Questioning the concept of Free Will

Jump to Last Post 51-100 of 149 discussions (806 posts)
  1. Milla Mahno profile image59
    Milla Mahnoposted 16 years ago

    I thought it was a free forum and everybody can have a say. Did I miss something? I am very sorry if I did yikes

  2. Mark Knowles profile image59
    Mark Knowlesposted 16 years ago

    Wow - One early night and look at what happens smile

    Ben and Sandra - thank you for defending me, but I think vd is showing his true colors with these attacks and it was pretty clear what I said or did not say. He thinks I am a liar and a coward, and if he says it enough times, I am sure there will be others that agree with that stance simply because I am an atheist and he is a "christian." I am really not bothered. It saddens me that that is the way it is, but continuing arguing in that way reminds me of the sort of arguments I would have as a child. lol

    I just did not have the energy for absorbing that much negativity last night.

    Meastro and samuel - I genuinely hope you get your differences worked out, but this is yet another nail in the coffin of your religion as far as I am concerned. When a father will disown his son and call him a liar and a coward in public because of differing interpretations of the bible, you must surely question that. What next ? You both collect a bunch of disciples and have a war? Sound familiar? Sheesh......

    Make Money



    I don't see how this is my fault ( or any other atheist that may be here). You christians seem to be doing just fine on your own. I did not ask Maestrowhit to tell me I was going to heaven. I don't believe in heaven or hell, so I am not worried either way. But I have 2 opposing sides here. One saying one thing, the other saying the opposite. So, I must make up my own mind, based on my own observations. And when I see a professed christian say things like this:



    It just persuades me that I made the right choices. It is no good blaming atheism for a rift between 2 opposing christian viewpoints. And you wonder why I am not interested in being educated by you?

    And getting back to what Milla Mahno said after you attacked her:



    Is this the way you spread the word? Attacking anyone who questions it?

    On the question of free will, it seems to me that Maestro and Milla have a valid point.

    How can you have free will if you know that whichever way you decide, you are either going to burn in hell or live in bliss?

    Although, if heaven is full of the type of christians that attack me at every opportunity, that sounds like hell to me and I know which one I am choosing  big_smile

  3. viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Ben; 

    Just examine the facts or would you rather insult me? The facts are right here on this thread. Mark lied three times on this thread. See for yourself, Ben. If you will not take the time to find out the truth for yourself, why waste time with your version of things? I know how you pal up with Mark and reject all Christians, but you might want to do your homework before commenting without knowing. Like I said it is right here.

    Here is quote from Mark on this thread. “I have not publicly admitted that I come here to purposely antagonize people.” Here is his original comment - to you, oddly enough - 6 weeks ago, “As you may have noticed, one of the ways I do this is to antagonize people and see what their reaction is.” There is his lie #1for you, Ben.

    Here comes lie #2. He said that two threads were closed by me making attacks on him. Here is his quote from page 6 of this thread, “We have interacted before and both times we did, the thread ended up being closed by an admin because you were making personal attacks on me.” He produced one thread liniked here. The thread listed was closed by an admin. That part is true. However, please show me where the admin said it was because I made personal attacks against Mark. Go there and you will find plenty of personal attacks, though.

    http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/7419?page=9

    To make it easy, here is the only comment from an admin. “Thread closed.  Too many personal attacks here.  If you want to keep debates like this open in future, please refrain from insulting each other.
    That is her bold. So, Ben, does each other mean that perhaps two people (at least) were guilty (of whatever they perceived)? Of course it does, Ben. So, his statement that the thread was closed by my personal attacks on him is a lie. Lie #2…

    I asked him over and over to prove his point, like in this comment to him, “As long as I am calling you on all your lies Mark, show me where any thread was closed by my comments. That is what you claimed a few posts ago, right, Mark?”

    First, he will not produce a second  thread at all, and that is his lie #3. If it is not a lie, then get ole pal Mark to produce that second thread. Do you want truth, though, Ben, or do you want to side up with your atheist pal against that Christian that hates lies. You are soundly proven wrong here, Ben because you sided against me with Mark without doing your homework. That is just prejudiced. You have not chosen wisely.

    Ben. You could have gone back and seen all this for yourself, but instead you “jumped into the fray.” Take it up with your buddy, Mark, the big liar. Or is three lies just a small liar, Ben. Some Christian, huh? Liars will burn in hell indeed, Ben. Be careful whose side you end up in when all is said and done. The path is narrow.

  4. viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Mark;

    As Ben related earlier, it is you after all that gets the admins to close the threads. I beat you soundly on the other thread, too. You were just as wrong there as you are here. Obviously when you are humiliated, you use your pull to close the threads. If this thread is closed, it is not for personal attacks. It is for cowardice. If you are not a coward, then publically state that you want this thread kept open. You give out personal attacks like they are water, Mark, but when someone kicks your tail, you cry for the thread to be closed. You are the only one asking for it. LG said keep it open, and me, too

    Mohitmisra has no problem. Close all the threads you like, but it shows that you are indeed a coward. Or are you? I have the courage to deal with you anytime. so, I publically ask that this thread stay open. We will see if you publically state that you want the thread left open, and I welcome all others of courage to ask that it be kept open...

    1. Mark Knowles profile image59
      Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      What? lol Me use my pull to close threads? lol

      You credit me with more power than I have, so thanks, I guess smile

      I very much doubt they would close a thread on my say-so. Or keep it open.

      Cowardice? What on earth are you talking about?

      Time for your Valium perhaps?

  5. Paraglider profile image92
    Paragliderposted 16 years ago

    This is just pathetic. We started out with an interesting enough discussion about the nature of free will but now it's degenerated into family feuds and posturing. The three pillars of the enlightenment were Tolerance, Reason and Humanity. All three are absent from this thread. Grow up, guys. All of you.

    1. Mark Knowles profile image59
      Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Sorry. Quite right. Hard to resist smile

      In fact, apologies to everyone for continuing to antagonize vp.

      vp - I am done with this "discussion." Whether they close it or not is not up to me, but I see no point in continuing any further.

    2. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I am going to have to agree with you Paraglider. Also, I am partly responsible for the degeneration of this thread. VP thank you for standing with me but I have been totally wrong in the way that I have approached this forum. The only thing that I set out to do is proclaim the truth about the gospel, or the true gospel. Don't get me wrong I am in no way scolding you, for I think you are a man of integrity and I think the same about Ben. But you and Ben and Mark need to drop it. This forum is about "free will" and anything deviating from that topic is unproductive. You know, They beat Jesus to a pulp beyond recognition. They spit in His face, they cursed Him and mocked Him to a degree that no human being could ever take without resistance. But Jesus said nothing until after they had hung Him on that cross and then He said to one of the thieves on their cross "you will be with me in paradise" then He cried out to God "why have you forsaken me?" and at some point He said  "forgive them for they no not what they do" His final words were "it is finished"

      My point is that I think that we as Christians need to get the focus back on "THE CROSS"
      Nothing good will come out of this forum if we fail to do so. It's not about us, it's all about Jesus and Him crucified.

      Jesus Christ is the perfect example of "free will" He was not hipnotized by God His Father to carry out His will. No, He even asked His Father if there be any other way that He would gladly take it. Instead He CHOSE to do His Fathers will. He could have called ten thousand angels and more to rescue Him, but He didn't do that either did He? He was all man and all God up on that cross. He, God in the flesh allowed Himself to be tortured in all forms of torture because He loves us. All He wants us to do is follow His example. Love all man-kind no matter who they are. God hates sin but He loves the sinner.

      VP, Ben, Mark, Mike, thank you for your support on this thread. Now I have to swallow my pride and publically apologize to my son. That will be my next post. smile

      1. secondsamuel profile image61
        secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this
        1. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          MAESTROWHIT…………I know you’re out there some where. This is your dad. I am making this post exclusively for the purpose of making a public apology to you. I was wrong in the way that I approached you in your own forum. I was wrong for slandering your name as maestrowhit. I was wrong for calling you a liar and I was wrong for calling you a coward[ I, SECONDSAMUEL DO HEREBY APOLOGIZE TO YOU] on this day Sunday, 11-02-2008.

          Please don’t misunderstand me, I am not agreeing with your views on the concept of “free-will”, but I have no right to shuv my views down your throat. For that I am sorry. I would like it very much if you would come back to your forum and continue what you started. I will still dispute your theory but I will do it like a gentleman. If you don’t want to come back, I understand, and I will not judge you for not coming back. However, I will continue to post my biblical view on “free will” until it is no longer possible. I hope you don’t mind.

          I love you my son, God bless you…….SS.......smile

          1. maestrowhit profile image61
            maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            I apologize ahead of time to all of the rest of you who might read this. I'm making a personal appeal to my father on a public forum. This is of a personal nature and has nothing to do with the topic of free will. If you don't want to read it, here's your chance to just skip right over it. Again, sorry for this diversion.

            Secondsamuel:

            I agree with the others who said that this is an admirable gesture on your part. I thought it was finally over between you and I. The only thing that could've steered things back on track was what you just did, and I thank you. But I don't want to get back to the same track we just got off of. I want it to be different. So I'm going to address my main concerns to you before saying a word about free will, the Bible, God, or anything like that.

            I've told you time and again that the only thing I care about between you and I is that we have a good relationship. That means we are friends who enjoy one another's company. We treat each other with care and courtesey, always keeping what is most important as our primary consideration - constantly strengthening our love as a family.

            I don't care if I have to bite my tongue every second that I talk to you. I don't care if everything you say to me is totally wrong in my opinion. I can keep the subject of religion from coming out of my mouth if that's what it takes to have my Dad. Nothing is so important, not God, not anything, that the love between you and I should be tarnished.

            Do you understand this? Sometmes I think that maybe the hardships you've gone through in your life have rendered you incapable of believing that someone can just want to be your friend without any alterior motive. Dad, I just want to be your friend. I just want us to share good tmes together. That's all.

            I know you know that I didn't start this forum solely for your benefit. The views and interpretations I express here are straight from my heart and soul. But you saw what I wrote in here, you cut off ties to me in our personal lives outside this site. I don't care if you call me names till you're blue in the face. The thing that I care about is that you cut me off from having any interactions with you. You dissociated yourself from me. That is the only thing that I really care about. I will not have any public discussions with you if you are not speaking to me in private. If I don't have a Dad, then I have no interest in any kind of interactions with you on this public site.

            I would like to contnue talking about this with you and everyone else, but I have to know that you are on the same page with me about a few things concerning you and me.

            If you want to continue with this talk, I want you to agree with me on these things:

            You marked my emails as spam - will you now receive them like normal mail so that I can reach you?

            You haven't returned a single phone call out of the many that I have sent you - will you call me and talk to me in person?

            That's all I want. And then we can get back to this topic of discussion. I think that's pretty reasonable and fair.

            I love you, Dad

            1. secondsamuel profile image61
              secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              You publicly acknowledged my apology so I in turn will publicly acknowledge your terms and agree to them.
              I did not put your email address in my spam folder, I said I would, to inflict pain but I never did. As far as the phone calls go; your number is in my caller ID and I have not got a call with that ID. So I don't know what's going on there. Just to show that I am sincere I will give you a call in the morning per the number that I have in my phone.
              And for all you hubbers out there, let this be the example of true Christianity. For all you Christian hubbers out there, let this be a model of Christian behavior to follow. We are all guilty of adding that extra twist to our post that causes the recipient to be insulted. Jesus said if someone smite you on your right cheek, then turn and give them the left cheek also and I think He was talking about insults. If you can't get your point across without inflicting an insult then you will gain only a little fruit to show for your efforts. Think before you post.

              Well that about wraps it up, and just think I did all of the above of my own free will.................................................no harm intended...big_smile I love you.........dad

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                That's awesome. I feel really good now. I think this is an excelent example of God's love. You've proven to me that you are still the same guy I thought you were. I was a bit worried there for a minute. I'll be waiting for your call. Now we can get back to free will. Thanks a lot. I think it would be a good idea to reduce the personal content on here from this point on. What do you say?

                I'm impressed Dad, really. This is big of you.

                1. mohitmisra profile image60
                  mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  I think this is an excelent example of God's love. God works in mysterious ways.Father and son just made my day thank you both. smile

  6. Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago

    There is much Free Will happening on the forum.  Free will means that you have a choice in what and how and who you say or do it to.  It is you and only you that will deal with the consequences of those thoughts words and deeds.  It has nothing to do with religion per se.  God gave us all Free will so that we could have the choice to do as we please, but it is not a cop out from doing anything that you want to anyone that you want.  Every thought asction and deed has an equal reaction--that is all it is.  I can see it unfold here with everyone that fought each other--you nall got just what you did right back in your face.  Those of us who wanted to see other things were not so lucky but then agian it was our Free Will to get involved at all.  Then again there is Free Wil to back out and walk away.  There are too many things invloved here that I don't want to have to be involved in---so you all be happy with YOUR Free Will and I will be happy just leaving....  Remember it is a choice and it isn't coward or anything like that.........name calling never got anyone anywhere and lke Paraglider said---GROW UP!!
    See Ya!

  7. Milla Mahno profile image59
    Milla Mahnoposted 16 years ago

    I takes a real man to do what you just did SecondSamuel! I am sure your son will appreciate your move. smile

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I am a blubbery mess. *tears*.  I always did love a good ending or beginning.  smile

  8. Mark Knowles profile image59
    Mark Knowlesposted 16 years ago

    Well, that took balls. Good for you Samuel.

  9. Milla Mahno profile image59
    Milla Mahnoposted 16 years ago

    Guys, I can't stop the tears, tears of joy! This is unbelievably touching! Even if those religion forums don't ever bring any other fruit, they were worth having just for that single moment, you know smile

  10. Paraglider profile image92
    Paragliderposted 16 years ago

    Well done guys!

  11. Shalini Kagal profile image53
    Shalini Kagalposted 16 years ago

    That was truly touching - and for me, the essence of Christianity smile

  12. maestrowhit profile image61
    maestrowhitposted 16 years ago

    Ok, so now that the soap opera credits are rolling, I'll come back to the free will discussion.

    I did a lot of thinking and discovered the original reason why I started, a long time ago, to explore the possibility that there is no free will as is commonly believed. For those of you (secondsamuel; VP) who want to discuss this, answer this question for me:

    How do I accept Jesus as my personal lord and savior?

    I've heard that statement so many times in my life, and I've heard people say the words "I accept" in a prayer thousands of times. I've even tried it many times. But all it was was a prayer. And before you start preaching and evangelizing to me with all the same stuff I've heard countless times before, I want you to just think about the simple, clear question that I pose to you. The answer to this should not be extremely long. I prefer you to keep your answers short and conversation like. I don't want to read a sermon. I want you to tell me as plainly as you can, how does a person accept Jesus as their personal lord and savior?

    Like I said, this will take some back and forth conversation because I have some points to get to that can only be reached that way. Let this be the start of our new free will discussion

    1. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      First of all, without free will we are encapable of going through the motions required to become a child of God through Jesus Christ.

      Here is a small example from first chapter of John I like to use the "Amplified Bible" a lot because it saves time explainng what different words mean. And if it is OK with you I would like to give just one more translation of the same passage using "The New Living" translation because it is paraphrased and much more user friendly
      John 1:10-13
         10 He came into the world, and though the world was made through Him, the world did not recognize Him [did not know Him].

          11 He came to that which belonged to Him [to His own--His domain, creation, things, world], and they who were His own did not receive Him and did not welcome Him.

          12 But to as many as did receive and welcome Him, He gave the authority (power, privilege, right) to become the children of God, that is, to those who believe in (adhere to, trust in, and rely on) His name--

          13 Who owe their birth neither to bloods nor to the will of the flesh [that of physical impulse] nor to the will of man [that of a natural father], but to God. [They are born of God!]

      here is the same passage using the New Living translation

      10 He came into the very world he created, but the world didn’t recognize him. 11 He came to his own people, and even they rejected him. 12 But to all who believed him and accepted him, he gave the right to become children of God. 13 They are reborn—not with a physical birth resulting from human passion or plan, but a birth that comes from God.

      Now you can draw your own conclusions, but to me this passage clearly suggest that there is a requirement for recieving the right to become a child of God. The requirement is in two parts; "believing" and "accepting" both of which can only be done through an action of any given individual. It implies that there are some who accept and believe and there are some who don't.
      I apologize for the length of this post and I would like to use this opportunity to give the public the links that I and (you too maybe) use to study.

      http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se … ersion=51;

      here is a link that I use to define certain words

      http://www2.mf.no/bibelprog/vines?word=¯t0001186

      this is for anyone who wants to confirm the validity of opinions posted on this forum.

      1. Mark Knowles profile image59
        Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        This is one of those self-fulfilling arguments that supports itself based on a pre-existing belief.

        1. Free will exists
        2. We are incapable of becoming a child of god without free will
        3. Therefore free will exists


        But this doesn't really answer the question either.

        1. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Thank you Mark for your comment This does not directly answer the above question presented by maestrowhit. I am attempting to set a precedence to to set up for a direct answer. However, I have presented a few clues that would be in a direct answer, "believe" and "accept" and another word in the passage "recieve"
          Please try to remember that maestro introduced a pre-existing belief at the very start of this forum when he stated that Jesus is in all of us and I am not here to argue with anyone all though I did surrender to my flesh and do that very thing which was very wrong and carnal on my part.

      2. maestrowhit profile image61
        maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this



        Have you ever seen someone who you knew but hadn't seen in years and they looked so different that you didn't recignize them? Was that your choice, or could you not help it?
        Recognition is not something we can control. We can not choose to recognize something or not recognze it.


        do you really think that people who knew and recognized a man who was the source of happiness, life, love, power, privilege, etc. would not naturally welcome Him? Like the first verse said - they didn't RECOGNIZE Him. Another key to understanding scripture, or any other written narrative, is to use reason. It is unreasonable that people would deny something so wonderful if they knew it was indeed wonderful. They didn't know.


        This is a great one. I mean, just look at it. The people who welcomed Him and recieved the goodness He gave to them did not attribute thier new birth to thier own will! It's stated very plainly. They attribute it to THE WILL OF GOD!

        Thanks for the links. I could always use more insight

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Yes I agree.
          Read the Bible for yourself, and not from someone elses persective.  Then also read other books, like the ones they left out of that Bible in the first place becasue---there were some political involvements with that-you will see that when you read other books...then research the chronoligical timelines and other myths.  Oh and a good read would be anything by Joseph Campbell on the powers of the myths and the other book, sorry mind went blank on this one.......Jesus said to seek and you shall find--and he didn't mean from one church or anyone who would want you to know it only from their perspective.  Jesus enters into our hearts by what each individual can comprehend.  If the Gods wanted us to all be alike and the same he would have made cookie cutouts-which he has never done from thousands and millions of years until now and forever....

          1. maestrowhit profile image61
            maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            I thinkof God making us in His image like this:
            Before creation, there was only God. God was the only thing that God had to make anything out of. He made creation out of Himself. So, though everything is made in his image, the individual parts are unique. And each part is necessary.

            Matter is neither created nor destroyed.

            1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
              Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              The thing is there were GODS not A god.  Let US make man is OUR image.

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                yes I know, but still - all things came from one source. All things consist of the same properties. All things are unified and of the same thing

                1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
                  Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  Yes, they are--electricity and energy of that.  It's can't stop......

            2. secondsamuel profile image61
              secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              [Matter is neither created nor destroyed.].......... So are you saying that matter was here before God?
              I am not absolutely positive and I will do a validity check, but I think He only mentions male and female in His image (likeness)

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                No, I'm saying that God IS MATTER     He made everything out of HIMSELF

                1. Ben Bush profile image60
                  Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  So what do you do with the sttement of Jesus that, God is spirit and they that worship him must worship him in Spirit and Truth."????????

                  1. maestrowhit profile image61
                    maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    Spirit and Matter are the SAME THING!

            3. mohitmisra profile image60
              mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Very nice.

              Countless in front are your entity,
              Each having an individual idenity.

              You are made of such fine ,light love tissue.
              No beginning ,no end an ageless isuue. smile

              1. mohitmisra profile image60
                mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                From the One comes the two and goes back to the One:)

        2. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          First of all to recognize someone would be a natural re-action (reflex) to a pre-existing familiarity. I know you  because I am familiar (accustomed) to you (and your ways). I am your father and some would say that it would only be natural for me to know you. I know you only because I (chose) of my own free will, to stay with you at birth and then into the future, forming a connection with you thus becoming familiar with you. To recognize or not to recognize is a natural function of the brain having nothing to do with any kind of will. (think you call it involuntary). Just like a computer has the ability to recognize in many different applications, but a computer does not have any kind of will. At least not yet………..smile
          [But to as many as did receive and welcome Him,] they received Him and welcomed Him because John the Baptist went around telling all who would listen that the Messiah was coming, so when Jesus arrived He was welcomed because they had heard of His coming.

          [13 Who owe their birth neither to bloods nor to the will of the flesh [that of physical impulse]nor to the will of man [that of a natural father], but to God. [They are born of God!] ]

          I believe here it is saying that the new birth didn’t come by natural means (mom or dad) it didn’t come from some blood line (a particular race) it  didn’t come from some impulse (passion or plan) (a planned birth). We that are born again are born from God through salvation which comes by us adhering to it. Which is something that we are allowed to choose. It’s interesting that the word [will] is used twice in this particular verse which to me implies that “man” and “the flesh” has a will. If that is not so, then why is it mentioned. Please note that it does not say the [will] of God, instead it says [of God] there is a difference.
          You know that I have a stricken brain and some times it’s hard for me to gather my thoughts so please allow me to use a reliable commentary to further explain my point of view.

          His Divine and human nature. Matthew Henry
          John the Baptist came to bear witness concerning Jesus. Nothing more fully shows the darkness of men's minds, than that when the Light had appeared, there needed a witness to call attention to it. Christ was the true Light; that great Light which deserves to be called so. By his Spirit and grace he enlightens all that are enlightened to salvation; and those that are not enlightened by him, perish in darkness. Christ was in the world when he took our nature upon him, and dwelt among
          us. The Son of the Highest was here in this lower world. He was in the world, but not of it. He came to save a lost world, because it was a world of his own making. Yet the world knew him not. When he comes as a Judge, the world shall know him. Many say that they are Christ's own, yet do not receive him, because they will not part with their sins, nor have him to reign over them. All the children of God are born again. This new birth is through the word of God as the means,
          1Pe 1:23, and by the Spirit of God as the Author. By his Divine presence Christ always was in the world. But now that the fulness of time was come, he was, after another manner, God manifested in the flesh. But observe the beams of his Divine glory, which darted through this veil of flesh. Men discover their weaknesses to those most familiar with them, but it was not so with Christ; those most intimate with him saw most of his glory. Although he was in
          the form of a servant, as to outward circumstances, yet, in respect of graces, his form was like the Son of God His Divine glory appeared in the holiness of his doctrine, and in his miracles. He was full of grace, fully acceptable to his Father, therefore qualified to plead for us; and full of truth, fully aware of the things he was to reveal. (Jn 1:15-18)

          1. maestrowhit profile image61
            maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            It sounds like you're trying to say that since John the Baptist, who probably appeared to be a wild man (from what little I know), went around telling people that He was coming, they should've known Him and recognized Him? What did John do, describle how Jesus would look? DId He describe how Jesus would dress? Did He make any physical descriptions of Jesus? I don't think he did. It seems like you're saying that John made it so clear to everyone, and appeared to be speaking such undeniable truths that people listening would have no choice but to recognize Jesus as the messiah. This is unreasonable.

            My previous comment on your scriptural references still holds.

            As for the commentary you sent, there are parts of it that support my views. But this is all a diversion. Lets get back to the question at hand. Why do you need to prep me for it?

            How many times have you told someone that they must accept Jesus as their personal Lord and Savior? How many times have you heard others say that?


            I ask you and I ask them - How do I do that?

            Jesus says that unless we become like little children we cannot enter the Kingdom of Heaven. I've asked you a question that a little child could understand and probably ask. Can you give me an answer that a little child could understand? I bet Jesus could. And I'm sure he already did.

            1. secondsamuel profile image61
              secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              John 1:29-34 (New Living Translation)
              29 The next day John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, “Look! The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world! 30 He is the one I was talking about when I said, ‘A man is coming after me who is far greater than I am, for he existed long before me.’ 31 I did not recognize him as the Messiah, but I have been baptizing with water so that he might be revealed to Israel.”
              32 Then John testified, “I saw the Holy Spirit descending like a dove from heaven and resting upon him. 33 I didn’t know he was the one, but when God sent me to baptize with water, he told me, ‘The one on whom you see the Spirit descend and rest is the one who will baptize with the Holy Spirit.’ 34 I saw this happen to Jesus, so I testify that he is the Chosen One of God.”

              I would guess that Jesus was a pretty popular individual in that day, People followed Him around and there were probably rumors about Him setting out to go get baptized. I assume that John must have had some kind of encounter with the Most High God because it is was God that told John how he would recognize the Messiah.
              Any one can say that something is unreasonable. If you think the scriptures are unreasonable then that is between you and the Author. All I am doing is trying to persuade you that the bible supports the idea of free will. I think some times God over rides that free will for His own purposes but for the most part I believe we have free will and you have not given me one thing that proves otherwise You can draw your own conclusions. I have been presenting a form of proof  all along but you just will not accept what I have to offer. This forum is really making me tired. But I’m not giving up yet.
              Like I said I am getting tired, so instead of all this work I will give you a link so you can go there and read the commentary on the passage above. You said that parts of the past commentary helped your argument, would please show me how it does I didn’t see it.

              http://www.biblegateway.com/resources/c … q=i.50.1.6


              What do you have to do to accept Jesus Christ. Maestro I could give you passage upon passage. I could give you the traditional 4 SPIRITUAL LAWS. But I already know what you will do with that. I don’t think you will  accept any answer I give you so what’s the point. But just to humor you just a little I will tell you how I did it for myself.
              I didn’t do it in a big public arena, I didn’t walk down the aisle of some church, I didn’t quit drinking or smoking  or cussing or fornicating, or stealing, or lying, I didn’t do any thing to get ready for that moment. Within the dark dungeon of my lost soul there was much chaos but there was a still small voice that prompted me to surrender. At that moment my entire body convulsed, I started laughing and crying at the same time, then I started to shout out the name of Jesus. I was laughing, crying, shouting, and convulsing all at the same time. I have never been the same since that day. Oh yes I have failed my Jesus many times since then, I mean I have failed Him miserably. But He has been faithful to forgive me of my sins just like He promised. At that very moment of conversion my spirit was in touch with His spirit you know, like 2 computers sharing info with each other. During those brief moments which seemed like hours my own carnal will cowered up in the corner of my soul as if to hide and the Holy Spirit filled my very existence. Do you remember the computer thing I just mentioned; well during that time I acknowledged that I was a miserable sinner in need of a savior and I asked Jesus to take control of my life and help me to be pleasing to Him. Shortly after that, a few days I think, I woke up one morning (a Saturday I think) and I felt the spirit nudging my own spirit and I got my bible and went around the neighborhood knocking on doors and proclaiming the gospel and before the day was over 11 souls were saved. I didn’t even know the bible that well and I was preaching like a scholar to them people. But it wasn’t me that was doing the testifying, no, it was the Spirit of All Mighty God. Did I do all of that by my own free will? No not all of it, But of my own free will I surrendered my life to Jesus a few days before that.

              Well!!! I certainly didn’t mean to give you all that. Sorry I got carried away. I’m setting here crying tears of joy as I type. I am so tired. I gotta go ... I luv-ya-man,,,,,,,,,,I really do

  13. Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago

    Well, since my post was totally ignored..............----------why would GODS or Jesus want to have anything to do with the main inhabitants of this planet who are hell bent on destroying that very life that they made here for all of us to enjoy...why would they want to even converse with such?????
    I say GODS because religion seems to pass over what the verse really says when it says We are made in THEIR (plural folks) image and likeness.
    If we were made in their likeness then we must be like them--in all ways......think about it and don't go on the defensive and rant and rave about other biblical verses........................We make all the things happen here on the planet by our thoughts and our words and our deeds.  We were given the greatest gift of all--to choose our very own thoughts, the words we choose and the emotions behind them and then our actions towards everything on the planet.  What a great gift from those who made us.  We get self responsibility!!!
    Everything has a re-action and an effect of the cause.............everything.....

    1. Mark Knowles profile image59
      Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I didn't mean to ignore your post. Sorry, I was defending my honor lol

      So, what I think you are saying is we have free will. We were given free will, but because we have chosen to actively destroy our planet and ourselves, god/jesus/gods/creator has chosen to ignore us?

      I agree that we have total control over what we choose to do, and I agree that we are doing all we can to perpetuate a self-destructive, benefits-for-those-at-the-top system that needs to be changed.

      Whether we decide to change it is up to us.

      1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
        Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Well I didn't mean to say that they were actually ignoring us, but they could be.  Yes it is up to us to get us out of this mess and to fix the world we live on.  People, like those who give everything up to a creator and ignore the facts of real life, need to understand what causes droughts and plagues.it is the misuse of the land we live on.  Those plagues that hit egypt were not of god but becasue they raped the land so much that there were floods and such-becasuee nothing world grow there.because they used up all the land's nurishments and didn't know how to replenish them by crop rotation.-FREE WILL...they got back what they put out--or pulled out.......

        1. Mark Knowles profile image59
          Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          I agree with you 100%.

          I am still perplexed as to how exactly to persuade people to change.

          Any ideas?

          1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
            Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            I do, but I would be roasted, toasted and fried! LOL..........

          2. Lady Guinevere profile image67
            Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            I do, but I would be roasted, toasted and fried! LOL..........

            1. Mark Knowles profile image59
              Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              No, I am serious. I am slowly connecting with a lot of people who think this way, and I am trying to work out a way of saying it that actually makes a difference.

              My current thinking is that we need to make it possible for corporations to be able to make horrendous amounts of money from being environmentally friendly instead of the other way 'round. It might stop some of the spin on "Global warming is cyclical, it will correct itself." lol

              Or have a revolution...... smile

              1. viralprospector profile image60
                viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                Mark;

                Here is my plan:

                Overview - get the poor and needy to produce the windmills, solar towers and biomass converters to convert our energy to clean, renewable energy.

                In case you are still reading, I want to build factories in our prisons to produce windmills, electrolyzers and solar towers. These technologies are very scarce. People want to install alternative energy. It is expensive (supply and demand from econ class, right?).

                It is very political to deal with the prisons. The benefit of this to scoiety is massive. America (and Britain) spend billions in housing and caring for prisoners, money thrown away essentially. They produce little goods and services from their work. When the prisoners leave, they are not employable. The prison system would put the prison guards and politicians out of work if they graduated people with the skills needed in the free market. So, they do not want to do this.

                I once made my final presentation to the DOJ for a multimillion dollar grant. I told them this would shut down half of the prisons. I thought they would faint. I lost, and the winner accomplished nothing.

                With this, prisoners would leave and get jobs. Then, they would not return. Then prisons would close, and these jerks would lose their jobs. Follow the money, right, Mark?

                Using electricity for cars is idiotic. Where do we get the electricity from? currently burning coal for the most part. That is real clean, huh? Or Americans will recall the "drill baby drill" insanity (maybe you heard that BS too). Cars need to run on hydrogen. That is produced by electrolyzing water. The toughest atom to break is hydrogen from oxygen. So electrolyzers are real beasts of machines.

                Mark, your country and mine, the greatest allies in history, need to preserve ourt oil. Stealth bombers will not run too well on electricity, huh? Iran and Russia will walk in and take both our countries over in twenty years when we both run completely out of oil and only they have it if we fail at this, too.

                Short term, both our countries (particularly mine) have lost thousands of manufacturing jobs. We were stupid here to let Japan dump cars. We lost our #1 manufacturing jobs due to being too stupid to count. Duh, how could Hondas and Toyotas sell cheaper in America than Japan?. They could not outbomb us, so they just beat us in economics.

                Sorry, I could write several more volumes on this. I am sure you are surprised to see me with passion, huh?

                1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
                  Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  I got a problem with the Oil thing.  We don't need to rape the land for it!!  Get the point, we are raping the land and we are getting the consequences of that and have been for years.  Think of it this way----Mother Earth is a living being and her blood is the oil we get from her-now what happenes to a human when we bleed it dry-wheree do we get out blood from?  No more OIL!  Let her heal first!  I am sure that mother Earth will be much more giving if we give her a chance!

                  The rpison idea is good but we cannot let those killers run free now can we?  We cannot allow them to do more killing for the sake of our economy.  I do like them doing things for the economy though and putting them to good use.

                2. Mark Knowles profile image59
                  Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  No, I am not surprised to see you with passion. One thing I would not suggest you are is passionless lol

                  You make some good points here. Although I may disagree that saving oil so we can have stealth bombers is a good reason to preserve what there is, that doesn't really matter because I am not naive enough to think I could persuade you or anyone else that we do not need to "defend" ourselves from Iran and Russia.

                  Keeping the illusion of a threat from outside is certainly one of the accepted ways of motivating a nationalist population.

                  Whatever happens, when crunch time comes, the powers that be will take whatever oil there is left for government and military use anyway.

                  Unfortunately, I am slowly beginning to think that the only way we will be able to change our energy consumption is to  find some way for people to make large amounts of money doing so. Whether this is by using prisoners to make solar panels, or making it "cool" to be environmentally friendly.

                  The major problem with your prison plan is that the winners would be the prisoners (in the fact that they would leave prison with a usable skill). The population at large (because we would be preserving our resources), the planet and the environment.

                  The losers would be - whoever makes money from running the prisons; the government, local and federal, because with less prisons, there would not be a need for so much government. The energy companies because we would be less dependent on them for our energy needs.

                  So, I am not surprised it was thrown out. sad

                  Running cars on electricity is a complete waste of time. The energy has to come from somewhere and it makes no odds if you burn oil or coal to provide that energy.

                  And as for people who trade in their new car for another one that is a hybrid. I spit in their general direction. Does no one understand the environmental and energy costs involved in making a car in the first place?

                  By the time the environmental debt is paid by running a "greener" car, that car has been on the scrap heap for years.

                  It is just another way of "the system" persuading you to buy a new friggin' car.

                  Cars in general do not make sense. Electric or otherwise. Solar powered public transport? Now that makes sense.

                  So, how do we persuade people to change?

                  1. maestrowhit profile image61
                    maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    Nice side topic. Informative. Hey, you've persuaded this guy!

                  2. viralprospector profile image60
                    viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this
        2. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Are you referring to the plagues in old-testament times?

          1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
            Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Yep!

      2. secondsamuel profile image61
        secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Way to go 'BIG GUY"...........smile

    2. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Well put Lady Guinevere. smile

  14. viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Maestrowhit

    You asked how do we accept Jesus. That shows great wisdom to ask that. You want a short answer, so i will give one.

    Do you remember my personal testimony (by that I mean where and when i actually accepted Jesus)? Every believer has a unique story. There is no one way really, as a common sense statement. Jesus comes with the Holy Spirit, and the Holy Spirit is personal, given our unique talents and experiences.

    I feel that just stopping fighting Him off is step one. Step two is essentially taking stock of life and seeing if it really makes emotional sense that He is not there. Step three is jumping in with both feet, and enjoy the ride. It is a wild and exciting one.

    I will say that I personally have wanted you on our team from the very first post you made here, and that has only grown. That is just a personal thing.

    Is there anything stopping you?

    1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      How can you say that he is not there and you get the holy spirit after your life has begun--like years or never?  I am not looking for verses from that Bible--I am looking for answer from within you--that is where Jesus said all the answers are.  The Holy Spirit is given to you with the very first breath you take when coming out of the womb.  That holy spirit is in everything, not just humans or animals, but everything.  Ever hear a plant scream when you cut it?  They breath by osmosis and other ways, but that doesn'tmean they are without the holy spirit-on the contrary.  Pay attention to the world around you and in you.
      Jesus also said that the law is within each of us--he never said that it was anywhere else.
      FREE WILL is self responsibility and doesn't include blaming things on otehrs or on any Gods or even Jesus for not being there or even being there.
      We are responsible for our own thoughts, words and deeds and us alone.
      The Kngdom of heaven is WITHIN you--not outside of you.

      1. viralprospector profile image60
        viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Lady Guinnevere;

        I cannot just ignore the Bible, so I will say first that the Bible does say that they are connected, for all those watching. I say that the Bible is 100% true, so there really is no way for me to accept the terms you put in your post. It would just be a lie.

        As to common sense, all I can say is that I did not have the Holy Spirit personally when I was not following Jesus. So, the correlation for me personally is 100%. That is all I care to answer for, since I cannot vouch for the honesty of others. However, that is the common perception among Christians, and I have never seen it said it otherwise, except from you just now.

        "Pay attention to the world around you and in you." I do, and I do not think that was really necessary for you to command me to.

        Whoops, some scripture here? "Jesus also said that the law is within each of us"

        Where?

        "Jesus also said that the law is within each of us--he never said that it was anywhere else."

        I don't think so... "For all who have sinned apart from the law will also perish apart from the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law." That is one place... Sorry, but you started the scripture references. How can anyone sin and perish apart from the law if it is in us all?

        "We are responsible for our own thoughts, words and deeds and us alone." If it works for you, that is great. Others are called and follow where He leads. I guess the Great Commission is not something you believe in either?

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          There we go---assuming things you have no idea of--christans are good at this.
          In response the the law within us--exactly my point---who is to say who doesn't have what inside of them-nor you or I.
          Whose or where did I say common sense--you did, not I.
          Who said that I don't believe in what Jesus said and that the Bible is the whole truth and nothing but the truth--you did not I.
          You cannot live without that breath of life and in Geneisis is where it talks about that and it being the holy spirit---so were you dead--how was that working for you whilst you were making a family and friends and how did your parent's think of you---were you just not around and breathing--or what???
          There are many parts missing from that Bible and it has been translated so many times that parts are mis translated.  Have you ventured off to read chronoloical history and the places were some of that bible came from like greeks and such.  Have you gone on the quest yet.......assuming that you haven't then you should and the clergy do not know everything there is to know about god, jesus or any one of us here on thei earthly planet.
          I speak for Jesus whom is in my heart, mind and soul and not for the church and there is a big difference.

          1. viralprospector profile image60
            viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Lady G;

            "There we go---assuming things you have no idea of--christans are good at this."

            Our conversation is ended. I will not read any more of your post. I have watched and seen your posting style. it is not for me. Enjoy yourself. I am tired of fighting, and I try never to fight with professed Christians.

            1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
              Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              So be it!  I got to say that this kind of reaction is normal for those who care not to think for themselves and believe that someone else has control over them and allows such.  That was YOUR FREE WILL and this is mine.........
              so be it....and you did the assuming first...................
              I suppose that I will be thought as to be angry with the church becasue .hmm...I don't conform to the ways af men and I don't think like they do and that I don't go by traditions-which Jesus told them not to do in the first place!
              So be it.  I am no angy, I just disagree with all that.  I was given a brain to use at birth.............

      2. mohitmisra profile image60
        mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Vey nice and we as humans have the ability to get enlightened like Jesus and discover our true self-god self:)

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          That's what it's all about.  Each person has their own way and each person has their own lessons to learn about themselves and no one can be on the same exact path as another.

    2. maestrowhit profile image61
      maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Ok, How you you stop fighting Him off?

      What do you mean by emotional sense?

      What exactly do you jump into with both feet?

      One thing stopping from doing this is that I don't know what it is I would be doing or how to do it.
      Thanks for the brevity. I hope you'll continue in like fashion.

      1. maestrowhit profile image61
        maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        VP - this is the part you must have missed. I'm beginning to think you were being insincere when you expressed your concern for me. You ignored my response to you

        1. viralprospector profile image60
          viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this
          1. maestrowhit profile image61
            maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            This is really no help at all. I'm seriously not taking an approach against Christianity. I really want to know. If someone wanted to accept Jesus as their personal Lord and Savior, wouldn't you want to help them? I'm asking you to help me understand hoe to do that, and you're just making it more confusing.

            1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
              Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              All you have to do is ask.  Sit quietly in a room and meditate and just ask out loud for him to come to you--he will and then just talk to him just as if he was standing in front of you.  He will be there for he hears everyone.  You may feel weird at first, but just keep talking to him like he is there.  Tell him your fears and concerns and what you like about this world and what you don't like,  He is your friend and he won't give you doublespeak.

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                This is the best answer I've gotten so far. It's a real answer.

                But I don't think I can do that. I mean, talk to thin air? Is that supposed to save me? You say He won't give me doublespeak. Does that mean he'll give me singular speak? I'll hear a voice coming from nowhere?

                1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
                  Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  Why can't you do that?   Yes I mean talk to thin air.  It isn't thin air.  Just try it.  You may not hear or see anything but you might feel something.  Ask him to give you a sign--yes this may sound silly.  Jesus is all around you and so is his love.  It does not belong to just a select few--it belongs to everyone at least everyone on this planet....Doublespeak as I mean is run around the bush so to speak.  He will talk to you directly if that is the way that you can get his message or talking. He will be gnelt and he will come to yu in a way that only you will understand or be able to comprehend.  Be quiet and let nothing else come to your mind.  May sure you don't have any other distractions.  He is there.  Just try it.  If you don't feel or hear anything try again on another night or day.  It will be like telepathy when you hear his words or pictures or just a knowing--that part is hard to explain.

                  1. maestrowhit profile image61
                    maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    I've had a spiritual guide my whole life. I never had to do anything to obtain it, it was just always there. That sounds like what you're talking about.

                  2. mohitmisra profile image60
                    mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    Ask him to give you a sign. I keep asking the cosmos for signs and it keeps giving me signs.smile
                    It will be like telepathy- yes this is tue. smile
                    One story.Met up with a friend at the end of the day and we decided to have quick beer before parting.We picked up two bottles from the wine shop and went to our usual place.Then this voice in my head said-leave this place.I told my friend and he said whats wrong we have come here a hundred times.I told him I dont know but we must leave this place immediately.He joked it off and two minutes later we were surrounded by four cops for drinking without having a permit.A new police station had opened up a few days back in that area and we were not aware of it. Now he listens to me when I have an intuition smile

            2. viralprospector profile image60
              viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Are you just jacking with me? First you won't answer my question. Then you chew me out for not answering yours. Then I answer, so you say that is no help. You order me to be brief, then my brief answers don't satisfy you. Sorry, I just don't speak your language I guess. I won't waste any more of you r time.

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                What question did you ask?

      2. maestrowhit profile image61
        maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        VP, I did answer that question. See, it's right here

        1. Ben Bush profile image60
          Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Maestro, you'll find that honesty with people brings about a certain amount of respect towards you, even from people who may not agree with you or like you.

          Make sure that whatever good will you have generated with others is not squandered by a lighthearted attitude towards things that others take seriously. Such a breach in relationships can take a long time to repair.

          1. maestrowhit profile image61
            maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Just because my language and questions are simple and not complicated, it doesn't mean I am taking anything lightly. I've maintained strict honesty throughout this entire dialogue.

            1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
              Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Something is teling me that tey are playing games with you-why, I don't know, but it doesn't seem fair now does it?  I love you even if we don't see eye to eye.  I won't tell you that you are going to hell either becasue you don't understand.

          2. mohitmisra profile image60
            mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            He is being honest otherwise he would have agreed with you.

  15. t.keeley profile image76
    t.keeleyposted 16 years ago

    To answer Maestro's question "how do you accept Jesus as Lord and Saviour" :

    You don't. He accepts you. Of course I'm going to get proverbially stoned to death for saying that now...

    1. maestrowhit profile image61
      maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Not by me, buddy. I'm with you on this all the way

    2. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Of course we are because we don't go by the establishment and throw down our lives to a dogma that was set for political reasons.......

  16. Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago

    VP, I have one question of you concerning being Saved and all that from the Bible and accepting Jesus-----------
    If one is blind and or deaf how do they know Jesus if they cannot hear the word that comes from a church or your bible and they cannot hear a preacher preach HIS version of what the Bible says?

  17. maestrowhit profile image61
    maestrowhitposted 16 years ago

    A simple restatement of my original one:

    Involuntary actions are obviously not acts of free will, so no need for explanation there.
    For all other (voluntary) actions -

    Every action, or deed, is preceded by desire.

    I cannot not think of a single argument against this, but you might surprise me.

    So -

    If we were to control the desire, wouldn't we be controlling it according to what we want? Desire would still precede.

    And if desire does not precede, the action is involuntary, and is no longer being "done." An action like this just "happens."

    Wthout desire (motivation) we cannot do anything.

    Our actions have a REQUIREMENT in order to be carried out. That is not free.

    1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Yes it is---you control your thoughts which is where your desires come from.  The first desire you had was to incarnate to learn and to experience.

      1. maestrowhit profile image61
        maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Give me an example of you controlling your thoughts. Give me an example of a thought. Show me how this works.

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          an example would be --a thought pops into your mind that life seems chotic to you.  Change that to you love the life that you have with all it's opportunties to learn.  That's just an example at the top of my head.
          What you may feel that is chotic, may just be temporary but you can bring more positive into your life by not being negative and down about them.  See the silver lining instead of the cloud.  Be at peace where you are right now, this very second.
          It's hard to do becasue you will always want to see the negative.  You can control your thoughts becasue it can be done...

          1. maestrowhit profile image61
            maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            So, put simply, the thought that popped up is, "life iseems chaotic."
            Now you change the thought to, "I love life."

            Why did you change the thought?

            1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
              Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Desire to make life better and to experience good things--desire is still the thought.

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                Sorry, LG, but desire is not a thought. The object of desire is a thought, but not the desire itself. Desire is something closer to emotion than thought. Those are two different things.

                1. Mark Knowles profile image59
                  Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  But there is an entire industry built around creating a desire where there is none.

                  It is called advertising.....

                  1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
                    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    Yes and it works all too well!!
                    When one os in a diet--what do they see all day---ads for food and eating.  Now one is starving for Pizza and they have to go out and buy one...........
                    Advertisers know how to get their audience.............don't watch TV or go anywhere becasue you will see ads everywhere.  It works--just stop it all and you will not desire a thing...........

            2. Milla Mahno profile image59
              Milla Mahnoposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Because this was my free will smile (If I could answer wink)

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                You skipped a step. You just told me the means by which you changed the thought. I'm asking you why you made the particular change that you made. WHY did you change "chaos" to "love"? not HOW.

                1. Milla Mahno profile image59
                  Milla Mahnoposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  Because at some point in the past I exercised my free will to make a conscious decision to make an effort to look at the World positively smile

                  1. maestrowhit profile image61
                    maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    and why did you do that?

    2. viralprospector profile image60
      viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      My initial response to you (gee we have come so far and yet not at all, huh?) was that that is weak. To simply accept that you are not in control of yourself is awful, don't you think?

      I control my actions, not perfectly albeit. Was it you that then said I am perfect bla bla bla? someone did... No, I am not perfect, duh... I have discipline and perseverence, though. Those are essential qualities of a successful person. My 16 year old has them because I drummed them into him. Is he perfect at it, no, but he realizes that when he does not do them he is a failure for the most part.

      Being disciplined and having perseverence are free will choices, too. Do you see that?

      All your thoughts, words and actions are controllable. Is it 100% possible to achieve that much discipline and perseverence. Yes. Jesus did it. We can come, and should come, very close to Him. The better we do it, the better people we are.

      1. maestrowhit profile image61
        maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        You're not responding directly to what I wrote here. You're not addressing the things I'm saying. Look at my statements and respond directly to them. If that's what you're already doing, I can't see it. Make it clearer.

        Oh, and you never answered my response to your attempt at answering my question about accepting Jesus. Maybe you accidentally overlooked it. That question is the real meat of this discussion. I'm waiting for you to follow up on it. Go back, look at where we left off, and pick it back up again, if you don't mind. You said you really want me to join your team (I think that's how you put it). It sounded like you were genuinely concerned. So help me out here.

        1. viralprospector profile image60
          viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          I don't know. It sounds like it is all on your terms again. I thought the discussion was mutual, but I missed it.

  18. Milla Mahno profile image59
    Milla Mahnoposted 16 years ago

    Cause I liked it that way smile

    1. maestrowhit profile image61
      maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      You liked what that way? You liked the positive outlook?

      1. Milla Mahno profile image59
        Milla Mahnoposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Yep, and still do smile

        1. maestrowhit profile image61
          maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          So, did you choose to like a positive outlook, or do you just like it naturally?

          1. Milla Mahno profile image59
            Milla Mahnoposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Us silly girls don't go that deep smile I see what you mean, and I'm afraid I don't have an answer for you Maestro. I don't really know if there is a free will or not, and not that I care much. All I know I like it when the World shows its love to me. And I like to love it back. It seems to be natural  smile

            1. secondsamuel profile image61
              secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              I have a positive outlook and a negative outlook at the same time. Even now as I type this post both outlooks are present, but for now I am choosing to entertain the positive outlook

  19. maestrowhit profile image61
    maestrowhitposted 16 years ago

    I wonder what happened to my question about accepting Jesus......

    hmmmm, who knows?

    1. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Your question is being addressed and in part it has already been addressed. You are a very bright young man so I need to be sure that any answer on my part will be one that I can back up. This requires much preparation and meditation for me. How ever the answer has already been given in the passages that I recently referenced. There will be more answers to the same question in the near future but from different scripture references. I am trying to prepare you for the conclusive answer.

      while I got your attention I would like to ask you a question. You have stated in the recent past that (sin) does not exist. Do you still stand by this claim or have you changed your opinion. It's important that I know.

  20. profile image0
    sandra rinckposted 16 years ago

    I can't believe this thread is still going.  If you accept any God as you God then you do not have any free will other than to do exactly what you accepted as your mission to do. 

    So maestro, you accepted J.C, so now you get the hole kaboodle.  smile  Good luck with that.  Is it really worth it to you?  Your dad is too old to change no one changes unless it comes with a winning lottery ticket.  smile

  21. Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago

    There are no sides.  God loves all of us and so does Jesus.  It's when one society or religion that decides they are better than anyone else an that they have all the answers is when you have problems.  If one that says they know that there is a beautiful kingdom on the other side of that large gorge and you have to jump over it to get there would you--knowing that you are going to your death to get to that kindgom?  Or would you find another way to get there that seems a lot better than just believing that you will get there by jumping to yur death?
    Searching for a better way is FREE WILL too.

    1. mohitmisra profile image60
      mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      It's when one society or religion that decides they are better than anyone else an that they have all the answers is when you have problems.
      perfect-ego-this is the big problem right now.

  22. t.keeley profile image76
    t.keeleyposted 16 years ago

    Christ taught to preach...doesn't always mean being forceful, but there should be a sense of force behind the words. Empty pleadings are worthless. He Himself did not strive with those who wouldn't listen. He taught "no one comes to me unless the Father wills it."

    I figure that quote alone says that you're only as free as your will...which is only as free as your sinful pride.

    1. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I agree with you t.keely, it appears that you have your head firmly attached.
      that's right, we don't just get up one morning and decide that were gonna-go-git-saved. the bible says that no one comes unless they are drawn. God does the drawing through the holy spirit, bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbut we still have to choose whether or not to allow ourselves to be drawn  the end result being salvation.

      do you agree TK? smile

      1. maestrowhit profile image61
        maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Second samuel: this is totally unscriptural. You're saying that God draws us to Him and in the moment He draws us, it is up to us to accept or reject Him.

        That is completely false and cannot be found anywhere in the Bible.

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          LOL This sounds like the stuff they pulled over the eyes of the people in the movie "Logan;s Run".

        2. maestrowhit profile image61
          maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          I want to repeat this

        3. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Maestro typing in bold to me is indicative of anger or shouting. You don’t have to shout here maestro, I can read regular type just fine.
          You claim that the words in my post are not in the bible. OK, I am going to waste some more of my precious time and go and look up the passage and show it to you. I say “waste my time” because no matter what truths I show you. You are going to reject it, in my opinion your heart has been hardened, you have made up your mind that you are right and anyone who opposes you is wrong and the only one that can change that is God Himself. I am very close to the point of leaving this thread, and let God take care of it. In the end His truths will stand unchallenged. You claim that you have received a message directly from God and that is all well and good. But you know what? I too have received a message directly from God. The Bible. The inerrant word of God. It is available to all who choose to PONDER it’s truths.

          Here is the passage
          John 6:43-45 (New Living Translation)
          43 But Jesus replied, “Stop complaining about what I said. 44 For no one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws them to me, and at the last day I will raise them up. 45 As it is written in the Scriptures, ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who listens to the Father and learns from him comes to me.

          There are other passages that imply the same thing , but I am growing weary of this quagmire. You “boldly” proclaimed that I was wrong, so the burden of proof falls on you to make it so


          We have no free will, we are already predestined to go to heaven or come to salvation, there is no need to change our evil thoughts towards God(repentance), there is no need to seek His truths which are found in His word then what be the necessity of drawing us in the first place. Nothing you have given to anyone on this thread has proven your arguement. You have stated your opinion but you have proved nothing.Nor have I. God's word proves its self. We are not called to prove, we are called to study it.  You claim to be on some mission from God but all you are doing is causing devision, and confusion. I do not have to prove anything, I know I'm saved and I know why I am saved and I know beyond a shadow of any doubt that I was not saved by any formula that you have presented in "your" forum. I was saved by grace through my own faith (exercised of my own free will). I don't need to argue and (quite frankly I think it's wrong that we do) about the free gift of salvation.
          You can offer to take the place of the most condemned murderer on death row but he is no better off unless he accepts the exchange and walks out of the prison.
          i know it's hard to see the forest when your eyes are entranced on that huge tree in front of you. Step back and get a better view.

          I love you my son smile

          1. maestrowhit profile image61
            maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            You told me just yesterday that you're going to stick with this till the end, and now you're saying you're about to bow out. What happened?

            You took the bold wrong. There was no reason for it other than simple emphasis.

            Another thing I told you, and I'll tell everyone, is that I am open to the possibility that I am wrong. Do you think I'm lying? It's you who aren't open to the possibility that you're wrong. What you said about me already deciding that anything oposing my views is wrong, is not a description of me; it is a description of yourself. I ask explanations to things that I sincerely do not understand. This is not a game to me, no matter what you may think. You just aren't taking me seriously.

            In all honesty, the verse you quoted above supports exactly what I'm saying. "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws them to Me."
            How can you get any clearer than that?

            You ask what is God's necessity in drawing us? The necessity is that we need Him in order to live, and He wants us to live to the fullest! He loves us! Every one of us! This is a positive message I'm spreading.

            I claimed that the idea of choosing to accept God's grace, instead of rejecting it, at the moment He decides to give it to you is not found anywhere in scripture. To prove that I would have to paste the entire Bible on here. I can't point something out to you that isn't there without showing you the whole thing. You said to me and to others on this site that you are in this for the long run. If you're going to back out now, at least acknowledge that you have changed your mind.

            Above, you completely misquoted scripture, and misrepresented doctrine in this statement:

            "I was saved by grace through my own faith (exercised of my own free will)."

            That is the oposite of actual scripture, which reads -
            Ephesians 2
            8) For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;

            That is saying that the faith through which we are saved is not of ourselves. You just said it was your faith. It's not. Don't take credit for your own salvation.

            Look, I'm not getting offensive or nasty. I am keeping all of that out of the picture. If you give up, then that's fine. I love you too

            1. Ben Bush profile image60
              Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Are you saying that we have the choice to reject the grace of God?

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                I'm saying the exact opposite of that.

                1. Ben Bush profile image60
                  Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  Then why does it matter how we live. Who cares if you have Satan, a spirit guide or the Spaghetti Monster come to you and reveal to you what??????????? does it really matter? Is there no right and wrong, is there no good and bad, is there no nothing simply becasue God corrects all

                  And what does he correct it according to? What makes adultery, fornication, rape or murder wrong if it all ultimately gets wiped away. And the reason it gets wiped away? What is the legitimate reason, the grace of God, the sacrifice of Jesus for what?

                  Please explain the reasoning? I could ask alot more.

                  1. maestrowhit profile image61
                    maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    What matters is life. Wouldn't you agree?

                    There is life to the fullest - also known as eternal life; and there is life lived in sin/darkness/death.

                    God told Adam that in the day he ate of the forbidden tree, he would die that day. The fruit of that tree opened Man's eyes to a lie - a false knowledge - a deception. And now we are born into a life lived inside the illusion of Good and Evil. That life, compared to eternal life, or life to the fullest, is death. We can not see past the illusion that there is Good and Evil all around us. It blinds us to the reality of existence. It chokes us off from tasting what it is really like to LIVE.  That is what sin is.

                    So, what makes these things wrong - rape murder, adultery, etc? You have to think outside the box of morality; outside the box of the knowledge of Good and Evil. What makes them wrong is that they kill us. They kill our spirit. They steal away from us true life. Have you ever murdered, raped, adulterated? Can you tell me that those activities are fulfilling and healthy? No they are not. They are spiritual cancer that kills and destroys. That's why they are wrong. Not because they are against the rules - but because they do not promote LIFE.

                2. Ben Bush profile image60
                  Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  ??????????????

                3. mohitmisra profile image60
                  mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  God is beyond death and yes one must die in order to become one with him. smile

      2. secondsamuel profile image61
        secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        bold type and humiliation of your father will not get your point proven. I am not as quick with my mind as you are with yours and you know why, so show a little grace here. I think that's what Jesus was all about anyway.

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Chill out man!!  Your ego is showing.....my what a big one you have....

          1. secondsamuel profile image61
            secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Your lack of "free will" is showing:)

      3. secondsamuel profile image61
        secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        A gift is of no value unless you recieve it. If someone gives you a gift it will be of no use until you open the package and use the contents

        I still stand by my claim that faith is an act on one's will. To god be the Glory

        1. maestrowhit profile image61
          maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Not in the case of a gift from God. Did you accept the gift of your birth? I don't think so. Did you accept the gift of your beating heart? I don't think so. Did you accept the gift of the air you breathe? no, not likely.

          You contradict yourself. In the same statement you give glory to both yourself and God. The Bible states clearly in several locations that faith is a gift from God and not an act of man. 

          I know you have a certain difficulty. I don't mean to be hard on you. Sorry if it seems that way. I'm just passionate about the truth, that's all.

          1. secondsamuel profile image61
            secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Here is the truth, I didn't accept the gift of my birth, I was not mentally capable of accepting anything at that age in my, I don't think anyone is. But as I grew into a man I became able to differentiate (is that a word?) anyway....or analize maybe my suroundings. Oh shucks, I'm trying to sound all educated. What I'm trying to say is that I grew up and figured out that I could make choices about every aspect of life. In fact I learned that it was necessary to make choices or else I would have been dormant. (or maybe a door mat). I heard about the gospel and then I heard the gospel, then I read the gospel and that gospel said that ..................here's the big one (IF) this is not an exact quote so please don't scold me in public. OK back to the big (IF) I would but believe (look that word up in the bible dictionary) or recieve Him Jesus (THEN) He Jesus would give me the right to become part of His family as His child. (I didn't copy and paste that passage but you know which one I'm talking about) Please don't make me go there. Plain and oh so simple TO AS MANY AS DID RECIEVE HIM HE GAVE THEM THE RIGHT TO BECOME THE SONS OF GOD. I think I quoted that right. I don't think it says he gave us all the right. There is a condition attached to aquiring the right. I give no glory to myself and never have. I simply accepted the present He gave me, opened it up, and now I am using it to clean up my sins on a daily basis. Am I glorified because I accept His gift? Am I glorified because I use His gift?tongue

            1. maestrowhit profile image61
              maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Ok, so how did you do that? How did you accept this gift? How did you accept Jesus? And I don't mean what words did you say or what did you feel like, I mean how specifically did you ACCEPT Jesus, or God's gift of salvation, or whatever you wish to call it?

      4. secondsamuel profile image61
        secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        You insult me when you implie, no, say that I take credit for my own salvation. You know that is the furthest thing from the truth.

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Maestrowhit;

    That is pretty funny. It was right on the post you used to chastise me about not answering your questions...

    "Is there anything stopping you?"

    By the way, make Money is right on. This is not so difficult. If you want to do it, you will do it.

    While none of us want to focus on it, or even mention it really, there is a down side to not choosing Jesus. You know that, though. I am confident that you have learned several things because you thought they were the right thing to so, a job, an education, cleaning the house, doing laundry, cooking ,etc. Just do it the same way you did those things if you want. So don't come back and ask how do you learn those things. This can go too far real easy. You have several good answers, even if you think mine was stupid. I find that pretty funny, too, since it was how I did it. Oh well, everyone to his own.

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Make Money;

    You are on a roll. The best advice given to Maestrowhit was your advice to listen to his Dad.

  • Make  Money profile image68
    Make Moneyposted 16 years ago

    Makes sense, doesn't it viralprospector.

    A man's pride is his biggest downfall.  A woman's too. smile

    1. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Well I guess you may have heard that PRIDE ALWAYS PRECEDES A GREAT FALL...................of course no harm intended.........big_smile

  • maestrowhit profile image61
    maestrowhitposted 16 years ago

    I have to admit, at this point, that I believe I have a new word from God. I believe God has given me something new. I've come to this conclusion through all the reading and researching I've been doing. Here's how I feel about it -

    The writers of the Bible were supposedly inpired by God to write what they wrote. None of them knew that their works would be put into a book called the Bible along with a bunch of other writers whom they didn't know and would never meet. But for some reason, the Bible is considered to be the one and only authoritative Word of God.

    I believe My words are also the Word of God. I have a message straight from God to tell people. You can call me cracked or insane, I'm sure I may seem to be, but I believe this with every fiber of myself. I believe that God is giving me a message that is just as important as any message you'll find in the Bible.

    This ought to clear up any confusion about where I'm coming from.

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Mohitmisra, Maestrowhit and Lady Guinnevere;

    I read all your posts, and I am compelled to say some things to you that I have been beating around the bush about. I do not attirbute all of this to any of you, but there are pieces for each of you. That way, no one will need to take it personally.

    Jesus is not the same as other people, I don't care who you pick - Mohammad, Buddha, you, or any other person. 

    The Bible could not be more different than the Quran, for example. Mohammad actually commands this day for all Muslims to kill all infidels. All Christians are the death target of all loyal and fundamental Muslims. Jesus said that He came to fulfill the law, not to abolish it. The law, which He repeated is "thou shalt not kill." You need to study these religions to know.

    There is not any other scenario in Christianity than that Jesus, God and the Holy Spirit are one God. Mohammad and Buddha are simply false prophets. It is repulsive to hear the total lies that are being spread about what Christianity is here!

    John 6:14 said, "Jesus replied, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me." That is a pivotal concept of the Bible that hinges all other verses.

    No, not Buddha or Mohammad, and no they cannot be the path if Jesus is the only path. I am not asking you to believe the Bible. That is either your path or not. However, you are wise to give up your propensity to give a public assessment of it immediately.

    That is not said to belittle you. I know very little about your religions. In fact, I do not know what religions you profess, and I do not need to know. They are false! You seem to be taking bits and pieces from all. The Bible totally prohibits buffet Christianity. Those, who do it, face what appears to me to be a very horrible judgement day, particularly those who go public with that. That is misleading those who are potential seekers. The Bible ends with this very warning,

    "I testify to the one who hears the words of the prophecy contained in this book: If anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book. And if anyone takes away from the words of this book of prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city that are described in this book."

    So, I warn you and others on this forum of that. If you wonder if God means business, here is one of many examples that say you will absolutley be burned in hell if you go astray. "But to the cowards, unbelievers, detestable persons, murderers, the sexually immoral, and those who practice magic spells, idol worshipers, and all those who lie, their place will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur. That is the second death.”

    Finally, as has been said early on in this thread, it is about obedience to God only for a Christian. Nothing, that is right nothing I repeat, takes precedent over each person's walk with the Lord. Luke 18:29 said it this way, "Then Jesus said to them, “I tell you the truth, there is no one who has left home or wife or brothers or parents or children for the sake of God’s kingdom who will not receive many times more in this age – and in the age to come, eternal life."

    Perhaps you take lightly your acts on this website. Those who are seeking come here for guidance. We all must take very seriously our words here as we become teachers, whether we like it or not, when we post publically. "Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers and sisters, because you know that we will be judged more strictly."

    1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this
      1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
        Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this
        1. viralprospector profile image60
          viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          The Holy Bible

          1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
            Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Hey I tried to take out some text, but it kept giving me an error message
            anyway,
            VP, what year,(pre nicean or post) translation and language---the are all different in their translations.

            1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
              Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Here you can do searches yourself and in all translations and languages:
              http://www.biblegateway.com/

    2. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you VP. To God be the Glory...........

    3. mohitmisra profile image60
      mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I spread knowledge of the Light just like Jesus did and when I say all the prophets are identitical like brothers I am speaking the truth.What Jesus taught was for the whole of humanity and it goes the same for the Buddha or Krishna or Mohammed.God is not restricted to any one religion. smile

  • Mark Knowles profile image59
    Mark Knowlesposted 16 years ago

    All - Please could we cut down on the massive re-quotes?

    It is making it difficult to read anything.

  • Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago
  • Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago
    1. Mark Knowles profile image59
      Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      You are preaching to the choir here Lady Guinevere. I am well aware that christianity was "borrowed" from a number of other earlier religions and the bible is a political book, and most certainly the work of man not a god. But I thought you were a christian?

      And if you guys are getting an error message it usually results from a missing quote tag - [ or ] smile

      1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
        Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Well Mark, I don't know much about tags and all that.
        I know you know about that stuff, but others do not.  I can present it but not guarantee they read it.  It's like taking a horse to water....
        I am christian, in that I follow Christ in my heart and not some doctrine that is used by the Church to control the people in fear for monetary use.  Church is a big business and lucrutive---that's why they fight so hard to get people to join and then instill fear into them to keep them and why they teach them from a very early age that they are the only way to get saved.  I wrote a hub on babies and it brought some of these fallacies to light.  They teach children that they are condemned the moment of conception--condemned to hell -----the child doesn't even have a chance-that is the fear they instill in their people.  Jesus didn't follow a church or any type of traditions.  He is the one that fought against such things, but yet those who say they follow him do not because they do go by traditions.

        1. Mark Knowles profile image59
          Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          I agree with you. But even if they do read it, they will decide it is a lie. I have been banging my head against that wall for some time. If you think whatever translation of the bible you just read is perfect and gives you all the proof and knowledge you need, you are not going to accept it when some one proves that is not the case.

          I could call myself a christian for the same reasons you do, but that does not count. You have to accept Jesus Christ as your personal savior and believe all other religions are written by false prophets and these people are going to burn in hell for all eternity. Or you don't go to heaven. smile

          Seeing as I don't believe any of that rubbish, I can't join. lol

          Not that I would. Free will smile

          1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
            Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            LOL, I do agree that they are brainwashed into believing that nothing else is true except that which they have been taught.  Now how to you get out of the brainswashed...........a traumatic event will certianly do it as in my case.  Thugh sometimes they will just go back onto the brainwashed state where they feel comfortable......
            Brainwashing, the application of coercive techniques to change the values and beliefs, perceptions and judgments, and subsequent mindsets and behaviors of one or more people, usually for political or religious purposes

            1. Mark Knowles profile image59
              Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              A traumatic event can go either way. smile

              Having been through a few myself, I often wished I had some sort of belief in a higher power to fall back on. Until I came across a few people who did have that belief, but, oddly enough, it didn't do them any good when the crunch came. I mean - if you truly believe that your husband/wife/son/daughter etc is going to heaven, why would you be upset when they die?

              This is because I do not think most people really believe. If they did, and read in the bible the things I read, the world would be a wonderful place. I mean just imagine if all the "christians," did in fact treat others as they would wish to be treated themselves. Not working out so well......

              1. t.keeley profile image76
                t.keeleyposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                LOL Mark. Thus is man's great error. I do believe organised religion has caused  a multitude of sins. I also agree that if everyone actually believed what they said they did, the world would probably be a  better place. Can't know for sure because it's never happened, but at least our founding fathers seemed to adhere to a level of principle...perhaps that was the height of civilization after all....

              2. Lady Guinevere profile image67
                Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                Well some of them---hmmmm--most of them would rather preach the bad things that MIGHT happen to you if you do not beleive the same as they do, but I rarely see that Golden rule either.........I believe Jesus sadt that one was the most important after the commandments were listed--then again if you take all the commandments together you will get the same thing--just broken down.

              3. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                Also known as indoctrination. Also known by some as mass hypnosis.

                I am, as most are, a victim of this, and it was an extremely traumatic experience that brought me out of it.

                I agree, Mark. I have yet to meet a "true believer"

                1. secondsamuel profile image61
                  secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  This remark also is an insult to me and other Christians. you are implying that you and a few others, the ones that agree with you (me not included) are the only 'TRUE BELIEVERS". I don't think that is very Christ like. To god be the Glory

                  1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
                    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    So be it then.  You can't please everyone all the time.  If the shoe fits...........
                    What would you know of Christ-like anyway-Jesus didn't come to give everyone a high, it said that he came to set everyone against each other--now why would he do that abd why are christians pertraying him as some meek and mild manners person.
                    To God be the Glory-that is correct becasue we are made of him so we can not be anything else but what he made us of and that was him........

                  2. maestrowhit profile image61
                    maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    I was including myself, meaning I don't think anyone really believes in SOME of the supposed realities presented by Christianity. Not all of it. No one is right and no one is wrong. That's not what this is about.

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Lady G (I shorten it because I can't spell it);

    I also have the same problem that when I delete text, it gives me an error message. This website forum has antiquated program language.

    I like the NIV translation best, and bible.org recently translated the Bible, and it is perfect, too.

    1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      But it isn't the tru version with the correct words that were used and translated.  Church was not in the original text and neither was Satan.  All I am asking you all to do is read this other texts and books stuff.  That is all.

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Mark;

    I am not saying that I am up for arguing this with you, but this is a problem for me:

    You said, "If you think whatever translation of the bible you just read is perfect and gives you all the proof and knowledge you need, you are not going to accept it when some one proves that is not the case."

    It would seem to me that you would be obligated to prove this statement, though. No one prompted this statement from you that I can see. It appears that you are saying that you can prove that the Bible is false. I want to see that proof. Do you have it?

    1. Mark Knowles profile image59
      Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Yes of course. Lady Guinevere actually posted some links showing that the current bible is not as it was originally written and there is much evidence to support this statement. What did you think of those links ?

      By the same token. You stated that the bible.org translation of the bible is "perfect." What evidence do you have of this?

  • t.keeley profile image76
    t.keeleyposted 16 years ago

    SS, I'd disagree. We are given the desire for God. That desire is incapable of being denied, in other words once you're drawn you cannot ignore or rebel against it. It's so powerful that all those who are drawn to God inevitably will be redeemed. That's a facet of theology that has been around since Paul's epistles, since he himself preached such doctrine.

    We want to give man a will. It's part of our pride. We "feel" good when we have a part in our own salvation. It's possible to say that, as a result, we bridge the gap from man to God by taking the last 25% of the process "into our own hands."

    "Not by works of righteousness that we have done, but according to His mercy, He saved us. By the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Spirit."

    I see nothing of man choosing God here. It's taught by Christ in John chapter 6 as well.

    If you can say we have a will, that will means man has part in his own redemption. According to the Bible, that's impossible.

    1. Ben Bush profile image60
      Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      The only problem with that is that you are compelled to give God credit for everything man has done. That includes the original deception and sin by Adam and Eve.

      If we can't resist this drawing by God, then man certainly couldn't resist the original temptation set up by God.

      Which makes a joke out of every facet of life, including this forum and every action taken on it. We all are simply a group of automatons simply acting out God's original plan  of???????????

      You're right, it has been around since Paul's epistles, but it wasn't taught by Paul. It was addressed by Paul in the overall body of his teaching.

    2. maestrowhit profile image61
      maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you very much. Said well.

    3. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Man's will (is) man's pride. Man's will is set against all that is of God until God draws man to Himself (this process could take years or it could take minutes or seconds depending on how strong the will of any given man is) some men are just more stubborn (pride) than others.Study the story of Peter (i won't take the space it would require) but briefly Jesus once said to Peter "get thee behind me satan" Jesus was speaking to the will of Peter. I could make a big long defense of my belief just with the story of Peter, But you appear to ba a learned man so I won't bore you with stories you think you understand. Have you ever read a novel once? I'm sure you have. Did you remember every detail within the contents of that novel? All I'm saying is you can't see the forest for the tree, step back and get a better view..........lol........SS

      1. maestrowhit profile image61
        maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        you aren't making a point here. You're making claims and not explaining them. Have you considered it is you who isn't seeing the forest?

        1. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          I can clearly see the forest and I am sorry that obviously you can't but I love you any way:)

  • t.keeley profile image76
    t.keeleyposted 16 years ago

    BB, man is responsible for his sin. I think I made that pretty clear. That doesn't mean we don't have a will, but read Luther's "Bondage of the Will" and you'll see what I mean. Man is slave to his sin. It doesn't mean we're not able to make decisions against God. It merely means we're guaranteed to make sinful decisions without God. God alone is responsible for righteousness. Man has no part in it. We're not machines of God, we're machines of ourselves. In the end, only Christ frees us from that.

    Define what Christ is, if you want to. I've decided who He is to me thru careful reading of His Word coupled with teachings of much wiser men than myself.

    Man is free. At least as free as his sin allows him to be. Which means, in the end, we're dead to ourselves. If that's the case, I re-submit I have yet to see someone raise themselves from the dead without Christ.

  • t.keeley profile image76
    t.keeleyposted 16 years ago

    Ephesians 2, from BibleGateway:

    1And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;

    2Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:

    3Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.

    4But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,

    5Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved;)

    6And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:

    7That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.

    8For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:

    9Not of works, lest any man should boast.

    10For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.

    11Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;

    12That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

    13But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

    14For he is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us;

    15Having abolished in his flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

    16And that he might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:

    17And came and preached peace to you which were afar off, and to them that were nigh.

    18For through him we both have access by one Spirit unto the Father.

    19Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;

    20And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;

    21In whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord:

    22In whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.


    ---

    I realise this can be interpreted many ways. I will say, however, this strictly says without Christ nothing happens for the sanctification of the saints, much less the redemption.

    I see nothing of man's will here. This is a Pauline epistle as well, so he clearly taught that without God's drawing of man and Christ's redemtpion and the Spirit's sanctification...well, nothing righteous happens. We can sin til we're blue in the face, but attempt to glorify God on your own and the only thing you'll get is morals driven by human pride.

  • Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago

    Why did God cause the flood?  Was Noah the perfect human being?  Didn't God wash away all the world's wickedness and sin in that flood?  Then he had to send Jesus to tell us that there is no sin and all that?  If the sin and the fallen angels were all drowned--where did sin come from then and why did Jesus have to come and just re-do what God had done in the Flood?
    The greatest sin is suppression of knowledge..........you can see that all over the earth with the stealing of pagan customs for political gains and burning of the Library of Alexandria and now exclaiming that everything that is not the same as the modern translations of the Bible are all of some other entitiy, that was supposed to have been drowned in that flood...........where does religion stop and believe what is there in front of their eyes?  I know why----money--it is the root of all eveil and the religions are capitalizing on it............does it make it right and others wrong--sure does cause money talks and money is power....

  • t.keeley profile image76
    t.keeleyposted 16 years ago

    Good question LG. The only thing that comes to mind is that I'm not God, and I'm glad for that. I also am not one to question whether or not God's in the right or wrong or "why bad things happen to good people." One day we'll all either be right or wrong or whatever else remains. smile

  • Mark Knowles profile image59
    Mark Knowlesposted 16 years ago

    Oh, and I had to share this one:

    http://markpknowles.com/wp-content/uploads/believerjerk.gif

    big_smile

    1. Ben Bush profile image60
      Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Could that be a fill in the blank quote?smile

  • Mark Knowles profile image59
    Mark Knowlesposted 16 years ago

    big_smile

    That would work too big_smile

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Mark;

    I did try to read the links Lady G. posted. A couple of them are familiar, so I did not need to check them out. I am sure you did not however, since these were mostly just websites with tons of places I might go, no big deal. the articles that had a specific destination were no big deal. I did not see anything all that exciting, certainly not revolutionary or anything that could hinge a decision like whether the Bible is coorrect. That is just my opinion anyway.

    I probably am biased who I think the biblical scholars are, but I know who I trust. Maybe that is because I know them personally. Maybe because I have a very extensive background in ancient history and language. Who cares, though.

    Posting a bunch of links is not a good way to make a point here. You know that. I read them because I want to know where Lady G. is coming from. I do not consider most of what she posted lies, by the way. Actually most of it is what I also know. Some of it is not. I can make a case for my interpretations being different than what I read and disagreed with, too. I try to do that with commentary based on common sense. I prefer not to post scriptures without explanation, as some have asked I not do that. I actually agree with that. If I do not have an opinion about it that I can defend, the scriptures are far more subtle than just to post them in most cases.

    She shared good information, and from what I read, I believe that the Bible is 100% correct. I cannot prove that is it is 100% right, but if it is not, then someone needs to prove why not. A list of really good links will not do it.

    1. Mark Knowles profile image59
      Mark Knowlesposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      OK, but I believe the point she was making is that there is more than one bible. More than one interpretation. More than one instance where words and meanings in the bible have been changed.

      You said that you liked the NIV translation and that the bible.org translation was also perfect. So rather than just add links to offsite information, I will paste some information regarding the NIV, which I believe the bible.org version is also "interpreted" from:

      Assalamu-`alaykum wa rahamatullahi wa barakatuhu:
      1. Introduction

      The New International Version (NIV) of the Bible, produced during the 1960s and 1970s by a committee of more than one hundred scholars, has become the preeminent translation trusted by millions of Christians worldwide. The goal of this translation was to convey in modern English the message of the Bible’s original authors. The success of the NIV Bible can be seen in the fact that in each year since 1987 it has outsold the classic King James Version (KJV) Bible. Given such a smashing success of the NIV Bible, some people have seen the "invisible" hand of Trinitarian deity in its success and started to consider it as the "word" of God. This is very similar to what some people have felt about the KJV Bible. It is worth noting that the belief in the virtual inspiration and divine preservation of any translation has no basis in Christian theology.

      The success of the NIV Bible also found its detractors. Some have called the New International Version as the New International Perversion. Our aim, however, is not to look into reasons for the NIV Bible's success or the arguments of its detractors. Nor are we interested in bogus debates such as the NIV versus the KJV Bible because they are simply translations whether in modern or in the Jacobean English. Our aim is to look into the textual sources used in the translation of the NIV Bible. Are they, what Christians claim to be the "Word" of God? Do they qualify as the "Word" of God? If not, then why not? In this article, we will show that the textual sources used in the translation of the NIV Bible are "eclectic". These "eclectic" sources do not represent either the "original" text or the "inspired" text.

      2. The NIV Bible On Its Textual Sources

      What sources does the NIV Bible use for its translation? It is instructive to read what the Preface of the NIV Bible says. According to the Preface, the textual sources for the Old Testament in the NIV Bible are:




          For the Old Testament the standard Hebrew text, the Masoretic Text as published in the latest editions of Biblia Hebraica, was used throughout. The Dead Sea Scrolls contain material bearing on an earlier stage of Hebrew text. They were consulted, as were the Samaritan Pentateuch and the ancient scribal traditions relating to textual changes. Sometimes a variant Hebrew reading in the margin of the Masoretic Text was followed instead of the text itself. Such instances, being variant within the Masoretic tradition, are not specified by footnotes. In rare cases, words in the consonantal text were divided differently from the way they appear in the Masoretic Text. Footnotes indicate this. The translators also consulted the more important early versions - the Septuagint; Aquila, Symmachus and Theodotion; the Vulgate; the Syriac Peshitta; the Targums; and for the Psalms the Juxta Hebraica of Jerome. Readings from these versions were occasionally followed where the Masoretic Text seemed doubtful and where accepted principles of textual criticism showed that one or more of these textual witnesses appeared to provide the correct reading. Such instances are footnoted. Sometimes vowel letters and vowel signs did not, in the judgment of the translators, represent the correct vowels for the original consonantal text. Accordingly some words were read with a different set of vowels. These instances are usually not indicated by footnotes.[1]

      As for the Greek text of the New Testament, the Preface says:

          The Greek text used in translating the New Testament was an eclectic one. No other piece of ancient
          literature has such an abundance of manuscript witnesses as does the New Testament. Where existing
          manuscripts differ, the translators made their choice of readings according to accepted principles of New
          Testaments textual criticism. Footnotes call attention to places where there was uncertainty about what the
          original text was. The best current printed texts of the Greek New Testaments were used.[2]

      In other words, the sources that were used for the NIV Bible are based on critical texts and are usually refered to as "eclectic" texts. An "eclectic text" is composed of elements drawn from various sources.

      Let us now look into the "eclectic" sources that the NIV Bible uses and see whether they qualify as God's "inspired" and "inerrant" words.

      3. Biblia Hebraica: The "Inspired" Old Testament?

      Biblia Hebraica is one of the best-known critical texts of the Hebrew Old Testament and is the standard source for printed Bibles. It was first edited by Gerhard Kittel. The fouth edition of Biblia Hebraica is called Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia (BHS) (edited by Karl Elliger and Wilhelm Rudolph) and was authorized by the Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft and the United Bible Societies. Earl Kalland, writing in "How The Hebrew And Aramaic Old Testament Text Was Established" in The NIV: The Making Of A Contemporary Translation, describes the material that the translators of the NIV Bible used for the Old Testament:

          While the NIV translators generally used the Kittel Biblia Hebraica published by the Privilegierte Wutembergische Bibelanstalt of Stuttgart and available in the United States through the American Bible Society, until the later edition called Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia was made available, other sources within the framework of the various translators' expertise were considered....

          The text of Biblia Hebraica itself, as well as other critical texts, has its own history resulting more or less in an eclectic text. The evaluation of the critical materials in Biblia Hebraica was constantly in review.[3]

      The reason why an "eclectic text" such as Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia exists is because the history of the Masoretic Text[4] itself was fluid. There is no textual source that can be called as "the" biblical text. Emanuel Tov, J. L. Magnes Professor of Bible at Hebrew University and the editor-in-chief of the Dead Sea Scrolls publication project, says:

          The biblical text has been transmitted in many ancient and medieval sources which are known to us from modern editions in different languages: We now have manuscripts (MSS) in Hebrew and other languages from the Middle Ages and ancient times as well as fragments of leather and papyrus scrolls two thousand years old or more. These sources shed light on and witness to the biblical text, hence their name: "textual witnesses." All of these textual witnesses differ from each other to a greater or lesser extent. Since no textual source contains what could be called "the" biblical text, a serious involvement in biblical studies clearly necessitates the study of all sources, including the differences between them. The comparison and analysis of these textual differences hold a central place within textual criticism.[5]

      Similarly, Kalland points out that:

          The rise of Christianity gave impetus to the Jewish scribes (sopherim) to standardize their texts. Many variations in these texts had already appeared, as is evident from the differences between Greek, Samaritan and Hebrew manuscripts - and even more evident in the Dead Sea Scrolls....

          Simply stated, there exists no single text that can be called as the Masoretic Text (except as a generalization). That is one of the reasons why critical texts like Biblia Hebraica exist. The editors of such texts decided what to them was most likely reading of the original. This becomes their text. Then they place in margins the variants and the support for their text and for the variants.[6]

      The Kittel's edition of Biblia Hebraica and its fourth edition Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia is based upon the Codex Leningradensis (L).[7] It is the oldest complete manuscript of the Hebrew Bible dated to 1008 CE and is based upon the textual work of Ben Asher. One can say that the Biblia Hebraica attempts to be a faithful representation of a single manuscript, i.e., Codex Leningradensis. But in those places where Codex Leningradensis is defective, or most likely preserves a faulty reading, the critical apparatus is essential for evaluating the other possible readings from other important sources such as Samaritan Pentateuch, the Septuagint, Peshitta, Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) etc. However, scholars have cautioned that Biblia Hebraica does not cite all the readings/evidences and whatever readings/evidences are cited is dependent upon scholar's insights. Errors can creep in due to assumptions. Ralph W. Klein says:

          The common mistake in Old Testament textual studies is to resort to LXX only when the MT, for one reason or another, seems difficult or corrupt. This procedure falls prey to two pitfalls..... In this connection, the following warnings about the uses of apparatuses in Biblia Hebraica must also be issued:

          The apparatuses do not cite all synonymous readings or all the evidence for shorter and longer readings. The reason for omitting some of the evidence for variants in LXX or the other versions may be related to the assumption that the MT is correct except where it is obviously difficult or corrupt.

          The textual notes in the 1937 edition and in the current reissue are done by a great number of scholars whose presuppositions and assumptions vary and who are gifted with a wide range of text critical insight.

          The notes and emendations are often focused only on one word or expression , thus neglecting the wider context in the LXX or other ancient versions.

          The apparatuses in the 1937 edition contain errors of fact, as Harry M. Orlinsky has tirelessly pointed out. Many emendations offered are merely conjectures, without manuscript or versional support. While conjectures are at times necessary, they are by definition the most subjective of operations...

          In sum, Biblia Hebraica is a helpful collection of variants and scholarly suggestions, but it must be used critically.[8]

      Similarly, Waltke also points out the severe shortcomings of Kittel's Biblia Hebraica as well as modern day editions of Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia.

          Unfortunately, its critical apparatus swarms with errors of commission and omission, as Orlinsky put it. A new edition, Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia... is now appearing in fascicles. In addition to making minor changes, the editors, K. Elliger and W. Rudolph, inform the reader that the contributers "have exercised considerable restraint in conjectures." This welcome restraint, in marked contrast to the earlier editions of Kittel's Bible, shows that, as the result of the discovery of the DSS, scholars have learned a new appreciation for the credibility of the received text. Unfortunately, the apparatus followed by Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia continues to swarm with errors of omission and commission and therefore cannot be depended on.[9]

      Therefore, it is not difficult to imagine that the critical text of the Old Testament as represented by Biblia Hebraica, with all its imperfections and shortcoming, aims for the earliest attainable form of the Hebrew text that can be discerned on the basis of the surviving manuscript evidence. There is no basis for the claim that Biblia Hebraica represents the "original" and "inspired" text of the Hebrew Bible, although a textual critic can say that it is an attempt to establish the "original" text of the Bible using imperfect and late manuscripts. This is more than clear if one reads the translator's manual for the preparation of the NIV Bible, where the stress is on using the best possible text of the source material than the "original" text.

          The Committee on Bible Translation for the New International Version produced a translator's manual as a guide for those who were to engage in the endeavor. This manual, in very simple terms relating to the text of the Scripture, declares:

              Translators shall employ the best possible texts of the Hebrew and Greek with significant variants noted in the draft notes even though they may not necessarily be in the final printed product. Important text variations which are not adopted in the body of the work should be noted in the margin for the consideration of higher committees.

              In general the approach to textual matters should be restrained. The Masoretic O.T. text is not to be followed absolutely if a Septuagint or other reading is quite likely correct. All departures from the M.T. are to be noted by the translators in the margin.[10]

      Given the above facts concerning the textual sources of the Old Testament in the NIV Bible, one can accurately say that the Biblia Hebraica is neither "inspired" nor an "original" text. Let us now focus our attention on the sources used for the translation of the New Testament in the NIV Bible.

      4. Is The United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament "Inspired" Then?

      Well, let us see what Ralph Earle writing in "The Rational For An Eclectic New Testament Text" in The NIV: The Making Of A Contemporary Translation says:

          What Greek text was used by the translators of the NIV New Testament? It was basically that found in the United Bible Societies' and Nestle's printed Greek New Testament which contain the latest and best Greek text available.

          In many passage there is no way of being absolutely certain as to what was the original reading because the best Greek manuscripts, both earlier and later ones, have variant readings. In such cases the translators were asked to weigh the evidence carefully and make their own decision. Of course, such decision was subject to reexamination by the Committee on Bible Translation. In the UBS text, the adopted readings are marked with an A, B, C, or D. Those marked "A" are virtually certain, "B" less certain, "C" doubtful and "D" high doubtful. It is the last, especially, that have to be weighed carefully.[11]

      The textual source used for the translation of the NIV New Testament is again a critical text. Does the use of critical text here mean we have the "original" text with us? Dr. David Parker, a New Testament scholar from University of Birmingham, adds a word of caution and differentiate between what is desirable, i.e., to know the "original" text and what can be extracted from the colossal mass of variant readings in the New Testament manuscripts.

          We have, however, to distinguish at any rate between the desirable and attainable. Caution rightly prevails in the Introduction to the most common used edition of the Greek New Testament, the small blue volume known as Nestle-Aland:

              Novum Testamentum Graece seeks to provide the reader with the critical appreciation of the whole textual tradition... It should naturally be understood that this text is a working text (in the sense of the century-long Nestle tradition); it is not to be considered as definitive, but as a stimulus to further efforts towards redefining and verifying the text of the New Testament.[12]

      Dr. Parker emphasizes the fact that the text in the Nestle-Aland's Novum Testamentum Graece edited by Kurt Aland and Barbara Aland (27th edition, Stuttgart, 1993) was agreed upon by the committee as the "best" reading (hence a working text!) and it has nothing to do with the "original" text.

          This text was agreed by a committee. When they disagreed on the best reading to print, they voted. Evidently, they agreed either by a majority or unanimously that their text was the best available. But it does not follow that they believed their text to be 'original'. On the whole, the textual critics have always been reluctant to claim so much. Other users of the Greek New Testament accord them too much honour in treating the text as definitive.[13]

      As far as the Novum Testamentum Graece is concerned, one can say that the committee itself does not make a claim that it restored the "original" text of the New Testament. Kurt Aland and Barbara Aland inform us about the various problems with the committee text.

          A "committee text" of this kind is occasionally regarded as problematical, and at times it may be so. In a number of instances it represents a compromise, for none of the editors can claim a perfect acceptance record of all recommendations offered.[14]

      Since Nestle-Aland's critical edition is very complicated to be used in the translation of the New Testament in other languages, there was a growing need for new edition of Greek New Testament which would serve this purpose. This need was materialised in the form of The Greek New Testament (of course, based on Nestle-Aland's critical text) which has the following features:

               1. A critical apparatus restricted for the most part to variant readings significant for translators or necessary for establishing the text;
               2. An indication of the relative degree of certainty for each variant adopted as text;
               3. A full citation of the representative evidence for each variant selected;
               4. A second apparatus giving meaningful differences of punctuation. Much new evidence from Greek manuscripts and early versions has been cited. A supplementary volume, providing a summary of the Committee's reasons for adopting one or another variant reading, will also be published.[15]

      This edition is similar to the Nestle-Aland's critical edition except that it has more details on the textual variants and their relative degree of certainty.

          By means of the letters A, B, C, and D, enclosed within "braces" { } at the beginning of each set of textual variants the Committee has sought to indicate the relative degree of certainty, arrived at the basis of internal considerations as well as of external evidence, for the reading adopted as the text. The letter A signifies that the text is virtually certain, while B indicates that there is some degree of doubt. The letter C means that there is a considerable degree of doubt whether the text or the apparatus contains the superior reading, while D shows that there is a very high degree of doubt concerning the reading selected for the text.[16]

      The committee for the United Bible Societies' Greek New Testament at one point of time consisted of Kurt Aland, Matthew Black, Bruce Metzger, Allen Paul Wikgren and Carlo Maria Martini. The picture below shows them involved in discussions dealing with textual variants in the Greek New Testament. Also notice that on the blackboard, the manuscripts with their short-hand notation are depicted against the letters A, B, C and D for a reading.


      http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Bible/Text/Canon/gntcommittee.jpg

      So, if you are making a case that the bible is the "Word of god," clearly when there is a human vote on how it should be translated, this does not make sense. And as to it being "perfect," I would ask how you came to that conclusion?

      Although, I think it is probably better to add links for easier reading next time.

    2. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Sure looks and feels like brainswashed to me.  Thre isn't anything that will change a closed-mind-and you an take that to the bank!  That is where all you money is going anyway.
      So you say that you know who put the books of the bible together and who translated the original text.my you mut be really old and how did you get into the room at the OLD Vatican to do that???

    3. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      You tired, but you didn't read because...let me get this right.....you were too lazy to check out the links???  That is why you like Chruch becasue they tell you all the answers, but you know what--they could be lying to you too.  Case in point--if they were told something that was true, only it was a lie and they spread it around like it was the truth--does it make it the truth?  They are banking on that like persons like you who aren't going to go look up their stuff and trust them to tell you the truth.  You see they don't care if it is the truth because they KNOW that you will not take the time to go look it up.  A lie based on a lie and spread around still makes it a lie.  Now you can turn it around, lke I know that you will, but hey that is your foult for trusting in those people who have lied to you since birth--and you can't blame it on satan or God--only yourself.  It's called being a lazy christian.  They can concoct up anything they want and they know that the congregation they lead will believe them--just like that!

      1. Ben Bush profile image60
        Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Lady,
        Take it easy on him. He can't help it. God made him lazy. After all, he doesn't have a free will, so he just waits till his body moves in a certain direction and performs a certain group of movements and....presto.....action.....God's will is accomplished through him, even if it is laziness. No one is to blame.smile

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Wow--then that means we can all be lazy??  And if bad things happen we can blame no one?  j hhhhmmmm what a concept!

          1. Ben Bush profile image60
            Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            You're right. Great concept!
            Eliminates all responsibility. It's all God's fault....oops......will!big_smile:

            1. maestrowhit profile image61
              maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              People who are lazy are going to be lazy regardless of who's responsibility it is. Same goes for murderers and rapists. They are going to do those crimes whether they know it's their fault or whether they know it's not their fault.

              Do you think that if God was finally disproven to the entire world beyond a shadow of a doubt that everybody would go out and start raping and killing, and eveyone would become a lazy worthless junkie? No, they wouldn't. And if I prove on this forum that free will indeed does not exist, that doesn't change anything. Youre still going to do what you do, and so am I.

              The important thing is that we are better off and more healthy and alive. And being enlightened to the truth enables us to be that way.

              1. secondsamuel profile image61
                secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                the fact that you believe your theory that "free will" is non-existant proves that you your self have "free will"

        2. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          HELLO *&^%)(*# hmm

          1. Make  Money profile image68
            Make Moneyposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            It's just Ben's way of showing how some of the things they are saying are ridiculous.  You know, 'no free will'.  I call it  irony.  I think we are all getting fed up with this thread.  They need to go back and read some posts first before they post again.  It's just there pride speaking now, Lady Guinevere, Sandra and Maestro.

            Mike

            1. secondsamuel profile image61
              secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              Please God............Please forgive them ...they know not what they do roll

              1. maestrowhit profile image61
                maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                It's quite fitting that you would quote that particular phrase from the mouth of Jesus whilst hanging on the cross. Lets look at it.

                Who do you think He was talking about? Was He only talking about the Roman soldiers gathered around Him, beating and taunting Him? Was He talking about the others as well? Or was He talking about all of humanity? Yes, He was. Didn't we all crucify Him with our sins? Or was it just a few of the sinners who crucified Him? No, it was all of us. Because if it wasn't your sin that crucified Him, then you would not be able to benefit from His sacrifice, would you?

                He asked God to forgive us even when we DID NOT KNOW what we were doing. That goes for Atheists, Bhuddists, Muslims, and everyone. You say those people don't know the truth. You say that I don't know the truth. Well, Jesus says, Father forgive them, for they DON"T KNOW THE TRUTH.

                Do you think God denied His request to forgive us while we didn't know what we were doing? Does God deny any of the Son's requests? I don't think so. How is anyone to make a choice in thier heart when they don't even know that one needs to be made? God understood this, and forgave us when we weren't even aware that we needed it.

                I want to tell you all that I'm not on here to prove anything. I'm on here to spread the positive message of God so that maybe someone can sleep a little easier, or think a little clearer, or feel a little safer. I cannot prove what I'm saying. If you don't see it, I can't show it to you.

                1. maestrowhit profile image61
                  maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                  Here is what I was referring to

                  1. secondsamuel profile image61
                    secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    And all the brethen said..............AMEN

                    This is my own prayer that I voiced by the new spirit controled free will. I am free in Christ because I have recieved Him. I have recieved His words.


                    so when are you going to start telling the (WHOLE) truth? no harm intended (just a question)
                    the bible clearly shows there is also a negative side to the message of God

                    John 3:18 (New King James Version)
                    18 “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God

                    for those of you that a problem with different interpretations. I submit to you, why would this passage even need any interpretation. It says what it says. It says it so clearly that even I myself am not going to give my interpretation, there is no need. TO GOD BE THE GLORY:)

                  2. maestrowhit profile image61
                    maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                    Ben - you never commented on this post. Maybe you didn't see it.

              2. mohitmisra profile image60
                mohitmisraposted 16 years agoin reply to this

                I believe its the other way around smile forgive them as they think they are greater than you.You have made this entire cosmos but they make their own thoughts smile

            2. maestrowhit profile image61
              maestrowhitposted 16 years agoin reply to this

              you really like to judge people's intentions don't you? You like to say people are operating off of pride. Do you really think you know enough about me to say that?

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Second Samuel;

    It is an honor to work with you. This will all work out for the best for Him. Thank You!

    1. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      by scolding him calling him a liar and a coward further pushing him to push against you guys? 

      Aren't ya'll supposed to be forgiving and faithful and kind hearted and compassionate and understanding and caring and graceful and meek and [btolerant[/b]?

      1. Ben Bush profile image60
        Ben Bushposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Sandra,

        Don't forget "Truthful."smile

      2. viralprospector profile image60
        viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Sandra;

        Mostly, we are supposed to be honest and moral. I don't think it is good to smoochie poochie with evil.

        You ask, "Aren't ya'll supposed to be forgiving and faithful and kind hearted and compassionate and understanding and caring and graceful and meek and [btolerant[/b]"

        The answer is that I feel that I should respond as it is best. If I think someone is doing wrong, I should point that out. I think he is doing wrong, so I am pointing it out to him. If someone needs help, I should help them. I do not think Maestrowhit feels he needs help, so why should I help him? Wouldn't that be a waste of time at best? At worst, wouldn't he say nasty things to me?

  • Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago

    Matthew 10:33-38 (King James Version)
    33But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

    34Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.

    35For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

    36And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

    37He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me.

    38And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    1. Make  Money profile image68
      Make Moneyposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      The purpose of the coming of our Saviour was not meant to "set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law" but His coming and His doctrine would have that effect because of the obstinate resistance that many would have to it.

      Like we see in this thread and others.

  • profile image0
    sandra rinckposted 16 years ago

    ...so let me see if I get it yet.  The truth is a lie, a lie is the truth, if you have free will you do not have free will and if you do not have free will then you do not have free will, and Jesus is not good, and God is not bad and Christianity is the truth about a lie and Satan has no place to go. 

    Because...umm....God does not exist and people do but people aren't people they are animals like a dog and there is no such thing as Hell by the definition given by most Christains and no one can see God but the people in the Bible and no one today is believed to have been seen by the Spirit unless they can build a big church with all their money that Jesus said not to do, and obeying the 10 commandments is a crime even though Jesus said if you love him then obey the commandments...

    but people who obey the commandments are called jews and therefore are Jesus killers and to believe that people are in the heart of Jesus means that your a calvinist, and even though the scripture has changed many times over the years, and believed to have been the word of God, you say that God has not changed?

    And so even though you know that a lot of it has been changed you still insist on telling it as the truth without question even though you have nothing to back it up other than how you feel about a particular translation?

    Sounds to me like there are a bunch of cowards around ready to keep telling a lie and unable to establish any truth but you will be forgiven if you pick the right translation and spread the good news etc...

    But spreading the good news means that you have to tell the bad news to and if people do not comply then the good news is you are going to hell and if you keep telling lies then you will go to heaven.

    Seems to me that Christianity, and I mean no personal offence to anyone, but it seems to me that most Christians have it backasswords.  smile

  • Lady Guinevere profile image67
    Lady Guinevereposted 16 years ago

    James 2
    1My brethren, do not have the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, [Lord] of glory, with respect of persons:

    2for if there come unto your synagogue a man with a gold ring in splendid apparel, and a poor man also come in in vile apparel,

    3and ye look upon him who wears the splendid apparel, and say, Do thou sit here well, and say to the poor, Do thou stand there, or sit here under my footstool:

    4have ye not made a difference among yourselves, and become judges having evil thoughts?

    5Hear, my beloved brethren: Has not God chosen the poor as to the world, rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom, which he has promised to them that love him?

    6But *ye* have despised the poor [man]. Do not the rich oppress you, and [do not] *they* drag you before [the] tribunals?

    7And [do not] *they* blaspheme the excellent name which has been called upon you?

    8If indeed ye keep [the] royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well.

    9But if ye have respect of persons, ye commit sin, being convicted by the law as transgressors.

    10For whoever shall keep the whole law and shall offend in one [point], he has come under the guilt of [breaking] all.

    11For he who said, Thou shalt not commit adultery, said also, Thou shalt not kill. Now if thou dost not commit adultery, but killest, thou art become transgressor of [the] law.

    12So speak ye, and so act, as those that are to be judged by [the] law of liberty;

    13for judgment [will be] without mercy to him that has shewn no mercy. Mercy glories over judgment.

    14What [is] the profit, my brethren, if any one say he have faith, but have not works? can faith save him?

    15Now if a brother or a sister is naked and destitute of daily food,

    16and one from amongst you say to them, Go in peace, be warmed and filled; but give not to them the needful things for the body, what [is] the profit?

    17So also faith, if it have not works, is dead by itself.

    18But some one will say, *Thou* hast faith and *I* have works. Shew me thy faith without works, and *I* from my works will shew thee my faith.

    19*Thou* believest that God is one. Thou doest well. The demons even believe, and tremble.

    20But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?

    21Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he had offered Isaac his son upon the altar?

    22Thou seest that faith wrought with his works, and that by works faith was perfected.

    23And the scripture was fulfilled which says, Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness, and he was called Friend of God.

    24Ye see that a man is justified on the principle of works, and not on the principle of faith only.

    25But was not in like manner also Rahab the harlot justified on the principle of works, when she had received the messengers and put [them] forth by another way?

    26For as the body without a spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead.

    1. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      You go girl big_smile

  • Make  Money profile image68
    Make Moneyposted 16 years ago

    Lady Guinevere it doesn't matter if you put the whole Bible in here, it will still come to the same conclusion that faith without works is dead.  We have to take responsibility for our actions, not blame God for everything like people that believe in predestination do.  Predestination is a cop-out for many.   

    Sandra my works in this forum thread are basically the same as Ben, secondsamuel, viralprospector and now even Mark and others to show that we have to take responsibility for what we do and do good works.

    Actually I'm starting to enjoy Ben's irony.  It would be different if you understood it.

    1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I do agree with you that we need to take responsibility for our own actions-good and bad.  I also believe that there are no bad works, because we all get it back in the end or somewhere in between.  What goes around, comes around.  I'd rather be humble and do good works so they come back to me as such.  Then you have the good intentions that come back not so good--or so we are lead to believe.  20/20 hindsight--if we only had that before sight!!

    2. profile image0
      sandra rinckposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      well, you keep telling yourself whatever you need to tell yourself.  I think meastro said it plain and simple, that you have to take responsiblity for your own actions and stop blaming God or Satan for everything that you do, but of course like a good christain you are, you totally took his works and turned it into something that it wasn't meant to be. 

      *shaking my head in pitty*

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Lady G;

    I could not see how you could be more wrong. That is an absurd characterization of Second Samuel. It makes you look like you are clueless to miss a person's true character by so much. I see no ego in Second Samuel, just true and sincere concern for the welfare of his son. I would not expect the group to grasp what he is doing. I think he is absolutley on the money, albeit a lot less critical than I am of the situation.

    "Chill out man!!  Your ego is showing.....my what a big one you have...."

    1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Cutting someone down is not high on anyones best character list.  There you go........................  You may not, but some of us do-so we are all wrong then, I supppose..................and it looks like that apology was fake too--hmmmmm.

      1. viralprospector profile image60
        viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Lady G;

        I am sorry if you think I was cutting you down. I was just being totally honest. I apologize for the "clueless" remark. I did not edit the post. However, you have been absolutely cutting me to ribbons, post after post on this thread. Please go back and read all the posts you made to me. I was aghast. I was sincerely not trying to retaliate, but I guess after reading how low you have cut me, I guess it seemed OK at the time.

        However, for you to say that I was the guilty party shows that you are clueless. Sorry, it was not a good joke.

        1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
          Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          The comment wasn't to you but was in response t the comment about SS and his son's converstaion that you brought up.
          I don't see how giving you bible verses and links are cutting you to ribbons.
          In being that I was pointing to another convo, I was not saying that you were a guilty party.
          Joke?  Hahaha
          Whatever floats your boat, man!

          1. viralprospector profile image60
            viralprospectorposted 16 years agoin reply to this

            Well, maybe you think it is OK to call me brainwashed, closed minded and lazy… However, those certainly seemed to me as you might be, well, maybe cutting me down just a tad?

            You surmised that I did not read your links, and I said I did. I could not figure out how to feel like that built me up, you know? Then you chewed me out for not doing it. While not exactly insulting me only, you also said the Bible is not correct. That just did not feel all that uplifting either.

            So, if you want to think that you did not cut me down, then please don't start now...

  • viralprospector profile image60
    viralprospectorposted 16 years ago

    Ben;

    Explanation of what Lady G wrote to me, please...

    "Lady,
    Take it easy on him. He can't help it. God made him lazy. After all, he doesn't have a free will, so he just waits till his body moves in a certain direction and performs a certain group of movements and....presto.....action.....God's will is accomplished through him, even if it is laziness. No one is to blame."

  • profile image0
    SirDentposted 16 years ago

    Rev 22:17  And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is athirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely.

    The word will is used and also one can only come if they are willing to come.  It doesn't say I will drag you and force you to drink. I just don't understand how such a simple concept can be made so complicated.

    Mat 6:10  Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.

    Either God's will be done or the will of man?

    Luk 22:42  Saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.

    Fairly straightforward if you ask me. We can give our will over to another person, object, addiction etc. . . Or we can have free will. Just because you are tempted to do something, doesn't mean that you have to choose to do it.

    1. Lady Guinevere profile image67
      Lady Guinevereposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Correct!

      1. Make  Money profile image68
        Make Moneyposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Well I'm glad you finally agree Lady.  That's what we have been trying to say all along.

    2. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      thank you Sir to God be the Glory

  • Make  Money profile image68
    Make Moneyposted 16 years ago

    Spot on secondsamuel

    From John 1:11 & 12



    Note maestrowhit, "He came unto his own, and his own received him not"

    Why do you think that they "received him not"?  Could it possibly have something to do with their free will?

  • Make  Money profile image68
    Make Moneyposted 16 years ago

    There is forgiveness every day secondsamuel.  If they want to ask for it with a contrite heart.

    Nobody is saved until they meet their judgment day.

    1. secondsamuel profile image61
      secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      HALLELUIA!!!!!!!!!!!   lol

      1. secondsamuel profile image61
        secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Why hasn't anyone brought up the doctrine of baptisim? Hmmm..Interesting...hmm

        1. secondsamuel profile image61
          secondsamuelposted 16 years agoin reply to this

          Oh!!! I know why!!! because if you went and got your self dunked (which is what Jesus commanded us to do) then that would require some kind of action on our part...... I'm sorry, I forgot we have no "free will" but that's OK, God will just put us in a trance and we will walk to the waters, submerge ourselves without even batting an eye. Aint God good that way?
          To God be the Glory...smile

  • Post a Reply
    jump to first post
     
    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
    ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)