In a spirit reminiscent of the kamikazes of WWII, more than 200 elderly Japanese have volunteered to clean up the Fukushima power station. They claim they are just being practical. Yasuteru Yamada, a retired engineer, explains it this way,"I am 72 and on average I probably have 13 to 15 years left to live. Even if I were exposed to radiation, cancer could take 20 or 30 years or longer to develop. Therefore us older ones have less chance of getting cancer."
The government, however, is hesitant to let the volunteers into the radioactive power station. Yamada and the others have been lobbying for permission to help with the clean up. He says: "At this moment I can say that I am talking with many key government and Tepco people. But I am sorry I can't say any more at this moment. It is on the way but it is a very, very sensitive issue politically."
Should the government of Japan welcome and encourage their heroic offer?
And why exactly is this in a religion forum?
Q- there is such a thing as Education and Science- Philosophy category, which deals with nothing of religion.
Just a thought.
As for the OP- if people want to help clean up and have the experience to do so, then it would make sense to let them.
Given the risk I can see it being a job for volunteers. Japan is one of those countries where you would get so many volunteers you would need some scheme to decide which ones to choose.
Interesting altruistic behavior from a country in which almost 85% of the population has no personal religions.
But when people do not have a religious belief, they are more likely to take responsibility for their own actions, and have a greater understanding of the problems mankind is creating on this planet. The religious are more likely to wait for their maker to step in to sort it all out for them.
by Gerg 6 years ago
Is a society dependent on altruism sustainable?To what extent should government intervene to ensure there is a balance between opportunity for individual success and providing systems of care and support for those who can't help themselves?
by Clive Donegal 6 years ago
What constitutes our obligation to others?Is doing no harm sufficient or does each of us have an obligation to actively reach out to help others?Do you think that those who believe in a hereafter are more inclined to be philanthopic than those who do not?Is altruism natural or is it learned...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|