Recently Helium.com has been pushing the idea that writers can "make a quick killing by re-purposing" their articles on Helium (they've started paying up to $2 upfront for articles which is where the 'quick killing' bit comes from - however before you get excited, you need to be a 3-star writer which means you must have a lot of high-rating articles on Helium already).
I'm wondering why they would want stuff that has been published already?
If I were to post an article on Helium that I already had on my blog, and Helium had a higher page rank, would the Helium article get first pickings on Google? I'm wondering if that's what's behind it.
I'm guessing that by 're-purposing' they mean 'rejigging'. And it's a quick way to get a huge influx of articles. Perhaps a new tactic that they think will pay off handsomely?
No, they're specifically talking about posting articles that are already published elsewhere without the need for editing - hence the "quick killing" idea. Misha has put into words what I was thinking - that although Helium may appear only to get the second bite of the cherry, in practice their instance of the article is likely to become the "authority" one.
I'm not feeling tempted, personally - they've changed the rules again so your earnings are dependent on maintaining a rating star. That means spending an hour or two every week rating other people's articles, and the return simply isn't worth it. So much for Helium as a source of passive earnings!
Yes, compared to Helium, your blog is a spec of dust. They do have very good ranking power, and easily can outrank other copies of the same text, if later are not heavily promoted...
I am talking out of personal experience - one of their articles surfaces recently for one of my main keywords and is a real pain in the butt to outrank, despite of them having only 4 trashy links reported against my several thousands. No it is not about hub, it is about one of my sites.
Long story short - the duplicate content issue isn't as simple as many think... Trusted sites can and will benefit from duplicate content simply because Google 'trusts' them...
One of the top SEO's shares his analysis and testing (good reading if you're serious about SEO)
http://www.wolf-howl.com/google/google- … e-content/
Marissa, yes I noticed that you have to have stars and that means I have no hope of earning because I am not on the net anywhere near enough as still travelling. I battle to get on the net much at all . although I found a caravan park that has free internet so am here for a couple of days. Gee I can have a party now. not really as they could cut me of if I do too much and take ad vantage of it.
Have a great xmas, Eileen
by Kate Swanson 9 years ago
I was reading a Hub on Hubpages, and was concerned to read the advice that the content we use in our Hubs should be unique, not something we've posted elsewhere on the net.I started out on Helium and have nearly 200 articles on that site. When I joined HubPages, I saw it as a great opportunity to...
by Moon Daisy 8 years ago
Hello, here's something I've been wondering about for a while.I have a few articles on another site, which has recently announced that it's no longer going to pay international contributors. So I'm thinking it would be a good idea to move a couple of them over to HubPages (where we're...
by Nicole Pellegrini 4 years ago
I just got hit by a duplicate content unpublishing of one of my articles. For the record, it is my own work which I had originally published on another platform and wanted to relocate here. After deleting the article from the original site, I submitted a request with Google to have that deindexed...
by HSanAlim 7 years ago
Given all the time spend world wide worrying about Panda and Google's poor quality and duplicate content comments, what the hell does this post from GOOGLE themselves mean. Talk about contradictory!http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot. … apers.html
by Kate Swanson 9 years ago
I notice several disgruntled Hubbers on Eric's new Hub, saying they're leaving HubPages because of the duplicate content flags.They seem to be misunderstanding what the dup content flag is all about - either they think they're being penalized, or that the flag means they have to delete the Hub.I...
by ryankett 7 years ago
Yes, I understand, the algorithm could settle. I'm not holding my breath though. What can Hubpages do to appease Google?I can see nothing less than:- Taking out the bottom 40% of articles in terms of quality.- Pre-approving each and every article like InfoBarrel. - Removing ALL duplicate content. -...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|