Is it possible for there to be art for arts sake, or is that a hoax?
Picasso said "The idea of art for art's sake is a hoax." He basically said that art is done for others to see. Do you agree or disagree and why?
Well I think it can be both, when I write or paint, sculpt, or make music I can get so into what I'm doing and really forget time and my surroundings. I would have to say it's due to personal gratification with what I'm doing it is fulfilling me in a major way. That would be considered art for arts sake, but I would say also that the pride of having someone else admire your work is also gratifying as well.
Art can be done for arts sake. There are plenty of people who paint, write poetry, etc. for themselves who have no intention of trying to sell it. The fact that some of these people do not live alone and thus family members can see the artwork doesn't change the fact that the artists doesn't plan on the public seeing it/reading it. However, the meaning behind the term Art for Art's Sake isn't that you do or don't want people to see your paintings etc. It means that you create art with no deeper meaning than to create. In other words, you are not trying to teach people anything, change their viewpoints on issues, comment on social issues etc. You create because you feel the need to create. What other people get out of your art, if anything, is up to them, not you. Other artists do indeed create art with a specific purpose in mind.
I am not familiar with the quote and what prompted it. I have run into artists that create because they love to create. Even that artist interacts with his art by viewing, listening or whatever depending on the medium. I would venture that it is possible if you can avoid pressure from the people buying your art. I really don't like to disagree with Picasso. He was much better at art, than I will ever be.
That depends upon what you consider "art for art's sake", but overall I would agree. To me art for art's sake would lack passion and form (IE any recognizable features). I like art that has a personal meaning to the artist.
If you believe that art is a form of communication (just like writing) then Picasso is probably a wise man and correct.
by Wayne Tilden 8 years ago
Art for Art's sake? I say "yes!"Does an Artist need an audience to create, or is Art purely organic?
by gorilla24 5 years ago
Do you think Mantai te'o was involved in the catfish hoax? If so why?
by TreatLady09 8 years ago
Could there be a possible chance that if i had an ectopic pregnancy that i could have another one.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|