The first question I am in a quandary regarding. I get so confused what a psychic is vs. a spiritualist and etc. Speculatively if I believe the bible is the inherent word of God . . . then with the book of Revelations a part of that I would have to ponder. Logic says once true always true of least for this world.
The second question is a definite yes. Most of the time for me a coincidence means unexplainable, a result of disbelief, or lack of willingness to accept a connection. Things have come true for me that were foreseeable by myself of least and too times by others. To be true there first would have been a pondering of if so or a such and such.
At question for me is the miraculous, the confusing, and the instances of 'deja vu' as having no coincidences, yet fits providence.
hmmm . . . I don't know if that makes sense or not ;-)