Time for some REAL Change!

Jump to Last Post 1-5 of 5 discussions (88 posts)

61
Barefootfaeposted 10 years ago

Here it comes.....
reply report
1. 0
  Old Poolmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Hmmm, I wonder who woke them up?
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  It's time....it's way past time.
  reply report
2. 60
  Josakposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  New boss same as the old boss. I really hope I am wrong though and they turn out to be sane conservatives with real ideas.
  Content is king, it will take serious policy change for the GOP to get anywhere.
  reply report
  0
  Old Poolmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Josak, you are asking for a lot asking for real ideas out of Washington. The GOP will need to make some major changes just to stay in the game.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  This needs to be said...
  
  There have been no new ideas out of Washington. Barack Obama did not bring any new ideas.
  Ask Europe.
  reply report
  0
  Old Poolmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Yes he did. You forget about higher taxes, free mandatory birth control, gays in the Military, women in combat, sharing the wealth, etc., etc.
  How can you say he didn't bring new ideas to Washington? The fact that most of us didn't like his ideas means nothing.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Wellllllll..................
  New idea TO Washington I guess. Nothing that hasn't been tried elsewhere.
  reply report
  0
  Old Poolmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  LOL - Your right, none of these were really original ideas.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  In what way could you not say the same thing about Obama? Be real.
  reply report
3. 72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Why make it so easy for Hilliary? Have we learned nothing?
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Easy?
  That would be running a McCain or a Romney again.
  Who do you suggest?
  reply report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Jon Huntsman was the only grown up in the room with Ron Paul as a good second choice. I also thought that Gary Johnson was a good choice. If the GOP thinks that parading Marco Rubio or Jeb Bush across the stage and think that America is not going to see through the thinly disguised veil of catering to the hispanic vote they can expect more of the same results as this past election.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  No I don't like either of those either but I want to be able to tell the difference between my candidate and the ones we are running against.
  
  How about an actual Conservative? Huntsman and Paul are neither. Rand is closer than Ron although Rand is libertarian, I will take that.
  reply report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  How did that work out this past election? You are making my point exactly. America resoundly rejected the right and put Obama back in. He appealed to the left and secured the hispanic vote that sent him over the top above Romney. Unless the GOP learns where the electorate is or can gerrymander the vote to sway towards them, Hillary will be elected. The country wants to be in the middle and the GOP is being taken over by the extreme right. Romney was the would be conservative that was a chameleon everybody saw as really to the right. I agree that there has to be a degree of conservatism in the mix but unfortunately going for all conservative and no compromise is why we are where we are now.
  Huntsman made sense and Paul was right for real change.
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Huntsman made a lot of sense! Too bad the far right rejected him. The GOP needs to get off the social conservative wagon and stick more to fiscal issues. With the state of our economy, gays getting married, the legalization of pot, etc. should be the last things people are worried about. Personally, I support both the things I mentioned, but even if I didn't, I'd place my concerns on the back burner until the economy, jobless rate, and other financial issues were solved. BUT...I'm not a politician. Thank goodness!
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Well maybe our problem is we have two parties and that make them feel there should be a difference so people can tell.
  When you talk about Huntsman I get the feeling you want someone who will agree with the Democrat party. So let's do away with the Republican party altogether and just have one party and select someone from there.
  
  Agreed?
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  No, I actually voted for Romney - because of fiscal issues. The GOP needs to take the pulse of America. Most people I know don't give a hoot if gays get married or not, and that includes every Republican I know. I'm saying the Rs need to draw a contrast between the way they would handle things like big spending and deficit spending versus how a D would handle them. Fiscal issues should be the focus - not whether John and Sam or Suzie and Jane want to get married, whether a gay man should be allowed to serve in the military, or whether people can legally smoke pot. When they talk about such social issues, they're losing sight of the all-too-important fiscal problems we're facing.
  
  Oh, and as far as "agreeing with the Democratic party," I want a politician who WILL agree with the Ds when the Ds are right, instead of disagreeing just because they're the opposing team.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  No....what the problem is many are like me and think if they want to get married..whatever..I am not going to ulcerate over it.Liberals scream about it all day long and because I don't it is characterized as not caring. It's BS.
  Is that what your leaders are really supposed to spend their time being concerned about?
  Have you heard North Korea lately?
  Have you heard Iran lately?
  Gay marriage should not be an issue we think is top of mind for a President or a candidate.
  It's their business and whoever is in the White House has other business.
  reply report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Totally agree with this statement.
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  You just said the same thing I did. We have bigger fish to fry!
  reply report
  60
  Josakposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  People not having equal rights in this country, being discriminated against under the law will always be the biggest problem we face until it is fixed, the foundation stone of any country has to be a solid set of values and liberties.
  North Korea and Iran both deny their citizens basic rights too, it's about time we stopped.
  
  Also Seriously neither Iran nor NK is any real threat to the US, any attack by either would spell their certain doom.
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I should have been clearer. My "bigger fish" didn't include Iran or NK. I'm more concerned with the financial health of the US - as a whole and for individual citizens. Our decifit is too big, too many people are jobless, too many people are homeless, and too many are hungry. Iran and NK are not at the top of my worry list. I'm not saying, however, that they don't concern me at all. Certain death is not always a deterrent for some groups.
  report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I agree that we have one group who spout off as being different from each other until the check clears and the vote is bought.
  
  The two party system is what strangeled the country and they are not about to loosen the noose.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Right.
  
  And as to the D's being right I will agree with them when they aren't trying to steer the population of the planet with their ideology.....which hasn't worked anywhere else....especially the fiscal end......ask Greece.
  reply report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  What's your point? That one cancels out the other with ideology? The ideology is the same. All the slimebags want to do is make money. Don't you get it? That is where the whole system has been steered for the last 200 years when we got professional politicians to supposedly represent us. As long as you play into their game of us and them, they win. Have you noticed nothing changes. Gas prices are just as volatile as they were in the 70's even with the subsities. Farmers were and now corporations are paid to not grow certain crops. The wars are never ending while the military industrial complex expands every year. The jerrymandering of the vote is the same as when it was instituted loosely in 1812. If you want to continue the bickering about party idelogy and who is right and who is wrong and who you think will represent your interests you better first get a healthy bank account so you can put some skin in the game to further your agenda. Otherwise just sit back and watch nothing happen.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I just think you hvae to look at what people want to have happen.
  Just like the looking for candidates that will just agree with everything. If that's all he or she is gonna do why bother?
  reply report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Looking at what you want to have happen and getting it done are impossible with the broken system we now have. Money is the vehicle by which everything is based. We need to take the money out of the equation to get true representation.
  Term limits, publicly financed campaigns and lobby reform are our only hope. As long as we bicker over the samantics of ideology without fixing the system why bother as you say.
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Hey I will make a deal with you and you can take this to the bank.
  
  Go through and talk to all the liberals on here who spend all day long making certain they protray those of us who don't agree with them as murderous lunatic savages and you have a deal. I will shut up about them.
  But the next thing likely to happen i one of them will reply to this and tell me to stop behaving that way.
  
  You cannot win. But you cannot allow them to either.
  report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I can talk to either side until I turn blue in the face and even if I sway them to either side nothing will change. The two party system is at the heart of the issue. The professional politicians do what they want to further their agenda and the rest be damned. Just look at who contributes to their campaigns to see that they have no allegience to anybody but themself.
  Your argument nips at the tail of the problem and not the head where the problem is. People have opinions and the politicians know that as long as they keep the sheeple wrapped up in it they can act in autonomy.
  Term limits, publicly finnced campaigns and lobby reform is our only hope. Take the money out of the equation if you want real change.
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Mitt Romney was and is
  
  N O T
  
  a conservative. Can we all GET THAT?
  reply report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Who knows what he is. He wore so many hats and spouted so much rhetoric there was no telling. His 47% line resoundly slammed his butt as a conservative. This was a statement he thought was in confidentiality but was his undoing.
  
  I don't blame you for not liking him as most of the party did not want him either. But with the likes of Perry, Santorum and Bachman the conservatives got hitched up to that religious right bandwagon and Romney became the golden boy.
  
  Like I said Romney was such a chameleon.
  reply report
  89
  Zelkiiroposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, please. Romney is as Conservative (and slimy) as they come. Just because he was caught saying what every Conservative really believes doesn't mean you have the right to try to claim he's not yours.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  You have never known a Conservative.
  
  Romney started socialized medicine in his state.
  
  AAAACCKKK! Not Conservative.
  reply report
  89
  Zelkiiroposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  It was probably the only half-decent thing Romney ever attempted. Of course, it's still a massive failure compared to the rest of the world's healthcare systems, but so is our regular system, and at least he tried.
  reply report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  What would an "actual conservative" be? Huntsman was by far the best your party had to offer.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Because he agreed totally right?
  reply report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Or because he actually had experience working across the aisle, business experience and had spent years working in China, therefore he had foreign policy experience as well. Should he have gone to Bible college instead?
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  no but since Democrats never work across the aisle it's like I said.
  
  He agreed with everything.
  reply report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I think I understand now why were so polarized as a country.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Let me see if I can explain this for you. You don't understand.
  I am sitting here with a Liberal trying to tell me what kind of Conservative we need to have to run for President.
  Now.....I can go with your pick, When time comes and he is the nominee you are going to call him everything you can possibly think of and describe the social and fiscal Armageddon he will bring about......am i not right?
  
  Let us pick our own nominee ok?
  reply report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Actually, no. I just listed reasons why he would make a great candidate. Maybe if the GOP would moderate a tad they could win a majority of all voters instead of just voters in South Carolina and Oklahoma.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Why is it only Conservatives who need to change?
  Why can't the left moderate a little bit? See your whole viewpoint is there would be a utopia here if not for conservatives.
  Little one sided?
  report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I actually didn't say that at all.
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Perhaps you didn't say that literally but it is the basis of your whole argument.
  report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  No I didn't. I was merely pointing out how Huntsman would have been good for the GOP. You don't need to be a Bible scholar to be a good conservative candidate.
  report
  60
  Josakposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Have to agree with Cody, Huntsman is the closest thing to an electable candidate the GOP has, he isn't an extremist and due to his overseas stationing etc. he actually understands what the world is and how it should be dealt with unlike the usual conservative view of attempting to intimidate or bomb the world into submission thus causing massive backlash.
  report
  89
  Zelkiiroposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Huntsman isn't an omnicidal maniac?
  
  No wonder the GOP and the general public abandoned him.
  report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Why do we need a conservative as President? Is it fair to everyone else that we have a leader who is predisposed to hold only one side of any argument. It is like going in front of a biased judge. No matter what the case involves there is only one answer in his mind. That is what you get with a leader who is dedicated to one view. If we were all the same I would say that is a no brainer but we are a nation of many differences and compromise is what unites us. You can see what biased thinking has us in now.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  So the folks holding the power now aren't biased?
  
  Seriously?
  Why is it only Conservatives are supposed to compromise?
  You should really have a long talk with Harry Reid because he is apparently a Republican Conservative and doesn't know it because he won't compromise.
  report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  You really have only one way of looking at things. The reason why we have what we have in the White House is in response to the nonsense you keep blathering about. If you try to swing the vote one way what you have is a backlash as we now have. No agreement, no compromise and no government. If you stepped back you could see that. Instead you cry about what we have instead of how we can make it better. Your only thought process is that it MUST be your way or it will fail. We have to live together but as long as you put all your effort in one ideology this is what you will have to live with. How is that working out for you?
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Oh no............
  
  Tell me what must be compromised on. I mean you have all the answers........
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Rhamson is right. You should try opening your mind a little.
  
  Just look who is invited to speak at CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference): Donald Trump, Sarah Palin, Rick Perry, Scott Walker, a bunch of rigid ideologues. And look who is conspicuously absent: Chris Christie, the most popular Republican in the country, a guy who had the integrity to work with Obama to get something done for his people.
  
  Talk about conservatives recommitting to irrelevance....
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  So who is supposed to speak at a Conservative gathering?
  See it keeps going down the road that we have to hammer our thoughts into Conservative heads because they, after all, are the sole thing wrong with this world. It smacks of the whole there are enlightened people(on the left only...imagine..)we must listen too.
  They pulled that stunt at the White House on a group of Catholic Bishops.
  
  Compromise cannot be a one-way street but that is exactly what I am getting here.
  report
  61
  John Holdenposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  No, you keep saying that the right wing way is the only way! There is no compromise from you.
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I have not said that John.
  I have asked people what they want me to compromise about which is apparently the wrong question.
  What will the left compromise on?
  Tit for tat..pro quid pro Clarice...
  report
  61
  John Holdenposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  The following comment is pretty typical of your attitude and sentiment -
  
  "Go through and talk to all the liberals on here who spend all day long making certain they protray those of us who don't agree with them as murderous lunatic savages and you have a deal. I will shut up about them."
  
  I for one have never portrayed anybody I disagree with as a murderous lunatic savage.
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  No John you have not said that.
  Therefore logic should assure that I did not mean you.
  Logic should also tell you I meant others and there are plenty here who harbor some emtions pretty close to that.
  report
  61
  John Holdenposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Then why say "all the liberals" why not "some liberals" (not to mention some right wingers who are equally bad).
  
  I'm so used to being referred to as a murderous savage that I hardly notice any more.
  report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Perhaps you aren't as liberal as you think.
  
  Why not some Conservatives and not all Conservatives.
  Many here think a Conservative thought is the purest evil.
  report
  61
  John Holdenposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Well by my definition (and the European definition) though I may have liberal attitudes I'm not actually a liberal at all.
  
  But I made no mention of "all" conservatives. To do so would be hypercritical of me, I know some conservatives who are very decent people, give you the shirt off their back even.
  report
  72
  rhamsonposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Obviously we cannot continue in an objective open discussion. I wish you well with your thoughts and perpective. I haven't much hope that it will help anything.
  report
65
innersmiffposted 10 years ago
I'm not hopeful that these candidates will be any better than the old. The sooner we reject politics the better, in my opinion. Government is a hive of corruption that few can use for real good.
reply report
1. 0
  Old Poolmanposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Great idea, but how the heck do we do that? Even though we did it by voting, we were actually hiring these guys and gals to represent us. If we just hired some new people, what would stop it from reverting to a pit of corruption again? Term limits, less pay, and no retirement plan would be a start in the right direction.
  reply report
  65
  innersmiffposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Government is nothing like hiring someone. When you hire someone, they are legally obligated to fulfil their contract. When you vote in a politician, they only have to do as much to keep their electorate happy, or as the case may be, mildly dissatisfied. They can violate all their promises if they darn well want to, who is to stop them? When their term finishes, all their party needs to do is persuade you that they have some new, better people who will do it right this time, even if the previous 9 or 10 were the same, and despite the fact that they're bought by the same people. It's a fraudulent system.
  
  All we need to do is stop cooperating with it. Stop paying taxes, stop signing up for the military - refuse to associate with the government just as you would refuse to associate with a business if it had committed the same crimes.
  reply report
  77
  Kathryn L Hillposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  We would have to all agree to stop paying taxes... the whole nation on the same page. - wouldn't that be so cool to actually take back some power?
  reply report
  61
  John Holdenposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Just move to Somalia and then see how keen you are on a tax free system.
  reply report
89
Zelkiiroposted 10 years ago
The only half-decent Republican alive today is probably Jon Huntsman. And even then, he's only half-decent.

We need to find a necromancer and pay him to revive Teddy Roosevelt, just so he can beat the shite out of the current Republican party.
reply report
58
Education Answerposted 10 years ago
The problem is that we haven't had a truly conservative republican in years and years. Who was the last fiscal conservative? Good luck figuring that one out. We have had social conservatives, but nobody has been both a fiscal and social conservative in quite a long time. Both parties have spent us into the hole, though the POTUS has really stepped up that game.
reply report
1. 89
  Zelkiiroposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Fiscal Conservatives are far less dangerous and far less abominable than social Conservatives. Why would you ever want someone who's both?!
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Because they have some common sense.
  reply report
  58
  Education Answerposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  We don't get fiscal conservatives, and at this point, I wonder if America would be willing to lose or trim the budget as much as is necessary.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  How would we ever know? Do you realize what a drop in the bucket the sequestration was?
  Have you seen the wailing and gnashing of teeth and from the left over it?
  Have you heard the disinformation about it?
  You even had James Carville out there saying it was no big deal and he was just simply ignored over fear fear fear fear fear!
  
  Oh but they will happily cut defense!
  reply report
  61
  John Holdenposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Yes, what are you defending against? You are a virtually impregnable continent and yet you spend two and a half times as much on your armed forces as the next nine largest defence forces combined!
  
  Why?
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Because of the threat of alien zombies.
  reply report
  89
  Zelkiiroposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  COMMUNIST alien zombies!!
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  reply report
  78
  Mighty Momposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Redundant, I think.
  Are there any alien zombies who are not communist?
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  MM, I think a few are socialists.
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I pretty much agree. I want a fiscal conservative who's a liberal-moderate on (most) social issues.
  reply report
67
Cody Hodge5posted 10 years ago
Sigh...

Not a single viable leader in the whole bunch.

Still not ready to graduate from the kiddie table of American politics I see...
reply report
1. 61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  What do you believe constitutes a "viable leader"?
  Have you ever held a position of leadership Cody?
  Have you ever supervised people?
  reply report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Not a single "Tea Party" candidate..
  
  And yes, I have. Its fun. Of course, you actually have to know things instead of just talking and making lame memes.
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  uh=huh.
  When you have worn a uniform with three stripes or more on it get back to me.
  reply report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  My Little League jersey had stripes on it. One of my work uniforms did too.
  
  So, shall we continue our discussion?
  reply report
  93
  habeeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  Hey, your avatar is wearing stripes, too. I'm beginning to see a pattern here.
  reply report
  67
  Cody Hodge5posted 10 years agoin reply to this
  I'm thinking I was a Zebra in a past life
  reply report
  61
  Barefootfaeposted 10 years agoin reply to this
  So you are a striped donkey?
  reply report

Post a Reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Time for some REAL Change!

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Time for some REAL Change!

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies