Uh-oh! I can logically prove with one statement that God is real.

Jump to Last Post 1-18 of 18 discussions (91 posts)

60
paradigmsearchposted 11 years ago
If something can exist, then it does exist.
reply report
1. 60
  mischeviousmeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It can only exist, if said existance is verifiable....
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I thought you only believed in subjective reality
  reply report
  60
  mischeviousmeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I didn't say I believed it was subjective, I said the way we judge information is subjective. The views are subjective, not the premise...
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Gotta disagree. History has taught us that things exist that we weren't aware of. Existence can exist without another existence being aware of that existence.
  reply report
  60
  mischeviousmeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Without definition, there are no borders to identify.
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  True. But just because we can't identify them doesn't mean they aren't there.
  reply report
  60
  mischeviousmeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  If it hasn't been seen to identify, then it is labelless and therefor does not exist.
  reply report
2. 59
  Paul Wingertposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  With the existence of physics and gravity, something can be created from nothing - no need for a creater (God).
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  How?
  
  I'd like to know the mechanics of how that would work.
  
  Please supply ONE single bit of evidence that something can be created out of nothing.Even a plausible theory will do.
  reply report
  0
  Emile Rposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yeh. I'm waiting to hear the answer to this one.
  reply report
  59
  Paul Wingertposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Read Stephen Hawken's Story of Everything. Plus the Big Bang was recreated in a lab. If you're not familiar with quantam physics, dark matter and nuclear fusion, I'm not going to waste my time explaining to any of you.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I am very familiar with quantum mechanics.
  
  Now lets hear your plausible theory.
  reply report
  59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You are??? Odd, very few are "very familiar" with quantum field theory. Do you have a phd in physics or something?
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No. But i understand it enough to see that it doesnt provide any plausible theories on how the universe was created out of nothing.
  reply report
  59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Then, it would appear you have no understanding of it at all.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I am glad you are comfortable with scientific explanations for the beginning of the universe.i am not.understanding has nothing to do with acceptance of a theory.
  
  I havent accepted ANY theory, religious or scientific.
  
  You're acceptance of scientific theory is based on belief that verges on religion.
  reply report
  59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  So, you know quantum field theory, yet your posts show evidently a complete lack of any scientific thought whatsoever when you make such a ridiculous claim.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You are still evading my actual question.
  
  How do you think the universe started from nothing?
  
  You may use small words to answer, due to my lack of intelligence.
  reply report
  59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It doesn't matter in the least what I think, we consult cosmologists and physicists for those answers.
  
  I could tell you that the universe was blown out the nose of a giant lizard. Does that help you?
  report
  74
  DoubleScorpionposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I wonder if the universe was created from nothing..How do we know it was created from nothing...Maybe all of the materials were here and it just formed to its current state...Even in the bible, God is described as forming from material already in existance.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Thats the thing. No one knows.
  
  No one.
  reply report
  74
  DoubleScorpionposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yeppers...And I doubt anyone currently alive will figure it out before death. Maybe one day...And if not...We will all find out when we die...either there is something...or there will be nothing...
  reply report
  77
  Crissyliteposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It's something. I always felt that quantam physics supported the existence of God and the spirit realm. Hmm...I still do. It's so amazing.
  reply report
  59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Why do believers constantly fabricate their alleged knowledge of complex scientific theories that they clearly know nothing about and then tell us those theories support their ridiculous claims of gods and spirits?
  
  Dishonesty at it's fullest. It's so amazing.
  reply report
  77
  Crissyliteposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I'm not being dishonest. Nor am I being rude, sir. I am educated. I didn't join Hubpages for this, & I'm not going to entertain you anymore.
  reply report
  0
  Rad Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Interesting comment! According to your comment you don't think something can be created out of nothing, yet here we are. But if you are correct and things don't just appear we (and by we I mean you) have a problem because faith expects you to believe that God has always been there or here. He has no parents, was not made and always will be here. He can create things from nothing and all he wants is our worship. Well, let me ask, how can someone not have a start or a finish when everything else does? That I find much more perplexing that trying to figure out how the big bang happened. You should as well. Some critical things would be a good start.
  reply report
  60
  Eric Newlandposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  To me the idea of something omnipotent having existed perpetually makes more sense than the idea that the universe itself is its own causeless effect. If the universe has always existed, perpetual big bangs and whatnot, it's a wonder that there's anything cohesive left. Matter and energy are preserved, but no reaction is 100% efficient. If the universe is an eternity old, then logically it seems that it should have reached complete and total entropy, well, an eternity ago.
  reply report
  59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Despite the fact there is hard evidence for the latter and none for the former?
  
  Curious thing you call "sense".
  reply report
  60
  Eric Newlandposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, I accept the hard evidence that the universe somehow exists, and that there is strong scientific evidence that somehow a Big Bang started a chain of events leading to where we are today.
  
  It's all about the "somehow." Speaking of science, everything we know says that everything in the universe is governed by cause and effect. And yet the universe itself has no cause? To me this creates a logical gap that seems to demand something that isn't governed by cause and effect to be the initial impetus.
  reply report
  93
  wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Enter the world of quantum mechanics, where little has a cause. Particles pop into and out of existence for no discernable reason. Electrons move about a atom's nucleus with nothing causing that change of location.
  
  The macro world we live in and (somewhat) understand is cause and effect; the fundamentals of the universe that we are just now touching on are not.
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Just because there is no discernable cause doesnt mean there isnt one.
  reply report
  93
  wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Very true. At the same time, however, just because we want there to be a cause (the familiar is comforting, the strange frightening) doesn't mean there is one.
  reply report
  59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  To those who don't understand those theories, it would appear to be all about the "somehow" but to those who do understand, the "somehow" disappears.
  
  Interestingly enough, many of our scientific theories are 'counter-intuitive' in that what we deem to be logical is not logical at all when it comes to understanding those theories, and yet, when we do understand them, they are perfectly logical.
  
  Years ago, I struggled with one of the postulates of relativity trying to understand why the speed of light was a constant and why a space ship that traveled near the speed of light still measured the light at that speed, it was entirely illogical considering how we view our world and how we measure velocities and speeds with moving vehicles.
  
  After much thought and lots of reading, I finally understood it and it all made perfect sense.
  reply report
  0
  Rad Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Eric wrote "If the universe has always existed, perpetual big bangs and whatnot, it's a wonder that there's anything cohesive left. Matter and energy are preserved, but no reaction is 100% efficient. If the universe is an eternity old, then logically it seems that it should have reached complete and total entropy, well, an eternity ago."
  
  Why would you think the universe would burn out? Everything here gets reused over and over. Our energy goes into the ground and creates compost and in turn creates pants which animals eat and something else eats the animals and so on and so on. This is just how the universe behaves, a star dies, it's energy moves on to create another star.
  
  Nothing lives forever, ever. Why would you assign that to a god? It's like everything in the universe has a lifecycle except God that we only think exists. Man has created this God to explain the universe that doesn't follow any of the rules that the universe follows.
  
  I can't be alone in this thinking. It's common sense.
  reply report
  93
  wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Of course God doesn't follow the laws of our universe; He is not of this universe and there is no reason to think that He is subject to our laws.
  
  Mankind made up God, yes, but did not make Him subject to our rules. He can do anything and nothing in our universe can do that. Everything BUT God is subject to the same rules, whether we know and understand them or not; God is not.
  
  If God created our universe He had to exist prior to that and thus cannot be a part of our universe. Common sense.
  reply report
  0
  Rad Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Wow you have a lot of knowledge as to why God does not fit in this universe and how we created him or her. I'm sure it makes perfect sense to you that God is the only thing that doesn't behave within the laws of the universe, created everything as we know it, has always been here and always will be. But, I believe in Santa, he knows if you've been bad or good so be good for goodness sake. Santa never ages and once a year he gives presents to every good boy and girl. And he does this on Gods birthday. Wait, how can God have a birthday? He was never born. I'll take Santa's word for it and keep getting my presents.
  
  We live in a world where everything has a beginning and and ending, our lives, the earth, the sun, the stars, galaxies the universe. Everything without exception. Why would you except that the one thing (God) that we have no proof of it's existence breaks all the known universes rules? Humans invented God in order to explain our existence and to keep people in line (just like Santa), but in doing so we gave him powers that are beyond our universe.
  
  Is this easier for you to swallow than trying to understand why we are here?
  reply report
  93
  wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I grew up in a pretty fundamentalist church so understand what many of the claims are for God.
  
  The rest is merely common sense: if God made the universe He cannot have originated in it and thus would not necessarily have to follow the rules here. Sure, God may have made the universe with rules that He has to follow (although the fundies tell us He has no rules to follow and can do anything He wants to) but there is no reason to think that He did so, either.
  
  No, everything does not have a beginning and end if you exclude the big bang. Energy never ends (dies out) for instance - light will travel forever if it hits nothing to stop it. There is no indication that an atom of Hydrogen will suddenly disintegrate unto nothing without a sun to act on it. Gravity won't suddenly disappear one day. All these things may change somehow, but none disappear into nothingness.
  reply report
  0
  Rad Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Okay, lets for one second assume a God made the universe, but he didn't originate from it. Where did he originate? Of course this is all speculation. I'm not sure what you meant by growing up in a fundamentalist church gave you understanding what many of the claims are for God?
  reply report
  93
  wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  It's not an assumption - just common sense. God cannot have both originated in, and constructed, our universe. First, He is immortal while our universe had a definite beginning whether via the big bang or God (or both). Our universe could not, therefore, have produced God - he had to exist somewhere before that time. It would be like claiming that you made a beautiful painting before you were born - the time frame doesn't fit.
  
  We can call Gods location before creation another universe for discussion sake, but it need not have been. Who knows what is outside our universe (besides God, of course). The location or characteristics of that "place" are immaterial as long as we recognize that neither needs to have any correlation to our own universe.
  
  For years as a child I was pounded with "facts" about God - His omnipotence, His omniscience, His love for the animals He created, His greatness and His demand for worship among other things. Just nothing about what He really is or where He came from. Other churches will of course have other "facts", but some overlap.
  reply report
  0
  Rad Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That's all entertaining, but none of which are facts. God is not Fact. The big bang may not have been the beginning, just a cycle, perhaps explosion and then implosion. We don't know anything about our universe. You have no knowledge of God, just words in a book written by humans.
  
  The God you described perplexes me. If God is great why does he demand worship. That would seem to me to be a character flaw. Seems needy. Oh, and then there's his love for animals that you mentioned. Is his love for them why he invented pain or carnivores. Would his love let them get eaten alive. Sounds much more like something evolution would allow. More of a survival of the fittest thing.
  
  You are mistaken by calling your beliefs facts. You have no facts.
  reply report
  93
  wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Your questions are irrelevant and should be ignored by any right-thinking Theist.
  
  As any believer will tell you, God does exist and questions such as these are best left to unbelievers as they could shake the faith of the weaker believers.
  
  As far as the big bang, it apparently created the entire continuum, including space-time. Without time, even a cyclical universe such as you propose can be considered to start with the "current" big bang.
  report
  0
  Rad Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You have been indoctrinated against asking questions? Why would anyone tell you not to ask questions? Questions are the only way to the truth. I am not trying to tempt you into thinking, I'm just asking question because you seem to have it all figured out.
  report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  This thread has to do with the existence of God. It does not have to do with what kind of God or what He may have been or not been up to.
  reply report
  60
  Eric Newlandposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Where did physics and gravity come from? Why do they exist?
  reply report
  60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I have no idea,and wont pretend i do
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Now that, imho, is a breakthrough statement.
  
  Why, indeed, does existence exist?
  reply report
3. 59
  A Troubled Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Unicorns can exist.
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That does seem genetically possible. Therefore, somewhere on some planet, there they are.
  reply report
60
Eric Newlandposted 11 years ago
I submit internet pornography as proof of your statement.

Well, I mean, I don't literally submit actual internet pornography. The mods might frown on that.
reply report
60
paradigmsearchposted 11 years ago
I really do want to see my op refuted. If it can't be refuted, then Hubpages might see it's first real, live online conversion.
reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
If something cannot exist, then it doesn't exist.
reply report
1. 60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  History has taught us that there are always things greater (and lesser) in virtually every aspect and degree.
  reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
Greater and lessor may be a subjective evaluation. But by golly it sure is fun.
reply report
60
janesixposted 11 years ago
I am not totally convinced that anything even exists at all.
reply report
1. 60
  mischeviousmeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That's the ticket... everything you see is filtered through the brain, then conditioning takes over and attaches the proper meanings. Therefor, it is an illusion of interpretation.
  reply report
2. 60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You think, therefore you exist.
  reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
God is God.
reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
Only does because it doesn't.
reply report
60
paradigmsearchposted 11 years ago
This was a good first run. However, the statement:

"If something can exist, then it does exist.",

has still not yet been refuted.

Keeping in mind everything posted so far, let's try again.

When I posted the op I considered the possibility of refutation to be around 1%. After this first run, I now think the possibility of refutation is greater than 1%. So we are on the right track.
reply report
1. 61
  Jesus was a hippyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  That statement does not follow logically. It is not true. By the logic in your statement, I can be a fighter pilot, therefore I am one.
  
  I'm not one though am I?
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Who said you can be a fighter pilot?
  
  Also, we are talking about existence, not type of existence.
  reply report
  61
  Jesus was a hippyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Your logic still does not follow. A planet made of marshmallow can exist but that doesn't mean it does.
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  And why do you believe that a planet made of marshmallow can exist?
  
  Here is a clarification: Just because one can conceive of something does not mean that particular something can exist.
  reply report
  61
  Jesus was a hippyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I dont. I said it CAN exist.
  
  And you have just debunked your opening statement.
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Here's the op: "If something can exist, then it does exist."
  reply report
  61
  Jesus was a hippyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Who says your god can exist? Isnt that a human conception?
  
  Let go back a bit with a reworded statement.
  
  IF a planet made of marshmallow can exist, then it does exist.
  
  We know that a planet made of marshmallow can exist, therefore, according to your logic, it does.
  
  So where is it?
  
  Chances of refuting your argument now stand at 100%.
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  You keep trying to substitute a specific item ("planet made of marshmallow") into a concept ("something"). It turns the discussion from the concept to the nuances of the specific object.
  
  However, I understand what you are saying. So much so, that you have given me some new insights. In fact, it may be breakthrough time again. Maybe if we tried substituting other items...
  
  HP really should pay us for this. All of us are exceptionally good today.
  reply report
  61
  Jesus was a hippyposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Im drunk
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Well, you are darn good at it.
  reply report
2. 0
  Rad Manposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  "If something can exist, then it does exist."
  I can have seven toes on each foot, but I don't, so my seven toed foot does not exist.
  I can have 3 eyes, but I don't, so my 3 eyed face does not exist.
  I could be richer than Bill Gates right now, but I'm not, so having more money than Bill Gates at this particular moment in time does not exist.
  
  Sorry your wrong. All these things could exist, but don't.
  reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
You are on track. Personally I prefer 'off the reservation'. However have tracks near by here and can hear the trains which I like.
reply report
60
paradigmsearchposted 11 years ago
And how does existence exist?
reply report
1. 60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Seems like things would make more sense if nothing existed.
  
  But things do seem to exist.weird
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I agree. Our current reality makes very little sense to me at all. That's why I keep coming back to the theory that we are all a bunch of lab rats. And that the superior entity that we call "God" may not exactly have our best interests at heart. Thus, if my op is true, and there is indeed a "God".... Then what does one do? It may not be entirely hopeless, but it could be kind of bleak...
  reply report
60
paradigmsearchposted 11 years ago
But neither question refutes nor supports the op. But can either provide a path to do so?

My head hurts.
reply report
60
Eric Newlandposted 11 years ago
Consider the irrational number. An infinite sequence of digits with no pattern. That means that every possible combination of numbers must exist within it at some point.

Thus everything that exists, or has existed, or will exist, or could exist, exists somewhere in the digits of pi in decimal form.
reply report
1. 60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  This does indeed lend more support to the validity of the op.
  reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
http://science.jrank.org/pages/3587/Infinity.html
reply report
1. 60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Yep. The concept of infinity is one of the basic foundations supporting the op. Disprove infinity, and that would successfully refute the op.
  reply report
61
knolyourselfposted 11 years ago
Play the part. It can be quite fun if you are only somewhat serious.
reply report
1. 60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I like that.
  reply report
  60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  In fact, I really like that.
  reply report
60
Eric Newlandposted 11 years ago
The OP does sound a bit like a rewording of Des Cartes' arguments in Meditations on First Philosophy.

I think a reasonable paraphrase is, "Because I can conceive of the possibility of absolute perfection it must exist."
reply report
1. 60
  paradigmsearchposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  No. It is my own original, brilliant thought. However, if I did reinvent the wheel here, then so be it.
  
  Alas, I disagree. I am of the firm belief that just because I can conceive of something, does not mean that that something must exist.
  
  Also, if I do conclude that there is a God. It most definitely does not mean that I think he is a perfect God.
  reply report
  64
  pisean282311posted 11 years agoin reply to this
  @para if something can exist...it applies to varied things....aliens can exist , god can exist , ghost can exist, life not based on carbon model can exist etc etc....but if it can exist , doesnot mean it exist....your point is valid...just because we are not aware about existence of x,y,z it doesnot mean that x,y,z doesnot exist...but at same time since we are not aware of x,y,z ,it also doesnot mean that x,y,z does actually exist...
  reply report
  0
  kimberlyslyricsposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
62
Druid Dudeposted 11 years ago
Statement: If something can go wrong, it will. Murphy's law. If something can go right, it also probably will. Murphy's law in reverse. To every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. So, to every possibility that there is no God, there is an equal and opposite possibility that God does exist. Consider the possibility that the universe is a living organism of a very high order, and that life and consciousness are integral characteristics of the internal physiology of this super organism, which, in and of itself is consciousness beyond anything imaginable. Well, I'm imagining it. Are you?
reply report
1. 60
  janesixposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  I think youre onto something
  reply report
  62
  Druid Dudeposted 11 years agoin reply to this
  Einsteinian physics
  reply report
54
prettydarkhorseposted 11 years ago
sensation versus reality, the duality of the subject to the object
reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Uh-oh! I can logically prove with one statement that God is real.

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Uh-oh! I can logically prove with one statement that God is real.

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies