NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- General Motors has made a final payment of $5.8 billion to the U.S. and Canadian governments, paying off the last of its $6.7 billion in loans, the company said Wednesday.
"I am very pleased to announce that, as of today, General Motors has repaid, in full and with interest, the loans made last July by the U.S. Treasury and Export Development Canada," said GM chief executive Ed Whitacre, speaking at a plant in Fairfax, Kan., where GM builds Chevrolet Malibu and Buick LaCrosse sedans.
Thousands of jobs were saved because of the loan - including mine. I'm seeing signs here in Detroit that things may be turning around.
Things don't seem as hopeless as they did this time last year.
So if the auto bailout left a bad taste in your mouth, if you opposed it, if you complained about it...
Rest easy. Your money has been returned.
That wasn't so bad now, was it?
That's awesome Wyanjen
Now if only the Bankers did the same huh?
I'm glad you brought this up. There are a lot of people who thought this was a giant handout (like the Iraq War was to military contractors, f'rinstance).
And Pearldiver: the bankers have been paying back their bailout money.:
http://newsroom.bankofamerica.com/index … ;item=8583
RE: giant handout:
For the most part, I'm talking about people I've heard first hand, the opposing opinion was to deny the bailout and then kick us while we're on the ground.
I mean, they weren't saying, "No that is fiscally irresponsible"
They were saying "F@$# off Detroit! You deserve it!
I'm not sure how I deserve to lose my apartment, my truck, and my retirement savings simply because I live in a county with a struggling industry.
Do you sense that I'm still a little bitter?
I've never heard the kind of "f#@* off" attitude from American citizens against other American citizens.
And the whole time, these same people had NO IDEA that it was a loan, not a hand out. Completely oblivious. Thanks for the kick in the teeth, now go read a book. Try to learn something.
The auto bailout opposers evolved into the tea partiers. Get yourself all worked up & pissed off, learn about the issue halfway, then go about yelling. If you're loud enough, you must know what you are talking about, right?
Of course, as I've said before, there are some legitimate tea points. They're just really hard to hear above the squalling half-wits.
I'm still working on this bitterness thing.
Well, I suspect (and I wasn't one of them!) that they meant the Big 3, not Detroit residents/workers.
But their callousness reminds me of that wife of a GM exec playing golf in Roger & Me: "why don't they stop complaining and just go get a job or something?"
GM received more than 6.7 Billion in bailout money, so they haven't finished paying the money back.
So, it makes the thread title a little misleading, but accuracy among those in support of this kind of theft from the American people is not all that important I guess.
It will eventually get all the money back, PLUS INTEREST. This second tranche repayment suggests that it's on track to repay the government everything. Plus interest.
Isn't calling that "theft," then, incredibly misleading of you?
No! The American people didn't want the bailout to happen, its the American peoples money, so theft is accurate!
So everything is up for referendum? Let's look at...the Iraq War, then. Were the American people convinced to support the Iraq War? Were the justifications for it true? How much have we spent, in dollars and lives, in this war? When are we going to be paid back for it? (And will it come with interest?)
Sorry, that's not the topic of this thread, maybe you should start one on that topic.
Nice try at deflection though.
Reminds me of a story I had read about Harvard President A. Lawrence Lowell’s attempt to start a debate at Harvard in the 1920s about whether the number of Jews should be restricted because Jews cheat. When a distinguished alumnus pointed out that non-Jews also cheat, Lowell replied that the alumnus was trying to change the subject, because Lowell wanted to talk about Jews.
Ok, are you attempting to hijack this thread?
I'm pointing out that your definition of government theft is clearly inaccurate, and if you needed an example of government theft to illustrate that for you, I provided you one. The fact that you have nothing to say about that itself speaks volumes.
"So everything is up for referendum? " No, only the stuff the wingnuts disagree with. If it benefits corporations, or it goes boom, it's not subject to referendum. If it benefits someone other than the right wing, it is.
You should know that by now.
money was loaned.
money was returned.
It's not only accurate, it's pretty damn simple.
Of course, if it is made out to be more complicated than it is, there is more room to bitch...
"Rest easy. Your money has been returned."
No it has not been returned! That is accurate, have a nice day!
If it wasn't returned, where did it go?
Maybe GM left it on the bar and somebody walked off with it.
But where did they borrow it from to pay it back? GM posted a $4.3 billion loss after emerging from bankruptcy.
Not sure how they accounted for the loan repayment but if they paid back 6.7 billion and only showed a 4.3 billion loss, they did ok. If they did indeed borrow from Peter to pay Paul at least someone thought they were a good enough investment to loan them the cash.
No - The loss was a trading loss. So they lost $4.3 billion and found $6.7 billion from "somewhere".
Where was the somewhere? Because it was not a private investor.
Well, you're getting into something that's over my head. I'd like to learn more about it. If you come across something that answers your question, or even asks it/analyzes it in an understandable way, I'd like to read it.
http://blogs.ajc.com/jamie-dupree-washi … on_insider
Seriously - where else could this money have come from? They lost money after the bankruptcy. Their market shares have fallen around the world and they find the money to repay some of their loans?
The stories written on this "slight of hand" maneuver by GM with the Obama administration as a willing cohort is where the money came from and where it went.
Posting out and out lies in order to make the Obama administration look as if they know what they are doing is ridiculous, the money has not been payed back and more than likely never will be payed back!
Its down the black hole with more taxpayer money!
Wait, how do you see that? The article says they paid everything in full, with interest.
Read instead of criticize, troll.
Or link to a source.
To Wyanjen, I think a lot of the animosity to Detroit comes from the perception that US manufacturers have been making substandard products for a long time and so deserve to fail. This is a false perception; in recent years US quality has gone way up. But the big three have done a terrible job convincing Americans that their cars are once again as good as or better than the foreign competition.
This is understandable, since in the days of low quality, low reliability, and low fuel economy, US manufacturers tried to get along by invoking patriotism (or more accurately, xenophobia and nationalism) to get Americans to buy American cars that weren't as good as the competition. It's going to be hard to win back American consumers, especially after this bailout (and it was a bailout, even though the money is being repaid).
On the other hand, I advised my mom to invest a small windfall in Ford last year, and she more than doubled her money.
Yeah, Ford has been doing some good things.
regarding fuel economy: there was so much criticism about SUVs dominating the lots...
but they weren't going unsold now, were they?
Remember the Geo Metro? 40 MPG.
People wouldn't buy it though, they stampeded to the SUVs.
I did read, http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-0 … ments.html
Actually I thought I read "loan money" instead of "bailout money" in your post. The loans have been paid ahead of schedule and with interest. The remainder of the bailout should turn a profit as well, when GM stock goes up the Government can sell it to the public.
And then there is the question of what would have happened to the economy if thousands of well paid autoworkers had suddenly lost their jobs....
This bailout is looking like a good deal for the American people, so far.
TK is wrong again (what's new?) The American people, much to the chagrin of the wingnuts, put Democrats in charge to fix the mess left behind by Republicans. They're doing a great job of it; all of your whining won't change that.
I'll check back in to review the daily pummeling you are once again going to receive. Thank God for Right-wing masochists. They make the forums fun.
"The American people, much to the chagrin of the wingnuts, put Democrats in charge to fix the mess left behind by Republicans. They're doing a great job of it; all of your whining won't change that."
If putting the US in deeper debt is fixing the mess then the Democrats are doing a wonderful job!
Still not TK
I could use a "Bail-out" next...I promise to repay it with interest!
Oh and here is some more on the repayment:
If you just remember - your government thinks you are stupid - it all makes sense. Sorry Jen.
by earnestshub 11 years ago
GM reckon that although they had a lousy year, the will be in profit this year and all the bailout money is to be paid back by June.There have been quite a few companies paying the bailout money back. Is this another positive indicator?
by zzron 9 years ago
Maybe the word hate is a little strong. So why do people dislike President Obama and the way he is running the country? Are you an Obama fan? Yes, no, what is your opinion of Obama and his policies?
by pgrundy 12 years ago
Does anyone else think this is getting out of hand? I read yesterday that GM will close 5 more plants and lay off 20,000 more U.S. workers but they need $14 billion to do it. How many jobs could we lose for $28 billion? How many billion do we have to fork over to get them to eliminate ALL the jobs?...
by phion 8 years ago
Taxpayers pay for $49,000 of the $89,000 dollars it cost to build a Chevy Volt. Sound like a good deal to you? That President Obama really wasn't joking when he said energy costs will have to sky-rocket was he? What a joke. See what happens when we rely on government?
by Journey2244 11 years ago
I think the wealth should be shared by the Rich. Let's put an end to hunger in our own country.
by Evan G Rogers 9 years ago
Warren Buffet personally benefited from the bailouts, so of course he wants the rich to pay more in taxes (he gets the money, and they're his competition).Also, he DOES pay more in taxes than his secretary -- in fact, the IRS claims he still needs to pay $1 billion...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|