The world sometimes lashes out at people who dare to be different and present a new, interesting type of beauty. Do you think that peoples' feelings about Sarah Jessica Parker are an example of this?
sort by best latest
Thank you duffsmom, and thank you all for your answers :)
If your going to say stupid things like that you shouldn't show your picture. I'm sure she sleep better at night knowing you won't be pestering her for a date
LOL, I sleep pretty well at night as well. You on the other hand, probably don't, considering you're getting your panties in a bunch for such an inoffensive and tongue-in-cheek comment. You should relax and stop taking things so seriously. Cheers ;-)
"Clara" apparently joined this site today just to defend SJP's honor in this ancient thread. Which means she's either SJP herself or a crazed fan.
Thank you for your thoughtful comment, I wholeheartedly agree - Serena Williams is hard to watch and not at all attractive. Sarah is an enigma, there is something about her, like it or leave it, but it's there.
Oh my God! The ego's of some of you. I'll say it again. I would give anything to see what you look like and who your dating. That women wouldn't give you the time of day.But the good ones did; John Kennedy, and the actor she dated for ten years.
Just because she dated John Kennedy it doesn't automatically make her attractive. All it means is that John Kennedy found her attractive. Nothing more. Beauty is in the beholder, so not every guy has to agree with John's tastes.
Thank you for commenting, Nicole. I think now that she is ageing her true physical hideousness is coming to the fore, although she is exceptionally gifted as an actress.
I feel bad for saying such negative comments on her looks honestly. She isn't that bad, and can style herself to be pretty and stylish looking. What she lacks in outer looks she makes up for with personality which is where real beauty lies.
Most celebrities have to step over people and act pretty nasty to get to where they are. Don't worry about stating your views, dear :) What you said wasn't negative, it was truthful.
You can't just say people are ugly on the internet when you don't actually know what they look like in real life. I bet Rachel is way prettier than you. Why can't people get that their there heads these days.
She proves that how you carry yourself and act are more important than physical aesthetics - perhaps overmuch but worthwhile nonetheless.
Is beauty a requisite to be an actress? No. But regardless, I'd rather see a talented "ugly" actress succeeding in Hollywood than an untalented bimbo.
Yes, beauty AND talent. Gabourey Sidibe is the UGLIEST actress around. No one wants to look at an ugly actress no matter how talented. Beauty wins, every time. On a scale of 1-10, Ms. Sidibe would be a MINUS 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000!
@Thief12 - thank you for your answer. Beauty is so specific to a person's nature, and not just skin deep. I completely agree :-)
@gmwilliams - thank you for your answer.
Hehehe, gmwilliams. You say "nobody wants to look at an ugly actress" and yet I just said I don't mind. You obviously don't know what you're talking about, hehehe. Cheers!
Wow. I guess this explains why no talent actresses like Megan Fox keep getting parts. It's because people like yourself would rather watch a talentless girl like her than watch Sidibe, who was only nominated for an Oscar in her very first film fyi.
There are quite a few actresses that aren't that good looking in Hollywood, but that's because not every role requires good looks. Gabourey was cast in a role that required that look that she has (Precious).
I'm sure that SJP appreciates the fact that you joined this site just to stick up for her.
^^ Shouldn't that be "NEIGH!"?
No, she ISN'T ugly but she ISN'T beautiful either. On a scale of 1-10, one can say that Sarah is a 4.5!
Sarah isn't ugly, but my God you are. YOu sound like a mentally ill ten year old.
I agree with you Rachel.