|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
in the terms of the Doctrine:
this is axiomatic (to the point of being an oxymoron) for clarks
is non-sensical (having no reference points, in the question) for a roger
is not a bad thing (as a predator, alone is optimal) for a scott
the key is perspective, of course...not only on the concept of 'alone' but also 'a crowd'
Clark there is right. It's all about perspective of both of the terms. In my case, a crowd is usually more then twelve people, and alone would mean, for me, that I don't know any of the other people here, nor have ever met them. I tend to get very nervous in such crowds. I used to have panic attacks as a kid, too.
I think, a crowd means more than 12.
I remember having said that I find it inappropriate (to do a certain thing) in public, only to learn from my friend, that legally, "in public" means more than 50 people.
Which is funny because when my son who was young and dared by girls to expose himself got into trouble for doing it in front of four people. He told me about the incident, I had a talk with him about it, and I thought the case was closed only to be summoned by the principal to discuss it again. Those girls, the very same ones who dared my son, told on him. Lesson #1, lesson #2, .... but again to refute the principal's arguments about the difference between "in private" or "in public", my son said "But there were only four of us!"
One is always alone. Sometimes you pretend to fit. Sometimes nobody asks you what you think unless there is a point of decision how to act - if the crowd decides to burn witches alive, what do you do?
Again, using my poor son as an example. Now is Easter time, when bunnies chase chocolate eggs - I know it makes no sense, but that is how ideas degrade. I am a non-believer and I once made a mistake of giving my son too strong an explanation why I will never become a Christian. He took it the wrong way so far, but his views on religion will certainly evolve later. But now - alone in the crowd - the whole class ostracizes him for being a non-believer. All these nine-year-olds who don't understand religion if you ask them a single question, tell my son that he will burn in hell.
The wise person would not advertise the views that oppose those of the crowd, but my son is too little (immature) for that, too.
Blending in the crowd is easier and maybe wiser. Standing on your own is courting the disaster.
I was taught that 'two is company and three is a crowd'. I am not afraid of being 'alone' in a crowd. Depending on my mood I may simply observe and ponder about the individuals - each and everyone of us is 'alone' in a crowd. We were born alone, unless we were twins, and we will die alone. Or maybe I would start a conversation with another 'alone' individual, and maybe more will join the conversation, and whalla, there we would be a crowd in a crowd. Of course, I don't feel comfortable in all crowds and I will get myself as fast as possible out of a 'negative' crowd.
Good point about 2 and 3 - the most stable combination is two people, adding a third changes group dynamics. It becomes weaker. That is why when the first child arrives, the family is never the same.
I think two is fine.
12 or more is a disaster. You can't hear anyone but loud voices.
A negative crowd, that's my HS reunions. They are disasters.
So if anyone wants to get together, 3 is fine but 2 is better. Liked your answer.
To me the thought of being alone in a crowd takes me back to some of my travels and places I've lived.
I can remember one day being in China in a crowd of many thousands and suddenly realizing that I had absolutely nothing in common with anyone. Not just those near me but nobody that I could see, hear or even call.
I can't say that it bothered me it just struck me as a thought.
I'm very often "alone in a crowd" I don't usually find people that share my interests. One learns the social graces, so that one's sense of isolation doesn't show. This situation has increased as I grow older, my contemporaries aren't around so frequently.
I didn't quite get the drift of your question but i would try to explain it. Unless you are really the freaky type, i don't think there is really anything to worry about being alone in a crowd. My understanding is that people tend to be so preoccupied in their small worlds to notice that you are an odd ball..well unless you invite them. So act like you are part of the crowd even if you feel left out or else, slowly slide out of their view and take a back seat.
I don't mind being alone in a crowd.
I chose to be alone.
But I don't like being lonely in a crowd.
Being lonely means no one really cares if you are around. I look at it from Reunions and social gatherings.
I was dragged to my 25th HS reunion and I just sat there feeling lonely.
You can't make yourself popular,
I like my "alone" time though. It's a time for me to just relax and not worry I need to impress anyone or to sit with others I haven't seen in thirty years.
I guess it's a matter of perception.
When I'm alone I don't need to hurry up. Or always put on a happy face.
One of the loneliest feelings is being at a wedding with no date. And you watch e eryone dancing. I'm glad that part of my life is over.
Being alone can be fun!
You can crank up the music,
Make a mess
Or just do absolutely nothing.
And just be you with you.
by Amanda Littlejohn4 years ago
Is it unhealthy to be alone?
by dashingscorpio7 months ago
What does being single mean to you?Traditionally being single defined one's (marital) status. Anyone who is not married is legally considered (single) or available to get married. However most of us now place (dating...
by SEXYLADYDEE5 years ago
Why do so many people think it's better to be in a bad relationship than to be alone?I enjoy my own company and I have so many crafts and hobbys that I love. Being alone is not a bad thing to me. I have three children...
by registerdomains6 years ago
What exactly a father expect from a son? What are the moral duties of a son?What does a typical father think when he grow his child? What he expect from a son when he become old? How much a son should bother his father?...
by schoolgirlforreal6 years ago
I grew up in a large family where I could always go to someone.I have stayed with family part of the week, to get a break from my apartment.Now that situation is challenged and I've been trying to adjust spending more...
by MysticMoonlight4 years ago
Do you agree/disagree/unsure? Why?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.