Lennon or McCartney?
Who was the driving force behind The Beatles? And why? Paul McCartney was orderly...John Lennon was unruly, but together they dominated The Beatles' songwriting and were in fact the greatest songwriting collaboration in popular music history. There has been an ongoing debate over Lennon or McCartney for decades. What are your thoughts and opinions?
John Lennon was the deeper of the two and his music (along with George Harrison's fewer contributions) always had a more spiritual quality to it. McCartney was the more pop music oriented of the two, but he sure did write some nice tunes. He hasn't been faring too well these past few years, but hey, he's still alive and it's possible that Lennon may have stumbled in his old age had he lived that long. Love them both though. Brilliant musicians and brilliant people.
Lennon wrote Imagine...alone...he was probably the better song writer and more inspired but we may never know. In the Beatles they needed to be together but they could each stand alone.
I would have to say McCartney. Though Lennon was definitely more dark and deep, most of the popular Beatles songs had to deal with love and more upbeat moods. On a personal level, I prefer Lennon. If Lennon was still alive today, i do not think he would be making music still unlike McCartney. Good question.
In my opinion, Lennon... What classics has McCartney produced since John was killed? I would say that since John's death, George Harrison has surpassed McCartney.
Just my opinion!
In my opinion, in the beginning Lennon was the driving force without a doubt; he put The Beatles together. Towards the end it was McCartney.
During their time together there was positive competition within The Beatles, hence some of the best songs of all time. Also, George Harrison provided some positive competitiion to both John and Paul.
After they split there was negative competition. Decent songs but nothing to match what they did when they were in The Beatles.
When they, sort of, made up, there was little competition between the two and, in my opinion, they produced nothing of the standard that they were capable of.
They were never anywhere near as good outside The Beatles as when they where together; they needed each other.
I say Lennon, with due respect to McCartney.
Lennon was the voice of his times, while McCartney provided a complementary soundtrack.
Lennon redefined the threshold of Pop, while McCartney expanded the range of Pop.
Lennon was the driving force that made The Beatles happen, while McCartney was the glue that tried, but ultimately failed to keep them together.
That's easy - Lennon. Even though I share my birthday with McCartney and his "Maybe I'm Amazed" and especially "Band On The Run" are forever classics.
As someone who wrote a biography on John (not me) put it, "Where McCartney had great talent, Lennon was a genius."
Are you kidding? There is only one answer:
Compare "Silly Love Song" to "Instant Kharma" or "Imagine".
After the Beatles broke up, John went over the top with sarcastic types of songs...but thoughtful songs. Paul went saccarine sweet and mushy...he was like a "boy band" without the pounding bass.
I think the biting wit of Lennon was the driving force, but when Lennon and McCartney were together they balanced each other out and their songs were more amazing (and prolific). The sum of their parts were greater than the whole..or the other way around...not sure of the saying. The saccarine boy and the sarcastic bad boy multiplied each of their talents when they were together.
The only songwriter/musician that even comes close to Lennon/McCartney songs is Billy Joel.
I have to take both...they are better together than apart...I think they pushed each other into different directions. Together they created the most creative music of their time. I don't think either of their solo works can compare...
by BritishRock 7 years ago
Both were singers and gutarists for The Beatles but which one had the better solo career? John wrote about War, Love and Peace. Paul has had a longer solo career but has he made the same amount of classics as John did? Personally I like John Lennons music over Pauls. I welcome everyones opnion.
by Denise Handlon 5 years ago
Who was your favorite Beatle?It's nostalgia time: if you were influenced by the music of the Beatles, did you have a favorite and why?
by PhoenixV 2 years ago
Who Was The Best Musician From The Beatles?And why.
by Jay Louidor 8 years ago
Who from the band The Beatles was your favorite?
by Lizzy Fox 5 years ago
If you could erase any one murder from history, which would it be and why?I would have to choose John Lennon because even though The Beatles were before my time, I love every one of their records, and I may be wrong, but I feel that if John Lennon’s life was not taken prematurely, The Beatles may...
by AnnCee 8 years ago
McCartney's tears for ObamaSir Paul McCartney fought back tears as he and Stevie Wonder sang Ebony And Ivory for U.S. president, Barack Obama - because he was so proud to be performing for the country's first black leader.The Beatles star was honoured at the White House earlier this month,...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|