If fish became amphibians through the process of evolution, then why do fish still exist?
If you read up just a bit on basic evolutionary theory, you would have the answer right there and wouldn't sound as clueless as you obviously are!
Modern evolutionary theory doesn't really claim that one organism evolved from another in a linear fashion. What is really claimed is that certain species share common ancestors. So, going off your example, modern fish and modern amphibians likely had an ancestor in common, and then their linages branched apart and came down to modern day. Along the way, other branchings also occurred. For example, amphibians and mammals share a more recent common ancestor than fishes and amphibians.
For the same reason your parents are still alive after you were born. Evolution isn't a drastic change, it's small things. To use your example, a fish gave birth to something that was almost a fish, but not quite. The fish didn't become anything. Think of it closer to a birth defect rather than a transformation.
Populations evolve, not class or order. A species, and even more so for any larger taxonomy group like fish, generally cannot evolve as a whole.
Because Mother Nature decided that each type of fish was successful in its environment and so it became stablised to some extent, a drastic change in their repective environs will trigger more drastic changes and, as happens too often, extinction. Amphibions are just other creatures that have become successful in a particular niche, in tthe same way that some primates have become successful at an arborial socity and others have become successful at cfty society.
by Mark Knowles 6 years ago
Some one just accused me of making a personal attack on them because I said they are ignorant of certain facts. Any one who has interacted with me here will know I try not to make personal attacks, other than to make fun of people, and these threads are littered with snipped personal attacks on me...
by TMMason 8 years ago
I enjoy this video so very much.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MX7Htg2HxkA&NR=1Abaa.. ah... ah... aba... what?I love that video... not to mention the fact that he never answered the question. Yes, I have read his letter to his fans as to his answer. And it is almost as funny as the video.The...
by thetruthhurts2009 9 years ago
Rules of this forum, no swearing, no straw men arguments and no FSM nonsense. Most importantly remember, Ridicule is not an argument. Enjoy. If want to continue to believe you come from a rocky soup. You can stop reading and leave now, but if you seek the truth you are most welcome to...
by Nathaniel Zhu 4 years ago
Why do you think people still argue again evolution?Seriously. This is the 21st century. I'm thinking they're in denial because it's against their religion - or they're just ignorant. What do you think?
by CJ Simonelli 4 years ago
All of the so-called "evidences" for evolution theory are essentially "fluff" evidences that reveal NOTHING about the origins of life. To illustrate, let's say I falsely asserted that a particular woman had once been a boy during childhood. I then discovered and presented...
by aka-dj 4 years ago
Have a quick look at this, (only very short).http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_many_cell … blue_whaleSo, it if one does simple math, one gets the following1Trillion, divided by 10billion, = 100,000 new cells added every year, to an amoeba, to turn into a blue whale.Seen, or heard of any such...
|HubPages Device ID|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Google Analytics|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel|
|Google Hosted Libraries|
|Google AdSense Host API|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels|
|Author Google Analytics|
|Amazon Tracking Pixel|