I have been getting a lot of emails lately saying: "Congratulations! We've Reviewed Your Article on LetterPile and It Looks Great!"
This is fine, but why are staff reviewing articles that have only been moved to the niche site two or three days ago? This seems a little premature and a waste of much-needed resources that could be employed elsewhere, doesn't it?
Every time you edit an article, even if you add a full-stop it goes back to the queue to be edited. They only check the changes you have made, so if it's not much it's a few seconds of work for them. Not a waste of resources if they maintain the quality this way. A few seconds or minutes is not much, imagine the spam that would go through if it were reviews every couple of months and not every time an edit was made.
Ok, I did change one word. Fair enough I guess. I didn't realise that was the reason. Thanks.
It'd be nice if we had the tool that they use for comparing current versus previous versions so we could see the edits we've made. Maybe it's something proprietary but perhaps not. We probably get a glimpse of it when we see the magenta/green highlighting in "view edits" after an editor has changed an article. I guess after we change something, the changes just appear as highlights in their viewer.
An editor did a major overhaul of one of my older and most read articles, and he provided me with a copy of the original for comparison. Since I was relatively new when I published it and they have made major format changes since then, he did some reformatting to comply with their formats. I liked it except that there is some confusion, even among HP editors about what is proper APA formatting of section heads. Personally, I have an APA stylebook and if they want me to follow it, I will follow the book, not the way they edit it.
I agree about the APA format. I use https://capitalizemytitle.com/ the website referred to us by Paul. Sometimes the editors do make changes even when I use this, but they are minor and I'm fine with that.
But I follow this website as it's quick and easy. I never had a stylebook, just knew of the rules as I write papers, etc. often. Had to often look up rules online, until I found this site.
I imagine that much like when our articles are edited and we can choose to view the article with changes highlighted they can do the same thing so if it's just a word or two or a full stop they can easily figure that out and it won't take them any time to edit it.
I thought it was all automated, Jodah. Every time we edit one word it goes through a basic edit bot. I doubt that HP staff is doing it by hand. No time or resources wasted. I may be wrong, not 100% sure. I get those emails all the time, too and delete them.
Nope, it's manual edits. Someone from the staff told us about it a while ago when the question was asked. They can see the changes made, so it's quite a fast edit process.
I remember someone asked if writers should not make these small edits because it wastes time and resources of the editors, and the reply was that they actually want us to keep making these small edits as it all helps to make the article better.
I remember that. I think it was Christy or Christen, the one who recently left. She said it wasn't a problem, it was just their job.
Thanks for the correction, Brandon. That explains then how some things are missed.
Maybe they're doing a mass review ... I found about 4 or 5 articles with major edits today. The editor axed quite a bit ... photos, quotes, verbiage, and fixed grammatical issues. At first, I felt upset but after further investigation, I realized whoever edited had my best interest at heart. No longer taking it personally.
Every time I update a niche article I get a positive pass from HP via email.
Interesting, I too thought the process was automated especially if the changes were minor.
On the other hand, there's been times when I made a small edit and received an e-mail that told me to fix additional things. Usually the suggestions were to fix broken videos or links.
by Cholee Clay 3 years ago
I have an article that an editor has made substantial changes too. Including adding a bio that they wrote themselves. I have not seen an edit this bad in quite some time on one of my articles, and I do not want to go through the whole article and rewrite half of it. I've already spent countless...
by Lisa Vollrath 20 months ago
So, yesterday, I got an email saying one of my articles had been edited: a recipe that's been posted since 2017. I'm not sure it really needed editing, since most of what was done was superficial. I checked it over, hated about half of the changes, and edited the article to correct some of the...
by Marina 5 years ago
Happy Thursday, everyone! In August we pre-announced a new tool that fixes common spelling and grammatical errors across the site. Today, Editbot, the first iteration of the tool, is live on a small percentage of Hubs and their comments. It will be gradually rolled out to all Hubs over the next...
by Dr. John Anderson 6 years ago
When I save an edited a hub, the saves appear in edit mode. But, the changes do not show in the published version. This applies in both Chrome and Mozilla and is not fixed by refreshing. It appears as though the published page is a version behind i.e. it is reflecting what was a saved previously...
by promisem 2 years ago
I have been pleased with the audience and revenue for my articles on HubPages since joining the site some years ago.I commend the company for creating the successful niche sites at a time when similar sites were folding. My existing articles that moved to those sites have done even better than...
by Kristin Kaldahl 2 years ago
I have 37 articles on PetHpful that are undergoing editing....AGAIN. This happens a lot. I'm expected to go into each article, read it, fix the mistakes the editors put into my articles, and repost the articles. I have other writing projects (book, book trailer) pending for my agent, and I don't...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|