Taliban or Tennessee: A parent cannot name its own child?

Jump to Last Post 1-2 of 2 discussions (16 posts)
  1. Credence2 profile image81
    Credence2posted 5 years ago

    No offense to those that call the "Volunteer State" home, but this is truly an outrage. Wasn't it in Tennessee where  adherents to Islam were hassled when they wanted to buid a mosque? Are we still fixated on the period of the 'Scopes Trial'?

    The Right is always talking about 'freedom', yet this judge illegally brings her religious dogma and doctrine into her decision. Since when has the First Amendment been put on hold? Obviously, for the rightwinger, some people are more free than others. 

    See the link below:
    What is your take on it, you have already heard mine!

    http://news.yahoo.com/tenn-judge-change … 23538.html

    1. Cody Hodge5 profile image77
      Cody Hodge5posted 5 years agoin reply to this

      But.....I thought only liberal judges were destroying the Constitution?

      And the South really thinks its capable of running elections without oversight?

      1. Credence2 profile image81
        Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this

        Hi, Cody, so what is going on 'down there'? I have to wonder. Certainly do not want to throw out the baby with the bathwater, but can't I even name my own kid?
        So what sort of tyranny is this?

    2. profile image69
      Education Answerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      I get that you feel that the judge overstepped her authority.  The Taliban, however, might be a bit much.

      Though I find it irritating, from a religious standpoint, that somebody would name their baby Messiah, I am in agreement with you about this being too invasive.  We are Americans, and we can choose our own names, thank you.  By the way, I am a member of the Right, a conservative.  I do not appreciate government intrusion upon freedoms.  That stance is conservative.

      1. Credence2 profile image81
        Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this

        EA, I knew that you would be too clever to allow yourself to caught in such a blatant double standard for a conservative. This may be one of the few times that we are on the same page.

        But I wonder though, how does the GOP get together, you have the pragmatists (Christie) the social conservative-tea party (Rick Santorum) and the growing libertarian movement best representated by Sen. Paul of tenn.
        How do you all get those disparate factions together for 2016?

        1. Ralph Deeds profile image64
          Ralph Deedsposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          My recollection is that in Quebec new or expecting parents are given lists of approved girl and boy names from which to choose. Not sure whether this is still the case.

          1. Credence2 profile image81
            Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this

            Ralph, I did not know that Quebec would make such a restriction, what is the basis of it?

            1. Ralph Deeds profile image64
              Ralph Deedsposted 5 years agoin reply to this

              Not sure. Here's a link to baby naming laws in several places not including Quebec:
              http://mentalfloss.com/article/25034/8- … aming-laws

              1. Ralph Deeds profile image64
                Ralph Deedsposted 5 years agoin reply to this

                Perhaps my comment was not correct or times have changed since I heard about the rule 40-some years ago from American parents whose child was born in Montreal. However, here's a link that indicates that names are sometimes challenged by the Quebec government:

                http://www.nancy.cc/2009/10/12/names-ch … t-un-ange/

                1. Credence2 profile image81
                  Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this

                  This is bizarre, Ralph. Regardless, I do not want to give the conservatives any ammunition. That practice is totally unAmerican.
                  The links were quite revealing, I am just surprised that Canada, a nation with a strong democratic tradition, would have such a policy.
                  Thanks for providing the info.


                  1. Ralph Deeds profile image64
                    Ralph Deedsposted 5 years agoin reply to this

                    I think the policy applies only in Quebec which has had secessionist tendencies going back many years. As I recall there was a movement to secede or perhaps affiliate in some fashion with France. I seem to recall that there was a referendum on secession which was defeated.

                    Here's a Wikipedia link to issues between Quebec and the rest of Canada:

                    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_sov … y_movement

                    "Tension between the francophone, Catholic population of Quebec and the largely anglophone, Protestant population of the rest of Canada has been a central theme of Canadian history, shaping the early territorial and cultural divisions of the country that persist to this day.[6] Supporters of sovereignty for Quebec believe that the current relationship between Quebec and the rest of Canada does not reflect Quebec's best social, political and economic development interests. Moreover, many subscribe to the notion that without appropriately recognizing that the people of Quebec are culturally distinct, Quebec will remain chronically disadvantaged in favour of the English-Canadian majority. There is also the question of whether the French language can survive within the geographic boundaries of Quebec and where French-Canadian society and culture fits into what is an increasingly multicultural country. Separatists and Independentists are generally opposed to some aspects of the federal system in Canada and do not believe it can be reformed in a way that could satisfy the needs of Quebec's French-speaking majority. A key component in the argument in favour of overt political independence is that new legislation and a new system of governance could best secure the future development of modern Québécois culture. Additionally, there is wide-ranging debate about defence, monetary policy, currency, international-trade and relations after independence and whether a renewed federalism would give political recognition to the Quebec nation (along with the other 'founding' peoples, including Canadian First Nations, the Inuit, and the British) could satisfy the historic disparities between these cultural "nations" and create a more cohesive and egalitarian Canada.

                    "Several attempts at reforming the federal system in Canada have thus far failed because of, particularly, the conflicting interests between Quebec's representatives and the other provincial governments' representatives. There is also a degree of resistance throughout Quebec and the rest of Canada to re-opening a constitutional debate, in part because of the nature of these failures—not all of which were the result simply of sovereignists and federalists not getting along. To cite one case, in a recent round of constitutional reform, Elijah Harper, an aboriginal leader from Manitoba, was able to prevent ratification of the agreement in the provincial legislature, arguing that the accord did not address the interests of Canada's aboriginal population. This was a move to recognize that other provinces represent distinct cultural entities, such as the aboriginal population in Canada's Prairies or the people of Newfoundland (which contains significant and culturally distinct French-Canadian, English-Canadian, Irish-Canadian and Aboriginal cultures- and many more)...."

        2. profile image69
          Education Answerposted 5 years agoin reply to this

          I doubt they will be able to do so.  Our party is fragmented into opposing ideologies.  Our only hope is that people vote against the opposing candidate, the democrat.  How many people have you heard say that the only reason they voted for the POTUS was because Romney was worse?  Sad as it may be, that appears, at this point, to be our only hope.  IF H. Clinton is the nominee, that hope becomes pretty slim.

          Sadly, I see the writing on the wall, and it isn't pretty.  Now, if a candidate, like Reagan, comes forward and changes everything, we may have a chance.  I'm not holding my breath.

          Best wishes.

          1. Credence2 profile image81
            Credence2posted 5 years agoin reply to this

            All the best to you to EA, I wasn't particularly hot on Reagan, but there is no question that he was a sea change in the political landscape, at the least the perception of it prior to his inauguration.

            I thought that the question on the future of conservatism in America warrented a thread of it own.

            1. profile image69
              Education Answerposted 5 years agoin reply to this


              Yes, I think it warrants a thread, though it may be a slightly depressing one for some of us.  We're down now, and I don't see a way out in the immediate future.  Still, the same was said of the democrats from 1980 to 1992.  The tides seem to always change, but I can't, for the life of me, see the immediate way out of the debacle that is my party.  Where have all the conservatives gone?  All I see is political games and pandering for votes.  At this point, most republican candidates will get my vote, because I am so displeased with the opposition, not because I want to vote for them.

              Best wishes.

  2. innersmiff profile image70
    innersmiffposted 5 years ago

    Take away the concept of a "legal name", and take away the problem.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)