What do you think, I think art is useless?
Do you think the word Art no longer has any real meaning.
The word Art seems to be used to describe just about anything, because of its ambiguity I think it has become a meaningless word but never mined me, what do you think?
An artist might tell you art is where someone's skill meets their imagination -- an example of which would be the clothespin in Philadelphia. As someone with zero artistic talent, I would tell you art is in the eye of the beholder -- so on that basis art can be anything or not -- an example would be the clothespin in Philadelphia.
I hope art is useless, it should be.
In this world of utilitarian design and product-driven creativity, we urgently need things which are not useful, which don't even have a monetary value or a practical purpose.
Art may be useless but I think it can be beautiful and is most certainly necessary.
As an "artist" I think that art is defined by the third person. You would be surprised of how many of my paintings seem ordinary,even bland to me.When the client comes along and see it, their eyes light up and feel a real connection to the piece. Actually in my first exhibition, the piece that got the most attention was a cultural scenic portrait. Pots and pans on an open fire! And still a lady teared up.
For others, that want you to paint their concept in canvas is the same. The piece is theirs, not mine.They came up with the concept and I make it tangible. I am pretty sure that at some point in life you felt inspired, connected or simply moved by any given form of "art". This is a good example, when I painted this I did not liked it that much. It was just a tree and a frog. But others did saw something in it that spoke to them. Does my painting could be considered as "art"? So yeah, I think the word art means something as long as inspires someone and makes them happy.
Hi ananceleste, I have even cried real tears over my own work and enough others have also for me to know how emotive it can all be but that wasn't the question, human feces is also called art when messed about with. Thanks for trying. Gareth.
All these well intentioned people tried to participate,and no one understood your question. If no one understands, maybe you had something else in mind? Re-wording, being more specific maybe.
Headline you could be correct, that's a concern with these comments, they allow too few words to say enough. Once questions are made they can't be changed and shouldn't be, that would make it unreal but now I need a comment from you to finish my bit
I think art is the very opposite of useless. Art is many things, but I believe that it is extremely important as a vehicle for expressing the human condition. I don't think it should it be constrained by narrow parameters when it is inspired by such a diversity of ideas and feelings, and expressed in so many ways by such a diversity of talent. Art of course covers music and writing as well as visual art, but at their best they all convey the important stuff - love and beauty as well as the darker side of life. I think people need to express themselves and understand the world around them and art is the way to do it! I've gone on enough now!
Hi DaffodilSky, music and writing as well as visual feces all fall under the same category that means nothing because it is too ambiguous, they can all be beautiful but they all have their own terms, individuality, until the art word comes out.
'The Supreme art, is to know the Supreme Artist, within and without. Art, in the most effective sense of the term, is a sublime Truth.' -Sri Chinmoy
What I am now looking at, is beautiful art, but this is only my perception. Do you see this in a different way? I hear your argument and perhaps it has some truth.
Still, Art is vast and continually creative. We may learn to see this with the intuitive eye or with the mind. In the region of the mind, some forms may be crude or tasteless, and others sublime. Still, it is the inner being that can truly understand great beauty. Art encompasses all things, and indeed life itself. Hope this helps.
Hi manatita44, it is useful, thanks, but your interpretation seems to getting close to art being God " Art encompasses all things, and indeed life itself" isn't it just a word without true meaning unlike, music, painting, sculpture or nothing.
You are separating, I am not. God is the Supreme Artist. Music, painting, sculpture .. they are the language of the Spirit. They are all His art.
Hi manatita44, "They are all His art." Yes I agree he is the creator of creation, not an imitator seeking sensation. Thank you for your insight and thoughtful clarification. It makes me wonder am I putting art on a pedestal when it's just the norm?
You are ok, Gareth. Just being practical and perhaps relating to something you know and love. Times are changing and people are seeing and doing things differently. It is not my field. I simply observe. Much peace.
Hi, I think I live in decadence while 3 quarters of the world live in hunger, war and pain, I make pretty useless stuff when I need to be more sane, many die of hunger and I need to do more or lose my brain to the wrong others for profit and gain.
I disagree. Art connotes a positive word for me, a compliment. Art is abstract and it needs imagination, analysis and appreciation of the subject to understand it.
Hi the girls, cool your allowed to disagree and there an't much wrong with my imagination compliment accepted. Thanks for trying.
Hi my brother Gareth.
I feel for you. Some people take these things quite seriously. Seems like you opened a can of something there. Peace again. Keep smiling!
Bro mana, I personally think most people only read the headline and it infuriated them so they went on the defensive, they became blind to the context but some did read the whole context so tried to answer it. Headlines work the way they are meant.
In modern terms, I definitely agree with you. As we live in an age where the world is increasingly "smaller" with rampant advancement of communication technology, I think all sorts of things that use to be meaningful and define us as human beings have become cheapened and commonplace; original ideas spread around the world in a matter of minutes now, changing the original into the collective at the most rapid pace we've ever seen. "Art" is a word that's right up there with "phenomenal" and "awesome"...words that used to be reserved for something truly special, but now are commonplace--the miracles of nature used to be phenomenal, now so is the latest "as-seen-on-TV" product. Awesomeness was once reserved for the power of God, now it also describes the new pizza joint down the street. In a world of computer generated everything, it does leave one wondering who are the real artists anymore in this age when "art" can be "created" with a few clicks and drags of a mouse. Does uniqueness exist anymore? Expanded personalization and customization of material things in our lives (think Picasso skins on laptops) has actually diminished our individuality by treating "art" as something we choose with as much thought as one of the dozens of styles of coffee at Starbucks (all these things give us the illusion of individuality by offering "style" only in the trivial, distracting us from choosing the real elements of life that actually define our souls). Has our "progress" and advancement actually lead to degeneration of civilization and our lives becoming ever more meaningless? As a society, I think we keep mistaking materialism for originality (the source of art) and always at our detriment since this just adds to our hunger for the very uniqueness we're constantly trying to define. The more we try to create these days, the less it seems we are able to do so.
Hi Valene, yes that's more like a thoughtful answer and plenty to think about that I hadn't considered, thank you for your thoughtful contribution.
PS. ha. ha, we seem to have an abundance of genus nowadays as well.
LOL, yes, everyone seems to think of themselves as original artists these days (i.e. Justin Bieber)! I loved your question, it really made me think for a change; thanks for posting this today.
You are welcome it's a two way street and thanks to you again.
Panting for his fix of deprivation
Blinded in a vast discolouration
Vulgar repetitious replication
Craving for celebrity transformation
LOL, love it! Whoever created him, they created a monster.
UMm, I tend to think he is influenced by his environment, a victim of an abusive system, the music Ind has a long track record, along with an entertainment business, the show must go on at any cost, all in plain sight, grown ups hold all the power.
Absolutely, he's merely a product of corporate commercialism, going much the way so many child entertainers have, completely exploited and prostituted to a consumer-driven society. And he, along with the rest of us are led to believe he's original.
I think art in a painting, art in music , art in a kids picture tell many things about us as people. Without art, this world would be plain and dull. If you think art is useless, well, I would hate to come over to your home and see the bare walls, and no music being played in the background. You must really get depressed. I would seek therapy if I felt this way. You have a right to like 7-up and drink wine together and I would say your crazy. That's what is good about America, we still have freedom of speech. I respect that in you're comment. Seems like a silly question with a person that has no one to talk too possibly. I feel sorry for you.
Hi tomy101, well I think you didn't even read the question and just jumped on the defensive and you won't be able to uinsult yourself now either, pity. http://www.lettersofnote.com/2010/01/ar … cause.html he made his living out of art.
No, I do not agree with you. The word Art imply to works with superior quality and strong meaning. Nowadays I lot of people call craft an art, which is bother me a lot. Probably a lack of art education, they don't distinguish craft from art. Art you can see in the big museums and leading theaters, not in your local gallery and dance studio.
Hi forevernatural, "not in your local gallery and dance studio, see in the big museums and leading theaters, not in your local gallery and dance studio." That's another twist, high art and popular art, the unmade bed or the taxidermist? Thanks.
According to my old dictionary, the word 'art' is described as: 'the making or doing of things that have form and beauty. (drawing, painting, sculpture, architecture, music, literature, drama and dance)'. For myself, I believe it still holds true to its meaning. I believe in the dictionary's view of it and how we see our world through these 'said things' described there. For me, it still depicts art as it is and perfectly! : ) We are all entitled to our own views and thoughts on things, so I guess it obviously lies in the eyes of the beholder, eh?
I live close to the Philadelphia Art Museum.
The clothespin I don't think has much to do with rt.
Neither does the love statue.
But inside the museum I've wondered about that one of Warhol with just he splats on it,
How do you compare that with Monet.
I think one can tell good art from bad art.
I can get a canvas and put my tongue in the paint and say I couldn't talk and people would go crazy over it. And look at Wyeth painting of Christina and say its ugly ( which it isn't) The weirder the better.
No I am not going to paint with my tongue. But I'm sure people would say that was art!
Hi Lor's Stories, "Warhol with just he splats on it," is that Warhol and not Jackson Pollack, they have Camouflage Self-Portrait, Warhol screen print and No. 22, Jackson Pollack which is paint splats, not that it matters I get your point, thanks.
It was Pollack
I get them mixed up.
Hi Lor's Stories, thank you for getting back to me with that information I was curious and think abstract camouflage is very similar to paint splats, and the only real skill is convincing somebody that it is worthy of recognition, a good example.
As your picture displayed depicts...art can be much the "Black Hole" or bottomless pit that sucks everything inside its infinite chasm. To me and I think it is a relative opinion, art means that which is drawn, painted, molded, sculpted or composed. Thank you for your question and I hope what I have said reveals my true love of art and not those things which to appear as false representatives of a revered and beautiful world of creation.
You are correct, to a degree. The word, ART, is used to describe just about everything from a collage of trash, to writing on a wall, a dance or a beautiful painting. Of course, people can tell the difference...call it what you want. The meaning is very broad. The traditional description of art, is as described by many of the hubbers here, and is taken seriously. For clarification purposes, your question asked specifically about the word, art, and not about works of art. Maybe there should be new sub-categories for the description of less traditional art, such as faux-art.
Yes faux an interesting description, faux art, money and intelligence, not that it is particularly directed at any individual or yourself as you seem to have some kind of grip on substance. Thanks for the clarification and your time.
Thanks Gareth. There is faux jewelry and faux fur, everyone knows it's not the real thing, but is still accepted...so I say faux art is a good term, nobody gets hurt.
Faux reminds me of this, in Viz Magazine, Elvis Presley Dambusters Clock Plate of Tutankhamun, http://www.flickr.com/photos/norbet/570 … /lightbox/ so funny.
by Michelle Liew 7 years ago
What gives you a sense of tranquility?
by Michelle Liew 3 years ago
What is a little thing in life you cherish?
by Dbro 8 years ago
What is the one thing that inspires you to create art?Everyone has their own reasons for creating. I wonder if there is a common thread that we artists all share. What causes us to desire to create?
by Sakina Nasir 4 years ago
Things bought in a spur of moment will either make us very happy or make us feel irritated. Yeah, it happens. Have you have purchased something, thinking how great it is? Then, you realise you never needed it in the 1st place. Have you ever bought anything that turned out to be completely...
by charlie 3 years ago
Gen 1:1-4 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. ONLY GOD and HIS HOLY SPIRIT WERE PRESENT in the beginning. JESUS DOES NOT appear...
by Prodio 6 years ago
What do we indicate to - when we use the word - real? Are imaginations real? Well - when we imagine - we are obviously doing/using something (materialists = electricity of the nervous system/ others = spirit).So - though the contents of a fantastic imagination might not be necessarily true...
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|