it is as important as many people think.
They love to bash the failure of the Cuban economy. Course they don't tell you there is a total US economic boycott since the fifties and none too much help for any socialist country.
If you want to look at Society as an organism, as Nietzsche did, then yes.
And America has proven the greatness of Capitalism... where all other systems have shown they are unsustainable and failures. And I know you all are going to hate that assessment.
The trouble we, America, are having is because of Govt. intrusion and over-regulation... a semi-Socialism that is choking this nation into the grave
I agree with that assessment, so long as you would agree that Norway proves the same for the greatness Socialism. Huge taxes, but immensely productive with a massive GDP per person and very high standard of living.
To a certain degree Psyche. I have an issue with using those nations as examples becausee of the limited population. When you involve Socialism or Communism you inevitably have to consider population control in order to not out grow the produced and managed resources.
Control doesn't stop at just the resources, production, distribution, etc...
I would say the opposite is true, since corporate owned governments are giving you moves made to help corporations over people.
Both political parties in America are accountable for this, but i think the most obvious and attrocious move was the ownership of Bush Jr. by Meryll Lynch, which brought about the bank deregulations which hiked interest rates on many mortgages, loans and credit cards which would have been illegal a few years previously.
I think corporations should be seperated from Government entirely so that fair rulings and laws can be made.
I don't think America has proven the greatness of capitalism simply because it is being crippled by it. Capitalism is a good thing, but allowing it to run the country creates a dangerous system.
When it comes to socialism, most developed countries have a bit of socialism in the mix, it works well in terms of fire protection, police, healthcare, education and road systems around Europe.
America seems weirdly fired up when it comes to socialism, I cna take some guesses as to why, but as a European in America it seems a little weird. Case in point, I went to visit my grandfather in law.
He is living on some form of government medical aid, he worked in the army, he receives an army pension, he worked as the sherrif, receives a pension from that too, and receives the american version of a state pension. One of his grand daughters (Not my wife for the record) Is a bit of a junky and a teenage single mother - living off government benefits, they could not support her otherwise, he also has two other young'uns in the family who are currently serving time for armed robbery.
All in all, the majority of his life is funded by socialist policies, and yet he is staunchly anti-socialist, kind of makes me laugh.
What America has had over the last 70 years is not Capitalism oli... so we cannot really use it as an exaple of true capitalism anymore. And fannie mae and freddy mac, along with Dodd and frank did alot to destroy the housing market and set people up for the fall. I agree that both parties are at fault... but do not get to stuck on blaming one or the other... both are responsible.
Quite. The state of economies rarely springs form ideology per se. You can run a good low poverty national economy on either model. Or you can have it crash and burn, for whatever other reason(s).
We don't really have matched cases to compare. It just seems to me that some nations are well-governed and others aren't. Different systems work or don't work in different contexts.
I would consider the US a mixed model that is not without socialist elements, and pretty successful. Equal Norway is very socialist but still has some strong free market elements too.
My take home message would be not to let idiots run the country. Even as a "lefty" I would rather have a smart Capitalist or Libertarian in charge than a dumb Socialist. And I would vote for anyone who will promise a balanced budget.
Yes we, America, have gone semi-Socialist in the last 90 years.
Entirely for the bad? Medicare all bad? Tax-funded police force? Fire service?
I mean I am a socialist but I am pro-free trade. Most rational people don't run a straight party line.
Best of luck psycheskinner, the only sort of socialist recognised here is the crypto communist, and not just communist, but Stalinist.
Agreed, people and politics should not run on favorite parties, but rather thoughtful policies.
I have never said any of that was all bad. I had a long discussion with Emile the other day and told her the same thing I have always said.
I have no problem helping the poor, elderly, disabled, and the just plain needy for the moment.
I have an issue with life long welfare and generational welfare, which I have seen first hand growing up in Lynn MA..
I have an issue with 99 weeks of unemployment. But not regular unemployment.
I have an issue with bail-outs for Banks, Industry and nationalizing any private industry period, including healthcare. It had its problems, but nationalizing it was not the answer. It was the over-regulation, along with the inflated payments made by the Govt through Medi-care and Medi-caid that set the rates and caused the inflation of healthcare costs to begin with. Regulation such as only one insurance Co. per State, that is no way for the free market to operate and adjust for Say's Law.
I have no problem with Soc. Sec. for the elderly and to have as a sefety net. I have a problem with the Govt having a different Soc. Sec. and healthcare system for themselves.
I do not think peoples who ideologies, ie; Communists, Socialist and others that do not think they should fol;low out Constoitution being in our Govt. and trying to tear up the Constitution and create a new system.
As far as Military involvment around the world;
I have a problem with our intervening in any Nations wars that are not a direct threat to our National Security. I am a non-inteventionalist... NOT and isolationist.
We got Osama... we should be pulling out totally from all the conflicts which are based on getting him, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq.
I have issues with us being in wars and ignoring the Constitution based on a law that doesn't supercede the constitution. ie; the war powers act, is unconstitutional and Congress cannot over-rule or transfer enumorated powers of the Constitution by a law... it take a Constitutional amendment.
I do not like illegal inmmigration and the rewarding of it with amnesty as we have done at least twice, if not three times. I believe if people want to come here then come legally as many do.
I believe we should giove all illegals a 6 month period to leave this nation, checking in at the border on their way back to be placed on a list which will be added to the back, the end, of the line which exists already. If after that 6 months you are found here illegally, you are arrested and charged and deported and you never have the right to apply and return again.
As far as those children who were born here... citizenship is not granted to them through the 14th amendment... that is a mis-translation and needs to be corrected. it read one parent has to be subject to the jursdiction of the US Govt, and if both parents are not legal, then niether is the child.
I think I got most of the main issues... lemme know if you have a question I didn't get.
Won't find any population controls in capitalism and eventually they will populate themselves into poverty, unless wars maintain a depopulating mean.
Actually invention and inovation play a great part in the sustaining of a country and it agriculture and other resources. So that is ot necessarily true. And in a free market inovation and invention flourish under free market capitalism. ie; new growing techniques, new energy uses and resources, etc...
So long as the Capitalism is education-driven it should naturally lead to low birth rates. Again, ideology does not cause high birth rates, typically poverty does. The reason being that those in poverty need to have more children to ensure some survive to adulthood and must have children to work and support them in old age. Those in affluence have great health care, few die young, and people can save for their own retirement and be secure even if childless.
Unless they are halted by free-market GREED. Forces already in control who don't want to share.
As In Koch and the Wind Farm here on Cape Cod.
He has a house on the Sound, you know. Perish the thought.
NIMBY = No Free market! Money rules.
Corporations are fascist concerned only with profits and themselves. Corporations will either be banned or they will destroy the planet. See Fukishima.
So do we just call the good bits of trade "Capitalism". Because yes, specialization and exchange raise standards of living.
But it also gave a wages insufficient for decent living and poverty for those who can't work through no fault of their own (hence the socialist dole, collective bargaining and minimum wage.)
Capitalism IMHO means the whole shebang, good and bad. As does Socialism which basically means not letting the powerless be abused or neglected, but at its extremes can suppress business and cause welfare dependency.
Both good ideas and both bad ideas. Hence the need for good leaders to pick out and use the good bits.
Poverty is NOT a disease. Poverty is a form of VIOLENCE.
Care to explain that?
Poverty comes and stems from ignorance. Not violence.
It's a paraphrase of a Gandhi quote. It's so easy for the very wealthy to become more so - it's even effortless. The opposite end of this spectrum is also true, and self explanatory.
The question is do you know why it is effortless? It's called "residual" income generation. Which is the base of wealth creation.
The opposite end is poverty and it comes/stems from ignorance in knowing how to prevent poverty from happening to oneself.
Nothing wrong with small capitalism. It shouldn't be confused with the corporation.
Plenty of people are born into circumstances where escape from poverty is rare regardless of what temperament or virtues you might have. That is why we try to maintain free and universal healthcare and education for children. Because there is nothing fair about inheriting poverty, poor education and poor employability.
My mother was one of many children of a father who was an illiterate manual laborer, who is probably alive today only due to the unionization of the mines. He urged his children to become educated and the then left wing government gave them vocational training for free. That is directly the cause of my mother being a teacher and me being an ex-university lecturer and current executive.
That is also why I am personally grateful and extremely committed to the socialism of free and universal healthcare and education for children and youths--and also extensive second chance education.
It is so interesting. When "capitalism" is seen to have clay feet, people rush to say that what we have is not capitalism.
They may call it corporatism or republicanism or some other ism so that capitalism can stay pure - even if the USA has not had capitalism for 90 years apparently. Yet the same people say capitalism is better than socialism. Capitalism as practiced in the USA is what most of us think of as capitalism
It is intellectually dishonest to dodge this question. And the right pride themselves on their clear thinking!
by Charles James 10 years ago
As some fellow hubbers will know, I am involved in writing hubs for a Socialism 101 series.There are a few issues raised by the conservatives where I do not fully understand what they are saying. Before I address these in a hub or hubs I really would like clarity on what exactly the conservative...
by JOC 24 months ago
Recently, at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), conservatives had a common theme of railing against Socialism due to some of the progressives that have announced their candidacy for the presidency.Some of the internet comments made when this fearmongering was discovered were just...
by Josak 7 years ago
One of the greatest criticisms leveled at socialist and perceived socialist nations is their high taxes, usually reinforced with the example of France and it's high tax rates under a newly elected socialist government.Let's examine that claim factually, a quick analysis will prove it false.For...
by ga anderson 5 years ago
*Thread credit should go to Credence2 for his Bernie Sanders enthusiasm - which prompted a look at his platformLooking at presidential candidate Bernie Sanders' website was a real eye-opener. Great sounding programs - paid for by the greedy rich, and the evil corporations of America.Many of...
by ga anderson 6 months ago
Peterstreep posted a thought about today's capitalism being different, (and the implication was that it is more dangerous), than the capitalism of the early 20th Century. Here is what he said:On the basics, I disagree, I think it is the same game, just with different players and boundaries. But in...
by Brian 10 years ago
I was talking with a group of friends the other day. and I suggested that there should be a national tax, where the money collected should be distributed evenly among every U.S. citizen, and I was labled as a socialist.I don't understand what would be so wrong about distributing that kind of money...
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|