If you stand back, and take a breath, you will realise that Editbot marks a major change in intervention by HP for the content of hubs. The following points are relevant:
=> The introduction of subdomains was heralded as an opportunity for authors to 'do their own thing' within the rules and be in charge of their own destiny. If you were good at it you did well, if not you failed.
=> Various previous site-wide changes such as the number of product capsules were only imposed after the author edited their hubs in response to suggestions. I cannot think of a previous instance where compulsory edits were thrust upon writers, rather than involving them to do the editing themselves.
=> The Hubpro program started the intervention, rewriting and editing hubs, but it was voluntary (you could opt out) and the author had the opportunity to edit and revert the proposed changes BEFORE they were accepted and went live.
=> Hubpro Basic was the next step by HP. It is compulsory, but the author has the opportunity to work with the editor and make reversions for things they do not like. One of the interventions related to 'style'
=> Editbot is a major new development as the edits are made ( done deal), before the author has an opportunity to accept them. Sure the author has the opportunity to revert to the other option to correct Editbot mistakes, but only after Editbot has changed every hub on the site, that Editbot deemed to contain errors. The poor way that Editbot was implemented, without the ability to have the tag disappear once the suggested edits have been accepted or not after being viewed by the author is symbolic of a change of attitude and approach. The edits sit on top of the original content, and bypass the original version of the text. The original author's text is not changed, the edits sit on top (take, leave it or change it).
I would have preferred the other approach, which was for Editbot to highlight potential spelling errors with suggestions. It would be up to the author to make the changes to the ORIGINAL TEXT. But now the edits sit on top of the content and HP has the ability to thrust similar changes on the content is similar ways. Editbot may be run monthly and so we can all expect this process to continue. I suspect that similar edits and changes will be thrust upon us.
I fear that the respect for authors and their content is gradually being eroded by Editbot. This is disturbing!
So far all the edits have been for content inside of people's comments on my Hubs. I smirked
I made the point about the level of interference with HubPages content becoming out of control a while back - in relation to copyright.
To my mind setting up a system which attempts to remedy problems with people who have poor English while alienating people who can write - who then transfer their content elsewhere - could spell the beginning of the end for HubPages.
IMO HubPages needs to think very carefully about the business ramifications of interfering with people's content - WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT.
After all, it's very easy to pick up all the content on a hub and remove it, deindex the URL and set it up on a site where nobody is going to "tell you" about spelling, grammar and how many links to a domain and Amazon modules you can have.
[NOTE re context: I have lots of very long hubs (several thousand words) which have incredibly few editbot changes - average seems to be about 1 - and that's often in the comments. I'm very irritated by any changes which I don't get to vet first BEFORE implementation. Plus traffic continues to increase exponentially on all the content I've removed and placed on my own sites. Just saying.... ]
Marina just posted an update related to EditBot here.
by Marina 2 years ago
Happy Thursday, everyone! In August we pre-announced a new tool that fixes common spelling and grammatical errors across the site. Today, Editbot, the first iteration of the tool, is live on a small percentage of Hubs and their comments. It will be gradually rolled out to all Hubs over the next...
by Cholee Clay 5 months ago
I have an article that an editor has made substantial changes too. Including adding a bio that they wrote themselves. I have not seen an edit this bad in quite some time on one of my articles, and I do not want to go through the whole article and rewrite half of it. I've already spent countless...
by Liz Elias 6 months ago
I have been working on edits like a mad dog the last week or two, and I am so frustrated I could spit nails!1) No matter HOW carefully I edit for grammar, lack of typos, flow, content, references, proper use of capsules, anchor text links instead of link capsules, it seems there is always a...
by Will Apse 23 months ago
I reckon HP want us to keep updating our hubs after they have been edited and moved to niches sites. I reckon they are also a little afraid that some hubbers will do more harm than good in the changes that they make.I've no doubt that many hubbers are anxious about changing editors edits.My...
by Sherry Hewins 19 months ago
It seems Editbot is at work again. Had several little fixes, almost all in comments.
by Dr. John Anderson 3 years ago
When I save an edited a hub, the saves appear in edit mode. But, the changes do not show in the published version. This applies in both Chrome and Mozilla and is not fixed by refreshing. It appears as though the published page is a version behind i.e. it is reflecting what was a saved previously...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|