My question comes after reading this blogpost:
http://nodogsoranglophones.blogspot.com … stroy.html
You are welcome to read it, but to save you from the mess that is Quebec politics I'll quote the relevant to my question sections here:
See, that just sounds like flat out fascism to me. It made me think about to what extent your "garden variety atheist" would like to see secularism go.
I think that the division between religion, and state is important, but I think the extreme Louise Beaudoin is trying to go is just down right insane.
It's simple, for governments to grasp ultimate power they first have to remove and reference to a power higher than that of the state. They don't want people thanking god for their good fortune, they want people to praise government!
Of course they are going to evoke freedom and tolerance as their motive for this, how else could they get away with it?
True freedom is freedom to worship as you see fit, true tolerance is allowing you to display religious symbols of your belief. Don't be fooled, these plans to erase god from society is indeed a step towards fascism!
Sounds a bit insane to me. What happened to "live and let live"? Are these things causing harm to people? -- especially the day cares and hospitals? Should we ban all cultural distinctions, too.
This is crazy talk. As much as I dislike religion, there are many fine people doing good work under the care of church organisations. Not all of them are religious either.
I am a non believer, and think that believing in a sky fairy because an old book says to is silly, but regardless of what people believe, if they are not harming others then let them get on with their work.
I would not mind normal separation of church and state, but banning? Never!
I'm not a casual garden variety atheist... I speak out against religion whenever possible.
"Live and let live" is how things should be, but when it comes to religion, the "let live" part often gets tossed out.
Anyway I'm not here to fight. I'm here to say that this entire agenda is asinine.
Any atheist who would condone this garbage is as whacko as the "religionists" they claim to stand against.
See, that what I expected - more or less agreement that this woman is insane. But then if there are still people voting for her, there must exist some people that agree.
How far would you go for secularism?
To the extent it remains secular and equitable; I will support it.
I am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
My bank asks people to remove anything that covers their head and sunglasses. Should that include religious garb?
I am a life long atheist. I understand the reason for this kind of law, but I think I would rather have tolerance.
But that should include tolerance for nudists!
It's a sad day when I find myself agreeing with you, or you with me! Tolerance is key and I can tolerate just about anything, though that hat is questionable...
by Kathryn L Hill 5 years ago
For an atheist, what is his/her state of happiness based on? Do atheists have more free will? Do they have more love in their hearts? Do they have more hope in their ability to survive? Are they more sociable and charitable? What is the advantage of not believing in God... or IS there an...
by Castlepaloma 7 years ago
For all the different ways people think and for all the kinds groups of what people are. There is no way the vast majority of people will ever agree upon one Religion. That means the vast majority will fight forever until all religion slow down and shrink to the point where Religion and does not...
by Castlepaloma 5 years ago
Is there a treatment for God addiction?. Excuse me for questionng everything. Never did get the illusion of blood or body of Jesus metaphor, it seem like vampire-ism or cannibalism. Never got these wars over imaginary friends or killing someone for working on Sunday. This karma runs over the dogma....
by Astralrose 5 years ago
How would you address a student question about the topic of god/s?If you are an elementary teacher and an atheist.
by Grace Marguerite Williams 3 years ago
Why IS it so difficult for religionists to live and let live in terms of religious/spiritual/ethicalphilosophy? Why MUST they insist in a homogeneous form of religious belief, oftentimes even going as far to proselytize those whom they contend that because of divergent, even diametrical...
by Alexander A. Villarasa 8 years ago
Secularism, in tandem with other belief systems i.e. atheism/agnosticism, objectivism, reductionism, aim to , ultimately eliminate religion/sprituality/, mysticism/transcendentalism and , metaphysics from human affairs, and replace it with the purely materialist view of reality,...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|