Torture Under the Bush Administration

Jump to Last Post 51-70 of 70 discussions (301 posts)
  1. Misha profile image66
    Mishaposted 16 years ago

    LOL Pam, yet another point of agreement smile

    People really don't understand that, they think they are invincible, even in the face of strong opposing evidence.

    Really exemplary case is the history of the heads of NKVD (KGB predecessor) during Stalin times. Three people subsequently hold the job, and every previous one was tortured and then executed by his successor...

  2. countrywomen profile image59
    countrywomenposted 16 years ago

    Actually one of my friend sent me an email once with a link (probably even available at youtube) about a horrible execution in front of a camera where the neck of the hostage is cut with a knife. I felt so much disgust and just couldn't digest that footage for couple of days. I feel if somebody sees those images then it certainly evokes strong reactions that anything can be justified against those folks who subscribe to such an "ideology".

    But as Sufi mentioned in the long term an eye for an eye never works and only constructive engagement with moderate elements among them(yes even they exist) helps to mitigate the negativity. If somebody is bad to us and we also treat them equally bad then what is the difference between civilized and "uncivilized" folks. And in the long run more friends are gained by humanitarian approach and the propaganda machine of those extremists folks would not have much ammunition left to fuel the new generation of folks to take up arms. I know it is a slow and painful process but do we really have any other choice?

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      The rules of conduct concerning POW's and torture was long ago established by lawful nations.  I suppose by some of the reasoning here (edit-and I mean in this thread, CW, not your reasoning, lol), since we were/are 'at war,' that is enough reason to also use terrorist tactics against our enemies, since it was used, too.

      Those who are arguing 'for' torture here really have no precedence or leg to stand on.  They are doing so for purely partisan reasons, I believe.  I'm probably ready to chalk it up to the well known Bush admin. and conservative incompetence...

      I know the tape you are talking about CW, actually. Incidentally, tapes like this are also shown to military officers in training...  And being involved in the acts of war IS DIFFERENT than dealing with enemy combatants or POW's.  One is a much more controlled situation, where emotions should have no part, if the interrogators are trained professionals. (ie, if a doctor 'freaked out' emotionally over blood and pain, should he/she be a doctor?)

  3. Teresa McGurk profile image59
    Teresa McGurkposted 16 years ago

    I know I'm jumping in here into the middle of the thread -- but I was reminded earlier today of an incident that took place in Belfast during the 1970's.  The British Army captured a terrorist just after he had planted a bomb.  Instead of going in to diffuse it themselves (this must have been before their handy robots), they sent the terrorist in.

    There was outrage.  The ethical debate was this: did the army have the right to put someone else in harm's way?  Even if that person were the guy who had planted the bomb and knew most about its composition and any booby trap in place?

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      I'd say that's debatable...even though I'd have to read and listen to more to make a decision on what I really think.  However, it is also--at least in my mind, a totally different situation than the systematic use of torture on a POW.

  4. Teresa McGurk profile image59
    Teresa McGurkposted 16 years ago

    yeah -- you're right; it is completely different than premeditated, systematic torture.  It's still someone exerting power over another in ways that infringe upon their human rights, though.

  5. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 16 years ago

    So that the point drawn is that the perception and allowance of human rights is always a balancing act--and is such when considering any right.  Mill argued that a struggle always takes place between the competing demands of liberty and authority--that we cannot have one without the other.

    A window shield view of this situation might be that it is of immediate consequence, outweighing the rights of the terrorist in favor of those he would save...  But honestly, I'd need to know much more.

  6. profile image0
    mdawson17posted 16 years ago

    I can say any kind of torture to any human being is wrong and any anyone who creates such acts should be held accountable regardless of job description!

  7. profile image60
    logic,commonsenseposted 16 years ago

    Personally I thought having Clinton as a President was utterly utterly ridiculous.

  8. tksensei profile image61
    tksenseiposted 16 years ago

    Oh and I don't know why you're so obssessed with fictional characters but I suppose he could have done with a few swimming lessons.

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      smile
      Could be his doublespeak strangled him, lol, maybe because he actually really really believed all the lil pernicious details were the important things (try writing a book or a thesis and have that...though syntax is important, if you can't talk about ideas, you will surely drown).

      While it is true that you can hang an opponent like this, you also will be considered in a certain light, smile.  As I'm sure the Bush admin. will be, actually.

  9. tksensei profile image61
    tksenseiposted 16 years ago

    Sorry to be so sleazy.

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      LOL  Yer a natural, TK.  What's your background?  History/Law?

      You still have a cute dog!

      1. tksensei profile image61
        tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        That's my ace in the hole. There's only so angry you can get with the picture of the cute dog there. Wolfgang to the rescue!


        In case of special emergency I break glass containing photos of my 8 month old little boy.

  10. Ralph Deeds profile image71
    Ralph Deedsposted 16 years ago
    1. nicomp profile image60
      nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this
      1. Ralph Deeds profile image71
        Ralph Deedsposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Clinton is off topic! Torture was not involved.

  11. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 16 years ago

    OK, Ok...I expect spitballs and food in the lunchroom to be thrown next. smile

    LOL, lol, anybody have a salient point to make?

  12. profile image0
    Leta Sposted 16 years ago

    "Hard to swallow" is probably a metaphor worth avoiding when it comes to water torture. I don't doubt that a few Dems (ie, Nancy Pelosi-my note) were clued in. And they should be held responsible for their share as well. This was a collective failure on the part of the political leadership of both parties - although obviously the lion's share belongs in the executive branch. But the Congress is co-equal; they were briefed; we deserve to know exactly what they knew and what, if anything they did to stop it.

    All the more reason for a truly independent commission to address all responsible parties. Give it time and money. This failure is different from the failure to stop 9/11, but it is a profound moral failure and legal travesty. There is just as much reason to investigate this. In fact, a thorough investigation by a mature democracy of this failure could begin to repair some of the damage. That's my hope. I want us to move on. But we cannot move on unless we have held ourselves accountable, and cauterized this period as anomalous.

    Or else the threat of a future torture program, justified as this one was, looms over all of us, and the world.


    --Andrew Sullivan, conservative, writing on his blog for The Atlantic

  13. Ralph Deeds profile image71
    Ralph Deedsposted 16 years ago

    White House to declassify revealing CIA torture report which rebuts much of the B.S. Cheney has been putting out.

    http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/tortu … ut-cheney/

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Yes.  Bob Woodward is saying the Bush-Cheney torture techniques were like something out of the 13th century.

      Also, this might have been Obama's play on the whole thing after all--taking the high ground, urging that we move forward, while releasing crucial information and letting others use up the space. Cheney blunders in....and hangs himself.  Rope a Dopes.  Similar to what was used with McCain/Palin.

  14. tksensei profile image61
    tksenseiposted 16 years ago

    Will they reveal all the related documents or just ones edited to show what they want them to show?

    Should any classified documents be used by either side in a political circus? I think not.

  15. Ralph Deeds profile image71
    Ralph Deedsposted 16 years ago
  16. tksensei profile image61
    tksenseiposted 16 years ago

    Is Joe Biden? Are you?

    1. Ralph Deeds profile image71
      Ralph Deedsposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Biden certainly is trustworthy.

      Cheney is hitting the road with a sound truck to spread the word on torture.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andy-boro … 01457.html

      1. tksensei profile image61
        tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Let me guess...

    2. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Are you to be trusted, TK?  wink  You can be kinda sleazy, as you admitted, lol...

      1. tksensei profile image61
        tksenseiposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Hardly.

  17. Ralph Deeds profile image71
    Ralph Deedsposted 16 years ago

    The Twinkie defense of torture

    http://www.slate.com/id/2218290/

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      With airy cream filling...  'Specially on Hubpages.

  18. Ralph Deeds profile image71
    Ralph Deedsposted 16 years ago

    Here are the 13 people principally responsible for torture in the Bush administration:
    1. Dick Cheney
    2. David Addington
    3. Alberto Gonzales
    4. James Mitchell
    5. George Tenet
    6. Condolezza Rice
    7. John Yoo
    8. Jay Bybee
    9. William "Jim" Wagner
    10.Donald Rumsfeld
    11.John Rizzo
    12. Stephen Bradbury
    13. George W. Bush

    This article in today's Salon details the role of each of the above felons http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2009/ … index.html

    1. nicomp profile image60
      nicompposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Salon is your source? There's a non-biased reference. lol.

      Anyway, convenient it is to omit the Democrats, including Nancy, who asked "Are we going far enough?" when they were briefed by the CIA regarding pouring water on people's heads.

      And when did this so-called torture stop? Oh yes, 2003, over 6 years ago. And how many people had some water poured on their heads? Oh, yeah.... three.


      How about a list of people who have volunteered to be waterboarded?

      1. John Ashcroft: http://digg.com/d1HySl
      2. Sean Hannity: listen to his show, he says it almost every day
      3. Nancy Pelosi
      4. John Boehner

      Sorry... I added the last 2 without consulting them.

      1. Ralph Deeds profile image71
        Ralph Deedsposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        The Holocaust occurred more than 60 years ago, but Germany is still prosecuting perpetrators. I'm glad, at least, you appear to agree that torturing prisoners was wrong.

      2. profile image0
        Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

        Exactly what was this post about?  Didn't see much of any argument whatsoever.

  19. AlexiusComnenus profile image60
    AlexiusComnenusposted 16 years ago

    Even as a soldier I don't trust anyone in government. It naturally corrupts. The fact that we are even debating the necessity of torture is an admission that bedrock principles on which this country was founded are eroding. Our "good" nature is what separates us from these terrorists. Any infringement on this distinction is a sacrifice.

    1. profile image0
      Leta Sposted 16 years agoin reply to this

      Agreed, Alexius.  Good to have another perspective.  Interesting that it converges with that of us 'liberals.'  But then who would know about this more than those instructed in soldiering?

  20. AlexiusComnenus profile image60
    AlexiusComnenusposted 15 years ago

    Torture is un-American. The fact that we allowed it under the guise of a "necessary evil" only shows just how far we've sunk. Franklin's advice was to never give up essential liberty for temporary safety. If only we paid closer attention to those wise men who started this country from scratch.

    1. Staci-Barbo7 profile image72
      Staci-Barbo7posted 15 years agoin reply to this

      We don't like to think that our America or our leaders are "like" those who ruled countries such as Hitler's Germany, World War II Japan, and those today known as "The Axis of Evil" in President Bush's own words.  However, when our leaders conduct themselves - and order others to do the same - without the conscience of a first grade child, we are becoming, by those acts, like the "them" that every good American holds in contempt for their brutality. 

      Trust me, this brutality and miring of conscience was not the fault of one party - both parties are briefed within the Congressional committees that deal with Homeland Security.  A link to the page that gives chairs and ranking members of these committees follows:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Un … Committees

      Members of both parties are included in this list. This is not a Republican v. Democrat debate, with the Democrats representing moral courage and responsibility.  Members of both parties are CULPABLE.  If you stand by as an observer to moral outrage and do nothing to prevent it or expose it, you are just as guilty as the one who initiates the wrong.   

      As Americans, it is time to see that WE ARE CULPABLE as a people, as our leaders still presumably represent US instead of their own private agendas.  Yes, those in power hid this outrage from us, but WE must make amends by demanding that this kind of atrocity can never again take place at American hands.

      No partisanship - I speak as one who loves my country and wants to see its moral goodness preserved.

      1. Ralph Deeds profile image71
        Ralph Deedsposted 15 years agoin reply to this

        Bush, Cheney, Addington, Professor John Yoo and the others listed above, not the Democrats, are responsible for the shameful torture. Some Congressional Democrats could have done more to resist but recent revelations are that the CIA and Bush people lied to Congress and didn't fully disclose what was going on wrt to torture and illegal surveillance of American citizens in this country.

        1. VENUGOPAL SIVAGNA profile image61
          VENUGOPAL SIVAGNAposted 15 years agoin reply to this

          Torture of terrorists and their supporters are not new. The famous modern terrorists, if and when they come to power, will do thousand times more cruelty to people against them. So, it is no sin if the terrorists and lawless citizens and their supporters are tortured.

          If the CIA and Bush, Cheney and Addington, Prof. John Yoo and others were responsible, it would have been in the national interests only. If Bush and CIA lied to Congress, should we think Congress is more sacred than the president of US and CIA?

        2. earnestshub profile image73
          earnestshubposted 15 years agoin reply to this

          Looking in from Australia, I am keen to see this out in the open.

          1. Ralph Deeds profile image71
            Ralph Deedsposted 15 years agoin reply to this

            Me too! But I fear Obama views this as a distraction. That may be true but it's a quite important matter.

    2. Ralph Deeds profile image71
      Ralph Deedsposted 15 years agoin reply to this

      Amen!

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)