If a hub's views decrease, it may go idle. Instead of working on new hubs, I have been taking an article at a time, and changing title, narrowing the topic, adding new information, working on the keywords, finding new examples, changing photos, adding photos. I am amazed at my older hubs that have no visible photo at top or such a large photo that no text shows. As times change, staff instructions and advice changes. I often wonder "Why did I do that? or Why did I say that? I even laugh at myself. Do you find a benefit in revisiting your hubs?
I agree that if you haven't looked at your early Hubs for a long time, it's well worth revisiting. We learn so much as we write, that there are bound to be things we can improve when we look back. I know I revised some of mine several times over the first year or two.
Now, not. I don't see any point in revising Hubs because theymight go into idle. Time enough to worry about it if they do - you'll usually have a few days to fix a Hub before Google notices the idle status. Besides, low traffic often has far more to do with the topic than the quality of the Hub: maybe you just wrote about something no one is searching for, and if that's the case, no amount of revising will make a ha'porth of difference.
We definitely find a benefit in updating already-published Hubs!
We recommend doing these things: http://hubpages.com/learningcenter/Upda … se-traffic
This reminds me... I reeeeally need to do this more myself. I'm glad you brought this up!
I find some hubs are easier to rework than others. Right now I'm trying to see how I can turn three hubs on the same them into one. Some that I wrote as answers to questions have a low survival rate. I've expanded on some of these and republished them, but others it's really hard to rework because they really are, I believe, complete. I'm trying to decide if I need to find a new home for them and as I decide what to do with them, they are simmering. Some still get visits and have higher scores than some featured hubs. I can't understand why they can't just automatically get featured again when traffic picks up. Squidoo lenses that fall back into works in progress fall in and out as traffic ebbs and flows.
I have a few hubs as answers to questions. One is doing fairly well. It sounds like Squidoo has a good idea. I signed up for that site but have not written for it yet. I wish our idle system was a little different, as you say. It is good to hear how others rework hubs.You have good ideas. Thanks.
I just know that I enjoy revisiting my older hubs as a learning experience. It is like taking a writing class and making improvement on an article. I took a class once where we had to write 1000 words and then rework it to 500 words. These things are challenges for me. The idle thing is a minor part of this challenge with my older hubs. Thanks for the comments. Marissa, I know you always make sense. You are probably right about people not being interested in some of my topics. Sometimes my articles aren't narrow enough, and I need to work on SEO and find topics that a lot of people are searching for compared to results.
It sounds like you're still in that phase where you're still learning new things, in which case going back and improving your older Hubs makes a lot of sense. I did that frequently in my first couple of years.
I've noticed you saying your articles aren't "narrow enough" and I'm curious what you mean by that? Can you give some examples?
Finding good dentist, rebuilding after hailstorm, I think I should not select too broad a topic. I have had some success with broad topics like public speaking, and health topics so I feel if it is good enough, it may work. It is taking a chance. Some hubs I wrote because I wanted to, knowing they might not fly. I guess we all do that sometimes.
Both those topics sound absolutely fine. If you try typing "how to find a good dentist" into Google, you'll see it auto-completes, which means people are definitely looking for it. It's more likely your title that's the problem - not many people are typing in "find a good dentist you can trust".
As for the hailstorm - I think the problem with that is that it's too specific, not too broad. Google auto-completes "how to rebuild after a storm" but doesn't have any suggestions for "how to rebuild after a hailstorm". Again, your title may be a problem - who's likely to be typing in "hailstorm: recover and rebuild"?
I can see the same problem with many of your titles. They are very important! Try to word your titles using phrases that people actually use to search for something.
For instance, "Did Aspartame cause Michael Fox's Parkinsons?" would be better than your current version.
"Kidnapping story - advice for parents" - do you think anyone is searching for that? I haven't researched, but I'd guess you'd be better with something like "How to safeguard your children from kidnapping - a cautionary tale" or "How to protect kids from child abduction".
Thank you Marisa. I do appreciate your help. I understand what you are saying. Titles are so important, and if you pick one that doesn't pull in the traffic, you are out of luck. Your expertise is invaluable. Thank you for reading one of my hubs.
I've been doing a lot of this lately as I've come to understand more about SEO and it's slowly bringing traffic back to my older hubs! When I'm struggling to come up with a new hub title this is when I tend to go over my old ones, so at least I'm always 'working' so to speak lol!
@Saloca I have 2 books on SEO, and I have read several good hubs. In the long run, it should be helpful. I use the Google tool, but I still find it difficult. I began writing for fun but now am serious about making money. I am glad your older hubs are doing better. It is interesting to look at the older hubs, as we have learned since that time. Thanks for your comment.
One thing I do is, after taking a look at the idling Hub, I look at my Hubs that are doing well, especially those that are never idle. Then, usually after doing an SEO search, I try to figure out if there's something I can change about the idle one to make it more like the ones that never idle. Doing this has helped me with some Hubs, not so much with others.
That is an interesting approach. If it helps with some, it is worth the effort. Idled hubs seem to lose traffic before going idle.. My lowest scoring hub went idle. It wasn't worth my fixing, as it wasn't a successful topic. Thanks for the idea.
There are only two reasons a Hub can go idle. One is if it goes through the Quality Approval Process and fails. The other is lack of traffic.
A Hub goes through the QAP:
1. When it's first published
2. If you edit it (even a minor edit)
3. If it gets picked up in a random sample.
Which means that an existing Hub, which you haven't edited, is very unlikely to be idled due to the QAP. So when you say "Idled Hubs seem to lose traffic before going idle", you're just observing cause and effect. The loss of traffic leads to its being idled.
By the way, it's worth bearing in mind that if you edit a Featured Hub, it will go through the QAP - so there's always a risk it might fail and drop into idle. So editing without a good reason is perhaps not a good idea.
I thought in the beginning that quality meant something in the idle process per staff. However, some hubbers have talked about their best articles going idle, so I guess that does not hold true. Why would a featured hub go through the QAP process if you edit it? Did I miss something?i
There have been several threads where staff have discussed this in more detail. If you have an existing Hub which goes idle, and you did not edit it, you can be 90% sure it has nothing to do with quality. It's based on "reader engagement", which Derek has confirmed means the amount of traffic it's getting.
I can only assume that because an edit can be quite dramatic, HubPages has decided to put all edited Hubs through the process.
So, you're saying, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Right?
You don't have to edit (or re-edit), but you must do something to change it in some way, to get it off of "idle," right?
You have to do something to make it better by changing content, adding or changing pictures, adding a poll. Do anything that might get more traffic. I unpublished mine, because it needed too much work to make it more searchable. It was a very early hub and not a very good one.
The only way you can change a Hub is to go into edit mode and edit it.
Let me clarify. I know you have to go into "edit" mode to change anything, but I meant that you don't have to actually edit or revise the article. You can make a simple change, such as rewriting or rearranging words in your headline. Sometimes, I make the smallest changes, to see if traffic picks back up as a result. Making small changes, one at a time, instead of doing a lot of editing, gives me a better idea about what might have been the problem. If I do too many things at once, I'm not sure which change made the difference, and frankly, I'd like to know.
That sounds like a good idea to me. I you make a few changes and they work, that's all you need. Sometimes changing the title and then revising the keywords works for me.
OK, I think you're using the word "edit" in the real world definition, whereas I'm using it in the HubPages definition.
"Editing a Hub" means opening it in edit mode, making a change, and saving it. It doesn't matter how big or small the edit is - even one word - it's an edit, and it will trigger another pass through the Quality Assessment Process.
Brakel2, I employed some of the same things you tried to update your hubs and it definitely helped. I "re-revived" one hub that went idle twice and it's doing well after taking out web images and adding my own, adding more text, and marketing it via email, twitter, and fb. I revived another by taking out web images and adding my own and changing some text. I also changed the summaries and titles. I did the same to other low traffic hubs including changing poll and rating capsules that didn't make sense. It is so true how you learn as you go. I still have a lot of work to do.
Every time I revisit one of my earlier hubs I find myself saying "what was I thinking." Revising oldies is a very worthwhile task. You will be amazed how it brings snoozers back to life.
by M. Toni 4 years ago
I've been on here for a few years, and I guess I never really understood the point of these scores. They don't seem to provide any real value to the user and I can't convince myself that they add value because they fluctuate so much.What's the point? Am I supposed to use these scores to tell me...
by Bobby Isenhower 6 years ago
I like helping people with their hubs. I've gotten to know the ins and outs and how it works. I know how to use the tools and other websites to drive your traffic. If you are new post hubs in here and I will get to each one of them to let you know what I think
by Jerrico Usher 10 years ago
My new experiment:http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/8289is looking better every day, and in fact I am trying to figure out ways to help as many Huber’s as possible in this path so I decided I'm going to develop my site in a way that gives authors some link juice (and this site will get massive...
by Nell Rose 6 years ago
How Many visitors do you get in one day on your hubs if you have written approx 150?The reason why I ask is that I have seen so many people on the forums stating they have at least 1000 a day. This is fine but they only have 22 hubs! is it just me, or am I missing something? perhaps my hubs are...
by Eric Dockett 4 years ago
Over the past two+ years I’ve really put a lot of effort into learning SEO and how to produce content that has some hope of success here on HubPages. It was hard work and frustrating at times, but it really paid off. So let me preface this by saying by no means am I dissatisfied with...
by David Gitachu 5 years ago
If we only produce content that people are searching for, will this lead to better quality content ? Will this lead to the growth of the knowledge base? How will new knowledge enter the mainstream if content is only developed to satisfy current demand?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|