I have a question for the Atheist, if there is Scientific Proof that God created the whole universe.
Would you believe in the almighty creator?
I have proof that I would like you to see and then answer the question; I created a Hub page on the proof of our creator and then make up your own mind. Remember opened your mind & take off the blinder so you can see the TRUTH.
“No quotes from the Bible just Proof”
I would ask anyone who is skeptical to watch Ben stein`s "Expelled". It is on Netflix watch instantly and it is also available on DVD. It takes an objective look at the scientific community and their refusal to even look at creationism.
Ben is his usual hilarious self but with a serious note to the subject matter. Ben is a Jew and the scientists who he interviews are in many cases agnostic. Very interesting documentary.
This is possibly the most ridiculous "question" I've ever seen. Laughable, and I did laugh. I do believe in a god: me. I am a Satanist and I control my own subjective world. As for proving your god, you have done no such thing. I've watched that video before, I could not stop laughing.
Unless an absentee father figure appears I'm still going with Stephen Hawking's latest book which states that if there is a god there is a number that you nor I can fathom to 1 that a being that controls every little goings on of our very large-and maybe infinite-universe actually exists.
And if you're going to reply to this email it to me so I can actually respond instead of responding to your own question so you have the last word someone with no dignity.
I watched your video. I also commented on your hub. Either way, the evidence as you claim, is subjective, because it does not encompass ALL science knowledge available. It only picks and chooses what supports the theory forward. Therefore, it's not truly using science objectively. There is no god.
The video does not prove the existence of God at all. The video is deceptive, particularly trying to explain Darwinian ideas in simplistic ways. The video puts words in Darwin's mouth that have nothing to do with Darwin's theory. Stating facts about how things behave does not prove anything at all. While we may not understand how some things come to be (we still can't cure a common cold) that is not proof of God. "Irreducible complexity" is a fancy sounding word to bamboozle idiots. It has no relevance at all to the debate about the origins of species.
The section on DNA actually shoots itself in the foot. Talking about DNA being compared to monkeys typing Shakespeare is just plain idiocy.
This video is designed to impress people who are not very well educated. The smart people will see right through it.
I'm definitely not wasting an hour on that. Saying you created a hub proving that God exists and then it turns out to be very little text, with just dogmatic and judgmental language and a video you (likely) had nothing to do with producing is not very admirable.
As for the person who recommended Ben Stein's "Expelled," that so called documentary uses editing to make the scientists look like they're saying things that they didn't actually say. Those scientists were also mislead into appearing. This sort of stuff is an old trick and is exploited to the nines in that "film." They also "expelled" the scientists who were actually featured in the movie from seeing it at various premiers.
The film has a 3.8 out of 10 rating on IMDB for a reason (and a 10% rating from critics on Rotten Tomatoes).
For more info, go here:
I don't really understand any overwhelming need to establish existence of God through the scientific route. Scientists experiment in the outer, physical world to arrive at their discoveries. Spiritual seekers experiment at their inner world to understand God and realize God.
There is no real compulsion for any scientist to accept God nor there is any necessity for a believer of God to seek scientific support to realize or prove the existence of God.
God can be realized but cannot be explained to the fullest satisfaction or conviction of anyone else. Those who realize God know that their experience corroborates with other realized souls and there they get the proof that their experience is true. It is in a way similar to one scientist following the methodology of experiment another scientist did and getting the same scientific truth confirmed.
When the Old Testament was first written the Universe - as we know it today, didn't really exist - at least not in the minds of Biblical protagonists like Enoch, Moses etcetera and the MEN who actually wrote the Bible.
These men believed that the immensity of the Cosmos was created: by God, just for us - the human race (whose sole purpose was to worship God) - and that the Earth stood at the center of the whole of creation. Everything revolved around us.
Down the ages the Christian church persecuted - sometimes to death - anyone who challenged this world view
Where in the Bible does it (the word of God) tell you that stars are organized into structures called galaxies and that these galaxies sometimes collide with one another? Where in the Bible is it prophesied that our own galaxy: the Milky Way, will one day smash into a galaxy called Andromeda?
These days the size of the known Universe increases by leaps and bounds with every new instrument: such as the Hubble Space Telescope, that is used to measure it.
Now ask yourself...
Why do scientists have to inform us of all these new discoveries? Shouldn't it already be written down somewhere - maybe in the Bible?
The Universe that was created by God has never existed - it is a fiction that has bedevilled mankind for millennia - the fact that some people cannot let this fiction go is only testimony to the power of religion as propaganda; their belief in such a Cosmos has no bearing on reality whatsoever.
i love when religious people use what they call proof. it only adds to the common knowledge that god is a myth. if you actually had proof as you call it, every religion in the world would be knocking at your door. good try but you failed completely. if god created the earth and all that's here then he really screwed up. why would something that supposably loves us create tornados, volcanos, earthquakes, hurricanes etc.
by Kiss andTales 3 years ago
Why do atheist and other none believers not accept as proof human existenceIncluding them ?I ask this question because atheist are persistent with this line prove that God existBut as they are given proof they persist to say the same words, example a husband and wife claims to love one...
by Mahaveer Sanglikar 2 years ago
Many believers like to say that Atheists should prove that there is no God. Believers should know that existence has to be proved, not the non-existence. If a thing exists, it is possible to prove its existence. So believers should prove the existence of God if he exists. But if they want to do it,...
by Animosity Reborn 5 years ago
How can you prove the existence of God?Write your proofs for the existence of God.
by Jake Brannen 3 years ago
How can you be an atheist if you can't disprove the existence of God?What validity is there to the double negative argument for the existence of God? Is it really rational to justify belief in something by the mere fact that it cannot be disproved? You also can not disprove the existence of...
by John Harper 5 years ago
Matthew Boulder, chief linguist for the project and professor of applied creation sciences at Bob Jones University, issued this statement: “As for the evidence- it is there and it is, to my view, undeniable. The very word of God, elegantly weaved in and out of our very bodies and souls, as plain...
by shuck72 4 years ago
If God created the universe, what was God doing before he created the universe? Thoughts?I recently watched the documentary The Unbelievers where the reknowned Atheist, Richard Dawkins posed this question.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|