Should Dog Owners Be Made To Go Through A Competency Test?

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (25 posts)
  1. Seeker7 profile image84
    Seeker7posted 11 years ago

    I've been a dog owner since I was 12 years of age - I'm 49 now. And I was talking with friends and we were discussing the harm that is being done to the public and animals whose owners bascially don't give a hoot about them. In addition there is the added concern of dog attacks - the majority of these attacks are by dogs whose owners have done nothing to train or socialise or supervise their dogs properly.

    I don't know about the logistics of introducing a scheme - I'm in Scotland - in the UK, USA, Canada etc. Maybe it would be un-workable, but myself and other dog owners feel that something should be done to protect the public and the animals from owners who don't give a dam about anyone or any animal. But would it help to improve matters by making it a legal requirement that dog owners have to pass at least a basic competency test and that at least some form of basic training - for the dog and owner - should be compulsory? Could this scheme be carried out by people such as - in Scotland it would be the Scottish Society for the Protection of Cruelty to Animals or the police or  animal behaviourists and trainers? The scheme would need to be funded probably by dog owners themselves.

    I would be interested to hear other people's opinion whether you are a dog owner or not.

    1. G.L.A. profile image83
      G.L.A.posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      I absolutely agree with you. Irresponsible pet owners contribute to more heartache and public inconvenience than they, themselves are worth. However, to take this theory even further.. Aren't our children at least as important as our pets? Perhaps we should require competency licensing for parenthood as well. Sounds like a good idea to me.

      1. Seeker7 profile image84
        Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

        Hi G.L.A. many thanks for the response. I agree with you about the children in our society and of course they are more important.  But I feel that  because it is so important it should be covered in  a separate forum topic.

  2. knolyourself profile image59
    knolyourselfposted 11 years ago

    People who exploit animals as a symbol fror some kind of identity, should ideally not be allowed to keep pets.

    1. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Knolyourself, - I agree with you entirely. In the UK - since the ban on American Pit Bulls - there are people who switched over to the Staffordshire Bull Terrier. I have to say that the majority of the breeds owners are excellent and responsible, but you have a minority who only have the dog as a fashion or status symbol ie - I'm tough, I'm hard - kind of crap. These are some of the worst kind of owners.

  3. Mighty Mom profile image80
    Mighty Momposted 11 years ago

    That is way too logical a solution.
    We make people pass driving tests to drive a vehicle (which can be termed a lethal weapon).
    If you're going to own a vicious dog you absolutely should have ot have a license for it!

    1. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Hi MightyMom - the reference to driving is a very good one and I wonder how some folks actually pass there test when I see the way they drive!! Thankfull if they are caught they are banned or made to re-sit their test. With bad dog owners it is much more difficult to get anything against them that will stick in court.

      As to 'vicious dogs'. There are some breeds who may be more prone to aggression than others. But this is my point - dogs wouldn't or shouldn't be vicious if they owners who have them know what they are doing! A dog who is properly trained, socialised and care for has no reason to be vicious. The dogs who are like this, are not properly supervised, trained or cared for.

  4. paradigmsearch profile image60
    paradigmsearchposted 11 years ago

    Here is a story for you all: neutral

    A vicious dog breaks free of his leash  and attacks an innocent pedestrian walking down the other side of the street. The dog drags the pedestrian to the ground. The dog continues to rip at the pedestrian's face and the rest of his body. The pedestrian finally manages to slam the dog's head against the pavement, killing the dog. The pedestrian spends a week in the hospital. Ugly scars all over his face and body for life. And the usual $100,000-plus medical bills.

    In County A:

    The dog owner is sentenced to 10 years in prison and is responsible for the medical bills.

    In county B:

    The pedestrian is sentenced to 2 years in prison for animal cruelty. The dog owner is not charged.

    The numbers are approximate, but you get the idea. County A was in Northern California. County B was in Southern California.

    1. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Paradigmsearch,

      Many thanks for your story which is, unfortunately for people and animals alike, becoming more common. The reason for these stories? Bad Owners - pure and simple. If you have a breed of dog who may be more prone to aggression, then the owners of these animals should be seen to be knowledgeable and competent enough to handle such an animal. But in actual fact any breed of dog who is not brought up and cared for properly has the potential to be aggressive and to cause severe injury and kill.

      This is why the law needs to be toughened up in order to get these crap owners banned from keeping any kind of animal.  I am working with one wee girl, who is now 7 years of age. When she was five she was savaged by a cross breed staffordshire bull terrier. Now this wee girl always loved dogs and she still does, but she is now petrified to go near one. Over the past 6 months we have slowly re-introduced her to dogs, starting with puppies and moving up, she is doing well but this is likely to affect her for, if not the rest of her life, then for the forseeable future. The dog was put down. The dog owner whose fault it was? Got nothing done to him! The dog as it turned out, had lived in appalling conditions, was barely fed and regularly beaten and kicked. When it was put to sleep it was a blessing for the animal as well as the public. But the problem is that the law keeps focusing on the dog and breeds instead of the owners. In addition as you point out we have the added problem of how these attacks are viewed - in some areas the penalties are different from other areas. If anything such as a competency test was to be introduced it would only work if the law itself is follow the same line.

  5. QuestionMaster profile image82
    QuestionMasterposted 11 years ago

    Right after they bring in competency tests for anyone who wants to get pregnant - especially if they're under 20!

  6. Maddie Ruud profile image74
    Maddie Ruudposted 11 years ago

    Are you going to make people pass a parenting test before they can have a kid, too?

    1. Google Gal profile image60
      Google Galposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      ya know I think that is a great idea seriously

    2. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      To MaddieRuud,

      Not at the present time since kids - well the ones I know - aren't capable of tearing off a human face with their teeth. But then again seeing one or two examples of parentng recently maybe we should think about it!!!!

  7. profile image0
    Holmes221bposted 11 years ago

    I believe it was a mistake when the dog licence was no longer necessary.  It made dog owners more responsible.  Only an owner who cared for their dog would be likely to pay for a licence.

    1. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Holmes221b,

      I agree about the licences. For my first two dogs we had to buy a licence at the post office and yes I think it did make dog owners more responsible.

  8. Mark Ewbie profile image80
    Mark Ewbieposted 11 years ago

    I think ALL potential dog owners of ALL types of dog - vicious or not - should have some basic training.  Why the dog needs walks.  Why it needs socialising.  Why it shouldn't be left on it's own all day.  Why it is a friend for life, not a status symbol / childrens plaything.

    And why they are the best damn thing in the whole world.

    Anything that might reduce animal cruelty or neglect is a good thing in my book.

    1. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Well said Mark - I couldn't agree more. I have found that people who are cruel to dogs/or any other animal, are not that much better, if at all,  to people.  The are nasty pieces of work that need a taste of their own medicine.

      The thing about training your dog and learning about it's behaviour is that it's one of the most fascinating of subjects. It's always a sheer joy to walk your dog, play with your dog and care for them. But when you understand why they do such and such a thing, it makes the experience of being a dog owner that much more enriching!!

      1. Mark Ewbie profile image80
        Mark Ewbieposted 11 years agoin reply to this

        Yes, that pack behaviour, the way it knows what you are going to do before you do it, how they pick up on your emotions, what the ears and tail do to express their own moods - it's quite a learning curve!

        1. Seeker7 profile image84
          Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

          Absolutely - and after donkeys years of being an owner - the dogs are still teaching me!!!LOL!

    2. habee profile image93
      habeeposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      I'm with you 100%!

      1. Seeker7 profile image84
        Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

        Hi habee - many thanks for your response and support - really appreciated!!

  9. optimus grimlock profile image61
    optimus grimlockposted 11 years ago

    sounds like a good idea!

    1. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Optimus grimlock,

      many thanks for your support - it's really appreciated!!!

  10. ershruti304 profile image61
    ershruti304posted 11 years ago

    Absolutely yes owing a dog is easy but maintaining them is not an easy task. Without proper knowledge about dog care the owner usually fails to keep it in good health

    1. Seeker7 profile image84
      Seeker7posted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Hi ershruti304 - I think you have made a very imporrtant point here. There are so many animals suffering various health complaints - easily sorted - because the owners don't do their homework on general dog care and if the have a pure breed, it's essential to know the breed inside and out in order to keep your dog in prime condition.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)