Traffic trend sites shows Hubpages has lost about 55% of traffic

Jump to Last Post 1-8 of 8 discussions (37 posts)
  1. claptona profile image67
    claptonaposted 7 years ago
    The chart showed a loss of about 55% of the traffic on Hubpages in the last 6 months.
    I also looked at the traffic trends on some of the niche sites, and they don't seem to be making up for the loss.
    In fact the bounce rate seemed higher than that of Hubpages.
    What are the old timers thoughts about this?
    I also noticed on the niche sites that the "follow" button really seemed to be in a strange place.

  2. EricDockett profile image97
    EricDockettposted 7 years ago

    What chart? I see a picture of a clock above an archway. Where are you getting this data, and how does the clock fit in?

    Certainly the traffic for HubPages will have plummeted, as thousands of the highest-quality articles have been moved to the niche sites.

    Personally, my traffic has greatly improved since the niche sites.

    Re: bounce rate: The way Hubs are interlinked makes this number hard to interpret on HP. Back when we had subdomains bounce was fairly high because any time a reader went from one Hub to another by a different Hubber it counted as a bounce. Then, when HP put all Hubs back on the main domain, bounce would have dropped a bit because all Hubs were on the same domain.

    Now that we have the niche sites, any time a reader goes from one niche site to another, or from a niche site to HP, or from HP to a niche site, it counts as a bounce. If you are comparing the numbers from when all Hubs were on HP to the niche site numbers then bounce will look a little higher.

    In my opinion, it's not really worth worrying about. It's just a metric. Reader experience is more important.

    1. profile image0
      calculus-geometryposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Isn't it obvious?  The people sitting below the arch are former hubbers who have been reduced to selling street art since their traffic declined.

    2. The Old Guard profile image60
      The Old Guardposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      LOL - you funny guy, calc!
      No, I was looking at this site here
      I've just been doing some research and it caught my attention.
      Wasn't saying it was bad or good, just wondering how it pertained to hubpages.
      Picture was just one of mine put in to enjoy, Ignore it if you don't like it.
      Had noting to do with the question.
      Thanks for the responses. calc got a good chuckle out of yours!

      1. claptona profile image67
        claptonaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Whoops, in wrong account when I posted this. Sorry......

  3. lobobrandon profile image87
    lobobrandonposted 7 years ago

    I thought the clock with a mountain (possibly geologically active) was a ticking time bomb. Then I read the OP said it was just a pic and not related - sad sad

    Anyway, similarweb is very inaccurate at least in regard to my own website. So I wouldn't trust it. It shows that my second largest user base is from Taiwan (0% in reality) and the bounce rate on my site is just 5% (according to similarweb), it's a more like 25% though.

    1. claptona profile image67
      claptonaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Thx for your thoughts, lobo.
      Much appreciated!
      At least the pic got your attention! LOL
      I've included the active volcano that's close to the one behind the clock.
      I could sit on the terrace at night and watch the red lava burst out every 15 minutes or so.
      It's Antigua, Guatemala.

  4. Marisa Wright profile image87
    Marisa Wrightposted 7 years ago

    The traffic stats for my blog are rubbish on that site, I wouldn't trust it.   Frankly I would expect the traffic loss to to be more than 55%.

    When the niche sites were announced, HubPages said they were going to skim the cream - i.e. move all the high-traffic Hubs first.  A figure was quoted - I can't recall but I think they said those Hubs accounted for 70% of HubPages' traffic?  Maybe someone else can remember.  So they expected 70% of traffic to go from the main site - and it will take time for the niche sites to reach their potential. 

    Most sites that track traffic are just guessing - not one of them has access to real stats.   Even a respected site like Alexa doesn't have accurate statistics. 

    Quantcast used to have 100% accurate data on HubPages because HubPages gave them access to their traffic stats.  They cut off that access before the move to the niche sites.

    1. lobobrandon profile image87
      lobobrandonposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Yeah that's what I remember too somewhere around the 70% mark.

    2. claptona profile image67
      claptonaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Thx Marisa,
      I appreciate your input and your thoughts.
      Not much dif to me, I'm trying to understand a lot of stuff. Was just looking around and saw that.
      The net be one interesting place. Not easy for a 64 yr. to comprehend stuff I've never really paid attention too.
      No worries, no hassles - just learning.
      Again, thx.

      1. Marisa Wright profile image87
        Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        We're the same age, you're not too old yet!   I started doing this stuff 8 years ago so I've got a head start on you but I still wasn't a spring chicken, so no excuses!

        The question about stats raises a bigger question - i.e. what's going to happen to in the future.   The move to niche sites has already slashed 70% off its traffic.  As new Hubs are being published, all the best ones are being moved straight to the niche sites - tha'ts the new normal, so new Hubs are never going to add much new traffic to the main site.  Meanwhile, moderators are still cherry-picking good existing Hubs for the niche sites, so that's more traffic being lost from the main site day by day.

        If we assume the site had only 30% of its former traffic after the initial launch of the niche sites, what will it be like by the time they're done cherry-picking?  How can a site with so little traffic be viable? 

        The main site will have to continue in the long term, as an administrative Hub for us to manage our accounts and submit new articles to the niches.  But I can't see how it has any future as a profit centre.  Maybe it will become a playground for Hubbers, a place to write stuff for each other rather than for a wider audience.

        1. claptona profile image67
          claptonaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

          Oh, I didn't say I was "too" old. If I was that, I'd be 6 ft. under!
          Didn't say I couldn't learn it, just saying my grasp is lacking. I've got a few fingers around it, but it's tenuous at best. LOL
          Great that you learned what you did. I enjoy your responses and insight into a lot of the questions and forums here.
          Not my worries about hubpages. They want a business, they'll figure out or go broke - the market is fair about that.
          What you learn here on hubpages, you can take anywhere on the internet. The beauty of the site Only thing consistent about change is the change.
          Have a great week!

          1. Marisa Wright profile image87
            Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

            You are right, HubPages is a business and they will figure it out.  The point is, though, that the niche sites ARE the result of their figuring. 

            We know they've been trying to make the main site profitable since the Great Panda Disaster of 2011, when we lost 75% of our traffic.  Although they've had some successes over the years, the site has never got close to where it was before Panda.   I'm not surprised they've finally decided, after 5 years, that there's nothing more they can do to make a profitable business as a single site - in fact, one could say they've been surprisingly pig-headed in persevering for so long.  Especially when you consider their top Hubbers (most of whom are online professionals and no longer here) were telling them to go niche years ago. 

            That's why I'm struggling to understand why they'd keep the main site going, because they could easily use as a "back office" only, with only our profile pages, forums and Q&A here.   Their slowness in going niche leads me to suspect there's a sentimental attachment there. After all, it's Paul Edmondson's baby and he still owns the company.  Although I could be cynical and say they don't want to tell us until they've mined the existing Hubs for all the material they want . . .

            1. Solaras profile image94
              Solarasposted 7 years agoin reply to this

              Even if pageviews are down 55%, there is still money being made here.  And they may create new niches (to mine from the motherload) once they have these under control.

              1. Marisa Wright profile image87
                Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                That's true, but bear in mind that all the profitable Hubs have already been moved to niches.  What's left is a huge mass of Hubs that weren't getting enough traffic to be worth creating a niche for the first time round. I'm know there are plenty of Hubs in that mass that they haven't created a niche for yet - but creating a niche site takes time and staff effort, and ongoing maintenance.  Can those costs be justified in terms of the future potential income of the niche?  If those Hubs are a small fraction of what's already only 30% of the site's original traffic, and even the original traffic wasn't enough to make the main site viable on its own, it's hard to see how the numbers would stack up for new niches.

                Also, maintaining the "rump" of HubPages takes up the time of moderators and technical people.   Assuming there are staff at HubPages who have a business brain, they should be looking at the ratio of cost to profit for both the main site and each of the niche sites.    If they cut back the main site to just an admin centre with forums and Q&A, they wouldn't need staff or technicians to manage the Hubs - they should be calculating what saving that would make and whether it's more than the income being generated.  Maybe it stacks up and if it does, the main site will continue. If it doesn't, it would be a poor business brain that didn't take action.

                1. Solaras profile image94
                  Solarasposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                  I see your point but....Something I have gathered from the forums is that many good articles earning well have been left behind.  Those are the ones people are petitioning for review.  I don't know why they were left behind.  Maybe there was such a rush or certain parameters that editors were looking for where those hubs slightly missed the mark.  But I have the idea that a good chunk of earning hubs are still on the HP site.

                  If I look at profiles of some of those with 10M+ views I see only a small percentage (25%) of their hubs on niche sites. One of those authors in particular was careful to tend her garden and remove non-performers.

                  Also, some may have been beaten out on the move because it was a duplicate topic, the hubs that remained behind have gotten a boost from the lack of competition.  Just some of the comments people have made here.

                2. Christy Kirwan profile image91
                  Christy Kirwanposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                  Just to be clear, we have not finished going through the backlog and our Curators are still working through old Hubs as well as new. Many of these simply haven't been looked at yet.

                  1. Marisa Wright profile image87
                    Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                    Just to be clear, the Hubs you're still going through - are you still going through the original "top" Hubs representing 70% of the traffic, that were mentioned in the original discussions?  Or have they already been moved and you're mining the rest for gems?

            2. RonElFran profile image97
              RonElFranposted 7 years agoin reply to this

              Marisa, I think there's a very important reason for keeping HubPages alive as a site. It should be what we call in baseball a "farm team." In other words, where do new writers practice their craft as they work to improve? I would be surprised if most new hubbers start out writing well enough to get to a niche site. HubPages should be an incubator site that provides a welcoming home for neophytes and produces graduates who develop to the point where they write well enough to make the big leagues (the niche sites).

              1. Marisa Wright profile image87
                Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

                I've thought of that.  If they go down that road, though, then they would probably have to make all the Hubs on the main site unFeatured, the same way Weebly makes its free sites unFeatured, so that staff don't have to expend time and energy on monitoring quality on Hubs that don't pay.

            3. TessSchlesinger profile image60
              TessSchlesingerposted 7 years agoin reply to this

              Agreed, Marissa. That said, my traffic has picked up as a result of the niche sites.

        2. Jean Bakula profile image94
          Jean Bakulaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

          I'm noticing a big spike in traffic for about two or three months after a hub is moved to a niche site, and then it seems to level out. I did well money wise this time, but can already see I have made less for the coming month (since we get paid from the last month).

          I'm fixing up old hubs, and am sort of surprised which ones are getting traffic. They are moving some hubs with little traffic, and they get more, so that's nice. And the hubs that were popular still are.

          I have written three new hubs, two made niches and one did not. It's hard to decide whether to keep writing. Plus my orders for my charts and readings have really picked up and it seems wiser to work on that.

  5. claptona profile image67
    claptonaposted 7 years ago

    Thanks for sharing Jean.
    So, it's a little less money right now after, what, 6 months?
    Do you think it will pick up as hubpages works on the niche sites?
    Glad to hear overall that you're doing well on hupages.
    To your continued success!

    1. Jean Bakula profile image94
      Jean Bakulaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      Hi John,
      They began moving my hubs in June, so that's about 5 months now. They seem to drop a little in views after about three months, so I'm not sure what to expect. My hubs that always did well still are.

      Once in a while they still edit a hub and move it to a niche, but at a much slower rate than they did. I think they are looking more for new material now. At least we know what the niches are, and so if we write something to fit one, our chances of having a new hub moved immediately is better.

      I guess we are all waiting to see what happens to our hubs that are staying on the main Hubpages site. As I said, they are still going thru them, and we can ask if they will take one every 60 days, but they are very strict with the rules when it goes that way. I felt that it was almost not worth it to do a whole rewrite on something, or just couldn't find pictures, though it seems they only require one and like it at the top.

      Best Wishes.

      1. claptona profile image67
        claptonaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Hi Jean,
        Thanks for sharing the additional info.
        Much appreciated.
        Best of luck!

  6. Marcy Goodfleisch profile image82
    Marcy Goodfleischposted 7 years ago

    I've noticed a significant and steady increase in traffic (and revenue) from the hubs migrated to the niche sites. I haven't written anything new for a long while, but I have to say the positive results of the niche sites is nudging me toward writing again. In the meantime, I am tweaking and making edits to things.

    As for other hubs that are just languishing (I am sure we all have a few) - perhaps the staff will spot other topics that can become niche sites. I am sure the initial group of themes was determined due to potential traffic. However, HP has a wealth of undiscovered gems (along with the slash), and once the staff has gone through the inventory, new topics may surface.

    1. claptona profile image67
      claptonaposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      It's seems, those that have had hubs moved to the niche sites are quite happy with the results.
      But, I few things seem odd to me.
      1) Even for us hubbers, the niche sites, at least for me, never appear in a search engine inquiry. Seem difficult to find.
      2) Even on hubpages, when you hit "search hubs" most of what comes up are Q&A's or forums. Very few hubs.
      And some of the "best" or "hot" are sometimes as old as 5 years.
      Anyone focused on zeroing in on a particular goal of visibility?
      Not complaining, just wondering.
      Thanks to you all for sharing on this question. I've found it informative.

      1. Marisa Wright profile image87
        Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

        Yes, people who've had Hubs moved to the more focussed niche sites are doing very well and I think those sites have great potential.   

        I've had the same experience with search:  even in HubPages' heyday, it always perplexed me how I could have so much traffic to my Hubs from Google, and yet I never saw a HubPages result when I was searching for stuff myself! 

        No one except other Hubbers is using the HubPages' search so that's not a concern.  The general public do not come to HubPages to browse.  If they're going to navigate around the site at all, they do so by following the related Hubs links on our Hubs.

  7. Will Apse profile image89
    Will Apseposted 7 years ago

    It really is like watching a religion develop. What are the sky dwellers really about? What do they want from us? Will we ever be good enough to go to the mountain top?

    Of course, if Donald Trump ever bought out HP, it would all be 'Leda and the Swan'.

  8. claptona profile image67
    claptonaposted 7 years ago

    Ok, so you get a message that your hub was chosen but didn't make the cut.
    You've been told that you need to edit it.
    So you do that - you do the editing and follow the advice of the moderator.
    Does that go to the bottom, or is someone keeping an eye on that particular hub to see if the author can make the grade?
    Or does the email itself put you back to the bottom of the heap?

    1. Marisa Wright profile image87
      Marisa Wrightposted 7 years agoin reply to this

      No, it doesn't go to the bottom - the moderator is looking out for you to resubmit it, so it gets priority.

      As I explained on another thread, the important thing is to look at the specific issues the moderator mentions at the end of the email.   The whole first section of the email is just generic and may not apply to your Hub at all, but that last paragraph is what they're really worried about.

      1. claptona profile image67
        claptonaposted 7 years agoin reply to this



This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)