New catchphrase from Obama's acceptance speech at DNC.
So... if he proposes that we build all this infrastructure in America and we do build it,
will he give us credit for it?
Will the GOP?
I mean, if we really do build it, could anyone argue that we didn't build that?
I believe the American nation NEEDS rebuilding. Just look at the pols and see how divided this country is (50 - 50) about issues that are almost 100% contrary to each other. It is about time to leave the rest of the world alone and concentrate all efforts on making life in America better for all people.
I'm with you. We spend WAY too much $$ overseas when we need it here.
You could solve most of your countries problems by simply nationalising Halliburton, or whatever name they use today, and getting rid of the Fed Reserve to regain control of your economy and currency.
https://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE%3 … 5GIkQW01AE
Wasn't there almost a trillion dollars distributed for this exact purpose? Does anyone know where the United States misplaced that $$$?
See it's all well and good to say...Let's just put everyone to work on the infrastructure.
Great....first you have to have the plans........then you have to have the contractors to do it. The idea I gather...because I watched NONE of either convention...is to get them to hire unemployed people. Do those people have the necessary skills?
There is a lot to this thing. You can't just DO it.
Let's don't forget money.
Oh that's right.......tax the rich.
If we are discussing roads and bridges, those that are engaging in commercial activities using these roads should be responsible for the revenue to improve the infrastructure. The work should be allocated through a bid system, once the GC is established they can sub the work out to smaller companies.
Forgetting the tax the rich comment. Why can't we all just do it, it's been done before, post WW11 and thereafter and helped economies recover>
I actually have no problem with the basic idea. I just want it to be done without it being a political football.
Yeah.....like that is gonna happen!!!
Well, in a sense it's always going to be a political football, because the party who suggests it is always going to be opposed by the party that didn't suggest it first. That's politics!
Non-commerical use also wears out the roads. Logically everyone should pay in a roughly proportional way relative to the benefits they get and their ability to pay.
And the work should not go to the lowest bidder unless there are very clear specs. That;s why some of the bridged are falling apart now, cheap building methods like the use of untanilized timber supports.
The reason I suggest those conducting commerce is that the expenditure is more easily distributed to operating costs. Ultimately everyone will pay the fees within the price of their products and services.
The work does not need to go to the lowest bidder, when I was responsible for distributing contracts, I would seek a middle price, as I was confident of their ability to perform a quality job for the cost. Of course if the United States decided to switch the funds that go to building the infrastructure of foreign nations to work in the borders of the United States, no one in the U.S. would feel any difference in their income!
And schools! Let's not forget schools.
My high school was a WPA project. It includes beautiful stone artistry inside (cool gargoyles, exquisite tilework -- I have photos somewhere, can't find on Google, tho). They don't build 'em like that anymore.
BUT WE COULD!
Point here is that when we think of infrastructure it's not just bridges and roads.
Yeah like when they built the interstate system. In the 50's?
This one was a bona fide WPA project. Opened in 1935.
I took my California native architect husband there and he was blown away.
He simply could not believe that such beautiful workmanship/craftsmanship would be in a public high school.
While we're talking of nation building, I will put in my plug to stop making strip malls that make every city look like every other city. Ugh and ugLY!
Just give any new start up business that employs five (non related) people or more (but up to say 50 maximum) a tax free run for the first five years, on the business and the employees.
Small is beautiful, manageable and will produce the entrepreneurs (remember GWB; "The French don't even know have a word for it" ) that rebuild a nations wealth.
by undermyhat5 years ago
"If you own a business, you didn't build that..."President Obama says taxpayer funded roads and bridges built American business.President Obama has said Americas infrastructure is in of repairPoorest Countries...
by paarsurrey6 years ago
Hi friendsIs America a Christian nation?ThanksI am an Ahmadi peaceful Muslim
by Josak4 years ago
I think it would be great if we could debate the economy not on the basis of "commonly known" or presumed but on the basis of provable facts with sources. I'll start, US deficit for 2009 (last budget made by...
by grinnin15 years ago
How does a country ever make up for wiping out it's first inhabitants? Inhabitants who loved and revered the land and watched it greedily devoured by invaders?? What is the price America pays for what it did? How can we...
by cooldad2 years ago
I can't help but wonder if the United States could be considered a terrorist nation. With its actions in the past and the present, can the U.S. be considered terrorists?The treatment of Native Americans, slavery,...
by David Livermore4 years ago
Let me preface this by stating I am not trying to be mean or a troll. In fact, I avoid the forums because I don't want to get involved. But with so many posts about the topics I'm about to discuss, I wanted...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.