Virginia Attorney General Wants to ban some sex practices

1. 79

   Uninvited Writerposted 11 years ago

   He wants to ban oral and anal sex. More from the "less government" party:
   
   http://www.care2.com/causes/ban-oral-an … neral.html

   replyreport
   1. 94

      wildernessposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      St. Augustine tried the same thing in the 4th century, along with many other controls on the sex lives of other people.  Get caught in any but the missionary position, for instance, and you could be burned at the stake.
      
      This has nothing to do with big government or even the Republican party as such; it has everything to do with religious control over other people.

      replyreport
   2. 59

      GNelsonposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      Again the party that claims to want less government regulation tries to regulate more.  They should be called the hypocrite party.

      replyreport
   3. 0

      Nancy's Nicheposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      The government will continue to push intrusion agendas as far as the people will allow! This issue is a private individual issue and the government needs to stay out of our bedrooms and personal life choices. They have intruded in our lives since 9/11 under the guise of keeping us safe and people fell for it. Shortly after more laws followed like snooping through the internet and drone surveillance. The latest is restricting what students eat and drink at school. That is a parents/students right? Individuals should be in charge of THEIR OWN lives and choices NOT THE GOVERNMENT!
      
      “A government that is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away.”~Barry Goldwater
      
      “Relying on the government to protect your privacy is like asking a peeping tom to install your window blinds.”~John Perry Barlow
      https://www.google.com
      
      /search?q=laws+of+intrusion+by+federal+and+state+governments&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

      replyreport
      1. 83

         gmwilliamsposted 11 years agoin reply to this

         + a multillion times.   This case scenario is quasiprophetic.  Remember the H.G. Wells' book 1984 where BIG BROTHER is everwatching........watching.........watching..............
         

         replyreport
   4. 72

      cheaptrickposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      So basically he wants everyone to sit down and shut up?...and why is it called the missionary position? Dose that mean atheists aren't allowed to use it?...and if God is so straight laced why did he name the 'G' spot after himself?...cause that's what women say when you find it...after a long and arduous search.

      replyreport
   5. 60

      Paul Wingertposted 11 years agoin reply to this

      And the Republicans wonder why they are referred to as the "Stupid Party". Go figure.

      replyreport
2. 83

   gmwilliamsposted 11 years ago

   Nothing makes my Sundays like a bunch of sexually repressed Republican men attempting to legislate sexual lives.   No sireee! I am digressing much.   However, doesn't "government have BETTER things to do than to pry into people's bedrooms.   There is unemployment, homelessness, and other societal malaises.   
   
   This is totally inane.   Who CARES what people do in the privacy of their bedroooms.  I believe that the VIRGIN-ia Attorney General is very sexually repressed and obsessed.   Maybe the General is  NOT getting any so to speak.   These Republicans DO NEED deep and intensive Freudian analysis or maybe a sexual surrogate to rid them of their sexual hangups. 
   
   Me thinks that the VIRGIN-ia Attorney General wants to return to the Middle Ages where sex was only for ONE, SOLID purpose.   Oh no, sex should NEVER BE for fun.  How outrageous and disgusting.  The Republicans apparently view something quite amiss with postmodern society with its sexual equality and liberation.   They want to return to the "good old" double and repressive standard.   Bring on the MIddle Ages, they say.    We postmodernist say, No #$%#$ way in hell, stay out of OUR bedrooms and tend to YOURS!
   

   replyreport
3. 92

   peeplesposted 11 years ago

   Guess they want everyone to lead a boring, basic, for reproducing only sex life. Shame. On a side note does anyone believe these people have never been involved in oral?

   replyreport
4. 82

   rebekahELLEposted 11 years ago

     It does tie in with the conservative party in that regard.

   replyreport
5. 83

   gmwilliamsposted 11 years ago

   
   
   We WILL NOT stand for sexual debauchery in any shape or form.  NEVER!  This is the mindset of some atavistic and regressive people.

   replyreport
6. 80

   Wayne Brownposted 11 years ago

   Such sex practices have been banned and declared illegal for centuries.  There are laws all over the USA prohibiting such conduct but they largely go unenforced unless they are part of a public display.  Those who are ready to so easily redefine the institution of marriage might want to give some thought to how it affects the position of many of these laws already on our books.  After all, if Farmer Smith can legally marry his cow, why should it be against the law for him to take that brown-eyed beauty to the movies on Saturday night?  ~WB

   replyreport
7. 84

   psycheskinnerposted 11 years ago

   Most of the dumb sex laws are old, creating new ones is a new level of ridiculousness.  I don't care what my adult neighbors are sticking in each others whatevers, and government shouldn't either.

   replyreport
8. 92

   habeeposted 11 years ago

   Remember - there's a difference in fiscal conservatives and social conservatives. I'm an example of the first. As for sex, I think anything goes, as long as it involves consenting adults - not rape, not kids, and not animals. If adults want to have group sex, oral sex, anal sex, same sex relationships, or swap spouses, I don't care. It's none of my business!

   replyreport
9. 64

   maxoxam41posted 11 years ago

   And how would they enforce them?

   replyreport