True equality among humans will never exist. To believe that so is pure fantastical in scope. Humans are hierarchical by nature. There will always be someone who is more than you whether it is looks, education, popularity, &/or socioeconomic status. Also, on that note, there will always be someone who is less than you on the same criteria. There will always be so-called inequality among humans. But who are we to state that hierarchies are unequal-they aren't at all. Humans establish hierarchies based upon the value of a person or people. That is fact. Also, the family is the first place where hierarchies are first developed. Your thoughts?
Yes, just like lobsters. We have half a billion years of biology that favors hierarchies. We don't have to like it, but we have to live with it.
Lovethetrain, do you believe that hierarchies are an inevitable part of the human condition? Do you further contend that as humans become more evolved in consciousness, hierarchies will be a thing of the past? Do you maintain that humans will want to erase hierarchies for pure equality? Or humans want to use hierarchies as false status one-upmanship which masks subconscious insecurity?
I must agree, GMW, human's beginning of family is where hierarchies began.
If people read the Bible for its message rather than instructions on how to please God, the primary means for keeping the hierarchy, one would see the book implies it began with Adam's conditioning. He became territorial, met a man of the other gender then found themselves ashamed at not knowing how to mate with hair all over their bodies including his foreskin. That shame led to families with boys providing for girls they considered subservient child bearers.
Accordingly, all except the four Aboriginal groups Australia's natives call themselves meaning "originals", who still live environmentally (read Mutant Messenger Down Under), that Noah and his family represents as an example to us how to live to be able to return to environmental living we would have long recognized that to be the case. But when we read the ending of the Bible, the Revelation given to John, and apply the multitude of Metaphors, Allegories, Parables and Symbol-types (MAPS) found throughout the other 64 books we would know it is all intentionally orchestrated to continue eternally. Genesis 1:26-29 reveals man are to replenish earth Revelation 20:4-5 reveals again man are to replenish earth for the Alternative earth (21:1) filled with alternative man (21:4) in a sunless world (21:23).
So yes, the Bible, the Bhagavad Gita in India's religion, Buddhism and several others indicate family is the cause of the hierarchies. It is imbedded in us but we need to find out how to seek within ourselves to find out so as to be one of the 5% to overcome it since we are about 10 years from this world's end.
Thank you but is there really equal opportunity? Are hierarchies results of human unequal categorizations? What you are proposing is a meritocracy. After all, equal opportunity is a outgrowth of meritocracy. Meritocracy in its purest form doesn't exist. Somehow, humans receive rewards on aspects that aren't fully based on pure meritocracy. Other, underlying factors influence rewards such as likeability, status, beauty, etc. e.g. a poor child who is a genius won't advance as far socioeconomically as a wealthy child who is average. Another example is a plain supertalented girl who won't as many opportunities to be an actress than a beautiful girl who has little or no talent.
Yes, GMW, there is an equal opportunity but we don't get to become every stone in the pyramid's in any single lifetime. However many stones are in the pyramid require that many reincarnations to accomplish along with each facet of each stone. I estimate it to be a small 1 billion incarnations with 5% of them making it through civilization's end in Armageddon and another 5% discarnate to reincarnate at this world's end about 184,000 years later.
To loose Equality of Opportunity is the greatest loss we could possibly have.
That would be a great thread: Outcome vs Opportunity
Exploring all the ways we could loose O p p o r t u n i t y .
Socialism is one way.
Socialism ignores the value of equality of opportunity in favor of equality of outcome.
Which is why socialism is a crime and a sin ...
and in America a HUGE taboo.
Not all people want to be the best/ "more than" others. Some are happy with their chosen roles, no matter how humble. Their roles are enough for them. Does that make them less than others?
... By W H A T standards?
By W H O SE standards?
Most people are OK as long as they are not on the bottom of the food chain.
some people like free time more than money or food.
we don't need as much food as we think.
In fact, food (over eating the wrong foods) is the cause of most medical problems.
think about diabetes, heart disease, cancer, arthritis, the list goes on and on.
The intestines become congested and the blood stream becomes polluted. Backed up plumbing and an overabundance of saturated fats and chemicals is the cause of all our physical ailments and diseases.
Sure, there are some diseases caused by overeating. But "most" I highly doubt.
PS We don't need government sponsored health insurance/systems. We need clean, simple diets. Eating better will give everyone greater opportunities.
Again, KLH, I agree we don't government sponsored health, it is designed to make reach the Pharmas as well as insurance. What we need is to learn to eat every type of seed bearing plants or something of it and most, if not all of our health problems would vanish.
Actually it's over eating and too few different types of foods that causes the medical problems.
Free time means nothing if one doesn't have the money. Money is more important than any so-called free time.
I disagree with your food but agree with money and other stuff.
But most people are either AT or NEAR THE BOTTOM of the socioeconomic food chain. They are from 1/2- 1 paycheck away from homelessness. Think about it. Most people are at the bottom of the socioeconomic food chain. They worry about paying their bills. They worry about putting food on the table. They would be socioeconomically immobilized if an emergency arises. They are in KEEP DEEP socioeconomically!
I actually LOVE and adore free time. I am not rich or have more than others at all! But I am comfortable and have a life free of stress and complications.
and I only buy organic foods.
I have $1,005 retirement per month to live on and use about half to help others who don't know how to manage their much larger incomes. I'm most satisfied and was before I obtain the retirement over 5 years ago. Most of my time since October 1976 I was a moneyless nomad and very satisfied with my life. I'm an oportunivor, I eats whatever is available when hungry, little else actually matters to me.
Studies show that the lower socioeconomic people i.e. the lower, working & lower middle class experience more stress than those who are more socioeconomically affluent.
GMW, Those stressing the most are because they have not accepted their lots, those who do are stress free.
There is/was a girl in Louisiana who only had/have the minimum or society's goods but was as satisfied as I am without almost any. People are stressed out when they are dissatisfied with their position.
I've known drunks and other down trodden people who were very satisfied with their lots, openly accepting the minimum of man-made stuff eliminates stress and those are the people politicians can't control nor make to become stressed.
by ronaknky 9 years ago
Is democracy the best way to rule a country?
by TruthDebater 11 years ago
Does Capitalism create equal opportunity for all or just for the elite? The same with socialism, does it create equal opportunity for all or only those affiliated with government? Is both capitalism and socialism simply illusions making false claims of equal opportunity while those in power and...
by ga anderson 2 years ago
Thanks to TessSchlesinger for a couple of links that provoked the thought of this topic.The first was a 2014 article about one billionaire's view of the danger of extreme wealth inequality."I see pitchforks.At the same time that people like you and me are thriving beyond the dreams of any...
by Kathryn L Hill 3 years ago
Is America being destroyed for the ideal of equality? Is this ideal worth the destruction that must ensue for it to be realized? Will it ever be realized? Can it ever be realized? Liberal/Progressive democrats, what is your take on EQUALITY in America and will it be worth it in the final...
by ptosis 7 years ago
Total Equality: Is this something we should be striving for?According to the book, 'Touching a Nerve: The Self as Brain Hardcover by Patricia S. Churchland P.132 XX, XY genes during early fetal development, the gonads are neutral until 2nd half gestation and that the surge of testosterone...
by J Forlanda 9 years ago
Equality: Do you want equal opportunity or equal results?President Obama always talks about sharing in the success for everyone, and paying their fair share. He sounds very good, especially because he supports fairness in everything. Do you think he means he wants to make...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|