|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
This has puzzled me for a long time. Maybe someone can give a REALLY PLAUSIBLE explanation as to why evolution went down the road of sexes. It seems totally futile and illogical why a cell would divide and multiply, to reproduce, and then, at some point, diverge into the male/female thing. It goes from asexual, to male/female, where it easily reproduced, but now, has to re-combine with it's "other half", to reproduce?
I don't get it.
You make an excellent point...You must be a certified Pure genious!
That's easy to explain. With billions and billions of cell division and multiplication, one way or another, since this is not a perfect world, mistakes will take place. Improper division and multiplication will surely happen and it could lead to being sexual rather than asexual.
I have thought of this already. It does not stand a chance, because, if the female mutates in one direction, and the male in another, it's all over baby. Extinction.
It's hard enough t0 swallow evolution, chance mutations etc as it is, let alone adding a "difficulty factor" such as this into the mix. They have no purpose in separating, only to have to re-unite to procreate.
That answer may work for you, but it doesn't for me. Thank you for sharing though.
I ask a real question, and I get frivolous answers.
That is about as impressive to me as me saying "intelligent design" to you.
But, let me play your game one step further. Where are the asexual animals today? Surely there are these "variations" all around us. Mammals? Reptiles? Invertebrates? Please name some.
First of all, the process which you presented is not an evolution. It's from Genetic Engineering. It's just a process of life development whether it be male or female. This process is going on from the time of Adam and Eve (peace be upon them both). And the need for 2 opposite sexes is love, affection, serenity, peace and happiness from each other. Science also tell us that a healthy and good relationship between a husband and wife give rise to a total peace of mind.
can't give ya the answer, but i can say it is beautiful and something extra special for sure
As a man, I have to say I enjoy it too.
(Oops. Is that OK to say, seeing as somany see me as religious. They are not supposed to do that--enjoy I mean).
If you will go back onto Genesis and see what Sarah said when the angel said she would bear a son to Abraham. Gen 18:12 Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, After I am waxed old shall I have pleasure, my lord being old also?
The word pleasure was used by her. It is obvious what she meant by that word.
How much time do you guys need to answer this one?
100 billion years?
It is hard to say how long they will need to come up with an anawer to the question. I am sure they are searching high and low for an answer someone already made up or came up with.
It doesn't surprise me that Mark came up with the most succinct version of the most accurate answer.
I myself would phrase it as "Diversity."
That would work also. Still - they are not really looking for an answer. The question is what they want.
I would also mention that variation comes with a host of biological advantages.
Billions of years ago, an enterprising asexual lawyer monkey talked all the other asexual monkeys into becoming couples. The slightly more dominant monkeys developed penis's and lied about the sizes while the less dominant became females with vagina's and bitched about the male's lying!
The lying and bitching got worse so the lawyer monkey invented divorce. Of course...the lawyer monkey took a percentage of bananas, territory, grooming's, etc.
The male monkey almost always had to pay chimp support in bananas while the female got the tree and in dry seasons...a welfare stud along with banana stamps.
Lawyers aren't asexual today but they are still smarter than the monkeys!
Oh please, this is some of the most elementary biology. The most variant species is the one that is the most likely to survive changes in climate or epidemics or any other natural disaster. If all the members of a population have the same DNA then they are all equally as likely to die out, this is why only very simple and climate specific organisms, such as mosses, reproduce asexually and even mosses have a mechanism of variation similar to that of sexually reproducing plants.
The more genetically diverse the population, the better and sexual reproduction is a process in which the combination of two formerly existing sets of DNA combine to create a totally new and unique set. This produces variation in sexual species faster than in asexual species and natural selection invariably weeds out the least adaptable organisms.
by Freegoldman6 years ago
is there a logic..
by Rhys Baker6 years ago
What are the most common arguments against evolution by natural selectionWe have all heard the controversy that exists between the scientific and (primarily) religious communities over the origin of species. Which...
by usmanali818 years ago
If humans are evolved from monkeys then why the current monkeys are still monkeys???
by Lawal Abiodun2 years ago
If man evolved from monkeys, how come we still have monkeys?According to scientists, it has always to been said, times without number, that humans evolved from some kind of chimpanzee, ape or monkey. Well, this...
by Arthur Fontes8 years ago
Is evolution a reality? Did humans really evolve from monkeys who evolved from fish who evolved from single cell organisms?
by sooner than later8 years ago
http://markpknowles.com/wp-content/uplo … tofman.jpgthis was worth its own space. I am going to break this picture down from left to right, so if I say "the third monkey" that is the third monkey from...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.