I made the rookie mistake of creating a hub with too much informaion on it. I want to remove chunks of it and create more smaller hubs that will interlink. Will this be seen as duplicate content and will I not be allowed to create the new hubs?
No this is ok, because the hubpages separated will sort themselves out, I did this last month and there wasn't any issue at all.....no warnings whatsoever, but to be sure, maybe wait for a day or two and then publish the other hubs, could be an option....
Why not unpublish the longer, original Hub? Rework the information in it and then publish a series of new, shorter Hubs you have in mind, linking them together. Then nothing is left for you to worry about regarding duplicate content.
I don't see that strategy as making a difference as far as duplicate content. Either way, there will be only one copy of the content, but the search engines may have residual information from the old hub.
WE, maybe I didn't get my own words right and therefore did not make my point clear.
If Austinguy wrote a Hub that has too much information in it, and is concerned about leaving that Hub published, or portions of it, while creating and publishing related Hubs which might duplicate the content of the original Hub, then the solution is to delete the entire original Hub and start over.
I think Austinguy made a good observation after the fact...he had a lot to say, but it could have been presented, organized, in a better way. HP gives us the opportunity to do just that.
Thanks Sally's Trove, your point was clear to me. The Original Poster talks about "remove chunks of it and create more smaller hubs," so I assume there will not literally be any duplication.
Granted, what you are suggesting is prudent. However, I wouldn't bet that even that method could never trigger the duplicate content filter, since the old content may remain in the search engines for some time.
I understood your point, and am satisfied that I have also had the chance to express my opinion.
I have no idea for how long a duplicate content trigger might be ready to be released. I speak from my perspective as a communications professional who writes for the purpose of making sense to readers. I would be fine with a duplicate content flag hanging around while I deleted everything I published on HP in order to arrange a new version in a way that made better sense.
From my perspective, it's better to get it right for the sake of the reader. Maybe good SEO things happen from that.
I certainly hope so, because none of his existing Hubs are candidates for splitting up! I'm hoping he will come back and give us more information. However, if you take a look at his other Hubs, they are very short.
Yup, without his coming back to clarify a thing or two, we're all blowing smoke. And that could be a nice thing depending on the chemical composition of the smoke. But it has been a good discussion with good info for all, after all.
I agree. However, I would like to add that even in the worst case scenario, all that could happen with the duplicate content filter would be that you would see a flag on your account. You could still publish, then simply contact HubPages with an explanation and ask them to remove the flag.
I am doing a 20 "such and such" quotes about "such and such" hub. I even went back in after they marked it duplicate and made sure 400 of the words are my words, even though I know people googling it...
I would appreciate if Staff would tell me whether GamerGirl and Whitney, both of whom have chosen to crawl through all my output (output which staff courteously restored after I had totally deleted it on my sabbatical)...
I would like to make a suggestion to the TEAM here on HUB Pages. I feel that it would be a positive improvement here on the HUB, if all of the activity that is perpetuated by Hubbers, were made known.For...
Hi everyone,I know there have been a lot of concerns about our hub content being stolen. It has been difficult for all of us to keep an eye on our hubs - plagurising is rife! However, I wanted to share a...