Which do you think are inherently scarier, zombies or vampires?
Vampires...hands down. Zombies are stereotypically slow and dumb and in turn, it's usually the slow and dumb that get their brains eaten. Vampires on the other hand don't always stand out in a crowd, can fly, have superior strength and speed, shape shifting ability, can only be killed by certain things and the whole mind control, trance thing is a pretty sweet power. With that said, I'd rather be gotten by a vampire than a zombie. A bite on the neck with severe loss of blood would quickly cause lightheadedness thus leaving me "high" while getting this fatal hickey and still having the chance to live an altered life. Zombies though...bashing my head in to eat my brains would suck and knowing that my last thoughts would be "I'm slow and dumb!" isn't how I want to go.
Zombies. They're mindless, so they can't be reasoned with. They generally travel in huge hordes and (depending on which movie you watch) they're fast!!
Tough question. Both are certainly scary in their own right. Vampires are cunning, have the ability to blend, are immortal, and extremely powerful and fast. Zombies often horde together, presenting overwhelming odds, are strong in their own right as they do not possess any concept of pain or fear, and feast on the entirety of their victims rather than just their blood. In order to break the tie, I would have to agree with a fellow responder: the prospect of becoming a zombie seems much more terrifying to me than becoming a vampire. Though vampires are slaves to their blood-thirst, they at least have will and a concept of self. They can choose what course their life takes after infection. Zombies are mindless slaves to whatever turns them, and as such they wander the earth as ever-hungry automatons. This, to me, makes zombies far scarier.
I think vampires would be scarier, but I think that is due mostly to the fact that zombies are often portrayed as slow and dim-witted. However, there are other movies that show them being pretty quick and at times somewhat intelligent.. so I guess it would depend.
Well, it all depends on what kind of zombie/vampire. If it's a Romero zombie, then obviously them - it's a fact, no doubt about it. When the dead can bash through a coffin, not to mention whenever they kill they have a new member in their ranks, nobody stands a chance. OK, so there's the select few.
As for vampires, yeah they're scary. I won't lie that they've been lovie-dovied up (not referring to Twilight, I'm sick of those "jokes") and they're just generally insulting in Anime and such. So all in all, vampires are scary but beatable. Zombies - well, there's only two outcomes: we're all zombies, or we're all food.
PS: Follow your questions if you're going to ask them, OP.
Vampires can be terrifying, when they're allowed to be - but, there's a pretty big difference between the 'monster' vampire, and the tragic/romantic figure vampire. For the 'monster' vampire, you can have all the real-world horror of a particularly nasty sociopath, but with the addition of supernatural powers. But, with the tragic/romantic vampire, you just tend to have a lot of angst.
Zombies are like an unstoppable force of nature. If they're the slow and dumb sort, they might not be dangerous as long as you're careful. But, then, a flood isn't particularly dangerous, unless you get trapped. And, a bush fire isn't dangerous until you realise you've been cut-off. Zombies are dangerous in the same way.
Personally, I'd lean more toward zombies, though. Many of the scenes from horror movies that have most clearly stuck in my head as being particularly uncomfortable have tended to involve clearly terrified people realising that they're trapped, and lots and lots of grasping hands.
The Vampire seems to have an allure to it. If you are attacked by a vampire you, in most versions of the myth, become one of them. When the Zombies attack youa lso become one of them. But, there is a distict difference in that as a Vampire you are, for all practical purposes, still YOU. The Zombie simple becomes part of the horde...Borged if you will. To me, being lost to a collective and losing the essence of who I am is a far worse fear than becoming a virtual immortal. So I would, given the choice, choose to be attacked by a Vampire.
Because they don't exist then I think it all depends on the individual's understanding of what a zombie and a vampire is. For me, a zombie is a bit slow and stupid and just wants to eat your brain. A vampire is quicker, stronger, more intelligent and it's able to outsmart and seduce a human, which is where the danger lies, I think - with a zombie, you know what you're up against but vampires can trick you.
(I should point out that I'm getting my information from Buffy the Vampire Slayer, which I was obsessed with when I was younger, not Twilight - vampires do NOT sparkle.)
So, for me, vampires are definitely scarier.
by greengypsywolf1 8 years ago
Vampire, Werewolf, or Zombie, if you had to decide, which would you choose to be infected by?As my name might suggest I have an affinity to wolf, so the furry fur legged monster is what I would choose.What about anyone else?
by LovebianDesigns 5 years ago
With Z-day upon us we have been asking this question but we can't make a conclusion! We want to hear what you think! What happens when a zombie bites a vampire or a vampire bites a zombie?! Please help us out!
by Thomas Byers 5 years ago
I wonder why vampires seem to be such a popular writing subject now. I am really surprised at how many teens and young adults seem to just love anything about vampires.
by vampire lord 12 8 years ago
what is the difference between vampire and vampanezeI am reading Darren shan vampire assistant (1st 3 books) and have heard loads about the 2 I just need to know everything
by Shannon 7 years ago
What FACTS can you give me about VAMPIRES, WEREWOLVES, and OTHER MYTHICAL CREATURES?
by Harvest Hunter 8 years ago
Can Vampirism cure Zombification?Suppose a Zombie is only infected blood wise and he bites a person who will indeed be infected and become a zombie very soon. Could a Vampire take the infected blood out without being infected itself?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|