Eds not so strict anymore?

Jump to Last Post 1-4 of 4 discussions (14 posts)
  1. Daniel Mollat profile image94
    Daniel Mollatposted 8 months ago

    I haven't visited the forums for quite a while so I'm not sure if I'm posting this in the right place.

    I noticed that the editors are no longer as strict as they once were. It used to be whenever I made revisions to my articles I would immediately get a response from editors either confirming the changes or commenting that it needs certain changes.

    Would anybody care to comment?

    1. TIMETRAVELER2 profile image96
      TIMETRAVELER2posted 8 months agoin reply to this

      I've seen no change whatsoever. The same rules still apply, which is as it should be if this site is to maintain its quality and rankings.

    2. samanthacubbison profile imageSTAFF
      samanthacubbisonposted 8 months agoin reply to this

      We still review every article before it is published, and after every change made! You should be getting emails with these updates.

  2. Beth Eaglescliffe profile image97
    Beth Eaglescliffeposted 8 months ago

    The editing queues are longer these days. You will get a response, but it may be several days or even weeks after you made the changes. The length of the queue depends on the niche site.

    1. Shesabutterfly profile image94
      Shesabutterflyposted 8 months agoin reply to this

      I've been waiting over a year for one of my articles. I first submitted it in January of 2018. Haven't heard anything from staff since April of 2018 about this article, yet they've sent others to Pethelpful that I submitted after this particular one. Makes no sense. I finally gave up and just resubmitted it today (causing me to waste a submission).

      In regards to simple edits and not actual submissions, I always get e-mails saying my article still passes their QAP within a few days of editing.

      1. Tim Truzy info4u profile image97
        Tim Truzy info4uposted 8 months agoin reply to this

        Interesting. I've been wondering about this particular topic. I may receive an email informing me that the update still meets quality standards (sometimes), and sometimes, that doesn't happen. This is not a consistent response from the team (at least, from what I've noticed.)
        Perhaps, things will settle down, but I wonder: Are some accounts deemed more valuable, so the response is swift? Is there a learning curve going on for the editors? Are there any other factors occurring we don't know about? I don't know.

        1. samanthacubbison profile imageSTAFF
          samanthacubbisonposted 8 months agoin reply to this

          Hi!

          No, there is no bias towards particular authors. Our queues are updated based on the time of submission. For a single author making changes, some will satisfy our updated requirements, and some won't. If you are revising an article that you wrote 5 years ago, but it was well-written and evergreen, it'll probably still pass. It all depends on that particular article's content and quality level.

          You could be experiencing a longer wait time for articles submitted to network sites due to larger queues on that particular site.

          For minor, general changes, the mod team, more often than not, has a very large queue. They review each and every article after any changes are made.

          Another thing to note is our staffed hours are unpredictable at times, so some weeks there will be less/more support available.

          1. Tim Truzy info4u profile image97
            Tim Truzy info4uposted 8 months agoin reply to this

            Thanks, Samantha. I didn't nor would I mention "bias" at all toward authors. I mentioned "accounts" which are not necessarily the same.
            We couldn't be creative and not look at possibilities and potentialities, regardless of how speculative those ideas are.
            However, your explanation is useful. The HP Team has never been problematic for me. That's why I never started such a forum thread. allthings are revealed with patience. You guys have your job to do, and so do we. Cheers!

            1. samanthacubbison profile imageSTAFF
              samanthacubbisonposted 8 months agoin reply to this

              Since accounts are owned by authors, when you asked whether some accounts are deemed more valuable, I just wanted to stress the neutrality when we make these decisions.

              Thanks for hanging in there! If you experience any significantly long wait times, don't be afraid to email us. Sometimes, albeit rare, articles can "slip through the cracks."

          2. Shesabutterfly profile image94
            Shesabutterflyposted 8 months agoin reply to this

            That still doesn't explain why some submitted articles take longer than others within the same niche site. I had to resubmit an article that was previously accepted to a niche site a year ago that still hasn't been moved, despite other articles that I either submitted or where selected by staff to be moved to that same niche.

            It's almost like that article got lost in transition somewhere, although I was promised by staff it was in the que and would be moved to Pethelpful. I just submitted that article in question again today. We will see if it actually gets moved this time or not.

            1. samanthacubbison profile imageSTAFF
              samanthacubbisonposted 8 months agoin reply to this

              Like I said, "You could be experiencing a longer wait time for articles submitted to network sites due to larger queues on that particular site." The QAP process can take up to a week. Then it is sent to the network site's queue. That site's editor has to review it, which can take time as well, depending on how many articles are ahead of yours.

              When your article is "accepted" to a network site, it is published pretty much immediately.   

              You can always send the article to the team inbox to assure that it goes through the proper routine this time!

              EDIT: I just took a look at your account. If you are talking about the article titled "Human Foods That are Good for Dogs," I see a note from 12 months ago. Maybe you did not receive the email? Or it went to spam?

              1. Shesabutterfly profile image94
                Shesabutterflyposted 8 months agoin reply to this

                There is a more recent e-mail than 12months ago (Aug '18), but I also received the previous e-mails. I was in correspondence with Tessa & Robin. Both of whom assurred me I didn't have to resubmit and waste a submission. Just that resubmitting it would make it move along faster. No where did it say it would take over a year.

                "However, if an article is sent to our editing queue, like this article, you can either wait for the edit (which could take months to a year)" I didn't realize this meant it could take over a year.

                I made several edits to the article, but never resubmitted as I'm working on several others that have never been submitted. It was pointless to me to resubmit and waste a submission, when I have others that need to get submitted as well.

                The editing process is long and tiresome for all parties (authors & staff), but it was a lot easier when we got e-mails suggesting changes that allowed us to edit and resubmit without wasting our limited submissions. Seems like that is a lost practice now sadly. Everything takes twice as long now. Whether I resubmit or not I'm either waiting for qued articles to finally make it through or I'm pushing back when I can submit a new article.

  3. paradigmsearch profile image88
    paradigmsearchposted 8 months ago

    Team employee count has actually increased. Maybe kinder, gentler editors? big_smile

  4. Kenna McHugh profile image90
    Kenna McHughposted 8 months ago

    I have not seen a change. I edit my articles on regular bases and the editor usually gives me a thumbs up on my edits, thanking me for the updates.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)