Just out of curiosity—why is it when someone tries to introduce a positive thought there will be at least one individual who will interject a contradictory comment even when it’s non-solicited? Is it because …
a. Some people just enjoy debating ANYTHING
b. Some people don’t know HOW to think positive
c. Some people just don’t think …
I'm going for...
d. there will always be people that see things differently.
It is because there always has to be someone that has to stir the pot and make an argument. This is why I left HP and just came back.
I understand thank you very much. Just wondered if I was a majority of one!
And let me just add to the comment I made previously ... I have also considered leaving HP for the same exact reasons. I seriously try to avoid controversial subject because I choose not to engage in stimulating conversations that become "overly stimulating."
However, there are the rare moments when I think out loud about certain things.
All of the above. I like being part of good discussions, even if there are different opinions -- but, I see no reason to be part of a battle of words that go on forever.
d. Hate, jealousy, negativity and a general desire to bring others down.
Or maybe even genuinely disagreeing with someones point of view. It's not all as negative as you make it out to be. Of course there are people who do this out of the reasons you mentioned, but by no means a majority.
You are right. In 3 years I can count on one hand the number of people I've encountered who have been overtly rude here on HP. That's encouraging - until you get zapped by one of the few.
And it is that small minority that makes, unfortunately the greatest impact. Sensationalism sells ... unfortunately!
There are a lot of knee-jerk people, whose first reaction is to contradict. Not all of them do it deliberately. Let's forgive them, but that doesn't mean to put up with their behavior. They could be energy vampires. It's serious. Often we don't realize it. I also agree with a., b. and c.
It sounds like you ran into a....troll. These people get a morbid fascination and "thrill" from attacking individuals or trying to generate controversy. Often, you can ignore them. Other times, you can give them a taste of their own medicine. I've many epic battles with them on Twitter.
That's exactly why I don't visit forums very often, especially if religion is mentioned. a. and b.
Thanks for you comment. I definitely agree with you 200%
I put a block on the religious forums and my stress level has dropped considerably.
I think I need to do the same.
Block all forums, hubs, questions that deal with religion AND particularly that deal with religion and "the gay".
You already answered it. Just put a, b and c all together.
People are passionate and like to express themselves and there is room for all sorts of ideas. Debate is not a bad thing if it gets people thinking and pondering all sorts of perspectives. It's how we learn. There is a difference though in disagreeing tactfully - than in say trolling just looking to pick a fight.
I'm all for disagreement and discussion - not so much for name calling, antagonizing, starting trouble for the sake of it, etc.
I don't think it's a "hidden" agenda at all - in fact I think it kind of puts it all out there right in the open . The exception would be trolling - where it typically is a hidden way to incite others into a fight. You know the ones, they say something controversial or mean spirited, but pretend to be saying it in all seriousness just to get a rise out of people. Trolling does not equal debate / discussion though
I would agree up to a point. I have found that there are people who find the challenge of a heated discussion undesirable. To them it may be even intimidating. Everything in its place as my late mother used to say.
If the topic is one that is of a question/what's your opinion sort ... then by all means those who are interested in the camaraderie should participate. However, there are topics where people just wish to express their appreciation for a "job well done." There is only an expression of gratitude and this is where I truly believe there is a "hidden agenda" if I say "I truly enjoy the acting talents of Steven Seagal and someone turns around and states "but he was lousy in ..." I, Me ... Jacqueline doesn't appreciate it!
I don't see why it is OK for someone to say they like something, but "bad" or negative if they say they don't like something? No one has to get sucked into an argument, but people do have a right so say what they think. There seems to a bias against perceived "negative" comments as if they weren't as valid as positive comments. Being too positive can be just as closed-minded as being too negative.
That is an interesting concept. Telling someone "you are just too positive ... you need to be more negative." Humm!
There is also the interesting phenomenon of people complaining about negativity possibly not seeing that they are being negative themselves?
Let's look at these two statements:
"No one cares about your stupid comments" vs. "I can definitely understand your point of view however, what do YOU think about ..."
It turns the focus on the other person but in a way that is not argumentative or destructive. Pointing out that there are people who seem to focus on using negative comments is not the same (in my humble opinion) as being negative. At least it should not be seen that way (again in my humble opinion.)
Is that meant to relate to my post, because I don't really see it. Negative means expressing refusal or opposition. If you actually meant being insulting and rude--that's a whole different thing which I am sure most of us can agree about. It is a forum rule after all.
But the OP was about wanting to debate and being negative. Both of which strike me as valid approaches on a forum.
Actually, no. If my point of view has seemed to be personalize ... then accept my humble apology. I am just giving an example of how words can be used in both a positive and negative manner. I shall humbly agree to disagree. I have no desire to create a chaotic atmosphere but to look out of my window onto my beautiful deck and marvel how wonderful nature is.
I shall in like manner turn my attention to such pass times as working on my novel and enjoying my daughter's lovely pictures of Jamaica and desperately wishing I was with her!
Have a simply lovely day everyone and thank you for a most interesting and stimulating conversation! Au revoir!
Debate only truly happens when you have humans who have been taught the skills to debate. Logical thinking, informational progression, researching, historical precedent...to me, all that underpins a debate.
What I see in the forums is people who say the same unquantified/unqualified statements of personal opinion over and over, getting more and more indignant and insulting each time, and they genuinely think they are debating.
I agree, but that was the behavior raised in OP. And debate strikes me as a good thing, negativity per se as neutral. Rudeness, irrationality and pique--not that is what annoys me. Not just someone contradicting an assertion in the negative for a rational reason.
I really don’t understand this concept of “trolling” to use the vernacular. What exactly is this?
" In Internet slang, a troll (/ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion. "
This "trolling concept" sound simply deplorable! For any person to want to create such chaos is someone lacking in total consideration for another. How horrible ...
It is horrible and very distasteful, Jacqueline. It shows that some trolls (with the descriptions ChristinS gave us) that some people just have a very low and wicked mentality. It happens all the time in our forums and even in comments on hubs. This is one reason I very much appreciate the fact that HubPages has given us options to not receive notices on forums we do not want to get involved in or even see in our newsfeed, and to be able to delete comments on our hubs.
I can usually handle different points of view, but every once in a while someone will just push my buttons. I recently posted a hub straight from research on a topic that is in the news right now. A reader took exception to my point of view but attacked me personally for the content. And I do mean personally. It was all I could do not to return her venom in kind, but then I thought: what's the point?
We've all been there. Hang in there.
I can see that all folks here have pretty serious views. What confuses me forever is what positive and negative means. For instance, if I say that Adolf Hitler was a wonderful person, is that positive? If I say that J.Edgar Hoover was a cross-dresser, is that negative. If I say that J.Edgar Hoover was not a cross-dresser, is that positive or negative?
It seems that when people use the term positive or negative, they usually have a political agenda. Is there anyway that an individual can express an opinion about sexual preference without being demonized? We are in a time and place where simply refusing to write about some subjects is probably more constructive. Of course, that might be a positive or negative view.
As in "positive attitude" it means to emphasize what is laudable, hopeful or to the good; constructive.
Therefore, I feel safe to say that what is positive does not violate the feelings of others but is a devise used to uplift, encourage and produce a feeling of well being.
When our comments are criticized in such a way that it makes us feel unhappy then this is not a "positive reaction." Being considerate of other people's feelings whether we are addressing what someone wrote or face-to-face interactions should be the desire of every SANE human being. And it is human nature to defend ourselves when we feel threaten whether real or imagined.
Here here, I agree totally with these points Jacqueline. I joined a seemingly innocent forum titled something like "what is the best book you have read recently?" It was going fine until a commenter (who is not a Hubber but frequents forums, mainly on religion) chimed in saying 'origin of the Species' then commenced berating everyone who hadn't read it or didn't want to as 'narrow minded-Christians'. The original topic was nothing about religion.
That sounds a lot like a Predator to me. Predators lie in wait for unsuspecting people and then attempt to cause mayhem. I am sorry that you had to have such a negative experience. We should be able to enjoy friendly interactions without interference from such people.
These types of attitudes is exactly why I backed out of all religious discussions, Jodah. It simply is not worth my time and effort.
If everyone wrote with what Jacqueline 4390 refers to as "positive attitiude" we could probably even write about sex without hurting anybody's feelings. I, for one, am not holding my breath.
It is indeed so very sad that "civilized man" cannot work toward a common good without someone saying something negative, hurtful or hateful to someone else. What necessitates the desire to be destructive? What damage will it do to be polite, courteous and considerate?
This is human nature though. There are always people who will play the Devil's Advocate. Some do it in a nicer way, and some in a more rude way. Some people genuinely try to point out a different way of seeing things, whilst others will simply be having a bad day and will get their frustrations and anger out in rude comments. Just see things for what they are instead of trying to unrealistically force everyone to be positive and "civilized".
But sometimes "negative" comments can be just as constructive as "positive" comments. Sometimes it is only being told something with "negative" honestly that gets some people to realize what they were doing wrong instead of trying to point it out using a kid gloved hand.
I personally prefer the "kid gloves" approach. To each his own. I will not now or ever personally agree that purposely hurting someone is "for their own good." I am a firm believer of the Law of Reciprocity: what you give will return to you. And, usually it is a lot worse.
"honestly that gets some people to realize what they were doing wrong" is not the same as "deliberately hurting someone".
I never said that it was ... what I am saying is that there is a diplomatic way to tell anybody something without being offensive. My emphasis is on tactfulness which is not a negative trait. It is having concern for the feels of others. Some may call it being "civilized."
Have you never met anyone who simply does not understand tactful hints and kind words and will only react if they are talked to in a more forceful way? Your theory would only work if everyone were "civilized" and had they same calm personality that would allow them to listen to and accept "positive" criticism. A finger wag and slap on the wrist will not work for many people as well as a more forceful approach.
I see where Jacqueline is coming from here. Constructive criticism is fine and correcting someone if they have made an incorrect statement is too, but on the Internet you have to be more tactful in the way you do it than if you were talking to them in person. It is difficult to read the intonation and intent in the written word without the added assistance of tone of voice and body language, so if someone is a littlest sensitive about a certain subject they can take your helpful remark as harsh criticism if it is not worded carefully. I agree you should never deliberately try to hurt someone.
I would add though that people are often emotionally attached to their opinions - in that they take a constructive criticism of an idea as a personal assault. This happens a lot in forums - you can disagree with a persons idea and be respectful, but some people will still take the disagreement with their idea as you being a bully or they will see themselves as a victim - when in actuality you were only pointing out disagreement with their ideas. I have many people who I deeply respect that I disagree with vehemently - but I still have love for the person even if I don't like their particular mindset on things.
We live in a vast world full of different people with a myriad of experiences, perspectives and opinions all their own. I think it's terrible to sanitize everything so much to avoid hurting feelings that good ideas get lost. It is definitely a delicate balance.
What separates humans from lower forms of animals is our ability to emphasize. Intelligent beings with sensitive natures are normally very artistic and caring. Most people are known by their words ... not having the ability to "read minds" we are sometimes limited to the "verbal responses" of others.
Without the ability to "read" body language I can only translate your feelings by what you write and the way in which you write it. I can't "see" that you only mean well if the "tone" of your writing denotes otherwise. Expressions like "please" ... "thank you" ... "if you don't mind" and the very popular "don't take this personal" a some ways of buffering your words.
However, if you criticize my words ... you ARE criticizing me :-)
After all, they are my words!
If you don't mind my humble opinion :-)
Not at all - I have found though that sometimes phrases like "No offense" lol - are code for "I'm about to offend you" lol.
By all means, people can - and should - be polite and respectful in their statements. I've just learned that sometimes, especially around subjects that people tend to be very passionate about - religion, politics, parenting styles etc. that sometimes if you say "I disagree because this this and that" - they reach the conclusion that if you disagree with me, you are attacking me. - precisely for the reasons you just stated actually - that in writing especially it's hard to gauge tone, intent etc. and a lot can get lost that way. Communication on the net is certainly like the wild west sometimes. I think too the anonymity of the net gives people a lot of courage to cross the line to personal insults. Things you wouldn't dare say to someone's face are somehow easier when it's someone you don't really know and it's on a keyboard.
Right you are ... Hahahahaha! I agree with this comment "on point." People do tend to be bolder online. Me? I have mellowed 200% according to my face-to-face buddies :-)
Perhaps its age or finally being able to get it right but regardless I try very hard to consider the feelings of others (and ... I did say try!)
There are some people, when given a choice, would rather be mean and malicious, rather than be positive and offer suggestions instead of criticism. It's inevitable. Personally, I don't like offering critical words because words can hurt like nobody's business...I'm just saying...
So true, so very true. Words can really, really, really hurt. I have the scars to prove it.
You know as a child I learned "Sticks and stones may break my bones; but, names will never hurt me." That is so not true. And I try very diligently to teach my children the value of the words they choose. Once a word, name, etc. is spoken, you can never take it back. It may be forgiven; but, never forgotten.
This is so true, Shirley! Words have a much longer lasting affect than those "sticks and stones." No matter how you try; the words linger on! This is a wonderful lesson you are teaching your children. It never hurts to treat people in a kind, courteous and respectable manner. It will pay off ... maybe not now but it will pay off!
Don't let it be an issue. Don't be bothered by it. Address them if you feel the need to or keep going if you don't :-)
Growing up in the 1950's which was a great tyme to be alive when everything was nieve and innocent so to speak we never heard of the 'hidden agenda' until after college life. Well it came to pass that i got involved in a hidden agenda or in another term 'feathering one's own nest' and it soon became apparent that perhaps there is a hidden agenda behind practically everthing! That is why i decided to become involved in the counter culture and i reckon even that has been penetrated with the buying and selling of consumables. We probably don't even know what the biggest hidden agenda is but what does the media persist in trying to tell us daily in the news?:
It is very simple, we all tend to interpret information based on our own experience. It is part of the reason, people react differently to information. I think the key is to not take it personally.
In theory this is very sound advise ... however, there are times when I find it difficult to "not take things personally" especially when it is a direct attack against something I have said. So maybe its safer to just "stir clear" of certain subjects :-)
I think you are right.
I need to learn to avoid things---and opinions, most of which I can never affect in any positive way.
Sometimes I do wonder, though, why there is so much religious fanaticism in this particular medium; why do much of the space of Hubpages is devoted to a decidedly right-wing Christian agenda.
I hate to hear moderates, the voices of reason, concede discussions of important topics of the day. If you/we don't lift our voices the extremes will be the only voices heard. I'd hate to see that happen to HP.
When a lion roars it evokes fear and distress. A gentle voice "turns away wrath." I prefer to be a gentle voice.
It is also true that forums are not just for show and tell. You are--in most cases-- inviting comment, elaboration or disagreement from other members. To just display something you want appreciated without comment or critique, there are better venues (like a hub).
Perhaps ... however some comments wouldn't actually rate an entire hub.
e) To tease too egoistic and too sensitive people who are averse to any criticism and enjoy seeing them exploding!
Sounds very much like instigating. How very sad. Why would I want to upset somebody intentionally?
It is my opinion that oversensitive people who are averse to criticism make their own life miserable and also make the life of those close to them miserable. They tend to lack humor. I love humor. I get a sort of sadistic joy in teasing them and I chuckle and laugh when they hit me back in vengeance!
I think that the real 'hidden agenda' is actually within us all. We all have the potential to increase our talents through this personal awareness.
In my experience, the scenario raised in the OP is not debate. I agree that those interjecting humans may *think* they are debating, when it strikes me a lot more like a script-free reenactment of the Monty Python skit about the argument clinic.
What the OP is on about is explained in that skit: automatic gainsayers.
It is my observation that there are some people who like to always be right, and always think they are correct in their thinkingev3n if they are changing the topic.
by PoeticPhilosophy 7 years ago
Doesn't bother me one bit. I laughed and see the patheticness in these people so much now but decided I wanted to post about it and see if this has happened to anyone else. On one of my poems here is what someone wrote,"I am concerned about the image you selected, a silhouette of a woman...
by Kenna McHugh 3 days ago
The newsletter arrived with some valuable information that I can use as a writer. What do you all think?
by Jacqui 7 years ago
I'm of the opinion that I approve all comments even the nasty ones. If someone is going to be nasty in a comment then they should be public and made to deal with the fall out (if there is any.)However, I've noticed that one or two of my more ..... Controversial hubs have generated more comments...
by Yves 4 years ago
In which cases would you flag/report someone to Hubpages, or even ask that they be banned?For example, if someone slandered your name, would you flag them? Here is a comment taken from a religious Q&A comment on Hubpages: "Compulsive lying with an inclination towards spreading...
by Pamela N Red 2 years ago
Do you leave negative comments from readers on your articles?I delete spam but have left comments when a person doesn't agree with me. However, I have noticed I seem to be in the minority on this because when I've left a comment disagreeing with a person (this is not just on HubPages but on blogs...
by Jaye Denman 7 years ago
Why would any HP writer purposely not allow comments on his/her hubs?I just read two hubs--good ones--by an HP writer I hadn't encountered before, but neither has a Comments section. I wanted to comment on both, and the inability to do so stops me from reading any more of this writer's hubs. Why...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|