Should People Talk Of Good Morals Without Invoking The Concept Of God?
I believe it is very hard to talk of Good Morals without invoking the concept of God. God is good and to me its hard to identify what good is without acknowledging the creator. All good things comes from God and any good concept, good idea, good morals, good anything had to begin with God. Outside of that, it appears to be good but it has its short comings which will ultimately not be good. Good Morals comes from God and God blessed those who have good morals with Godly character, or good character. I hope this helped. Just my opinion.
If anyone wants to read on hubs about prayer, please be my guest......
http://hubpages.com/hub/Prayer-is-the-m … ve-in-life
I don't know if its a question of "should." People certainly can talk about morals without invoking God. The conventional wisdom, though, is that God is required to live the moral life and develop a moral society.
But there's a Slovenian philosopher called Slavoj Zizek who quotes (Hegel I think but I'm not sure). But Zizek, quoting this other philosopher, says: the typical formula is "If there is no God everything is permissible." But Zizek says that's actually wrong: "If there IS a God then EVERYTHING is permitted; but if there is NO God then NOTHING is permitted.
To my way of thinking, this latter conception is the correct one. There is a sense in which the use of God as a crutch (I'm not saying everyone who believes in God is using It/Him/Her as a crutch) actually trivializes life, because no matter how you screw up, as long as you, say, "accept Jesus (for example, I know you didn't mention Christianity specifically) as your Lord and Savior" in time, then you can go to Heaven. There's a sports analogy I like to make here, but this answer has already gone on a little long; so I'll leave it there.
good morals have nothing to do with god. i'm an athiest and i'll put my morals up against any god fearing person. religion definetly has no right to talk about morals being exclusively theirs but of course they do. look at history and see all the great religious morals at work, it will turn your hair white.
Morals have got nothing to do with God.
Morals are created by man.
Moral vary from time to time at a particular geographical location.
It also varies from place to place.
For example in some places a burka is considered to be moral but in other places a swimsuit is moral. However, when God created man he was satisfied with them being nude. Today's man will consider that immoral.
Yes, people should talk about morals without invoking the concept of God and they should also talk about morals while invoking the concept of God. Both are not mutually exclusive. Contemplating morals and expressing ones thoughts can be beneficial wether morals are a human construct or divine instruction.
I am not sure whether it should be a "Should people talk".
But surely, people CAN talk of good morals without invoking the concept of GOD.
I can talk about the next house grandma who used to provide food for any poor person knocking at her door. Her concept was "Serving poor people is better than serving GOD". Her morals are always with humanity and not with GOD. So, I do have a topic to talk about good morals, without touching GOD. We human created all morals, to keep ourself in a cultured circle and when it goes wrong, we put the blame on GOD.
Absolutely. While there is a strong relationship for religious people between God and morality, it isn't fair to try to apply this concept to everyone.
Not everyone believes in a God, but that definitely doesn't mean they don't have morals or morality doesn't apply to them. Religion is just one subscript or concept of moral beliefs.
yes my friend this is perfectly right, because the concept of god is not a story or not lessons to teach other the it is the heard rules to follow.you see later ,after following the rules of god which is written in holy books the follower sole is purified by this and that is the stage of contact with god dairectely
Everyone has morals weather they agree that there is or isn't a God. I know this may souund very religios to some but in that Book we call the Bible Jesus said that he put the LAW INSIDE OF MEN'S MINDS and HEARTS. He didn't say only some. The law of good and bad are not exclusive to Christians nor those that are mentioned in that Bible but the Christos---all those like Jesus before and after him will state the same thing. Morals are not a Christian concept therefore you don't need a God to have them.
God is important.Just because we cannot see something doesn't mean it doesn't exist
by daeemomin 9 years ago
CONGRATULATING AN ATHEISTNormally, when I meet an atheist, the first thing I like to do is to congratulate him and say, " My special congratulations to you", because most of the people who believe in God are doing blind belief - he is a Christian, because his father is a Christian; he is...
by Eric Dierker 2 years ago
Is Atheism really just another religion or faith based concept?It seems like the notions that there is a God or there is not a God, are both founded in belief because there is not proof either way. Well there is proof, but not conclusive in either direction. So aren't organizations with set forth...
by lanablackmoor 5 years ago
Do you think religion compels morality, or does morality determine religion?Obviously the relationship is somewhat multi-directional for most people, but I'm wondering which you think is more powerful. Do people usually choose a religion that aligns with their preexisting morality? Or do they...
by pisean282311 7 years ago
do you agree that man created concept of god to get answers to his/her questions like what is purpose of life , what after death?..read an interesting article on it...
by fred allen 6 years ago
Can morality exist without a divine authority?Without absolutes who has the authority to establish moral boundaries? If there is no divine standard, can there be such a thing as morality or right and wrong?
by Dgerrimea 8 years ago
Assume for the purposes of this discussion that something like causal determinism is correct. Nothing is fated to happen, but everything will happen because of a prior cause, and as such everything is inevitable.Does this remove moral responsibility?On the topic of punishment (eg. prison time) and...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|