Apple has just released an 'iMac', featuring an outstanding retina 5k display. Here is the thing: (suppose) You have just bought this version of iMac. You are amazed by the quality of its display. You shoot a video of this iMac while your friend was test-driving this machine.
You want to upload this video on YouTube ~ so that everyone can get an experience of this 5k retina display.
You upload the video - but everybody seem to ignore it. You realize that you had shot the video with a Nikon CoolPix camera: one which captures videos in 1080p resolution. That means: whatever details might be out there in reality - the camera will always reduce that detail into 1080p resolution.
You suddenly get this flashing precursor on the back of your mind ~ "To capture a 5k Display - You'd need a 5k Camera!"
Metaphoric Value: We have made ourselves dependent upon outside agencies and entities (i.e. newspaper, news-channels, reporters, school teachers, medical doctors etc) ~ to get a reliable, and accurate 'picture' (description) of reality.
But most people's 'minds' are run by a certain program (which works in their deep (unconscious) mind), which filters reality (the reality that they receive through their senses) and reduces it down into a very subjective 'picture' of the world (and the universe).
The program that runs their 'minds', has its own intelligence. It is cunning and at the same time creative. It has its own views about reality, and what reality 'should be'. If it (accidentally) discovers ANY information that contradicts its (the program's) (core) views about reality ~ it immediately runs 'recovery processes' to nullify and suppress that 'rogue' information.
People who are run by this (internal) program ~ never perceives reality ~ as reality truly is. They always end up perceiving a subjective reality (formulated by the inner program).
It is advisable to ignore, and even stay away from these people. But the odd is that these people are found everywhere, and in every type of profession that exist in a society.
I have to agree and disagree. I agree that some people are running a simulation in their minds that relieves them of worry about death by telling them that they are immortal. Now this simulation is hidden in the subconscious and they are unaware of the lies it performs to keep the simulation working. But I disagree that we need to stay away and avoid these people, they are of no harm to us.
It's easy to find them, just ask them if they feel they are connected to some God. If they say they are them you've found one. If you say you have a connection with a God then you are one, and then search the recesses of your mind using reason to find the simulation that is robbing you from reality.
Thank you really for plugging in the necessary update.
- nullifying and and suppressing 'rogue' information is the problem…
Roque information, such as…
How magical, perfect and beautiful everything seems to be in nature and in the world?
How miracles happen everyday in front of our very eyes?
How love emanates from your pets?
How adorable and precious both animal and human babies are?
How much your parents love you?
How much your children love you?
How random strangers are willing to help each other when help is required?
How happiness and joy can be felt within us for no reason at all?
How goodness and cooperation predominates in the world and is the true nature of mankind?
That type of rouge information...
or something else, Gs?
by emrldphx 6 years ago
For those who are interested, I am putting together a primer on the difference between subjectivity and objectivity. Much of the disagreement in this forum is due to confusion between the two. We'll start with a comparison of the definition of the terms.SubjectivitySubjectivity is a personal...
by cjhunsinger 3 years ago
It would seem that a question of proof of a claim is always asked and never given or accepted. It may be beneficial to define what a truth is or what a proof may consist of, so that a common agreement can be established and an endless barrage of, show the evidence' and 'thats not proof' can end....
by AshtonFirefly 2 years ago
I've been researching the relationship between philosophy and science lately, and I came across this opinion during discussion:This person claimed that scientific theories, by nature, are ultimately influenced by and based upon personal philosophies about how to interpret evidence and data. They...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|