|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Do you know how discussions work?
As I view it, discussions happen between people with slightly different if not polar opposite viewpoints. Questions are asked to gauge how the other came to their viewpoints, regardless if the person asking the question has the same perspective. You would never learn anything if you never bothered to ask questions from a viewpoint that isn't your own, and your questions don't suddenly become invalid when you do just because they might be difficult to counter.
What is your ideal form of discussion, and does it extend to discussions about your religious/non religious beliefs?
Yes, at least how they should work.
As you mention, a good discussion can be so insightful, but having them is a learned skill. Emotions always play a part, but they must be well tempered so that clear thinking can help form the question correctly as well as the responses given in order for the discussion to be profitable.
Good discussions can and should also happen between people who have the same position on an issue because the way each words the position can strengthen another's method of wording it.
I'm not against people of similar perspective having a discussion, though I do find it somewhat boring sometimes compared to talking to other people on the complete other side of the spectrum.
Yes, it certainly would have the possibility of being boring, but a good discussion could provide information that might surprise.
I certainly like the question. I am emotional. I can't help it and do not care to change it. I like having discussions that allow for emotion. Otherwise just give me a text to read. I like rational thought. I like logic in all the various constructs like religion or pure science. If this then that is interesting. But it is more interesting to hear what you think "if this then that".
My wife and I argue and discuss. If we do "point - counterpoint" we always come up with a good method of moving forward. We don't sit down and talk like a shrink would suggest: "honey I feel bad when you use words like that". Boring! We do a gut check, visceral discussion and then let it simmer. But we have some sensitivity. And part of the after discussion reflection is about feelings expressed, maybe poorly, by each other.
A flat no nonsense, purely logical discussion is normally quite boring. I had a discussion I had to have with a carpenter. Just the facts. I had a discussion with an atheist about God -- fun and exhilarating for both of us. I had a discussion with my young son about dinosaurs - exciting and full of passion. I had a discussion with my neighbor about fixing the fence his dogs destroyed - tense and bothersome.
Discussion work out well in a textbook. But real life discussions work with variables of emotion, logic, memories and attitudes. People have discussions so they are personal. Ignoring that is not productive.
I don't mind emotion except for when it completely binds a person from using any form of logic/rationality and they go off the deep end for no real reason, even if it's painfully obvious they could be in the wrong.
I read a study once a while ago. About 75% of Americans feel inadequate in their ability to say what they mean in the realm of important issues. Grocery store is fine but deep stuff, forget it. We have to keep that in mind. Now add writing it.
by Peter Freeman7 years ago
I'm not a big fan of getting into controversial discussions in the forums. I prefer to read than write here, but this has been bothering me for a long time. There are some deep questions that I want to ask. When I talk...
by John Hansen20 months ago
Why are there so many questions here concerning Christian(or belief in God) vs Atheism?Is this the best platform for discussing these issues and are people really interested in the answers, or is religion vs...
by Jacqui3 years ago
I was of the belief that the aim of 'sharing' one's faith with another was in the hopes they would see the light, find Jesus, and follow God. And if not, at least the person was made aware of the greatest of God...
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter4 years ago
What is the purpose of your question?How can you tell the difference between a question to encourage discussion and one to encourage conflict? Some questions have hidden agendas. Can you identify them?
by God shet3 years ago
I'm encouraged after yesterday's discussion. We can now take this into the next level.We all have the awareness that no one (atheists included) can change the world by winning an argument on a forum on HubPages. But...
by Person of Interest4 years ago
Have any thoughts about Q&A; do's, don'ts, observations, opinions, and whatever else comes to mind? I'll start.An observation. Sometime within the last 48 hours, I deleted 2 questions that I concluded the search...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.