This IS an Act of TREASON!

1. 69

   Cagsilposted 13 years ago

   Sorry folks,
   
   But it is what it is.
   
   http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/o … ates/14439

   report
   1. 60

      Josakposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Actually I think it's great, there is nothing wrong with becoming signatories to international treaties and regulations and they do not supersede the constitution nor the legislature that article is alarmist nonsense as a quick look through will easily show.
      
      "if we were to allow ourselves to be disarmed by these international soviet socialists, the next step would be to eliminate everyone who refuses to acquiesce to collective slavery."
      
      totally rational people

      report
      1. 69

         Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Coming from someone who apparently isn't rational. Thank you for your input.

         report
         1. 77

            colpolbearposted 13 years agoin reply to this

            ^Don't take Josak's comment personally.  He wasn't saying that you're irrational, but merely defending those he thought to be in the right.  If anything, you're the one being hostile.
            
            Furthermore, the article was extremely biased.  Right from the start, opinion spewed every sentence.

            report
            1. 69

               Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

               Oh okay. Good to know.

               report
               1. 71

                  TomBlalockposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                  Yep. I agree with Colpolbear and Josak. That article was rubbish. No sourcing, citations, or explanations, just fearmongering and rhetoric. Mind you, I dislike what Obama is doing, and he is attempting to use treaty law to effect changes on our own laws, but that article isn't going to give you a factual look at what he is really doing.

                  report
                  1. 69

                     Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

                     Oh okay.

                     report
   2. 62

      psycheskinnerposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Perhaps you could link to a story that actually says what the treaty does or the actual text of the treaty.  Because I can't think of a single potential way for international treaties to trump a nations own laws.

      report
   3. 60

      paradigmsearchposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Hey, Cags. I know what you mean as to our concern about subordinating ourselves to the United Nations. I went and read the actual executive order. Fortunately, this latest order still does not do that. It says, in part:
      
      "Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to a department or agency, or the head thereof;"
      
      and
      
      "(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person."
      
      .
      
      In other words, we can still tell another country to go f*ck themselves whenever we want.

      report
      1. 60

         Josakposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Precisely but of course you won't find the article mentioning that, as far as it's concerned we are all about to be exterminated for not not saluting the supreme overlord , it's the archetype of stupid journalism and we should know better than to take it as anything more than a joke.

         report
      2. 69

         Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Oh okay.

         report
   4. 60

      Pollyannalanaposted 13 years agoin reply to this

      Please do a hub on this, I will help keep it circulating. We have to stop this man!

      report
      1. 69

         Cagsilposted 13 years agoin reply to this

         Hey Polly, an article is already being devised as a petition to remove Congress and the President. There will obviously be stipulations for how it occurs, but that will be ironed out at a later time.

         report
2. 56

   Dame Scribeposted 13 years ago

   I can understand the need to reduce conflicts with jurisdictions and laws since FN's run into lots of that but this article sorry, not enough truth but a lot of ranting

   report