He was caught gambling. He has been permanently banned from baseball including the Hall of Fame. Is this a fair punishment? Are there other players who have committed worse crimes who are not banned from the game or the Hall of Fame? Should they be banned?
I don't know enough about this overall to say......
but I think it's an important question.
The only team I ever watched was the Cincinnatti Reds, 'cause my Dad loved them. Pete Rose is the name I remember most!
I also remember my Dad being disappointed when he heard about the gambling inside the team.
Pete Rose is one of the greatest players of all time. I'm a Giants fan, and one too young to have been around when the scandal broke, but it is still disappointing. I can't imagine what it was like for a Red's fan.
He deserved a punishment equal to his infractions. I'm not sure a lifetime ban from baseball and the Hall of Fame is fair.
Yes, Pete Rose should be banned. It is not a crime to Gamble. Pete Rose was not banned because he did something illegal. He was banned because he tarnished the product that MLB sells to its customers. You can not have players, coaches, managers, umpires gambling on games and tell the fans that they are watching a real sport. It becomes the WWE.
Pete Rose is not a victim. He knew the consequences of his actions.
You are correct; he is not a victim or guilt-free. He deserves a punishment. Do you think the actions of his gambling changed or could have changed outcomes on the field?
Bud Selig made special consessions to Steinbrenner 's and Joe Torre 's family to maintain and compete, several stables of racing horses. Last time I checked, folks gamble on horses. And Joe don't have 4000+ hits
In my opinion, Pete Rose deserves to be in the All of Fame. He is the greatest hitter the game of baseball has ever seen to this day. Yes, he gambled on his own team which is very morally deficient/unscrupulous, but that has nothing to do with what he did on the field. Unlike all these steroid users who are eligible for the Hall. If OJ Simpsons Hall of Fame football credentials haven't been revoked, Pete Rose should definitely get his chance in the baseball Hall of fame.
I agree. Great example with OJ. I never thought of that.
There is a difference between OJ's crime(s) and Rose betting on games. OJ's crimes, while horrible, were committed several years AFTER he retired from his sport. His actions had no effect on the games he was involved in nor did he break any of the league rules while an active player. OJ's HOF credentials were not tarnished (though his image was) for his crimes.
Rose's actions, on the other hand, though not illegal, were a violation of league rules and were committed during the years that he was active as both a player and a manager. By betting on his own team, he was in a position where he could directly affect the outcome of the games he was betting on (think 1919 Black Sox scandal). In this situation, according to league rules, the punishment fits the crime (so to speak). Some people may not be able to deny his accomplishments on the field, but it could be argued that since he was betting on games that he could have bribed players on other teams to gain an advantage. any situation where games and performances could be affected ultimately tarnishes the game and sport..
I agree with you somewhat on that Deepes Mind, It is possible Pete Rose could have affected the out come of games, although it was never proven. But if that's the logic to keep Rose out of the HOF, then no one else should be admitted into the HOF that played after 1985. The year Jose Canseco entered MLB and openly acknowledged steroid use and stated 80% of the players were using the drugs. Ken Caminiti of the Padres made a similar statement after his retirement from the Padres that 85% of the players were using performance enhancing drugs. Pretty much ever player that has denied using, has been proven to be a liar. So there is no way of knowing who used and who didn't, who's stats may be inflated by drugs and who's are not. The HOF should not allow any new members.
I can't fully agree with that. Of course, anyone that got caught or admitted to using certainly should not be enshrined, IMO. We can't speak for those who have kept quite. But the fact remains those who are caught and known to have violated league rules should face and accept their fate.
I just watched the Pirates at the Reds and Pete Rose was in the stands.
So he's 72 now and it's been 25 years or so since the betting.
I say let him in the Hall of Fame before he dies.
Baseball is somewhat hypocritical in that it allowed the steroid usage to go on and on.
by Kevin W 5 years ago
In my opinion, Pete Rose is the greatest hitter to ever step on a baseball field and should be in the Hall of Fame. I'm sure there are players in the HOF that have also done some immoral things in their time. Isn't the HOF based on the players performance on the field? Should the steroid era...
by mintinfo 5 years ago
Should Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens, and Sammy Sosa be voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame?The Baseball Hall of Fame ballot for 2013 was just released. Given these players alleged steroid involvement, should they be voted in the Hall?
by RKHenry 9 years ago
With all the steroids and drug use in baseball- why the hell is Pete Rose still banned from the Hall of Fame? You got all these guys messing with the game, just like Pete did- and they get more money, play, and are admitted into the Hall of Fame. But then here is Pete- one of the best...
by seattleamilehigh1 7 years ago
I can't help it. Pete Rose got EXACTLY what he knew was coming, and he kept on betting. He was not and still is not bigger than the game, as he has found out. If Barry Bonds never gets into the hall, I'm ok with that as long as Pete does not. Not that I think cheating like Bonds did isn't much...
by Ryan Lambeth 3 years ago
Should the indefinite suspension of Pete Rose be lifted?
by CJ Kelly 5 years ago
Does Mark McGwire deserve to be in the Hall of Fame?My opinion is absolutely not. He clearly benefitted from juicing and his performance in front of Congress was disgraceful. I would vote in Bonds and Clemens, but no one else from that era.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|