Should HubPages allow forum posts that imply violation of Adsense TOS?

Jump to Last Post 1-11 of 11 discussions (43 posts)
  1. Pcunix profile image92
    Pcunixposted 12 years ago

    Right now, people can suggest any form of SEO activity at all.   Link exchanges, automated linking services, whatever - no problem.


  2. lrohner profile image68
    lrohnerposted 12 years ago

    You know, I hadn't thought about it before (in terms of posting in the forums, that is), but our forum posts are actually indexed in Google.

    So point well taken.

    1. rebekahELLE profile image87
      rebekahELLEposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      well, google is always not far away.. something to think about.
      I think some simply need to think more before posting, especially when posting information.

  3. Apepperson profile image61
    Apeppersonposted 12 years ago

    I think it's more important for the voices of Hubbers to be heard whether you like what they're saying or not. It's more important than Adsense TOS. HP could always exclude Adsense from the Forums if either company is worried about it.

    1. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      So it's OK to talk about things that you intend to employ for your hubs as long as there's no Adsense where you discuss it?

      I don't buy into that at all.

  4. darkside profile image69
    darksideposted 12 years ago

    Often the mention of it comes about because of discussion. And people wade in with the pros and cons, as well as highlighting the dangers and consequences.

    If people can't discuss it, they won't learn.

    1. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I agree with that to some extent, but often there is NO mention of the techniques being disliked by Google.  We also have some Big Names that regularly insist that it's just a game and they can do whatever they want.

      I don't think that should be allowed on a site that uses Adsense.

      1. darkside profile image69
        darksideposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        So mention it.

        And quote official Adsense programme policies and Terms and Conditions.

        I have on occasion. Maybe less now than before. And I have also seen others quote extracts and post a link to the source of reference.

        1. Pcunix profile image92
          Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

          Yeah, right.  And then one of the "It's just a game gang" comes in and says that it's ok to do anything at all because it's not illegal and they just think it's a game.

          Who do you think the newbies listen to?  The guy making $6,000 a month with automated backlinking or the people making $1,000 a month or less?

          1. darkside profile image69
            darksideposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            If you've got a link to official Adsense TOS and the newbs don't want to listen, then there's not much more that can be done. At least you've put it out there.

            If on the other hand it's a matter of speculation and opinion you may need to loosen your stance. Not personally, but in the way that it is communicated to others.

            Don't take it to heart when others don't take the same hard line approach that you have.

            1. Pcunix profile image92
              Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

              I think a hard line is needed.  It's lack of a hard line that causes the crap here and it's lack of a hard line that could cause Google to devalue this site.

              But I've pretty much given up on that.  I asked HubPages if they were going to tighten up - they looked like they were heading that way, but then they yanked all that from the TLC and went back to pablum. At one time, you could point to stuff there that spoke against that kind of stuff, but it's gone, so I assume they like their cut of the big money more than they care about what they said they care about.

              Business is business. For some, anyway.

              So I give up. There is no sense in preaching against alcohol in the nightclubs.

              1. darkside profile image69
                darksideposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                I see your hardlined opinion as going way past the expectations of the Adsense and HubPages ToS.

                I don't believe in extremes. I believe that those who are doing the wrong thing (as defined by Adsense) will eventually get caught. Jumping up and down about it and wanting to be dictatorial doesn't win respect let alone support.

      2. Marisa Wright profile image88
        Marisa Wrightposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        I learned most of what I know thanks to discussions on these forums.

        These tactics are mentioned on plenty of other sites, often with no discussion or dissent, or any warnings about the fact that they're "black hat".  I'd much rather see people come here to the forum and ask about them first, than just go ahead and use them.  Sure, some "Big Names" will say go ahead, but others will present the opposing view, and the person can make up their own mind.

        1. Pcunix profile image92
          Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

          Well, I'm not going to bother presenting any opposing views any more. As someone said just this week, "if HP doesn't want me using automated backlink services, they should say so".  But they don't. So who am I to contradict the Mighty Ones who brag about it?

  5. Randy Godwin profile image60
    Randy Godwinposted 12 years ago

    I have wondered about this myself.  It's almost a "do it till you get caught or scolded" type of moderation on some forum subjects before you actually know what goes.

  6. frogdropping profile image77
    frogdroppingposted 12 years ago

    I don't automate (anything) but I figure that Google and the other SE's know exactly what goes on.

    It's all business. Even if someone has 'gamed' the system - if their content is smack bang on page one and gaining exposure for ads that redirect profit back to the SE's I reckon it's up to the SE's to decide what to do or not to do with it.

    I see that kind of content well placed time and again. And I haven't noticed it vanishing either. Business is rarely hand in hand with ethics.

    Like I've said before - if the SE's aren't coming down on it like a ton of bricks ... And let's not forget that you can buy ad placements that run attractive incentives to buy these automated systems.

    It might not be ideal, it might not be right - but it just might be the right of the business owner to decide what is and what isn't acceptable. Sucks - but there it is.

    As for HP allowing such posts - that is theirs to decide. I can't remember seeing blackhat SEO tactics littering up the forums. We're usually too busy pushing religion and politics smile

    1. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Well, that IS what's important, right?

      1. frogdropping profile image77
        frogdroppingposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        I wish I could agree. I don't. Neither religion nor politics are important. Politics is a bunch of people that ultimately all eat from the same trough.

        Left, right, socialist, capitalist - their interest is themselves, not the likes of me and you. Blame Obama? Blame the coalition government in the UK? Hogwash. They're puppets.

        And religion is a business. They all dislike each other, vie for the biggest pot, crow from the highest pulpit - and like politics it's all about the $'s, or the £'s - or whatever the local currency is.

        Money PC - that's what talks. And BS makes it all walk.

    2. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Ayup. That's the "everybody is doing it" argument.

      My problem is that at one time HP looked like they were moving toward tightening up. Then they reverted right back to normal state. That upset me.  I'll either get over it or I won't.  I doubt very many people will care very much either way.

      However, if enough of us cared, HP would have to listen.

      I won't hold my breath on that, either.

      1. frogdropping profile image77
        frogdroppingposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        I didn't say I thought it right. I like to think I have a a good work ethic. I like to think I have good principles in general. I was just saying.

        1. Pcunix profile image92
          Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

          I know.

          Most (most) of the people who are regulars in the forums have good ethics, A few don't. 

          At one time, I suggested we throw around some ideas that might lead to a suggested code of ethics for HP. The sneers over that were palpable.  It seemed everybody hated the idea - including everybody who definitely has good SEO ethics themselves.

          I am NOT bringing that up again, by the way. I understand that nobody likes it and nobody wants it. Certainly not those who make their money by fooling Google, but not even those who are completely honest.  So don't bother to tell me that I am an idealistic fool or that I'm trying to inflict my morality on others - it's a dead horse and I am NOT in its saddle.

          1. darkside profile image69
            darksideposted 12 years agoin reply to this

            What you fail to mention is that you went the hardline approach, broadcast the fact that if everyone didn't agree with that stance that you wouldn't respect them, and then finished it off with a flounce (said you were leaving the site).

            What everyone hated was your whole approach to it. And that your interpretation of the rules was the one and the only right way to read them.

            You come across as a nice guy, when you're not standing up on your soapbox.

            1. Pcunix profile image92
              Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

              I don't have any problem with that. I do not respect people who game Google and don't mind saying that again,

              And I may still leave. It is still on my radar.  I'm not sure I like HP. I like most of the people in the forums and I like the people I follow, but I'm not sure about the site overall. I am just not sure.

              But I give up on the soapbox because it is plain that nobody cares about honesty even when they practice it themselves.  Apparently it doesn't matter how you make money: just making it makes you someone to admire.  Even if you wouldn't do those things yourself, surprisingly.

              So don't worry about the soapbox. The voting trends are obvious. Nobody cares and this was just a little graffiti to say that I still do.  It is meaningless.

              1. darkside profile image69
                darksideposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                Last time you gave it a week.

                1. Pcunix profile image92
                  Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                  Yes, and I asked HP by email  what their intentions were. They said they intended to tighten up.

                  Si far I have seen just the opposite, but I remain hopeful.  Do I assume you'd prefer that I leave now?

                  1. darkside profile image69
                    darksideposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                    I would prefer if the site didn't have flouncey people and martyrs.

                  2. Maddie Ruud profile image73
                    Maddie Ruudposted 12 years agoin reply to this

                    I'm confused as to what exactly you're looking for, here.  We have tightened up quite a bit, and will continue to take down rules violations as they come to our attention.  We are currently understaffed as far as moderation, and while we are expanding our mod team, it's a complicated job and requires extensive training.  You can help us by flagging any rules violations you see, rather than simply complaining that we don't catch everything the first time around.

                    As far as your original post, content promoting traffic exchanges (which are an AdSense violation) are a violation of our rules as well, and Hubs containing such content are removed as soon as they come to our attention.  Once again, you can help accelerate the removal of such content by flagging it.

                    Please do let me know if you need any further clarification about our rules or intentions.

  7. rebekahELLE profile image87
    rebekahELLEposted 12 years ago

    there will always be those who haven't even read the adsense TOS, or will mention I must have read it wrong! roll

  8. Haunty profile image75
    Hauntyposted 12 years ago

    Wow, more censorship. And it's being discussed...

    1. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this


      What censorship?

      1. Haunty profile image75
        Hauntyposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        I mean the only thing that HP should do when someone violates the adsense TOU is to stop displaying adsense ads on their hubs. Why on earth should HP disallow discussion of adsense strategies in forum?

        1. Pcunix profile image92
          Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

          No reason at all, We should applaud the gamesters.  And we do.

          Pay no attention to me.  I actually am far less pessimistic than I sound.

  9. ns1209 profile image64
    ns1209posted 12 years ago

    I think in a forum like this you should be able to talk about what you like within reasonable limits.  Even when these topics are brought up people will normally say they are not as good as they sound and also there are no google ads on this forum. People learn about the negatives and need to know what exists anyway.

    I think some of the things you say are correct but you are too extreme as Darkside says and also say them the wrong way.

  10. rebekahELLE profile image87
    rebekahELLEposted 12 years ago

    did you read this article in NYT about black hat SEO? it was published today. it's quite interesting. … r=1&hp

    The whole thing with trying to build massive amounts of links to one hub seems like it would automatically be an alert on google's radar. It seems like a large investment of time that could be spent working on something that may prove more effective in the long run. Why do people want to risk losing their google adsense account?

    another article regarding SEO practices … f=business

    1. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      J.C. Penney denies being the source.

      That's interesting if true, because it means SOMEBODY thinks this could damage them with Google later.

      Poor Google.  They need to fix this and it is incredibly difficult.

      And they did:

      And the company did. On Wednesday evening, Google began what it calls a “manual action” against Penney, essentially demotions specifically aimed at the company.

      At 7 p.m. Eastern time on Wednesday, J. C. Penney was still the No. 1 result for “Samsonite carry on luggage.”

      Two hours later, it was at No. 71.

      At 7 p.m. on Wednesday, Penney was No. 1 in searches for “living room furniture.”

      By 9 p.m., it had sunk to No. 68.

      In other words, one moment Penney was the most visible online destination for living room furniture in the country.

      The next it was essentially buried.

      So much for the theory that creating bogus links for a competitor can't hurt them.

    2. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Because they believe the Big Names here who tell them that there is no risk.  Every time this comes up, one or more of them will jump in and say "If that were true, you could damage a competitors site by an aggressive link campaign."

      They then usually go on to say that Google has never, ever punished anyone for this.  Of course they have, and your link is just another example of many.

      But people won't listen, because they like to hear that they can cheat their way to success.  Sometimes they can, I agree, but Google is working hard to prevent that.

      Ultimately, Google will win. Certain folks think they are so much smarter than Google, but they do not have Google's resources and, over time, Google will win.

      1. recommend1 profile image60
        recommend1posted 12 years agoin reply to this

        I watched your lively debate with occasional hurling toys out of the pram by several parties - with interest.  I came to the conclusion that both sides are right to some extent.  At the moment heaping on backlinks of any kind correctly - as in to the correct targetted product from the link - still works just fine because as you say, they dropped from No 1  to no nowhere when the links were removed.

        On the other hand I agree that if Google are making efforts to improve the quality of webstuff then backlinking has to change in many ways.  I for one would be pleased to see pressure for quality to put the places to get the things or info that I want to the front page and the countless variations of bland mis or no-information with an ad beside it - to the back of the queue.

        Reality is being submerged in fake representations of it and quality is the key to putting it straight.

        1. Pcunix profile image92
          Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

          Quality isn't either the issue or the cure.

          Many quality hubs are supported by linking campaigns that are not in line with Google's wishes. Some of them might enjoy good SERP without the games, some of them might get there if nobody else were playing games, but we don't know because the games are being played.

          The only cure is for Google to be able to provide appropriate results without being fooled by fakked links. That is i tremendously difficult task and one that they may fail to reach.

          I have faith, though.  I think they will solve it.

  11. angel115707 profile image60
    angel115707posted 12 years ago

    you do realize that there are things google lists as unacceptable that journalists have to write about on a daily basis? If any of you plan on being or have been a journalist you would know this, certain controversial topics are off limits with them, but fearing them is just silly, I would be more concerned about quality than pleasing google, I have one hub with adds disabled because it is controversial, i have read by other hubbers, their bests hubs have adds disabled, but you do not see main stream News channels going "uh oh google will see this" and if main stream news is writing about controversial issues, citizen journalists definitely need to...

    1. Pcunix profile image92
      Pcunixposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Most of the people here are not journalists.  Their interest is earning money through Adssend and Amazon.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)