[img]http://www.newsworks.org/images/stories/flexicontent/l_bush-mission-acco
mplished_600x400.jpg[/img]
I've posted this in its entirety for your celebratory pleasure.
Aren't you so glad the Iraq War went so seamlessly? ha ha ha ha ha.
See bolded paragraph. Can you even imagine if Obama had invaded Iraq?
Why would we think invading Syria would make us safer??
By Dick Polman
www.newsworks.org
Happy "Mission Accomplished" Day, everybody!
May 1 marks the 10th anniversary of one of America's most shameful episodes - when George W. Bush descended from the skies in an SB-3 Viking fighter plane, dressed in full combat regalia. That moment was perfectly timed to catch the golden rays of twilight, as orchestrated by a former ABC News producer working for the Bush re-election campaign. Bush then switched to business attire and declared, on the deck of the aircraft carrier, backed by the infamous banner, that "major combat operations in Iraq have ended."
This anniversary observance should help put the kibosh on last week's bizarre Bush boomlet, the spike in his poll approval that he enjoyed during the opening of his presidential library. We all know, of course, that Americans have woefully short memories, so let us briefly walk memory lane to remind ourselves why Bush was one of the worst presidents in history.
For his defenders, I offer this simple test: Imagine what they'd say if Barack Obama reacted to a 9/11-style domestic terrorist attack by invading the wrong foreign country under false pretenses, and then declaring that "major combat operations" had ended - when, in reality, the major combat operations, the deaths of thousands of American soldiers, the wounded and maiming of tens of thousands more, and the budget-busting expenditure of three trillion dollars, were only just beginning.
Rest my case.
One reason why Obama doesn't want to storm into Syria on the basis of preliminary WMD evidence is because he'd prefer not to make a fool of himself the way Bush did. The craven rhetoric of 10 years ago, the rank deceptions, the slippery wordplay, the willfull ignorance - it all haunts us still....
President Bush, during his Mission Accomplished address: "We have begun the search for hidden chemical and biological weapons, and already know hundreds of sites that will be investigated."
Vice President Cheney, the de facto president, Aug. 26, 2002: "There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction. There is no doubt that he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us." (Italics are mine.)
National security adviser Condoleezza Rice, Sept. 8, 2002: "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud."
Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld, March 30, 2003: "We know where (the WMDs) are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat."
Bush cheerleader Dick Morris on Fox News, April 9, 2003: "Over the next couple of weeks, when we find the chemical weapons this guy was amassing...the left is going to hang its head for three or four more years."
President Bush, three weeks after his Mission Accompished address: "We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories. For those who say we haven't found the banned manfacturing devices or banned weapons - they're wrong. We found them."
Actually, Bush's team hadn't found squat, and it never did. And the skeptics were proven right.
Mopping the slop
For years thereafter, Bush loyalists tried to mop the slop by spinning/insisting that everybody, not just Bush, got it wrong during the prewar phase. So claimed Condoleezza Rice in 2007: "It was an intelligence problem worldwide. We all thought - including U.N. inspectors -that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction." But that was yet another lie.
The truth is, U.N weapons inspectors refused to join the prewar bandwagon. They were reportedly so contemptuous of the Bush team's WMD tips that they dismissed them as "garbage after garbage after garbage." Hans Blix, the chief U.N. inspector, says he repeatedly told the Bush team, during the prewar phase, that the WMD evidence was thin or worse ("As we found no weapons and no evidence supporting the suspicions, we reported this") - to no avail, of course. And after Bush claimed, in a prewar address, that Hussein was trying to get uranium from Africa, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog group, the International Atomic Energy Agency, concluded that the purported Hussein documents were, in fact, forgeries.
So let's mark today's sad observance by staying true to Bush's soiled legacy. He will forever own one of the worst strategic errors in American statecraft. And let's remember that the U.S. Supreme Court made his legacy possible in the first place - thanks to Bush v. Gore, which summarily halted the Florida recount.
I mention this only because Sandra Day O'Connor, one of the five Republican appointees who dragged Bush across the finish line, is voicing second thoughts about what the court wrought. Last Friday, she told the Chicago Tribune editorial board: "(The court) took the case and decided it at a time when it was still a big election issue. Maybe the court should have said, 'We're not going to take it, goodbye'' ... It turned out the election authorities in Florida hadn't done a real good job there, and kind of messed it up. And probably the Supreme Court added to the problem at the end of the day."
Now she tells us.
Happy “Mission Accomplished” Day to you too, MM.
May 1st is also another important anniversary to remember. Here are a few more words from President G. W. Bush regarding his plan to apprehend Osama Bin Laden.
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'” -G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." - G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
Finally, The Washington Post reported that the CIA unit dedicated to capturing bin Laden was shut down by the Bush administration in late 2005. {1}
On the other hand, President Obama's "Mission Approved" action was far more effective than President Bush's "Mission Accomplish" speech.
On May 1, 2011, President Barack Obama delivered justice on behalf of the American people.
Happy “Mission Approved” Day
{1} http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co … 00375.html
Sandra Day O'Connor has no right to judge anybody including Bush.
She's the one who tipped the vote in favor of killing the unborn years ago when they actually had a shot at their lives being protected.
And now I hear she's resigned. Good. Let her deal with her own conscience instead of trying to condemn someone else. Dunno when that'll be, but it'll happen. She accomplished her "mission" too, and it led to millions of women thinking they had the right to kill their own children.
Really? 5 years out of office, economy in the toilet, record unemployment, record gas prices, 9.6 million people dropped from the work force, the recovery summer that wasn't and shovel ready jobs that weren't, and this is what you do? Bash Bush? LOL
I guess I might do the same if my guy was such a dismal failure too, carry on.
This thread is specifically about President Bush and the Iraq war he manufactured under false pretenses.
And the FACT that he declared on May 1, 2003 in a photo op that HIS mission there had been accomplished.
Tell that to the Iraqi people.
Tell that to the families of thousands of US armed forces who died in Iraq.
And the thousands more who came back mentally and physically damaged and broken.
If you wish to discuss the economy (DJ broke 15,000 today -- a HISTORICAL high) on better than expected jobs news, unemployment down to 7.5 percent, the lowest in 4 years.
Note that when Bush took office in Jan 2001 the rate was 4.2 percent. When he left office
in December 2008 it was 7.3 percent.
When Obama took office in January 2009 it was 7.8 percent.
This following the biggest economic collapse since the Great Depression.
Obama did manage to turn the Titanic.
These numbers are from an unimpeachable source:
http://www.redstate.com/6755mm/2012/07/ … for-obama/
Yeah, think about that for a second, 7.5% is the LOWEST it's been in 4 years? Beyond dismal failure.
When it was 6% at one point during Bush's term Nancy Pelosi was screaming on TV "Where are the jobs Mr. President?" Funny after 4 years still not a peep from her asking Obama the same question when it's even higher.
by SparklingJewel 15 years ago
NATIONAL SECURITYWar-front Intelligence reportFor approximately half of the U.S. population, it is an article of faith that “Bush lied, people died.” The tired clichè was making the rounds again this week after the Select Committee on Intelligence published a new report titled, “Intelligence...
by Credence2 10 years ago
In light of the preparations for the commemoration of the 50th anniversary of the assassination of John F. Kennedy, past conversations with conservatives have come to mind.They told me that Democrats went away from them after Kennedy. Was it LBJ's Great Society, Medicare or Civil Rights...
by mortimerjackson 12 years ago
Despite what Obama's press secretary might tell you, the only reason that America is leaving Iraq is because of a declaration signed by George Bush saying that America will leave by 2011. Obama insisted upon staying in Iraq, but the Iraqi government has refused to grant US troops immunity for their...
by Sooner28 10 years ago
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/0 … 99310.htmlOn the front page of the Huffington Post, the caption reads: George W. Obama. I find this to be refreshing, and I am glad the left is beginning to see Obama is just as bad as Bush on civil liberties. Now that the illusion based...
by Susan Reid 11 years ago
One of my biggest frustrations with the Obama administration is they are not good at promoting their achievements. Although that could be the fault of the so-called "liberal media" which is all corporate owned and anything but liberal.Anyway, I came across this article and thought I would...
by Nina L James 11 years ago
I'm aware that this is an election year. I know that everyone is entitled to their opinions. But over the last year and a half, I've noticed some blatant forms of disrespect being directed at President Obama. Why? Is it because he is black? From highway billboards to other political figures...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |