What actual problems were resolved by the SC decision on Gay Marriage?
Be specific, as to the problem and the solution.
Equal rights is just to vague as an answer to this question.
Gay people couldn't get married before (and therefore did not have access to ALL the rights entitled by couples under marriage contracts). Now they can. The decision also reasserted the fact that human rights decisions should go to the SC (same thing happened with interracial marriage). America also set an important precedent around the world, and will hopefully encourage other countries to follow in legalizing gay marriage (and even decriminalizing homosexuality, which is still illegal in many countries). It's pretty simple, what specifically don't you understand about it? How is "equal rights" vague at all, unless you're not sure what exactly is included in a marriage contract?
But you're right, it didn't solve everything. There is still homophobia, hatred. People in legal positions still try to discriminate against gay couples (for example, the judge in Utah most recently who tried to take away a foster baby from a lesbian couple, purely because they were gay). In many states, you can be fired from your job or denied housing because you are gay, and no other reason. Gay teens are disowned and kicked out of their houses. Gay people are still attacked, belittled, even murdered.
We definitely have a lot of work to do as a society in eliminating homophobia (and racism and sexism, for that matter!). Hopefully one day soon there really will be real equality for gay people.
Changing laws is only the first step. Historically with each new generation people become more socially liberal and tolerant of others. An unmarried couple living together would have been scandalous in the 1950s! Today that's practically the norm.
I agree, that's true. Younger generations today are generally pretty tolerant and supportive of gay people. Interracial marriage is a pretty apt parallel, too, though sadly even today there are racist people who object. Still, there's progress!
The SC didn't change the law, they made a decision. It is the legislature that makes law, and amendments add to the constitution. And there is no such thing as homophobia. It is a slur word like fag and queer.
While the decision itself does not change how a person may feel about same sex marriage it does allow those couples to legally get married in all 50 states and receive the benefits afforded to married couples.
Generally speaking after laws have been passed or struck down over time (people become more tolerant) regarding the social issue that was addressed. For those alive in 2065 this change will be the norm.
With each new generation our population becomes socially liberal.
Back in 1967 the Supreme Court in "Loving v. Virginia" the court (invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage). The case was brought by Mildred Loving, a black woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, who had been sentenced to a year in prison in Virginia for marrying each other. Their marriage violated the state's anti-miscegenation statute, the Racial Integrity Act of 1924.
Today, less than 50 years after that Supreme Court decision there is far less stigma and discriminatory obstacles thrown in the path of interracial couples seeking to get married. Today when people see someone like Michael Jordan married to Yvette Prieto it's no big deal!
I suspect that 50 years from now the children of this era will wonder what the fuss was all about with state governments attempting to keep people marrying the person they love. It not against the law to be gay or lesbian, it's not against the law for them to live together, or adopt children and yet it was against the law for them to get married in many states.
In a nation that espouses separation of church and state there is no logical reason for us to justify this form of discrimination.
Same sex marriage is not mandatory. It doesn't affect us heterosexuals. We're still free to marry our opposite gender.
What prob did it solve?SC didn't attempt to provide judicial notice on what is a gay person, nor whether it is a mere sexual preference or something else. They failed to provide judicial notice of when life begin in Roe, and the prob still exists
by Elizabeth 2 years ago
How does legalized gay marriage "ruin" or affect a heterosexual one?One of the most common arguments against gay marriage is that legalizing gay marriage will somehow minimize or ruin heterosexual marriages. Admittedly, this is one of the stupidest arguments out there, but it is one...
by Peeples 3 years ago
Are future generations going to look back on those against marriage between gay people....the same way we now look back on those against interracial marriage years ago? Isn't it exactly the same thing? So will it likely result in the same type of view 40 years from now, or is something special...
by Kharisma1980 11 months ago
What is your opinion on the issue of gay/lesbian relationships and gay marriage?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
How do you feel about marriage equality? For? Against? Why?
by landensnana 2 years ago
Is gay marriage better then straight marriage???The straight marriage divorce rate is off the chart. Are the gays the ones who have the marriage thing all figured out?
by Cheri Taylor 7 years ago
Do you think it's possible for someone to be gay but disagree with gay marriage?To be active in the life style of being free but having reasons for why they feel should not tie the knot.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|