Do you believe that the Bible is an actual historic account?
From Genesis 'till Revelations.
Although there are sections which are corroborated by contempories, such as Tacitus, Suetonius and Polybius, the bible is at best an accurate description of events, made innacurate by countless translations and the passage of time, and at worst a work of pure fiction. The creation story in particular is almost certainly false, as both the timescale provided and the world created are incongruent with reality. That is to say that the universe is much older and far more diverse than this myth caters for. Note that I am not commenting on the bible's efficacy as a moral guide or it's tendancy to indocrinate, but rather on the historical veracity.
Excellent points, but on creation, could it be instead that the account may be right, but that interpretation is dead wrong? What if the "6 days" were zero time and the 7th day 13.7 billion years? With humility you can find a hidden wisdom.
@lone77, you are very wise indeed. The Bible plainly says that 1 day to God is as a thousand years, so six days may well be 6 thousand or six million years...His In Service
The theory of universal expansion can explain the time discrepancy in Genesis. The order of creation clearly models the fossil record. Personally, I subscribe to literal interpretation, but one can find faith and logic in figurative interpretation.
That's a bit like asking if the entire library is an historic account. I'm sure much of it is. And I think all of it may be. Revelation, of course, was a vision of the future, and it appears that some of that "future" has already occurred. The rebirth of Israel was part of the required events (1947). The "great star" named wormwood spewed its pestilence (1986). And the Rockefellers have already started talking about implementing their "mark of the beast" which will be required for all commerce (RFID chip implanted in every citizen). We've also had the Abomination of Desolation raised into the new WTC tower (Aug. 2, 2012), signed by the "dark prince" himself.
There is a great deal about the Bible that may be metaphor hinting at some real event that may have happened in some other form or fashion. Take the fall from grace in the Garden, for instance. That was purely a spiritual event and the descriptions of physical things might merely have been for the benefit of the audience. Adam and Eve died on the day they ate of the forbidden fruit, but then Adam ("them," "him" and "her") lived for 930 years, according to Genesis 5. But Genesis 5:2 speaks of Adam in the plural. Were all of the early patriarchs also eponymous tribes?
Could Numbers 14:34 be a clue that we need to multiply the ages of those patriarchs by some factor or set of factors to arrive at the correct timeline? Could the "days... were... years" wording repeated throughout Genesis 5 be another clue to this requirement?
I'm in the process of writing a book and trying to get funds to speed up the finishing of it to get it published this year. Stop by and give your support:
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/the-b … /x/2790782
The timeline discovered in Genesis is compatible with those of science. Imagine that! After all this time, the rift between science and religion was more about ego and interpretation, rather than fact (biblical or scientific).
And creation? The six days may merely have been God's "mental image" of what he wanted to create. The 7th (day of rest) was the perfection of that creation -- all 13.7 billion years of it. After stumbling upon the mechanics of creation, I was only slightly surprised that Genesis 1 and 2 had them all along.
Israel has not been reborn, at least not as foretold in the Bible. It is supposed to occupy all of the original land of Canaan, of which it currently owns only a fraction; the temple is to be rebuilt; and the Jews are to be regathered and at peace.
Biblical Archaeology has discovered much of what the Bible relates and is still uncovering ancient artifacts. The Bible is actually an historical primer. It is God's communication to us across the ages and an outline of His creation, the works of creation and a strategy for the future. There would be no "history" without it... His In Service
Much of it is. Historians know that the men like Jesus lived, as well as the Buddha and Krishna long before him. Some of the earlier figures did too.
Much of the stories of modern saints are full of humour and embellishment. There is a certain amount of necessary and unecessary myths in all faiths. They have their purposes. The true saint never rushes anyone. He/she knows that when the devoteee is ripe, he/she will understand what is needed to know, and as such will march Godward, leaving these questions behind.
What Bible are you reading? Buddha and Krishna are not in mine.
You are the greatest book that ever was and ever will. That which does not exist, can never come into existence. And so if you were not here, of what use will be a book to you? Be a good Spirit. Contribute to life. Do not hinder it.
@Violin, Jesus lived "as well as" Buddha and Krishna. He is not saying or implying that Buddha and Krishna were written of in the Bible, just that like Jesus, Buddha and Krishna were historical figures who actually lived... His In Service
No. And most research that claims to corroborate the Bible is funded by religious groups. Can you trust that their results are free of bias? I can't. General historical information found in the Bible is true, as are some accounts of rulers and conflicts between different groups. But the specific details, accounts of specific people, and the supernatural stories have yet to be confirmed by impartial secular researchers. There's no consensus on whether or not Jesus actually existed. The Bible is as historical as the Illiad and the Odyssey, or the Mahabharata.
by Chosenwoman 6 years ago
When you read the bible what do you find to be hard for you to understand? I believe what most of us struggle with when reading God's word is how to apply it to our lives. I know for me when I first accepted Jesus into my life I had such a hard time understanding the bible and how it relates to me....
by docrehab 8 years ago
Hi,I notice that being an Atheist is becoming a fashion lol....What if bible was telling truth ?thx
by graceinus 9 months ago
The Bible states that God created the Waters, but when did He do this?If you notice in the book of Genesis Chapter 1 it does not state the day in which God created the waters within the 6 days of creation. Between verses 2 and 6 it implies that water already existed. However, throughout the bible...
by Elizabeth 5 years ago
I was a missionary in the christian faith for years. I went to a bible college. I've read the bible - at least a dozen times, cover to cover. I've studied the dogmas, the doctrines and the theology - and I'm an atheist. What I'm offering is an open forum (open to the degree...
by Tricia Mason 6 years ago
Hi I would like to know, please, if any Christian members of this community accept evolutionary theory as true; or if anyone knows any Christians, who believe that evolution is true?Thanks
by sooner than later 8 years ago
Genesis 2:7"And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul." Many naysayers want to laugh at this scripture because it seems so "imaginary". But even the best scientists can't make...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|