Sorry to keep bugging folks, but I'd rather be safe than sorry...
I found the "perfect" photo to go along with a poem of mine...but the ONLY information about it, regarding whether there is or is not a copyright is this:
"Date: ca. 1906. Photo from the Santa Cruz Public Library collection."
Is it, or is it not then, considered in the public domain?
It is GENERALLY anything before 1923 that is public domain.... there are some weird circumstances that it wouldn't be, but chances are it's public domain.
Does it say it's been altered in any way from the original... or do you not have that info?
I do not have that info. The phrase I posted is all that appears.
Given my rather extensive knowledge about the topic, I do not believe the photo is altered at all.
If it's not altered and it's 1906, then it's public domain with 99.99 surety. Use it and attribute it as well as you can. (That's what I would do)
You may use it but try not to alter it too much.
A) Photographs or other works published anonymously, under a pseudonym or the creator is unknown taken or published prior to 1 January 1955
B) Photographs (except A): taken prior to 1 January 1955
C) Artistic works (except A & B): the creator died before 1 January 1955
D) Published editions (except A & B): first published more than 25 years ago
E) Commonwealth or State government held photographs or engravings: first published more than 50 years ago, or if made before 1 May 1969, first made more than 50 years ago"
There are some exceptions however: Fair use rationale for any countries where copyright may still apply: unique photograph of a subject by virtue of being the first. Rare, as only a few photographs of said subject are known to exists. Cannot be reproduced today.
Hubpages gives you a very specific list of websites to use to find your pictures. I would seriously stick to those in order to avoid any problems. I can usually find really great pictures on Flickr. Those are all I use and I haven't had any problems yet.
This is such a specific, limited-interest topic that I had to search by topic rather than site.... ;(
Unfortunately though, they are specific about which sites you draw from to protect you. I've had to get creative on what pictures I used just to stay within their parameters as well. If you stray from their guidelines and policies, you are just asking to get denied on your article. Hope this helps. You'll have to find a way to get creative. Think metaphors if you need to.
Normally, my search parameters on Google include the phrase, "public domain photos of...." and I get several sites from which to choose. When I find a photo that is suitable, the image itself normally states whether it is public domain or not; if not, I continue searching.
This particular case is the first time I've had this sort of ambiguous situation occur.
I use pixabay.com...they have a huge selection and if you don't see anything you like, there's a site that advertises on that site as well...you can purchase a license pretty reasonable for a better quality picture.
Next question in this topic:
My grandson took a self-portrait with his cell phone, (in his Army gear with rifle as he nears the end of his basic training), which he sent to his mother, which she subsequently shared on FaceBook, which I then did likewise.
Is there really a copyright issue if I use that photo to accompany one of my poems that is about him?
No problem, unless he explicitly denies you its use
Let's be real. Copyright is really only an issue for photographers and artists who seek to make a living from their work. Every time we copy one of their paintings or photos, we're stealing their livelihood.
But there are millions of photos taken every day, where the photographer has no interest in the value of the photo - it's just a memento of an occasion. If we copy a photo like that, even if it's not ours, we're doing no harm.
The difficulty is in telling which is which. If you see a stranger's photo on a website, you can't know what attitude the photographer has to it, and it's dangerous to make assumptions (because a professional photo can still look very casual). That's why we say, if there's no indication on the site, it's best to be respectful and assume the owner didn't intend it to be shared.
However in this case, you know the provenance of the photo and that the person who took it won't mind.
I agree with Marisa 100% . She gave you a perfect answer. When it's obvious that it's not taken by someone looking to make money from their picture, nor using someone's name or likeness to make money from them, I don't worry much about it. Realistically, when we share images, we are giving others free advertisement, backlinks, etc. I ask myself things like "Does hollywood.com really care if we use a picture of Eminem in an article about him?".
by Bill Yovino 6 years ago
I check out many of the new hubs as they come across my Home page. I'm interested to see how many people use their own original work, how many correctly use and credit public domain photos, and how many are outright stealing photos from the Internet.When someone posts a professional looking photo...
by ruthwalker 4 years ago
Hi there, joined HP a little while ago but only just got round to writing my first hub. It is going to be an historical piece but seem to be spending most of my time trying to find who owns copyright to the images I would like to use, which are all dated between 1920's and 1950's, and then trying...
by Ronald E Franklin 3 years ago
Who owns the copyright to a POW id card image?I'm planning a hub about a man who was held as a POW by the Germans in WW2. When his prison camp was liberated, he went to the office and picked up his ID card, which he shows in his book. My question: does he own the copyright to that card image? I...
by FloraBreenRobison 6 years ago
Based on the answers to the question I posted yesterday - motivated in part by the TOS difficulties with Pinterest and the new Pin It button - many people see no reason to cite photgraphs that are:a) in the public domainorb) that belong to the authorThis presents a confusion to me.How is a reader...
by Keri Summers 6 years ago
I'm a stickler for copyright (of course!) and have been reading up on use of "public domain" old works of fine art. In the UK, we have copyright in the photographs taken of fine art, and those photographs need to be additionally cleared (eg by paying a fee to an agency like...
by David Hunt 5 years ago
How do websites get away with attaching rights to images that were/are in the public domain?I've seen images on various websites that have "rights reserved" or "licensing required" and yet some are public domain images in WikimediaCommons. There are also images that I suspect...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|