By number of injuries per participant or depth of injury or number of deaths per participant? To define the metric first, then answer the question. Are there a lot of misnomers out there? YES. If you ask John Q Public the question and give him a multiple choice option throwing in "shooting sports" as and option, he/she will most likely rank that pretty high. The truth is shooting sports has an exceptionally safe record with very, very few injuries/deaths per participant compared to almost any other sport. You are much more likely to be injured playing basketball or jogging than participating in hunting, skeet/trap shooting or even paintball. see link. http://www.familiesafield.org/pdf/Injury_page.pdf
Whatever the sport, it seems taking anything to the extreme tends to cause injuries more, or not being prepared for the event, not being rested going into the event, or being distracted in the event are big issues for being injured. Those giving 110% from go are less likely to be injured than when they slack off.
I would say Downhill Skiing. These folks are going up to 60 miles an hour with just a helmet, and are pushing the limit to the full extent between being out of control and in control.
If "death" is the measuring unit of dangerous, then I would vote for auto racing,.
by open-minded 9 years ago
My friends are watching boxing right now and I can't understand how they enjoy watching 2 men hit each other? And boxers, why would you willingly hurt yourself?
by zahrak 7 years ago
What are the sport that gives you most injuries?
by Seckin Esen 4 years ago
Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities?
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|