I am reading a free pdf at the moment titled SEO On Trial.
It talks about a site holding position 1 on Google without any content, seo or anything else.
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=virtu … =firefox-a
The search term is - virtual personal your self - without quotes yourselffitness.com (PR4) and this site is number 1 out of 80 and a half million other sites and has been there for years.
Now when you see this type of thing, what chance do you think we have in finding our holy grail keyword?
Just a bit of fun I thought you would find amusing.
Just shows how much backlinks still mean for rankings. It has some nice backlinks from sites like wikipedia.
The 80.5 million results is due to the amount of times those particular words are used in a webpage.
As a phrase that people search for, it is only 4 people a day. Probably due to people searching for it after reading SEO On Trial.
If the author is going to use such a search term as an example then I fear that they don't know much about SEO or keyword research and not worth listening to.
I signed up for a Wikipedia account because I thought I could slip some links to my stuff in on there but I don't want to waste time editing other peoples stuff..Im not sure how you write an article there.
@TerryGi, makes you wonder how Google's Algo works sometimes
The e-book I was reading came to the conclusion that yes it is all about backlinking.
So basically, its all about backlinks and nothing else. That's what I took from this whole exercise and this listing actually proves the point.
SEO has been about backlinking since Google released PageRank and every search engine followed with their own take on link analysis. It's been this way for years and nothing is about to change. However, you also need pages that convert if you want to make money. No matter how many links you have, rankings alone won’t convince anyone to buy, especially if the site looks amateurish and the content doesn’t scan well.
Anybody can write a new wikipedia page. A friend of mine writes a lot of stuff for wikipedia and unbeknown to me, he tried to link my blog to it but they wouldn't have it.
It does look as if it could be used for branding, although
Yourselffitness sounds like a brand name, and so it seems possible it could get a wiki entry all on its own.
Even if it is crap.
Google is very serious about spamming. if you are not following the guideline given by google the you may banned by them. The content base link building is more useful then just putting link in single word. so i think people should generate contextual link to give benefit to your website and the site itself.
by LucidDreams2 months ago
They are just driving home the point that user experience and quality is point one!http://www.eddale.co/google/beware-google-bearing-gifts
by Shadesbreath8 years ago
Ok, so I want to pose a question about key words and I would like to have it discussed in my language. So... this question is for you SEO people and key word people. First, the set up:Ok, lets say I want to...
by Loraine Brummer4 months ago
Which is the most important for search engine searches: the Hub summary or the first paragraph of the Hub? I thought the summary was most important, but I notice that sometimes searches show the first sentences in...
by ofmelancholy7 years ago
When ı search about a topic the first page results are not very high quality material, ordinary stuff. Then what makes them on top page?
by ishwarya_p6 years ago
I am building backlinks to my hubs, already reached 35 backlinks which are all been indexed by Google, still no SERP boost. Typically how long it will take to see effects and boost in SERP?
by Gary Anderson20 months ago
But I am wondering why there seems to be competition in the real google world and no competition showing for it in the external keyword tool world?
Copyright © 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.