Isn't it unbecoming to a civilised woman to indulge in the luxury of matrimony?

  1. Prakash RnP profile image56
    Prakash RnPposted 4 years ago

    Isn't it unbecoming to a civilised woman to indulge in the luxury of matrimony?

    The fact that the institution of matrimony is basically anti-feminine is, as I view it, the strongest argument that disapproves of a 21st century woman's wilful indulgence in the silly, senseless, useless luxury of matrimony. It's worth noting as well that women in general have nothing truly meaningful to expect or gain from matrimony. The moustached humans aren't lions of men. They're deplorably lacking in the capacity they need possess in order to make a worthy hubby, aren't they?

  2. PoeticFailosophy profile image59
    PoeticFailosophyposted 4 years ago

    Yes.  I agree with everything you say, even at the end when you let one squeek out, it only punctuates your point. Just ask the highly civilized Anna Torv what she gained by marrying Rupert Murdoch and raising three children with him. Rupert Murdoch can't even grow a mustache and looks like he's wearing lipstick most of the time, that marriage ended in divorce!! What did Anna Torv get from this marriage aside from some happy years and a family? 

    SHE GOT 1.1 BILLION POUNDS

    http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/j … wendi-deng

    1. Prakash RnP profile image56
      Prakash RnPposted 4 years agoin reply to this

      There's good reason Ms Trov should consider her marriage to Mr Murdoch, because of  '1.1 BILLION DOLLARS', very very meaningful.But to women in general it may prove a mirage to dream of such a marriage as men like Ruperts are insignificant few.

 
working