They ask me to fix it and I fix it; then they ask me to fix it again ad I fix it again; repeat five times now and I have no idea what they want. The emails are SO VAGUE and I'm sick of trying to guess what's triggering the filter. Any ideas would be much appreciated!
btw, I have plenty of featured hubs and actually make payout every month, so it's not like I don't know how to write a decent hub.
I just read your hub. There are spelling errors along with some awkward grammar. Now, have I seen worse on HP? Yes. So I'm a little surprised you still having a hard time. But I have heard that the HP standards are getting tougher with each review. So maybe that's the biggest change. Errors that were overlooked previously, are now being flagged. Not sure.
Anyway, do another spelling and grammar check. That should do it. By the way, I learned a lot about sea glass. Thx.
I'm a Hubpages newbie, and I'm not completely sure about some of the types and styles of images and formatting that are preferred yet, (I just have the basics down) so I'll just comment on grammar. I hope you don't mind.
I see an error at ..." and it's not ot exactly rare, either.." It should read, "and it's not exactly rare, either.."
You may want to change 'PR' to Puerto Rico.
I think a semi-colon is appropriate where you have a colon after 'true:'
There's a grammatical error at "but if you're awwaare you can tell...'
It should read "but if you're aware, you can tell...'
Also, maybe think about taking out all, or nearly all, of the em dashes. I'm not sure if it's grammatically acceptable to use em dashes in any part of your article, but I think there's too many anyhow.
Hope this helps and good luck to you!
I would say it's the two Amazon capsules. Sea glass gifts aren't really the focus of the article and the editors have become much stricter about their relevance. Also the rarity chart is a little pixelated.
I agree with SheilaMilne that it's most likely the two sea glass gifts. I base that on hubs of mine that have been edited. We think that a gift made from the topic of our hub should be okay, but that is not the case. Bet if you delete those, the hub will pass muster. Perhaps substitute a sea glass identification guide, something that directly (not indirectly, but absolutely directly) relates to your topic. It's a beautiful hub, very informative. Hope this advice works for you!
Hey that's really good advice, and a really good idea -- if such a guide exists, that is. But the principle is sound. I would be willing to strip all of the Amazon out but one reason I'm even on Hubpages is to get a little income going. So I'm going to try that. Thanks again!
I took a quick peek at your hub, and here are my thoughts:
First, you have no clear introduction. I think capsule 2 should actually be capsule 1.
Second, your article is about sea glass, but your ads are about jewelry and combs made from sea glass. That's considered spam.
Most of your photos have no captions and many have no accreditation.
While the photos are gorgeous, the topic interesting and the basic information good, the article as a whole does not "flow". In other words, most of the capsules don't seem to relate well to one another.
I think if you got rid of the ads, put a more interesting title on and reorganized the capsules you'd have a real winner.
Okay fixed some spelling glitches, thanks for the edit. But thinking about it, the most recent email from Hub central said it had spammy elements. I know what those are, and I rewrote it twice now just to be sure, but still no dice. So the spelling is certainly better now, but I'd be surprised if that fixed the problem. Whatever it is.
Hey thanks for the input TT. Some really good points! But the ads of course are assigned by AdSense, not me, and the Amazon products (2) are about jewelry because that's really the only way sea glass is sold to the general public. Anyway do you think the two Amazon capsules equate to spam in the eyes of HP? I went in and wrote a little about each one based on my personal experience, as suggested in email number 3...
Your Hubs are REALLY nice, by the way. I appreciate your input.
Thanks for the kudos.
Yes, I do think the ads are probably the main issue because, as I and a few others have stated, your article is NOT about jewelry, it's about sea glass. You might want to write a different one about jewelry or even change the focus of this article so that it focuses on jewelry. You could still use a lot of the same info, too. In that case, if you place and word the ads correctly, you'd be OK.
I know you have them there because you think they will bring in some money, but even without them, you can earn because you'll still have the Adsense ads and also will earn from clicks. In fact, without them, you might even earn more because people who don't like spam, won't buy!
You seem to have taken many photos without permission. You can only use a photo if the photo's owner has told you that you can, via a creative commons notice or direct communication.
The easiest way to find creative commons pics is to search Google images and use the filter at the top of the page: search tools... usage rights....labelled for reuse.
Quite a few here: https://www.google.co.th/search?q=googl … tbs=sur:fc
Thanks Will -- I admit I got out of the habit after moving from Squidoo -- they're much less picky about it here, so I have let it slide. You're right and I'll do the extra work to fix it!
Actually, the easiest way is to find public domain photos on Morguefile.com and Pixabay.com where you never have to worry about accreditation and can get great photos. Wikimedia Commons is also good, but they have stricter guidelines in many cases.
Pixabay and many other public domain photos come up in Google image search under 'labelled for reuse'. Pixabay et al. are rather limited.
This is a tip I've given to some people of the HubPages community and it seems to work for them. In the future, I recommend you use a program/app called Grammarly. If you download it from, say, Chrome, it will correct not only your orthographic mistakes, but also ways of phrasing and possibly confused words. It's free (there is a paid version, though) and it makes proofreading so much easier.
I hope I was of help.
Looks good to me, have you edited it already? Also hmm maybe more content word wise, that's all I can say as they recommend that the best hubs have 1250 plus (I think). I'm a terrible speller, I've just gone through a hub that I wrote and corrected all the grammatical errors that their spelling bot had suggested and the article went up from a 60 something hub score to a 75 but then I did write it on a tablet when my laptop was broken. So much easier when google chrome tells me how I'm going wrong with spelling.
THANKS everybody for all the suggestions. My blood pressure has gone back down and now I have some useful ideas that will probably apply in some way to all of my hubs. Thanks again.
Replacing "Puerto Rico" with any other island wouldn't fundamentally change the article. There's not a lot of PR-specific content. The video you embedded is about Bermuda, not PR
If I happen to be in Puerto Rico, which beaches exactly should I go to or what local shops sell it? That's what a person googling "Puerto Rican sea glass" wants to know. You mention Rincon, but that's not a specific beach, that's a coastal city. The article is really more of a general overview of sea glass.
And as others have mentioned you have a bunch of amazon stuff, which HP is allergic to.
When I first came to HP, I thought we could take pictures from Google Images, and that's not the case. I also write on topics where most of the free sites don't have any pictures for my topics, or have such a limited selection, everyone has seen them many times. If you have a collection of sea glass, why not take a few pictures of that and email them to yourself, then put them in the hub?
I don't see grammar issues, you must have fixed them.
I've had hubs moved, and it seems they really don't want any Amazon capsules on them, unless it's very specific, so if you can't find anything like that, just leave them off. Best of luck!
I didnt find anything wrong but I did find the whole article rather boring and doesnt keep interest very well. I can stay tuned to most anything I read but if I were to find a problem, that would be it.
by Natalie Frank3 weeks ago
I have an article on Artist Communities in National Parks. It is the same quality as other hubs on similar topics but wasn't featured. I edited, nothing, then added a list of the 50 some odd programs and it was...
by Gemini Fox3 years ago
Had never done a “sales” hub before so decided to try. Have tweaked and tweaked this hub but it still keeps on being not featured due to quality. Getting a little T’d . . . http://geminifox.hubpages.com/hub/Green...
by Georgianna Lowery4 years ago
This is a two-fold issue. I know we're in the middle of a Google Typhoon or whatever animal is wreaking havoc this month plus the summer traffic is, well, obviously somewhere else. In January/February of this year, my...
by Catherine Giordano2 months ago
I understand the rationale for removing amazon capsules. I'm very careful not to include amazon capsules unless they are 100% relevant, and I can provide a personal opinion. I rarely do more than one per hub.HP is not...
by Jorge7 days ago
Hello,I took into account suggestions to improve my article and edited it accordingly, also the traffic is growing (two red triangles). In spite of this, the score dropped from 50 to 49 and it is not published.How do...
by AnnaMKB21 months ago
First off, my hubs are transferred from Squidoo, and I am aware of various issues there. I'd already checked and edited hubs after the transition, so this is all post transfer.What I don't understand is why some...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.