Context is so important. Prior to coming to power Germany was crippled due to paying reparations for the 1st World War. With rampant inflation, millions out of work and starving the then government pleaded to have this eased. France refused so giving fuel to extremists like Hitler.
But then there is his agreement with the Catholic Church for the restoration of the Holy Roman Empire throughout Europe. His Thousand Year Reich, any connection to the thousand year reign of Christ described in Revelation? Hitler the Messiah? Consider the efforts the Nazis made to find and take Holy icons and relics to Germany the Arian or chosen people ideology. Plus slaughter the Jews who, according to some, failed Christ before.
Mad! Stark raving bonkers but I wonder if any madder than many other world leaders still alive today.
Adolf Schickelgruber, alias Hitler, was largely demented. He'd be sectioned these days, or be in charge of somewhere like Iran or Libya. He was delusional at a time when most Germans/Austrians/Sudeten Deutsche suffered from a corporate persecution complex.
They largely saw the German/Austrian surrender as a betrayal and blamed either of the Kaisers for pulling them into war in the first place. (It was originally Kaiser Bill's decision to back Kaiser Franz against Tsar Nick his cousin George and the French cockerel, come what may).
Additionally he laboured under the various pre-conceptions that Germans/Austrians do even nowadays about the world around them. For one thing he believed he was not alone in his fear of Communism in invading Russia, but like Napoleon before him underestimated the size of the country and its seasons. Up to the end he moved map pins around in his bunker, thinking them to be his no longer extant divisions.
Where he wasn't delusional was in his treatment of 'minorities'. That was plain insanity, but he couldn't have achieved all of it without his co-conspirators, the ones who 'were only obeying orders', and he couldn't have achieved his rise to power without the connivance of a large part of the German/Austrian population. Vichy France, Italy and Germany's other 'satellites' didn't lag behind in their part, however. The Vichy government embarrassed the Germans by pushing their 'undesirables' at them without being asked, as did the Belgians and Dutch. Blame was too conveniently allocated to a small group of high-ranking Nazis who could be easily identified. It would have been next to impossible to squeeze more into the courthouse at Nuremberg.
The French did manage to identify their own bogeymen, aka Laval and Petain. They knew there were many others, but the Paris courthouses would have been swamped as well!
It's just as well he did himself in, isn't it.
He was a badass. My grandpa's been watching his documentary of the world war on Netflix for the past-2 day's. Guy was nuts.
He couldn't have done it alone. The Germans ignored the dark side of what was happening, pretended it wasn't happening and told themselves they could do nothing about it because the Gestapo would see them off to the KZ camps for rocking the boat.
Anyone who advocates murder in whatever name has something wrong with his brains. No one consciously want to be bad. But the very fact that he had the good sense to commit suicide to avoid capture obviously shows that he is not mad. If anyone is mad, I would think it's Saddam Hussein who would rather hide in a rat hole, when faced with imminent capture, considering that he had earlier told his countrymen to die for their nation.
I think he was just plain nuts. Of course, there's no question that he was troubled.
Adolf Hitler was beyond bad, he was the personification of pure, unadulterated evil. He knew exactly what he was doing. As a young man, he indicated that he wanted to make Germany a prime and a racially pure country, implementing the nefarious things he elucidated in his book, MEIN KAMPF. He indoctrinated Germany and conquered most of Europe, enslaving those he conquered, especially Poles, Russians, and Ukrainians (ostarbeiter). He all but exterminated Roma and Jews. He clearly stated such goals in his book.
In addition to that, he was against the mentally and physically handicapped, considering them to be unworthy of life and useless months. He established euthansia experiments which later would be used in the concentration camps to gas people. However, the outcry from religious establishments stopped these euthansia experiments on these people.
Hitler was not mad. Far from it. His mind was lucid regarding his diabolical goals of world conquest. Luckily, this never come to fruition. At the end, he even turned against the German people. He asserted to his inner circle that if Germany loses the war it is because the German people were inferior and not worthy of him.
I believe that he had an Axis II diagnosis of personality disorder, likely narcissistic/anti-social in today's parlance. He was also a pharmaceutical addict which complicated his mental health issues. Eventually, he very well could have had a psychotic break towards the end of his life.
by Cleanclover 2 years ago
What positives can one get in Adolf Hitler or Nazi party?Almost all dislike the Nazi Party officials or the SS men. Any positives we can take from them like the determination to succeed, will power, getting the job done, efficiency?
by God made science 6 years ago
I mean, Good and Bad are relative. So, when American soldiers kill Iraqi civilians, that's OK. When Bin Laden destroys WT Centre, that's bad? I mean, how do you define a universal moral principle?
by terced ojos 3 years ago
Adolf Hitler killed millions of Jews; was the killing of these Jews a judgement by God?It is a general consensus among Christians and Jews that Gods wrath is delivered upon nations, communities and persons who are unrepentantly wickedly in his sight. Was Hitlers murdering of the Jews a judgement by...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
What words would you use to DESCRIBE Adolf Hitler & Josef Stalin without using theactual names?
by Grace Marguerite Williams 3 years ago
What are the ten components that Genghis Khan and Adolf Hitler have in common?
by LAURENS WRIGHT 5 years ago
What steps do you feel that Hitler used to empose his power ?Hitler rose to power and then tracked down countless people and slaughtered them. Why did the people not resist the military? What happened ? Could this same tactic or scheme be used today ? Are you seeing any...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|