What are your thoughts about healthcare in the United States? Do you believe that there should MUCH BETTER healthcare in America?
I think there will always be horror stories in any health care system. One story comes to mind of a 10 month old baby whom the doctors in Great Britain are advocating being left to die. The US is (or has by now) attempting to pass legislation to allow the infant entry into our country where potentially life saving aid can be administered.
So, I would say health care in America is good. I know of no on who has been denied life saving treatment. Although, that treatment can easily bankrupt a family. I would say our system of dispensing health care to the individuals needs a lot of work.
Dig into the case a little. It is not black and white.
Should a baby with an untreatable condition be flown to the US to be used as a guinea pig? The European Court thinks not.
The treatment in the US is for a less severe form of the illness and it might render some useful data before the poor child dies. Or it might just be pointless cruelty.
My father always said he wouldn't fight cancer, unless the odds were greatly in his favor. When he was diagnosed he did everything possible to survive. Even when the odds were long. Life has a right to fight for itself; no matter the odds. A parent has a right to hope, and try to save their children. Whatever the odds are if those parents want to pursue that course it should be their right.
We don't need better health care. We need cheaper health care.
A U.S. Doctor is going to the baby, may be there now.
My daughter is an R.N. at one of the largest hospitals in the States. They do not turn away patients. Some patients are there for months at a time, because they have nowhere else to go. They'll leave and return, leave and return....
This has always been the case, not just at this hospital, but at many others throughout the United States.
It was a bald-faced lie when Obama and Dems were talking of people dying in the streets and insisting that the Gov must get involved in order to save lives.
The craziest thing (and most ironic) throughout 'the big sell' of Obamacare, were all of the horrible stories coming out about the Veteran's Admin.(aka: The Gov) Veterans were literally dying in the streets or in their homes, waiting for an appointment, while disgusting V.A. workers were goofing off or much worse. I'll not get into that, we've all heard the stories.
Thank God Trump is firing them left and right. Five Hundred since January.
If healthcare is ever going to be any better in the U.S. or anywhere for that matter, the Gov needs to stay out of it!
It is not a bald-faced lie. Studies show a much higher death rate for people without health insurance than people who have it.
http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2 … -coverage/
+1,000,000,000,000,000,000-the government needs to stay out of health care period!
I'm sure there are wonderful hospitals which don't turn away anyone. But, there are documented cases of hospitals in the west taking homeless people who they didn't want to take care of and dumping them on street corners. I'm afraid the government is going to have to find a solution to the growing problem of rising medical costs. I think part of the solution is going to have to include the populace not feeling the need to lean so heavily on prescription drugs for every minor problem.
Health insurance companies are in the middle between the patient and the doctor. The problem comes about because health insurance companies are for profit companies with a high risk reward ratio. Their whole business model is based on how much risk they are willing to take to maintain the patient's health and what is the profit they have to make from the patient and their service provider.
Obama Care and Medicare are really group insurances where the risk to reward ratio is lowered in Obama Care by having younger healthier people enrolled and Medicare by just having more people enrolled and having the government subsidize part of it.
To answer your question, we should have the same insurance plan as congress has. Why should there be a difference? If they are happy with their plan, what gives them the right to come up with something different for civilians?
You forgot to mention that the risk/reward ratio is lower because those younger healthier people are being forced to pay premiums that are far beyond their risk level. If their premiums were commensurate with their risk the ratio for the insurance companies would be unchanged whether they were enrolled or not.
Just another scheme to shift costs; this time to those most likely to be unable to pay them. Young people starting a life, job, family, etc.
by trish1048 9 years ago
For or against?Personally, I hate the idea. The government needs to stay out of my personal life. I like my freedom of choice.
by Susan Reid 5 years ago
If you are insured through your employer, the answer is no. If you are an individual or small business owner, please share your thoughts.Did you know there will be online health care insurance marketplaces (exchanges) in every state?Is your state running its own exchange ... ...or is it...
by RKHenry 8 years ago
Is health care in America a basic right or privilege?
by Judy Specht 2 years ago
I have been listening to how the government has a billion dollars for getting people to sign up for the Affordable Healthcare Act. Would that money have been better spent training more doctors and building new hospitals? New Jersey has closed how many community hospitals in the last few...
by SparklingJewel 8 years ago
I truly want to know if these are valid reasons...or are they perspective on what "could" happen, or just totally absurd possibilities. If you have proof to validate or deny these reasonings, I genuinely would like to hear them?Here are just some of them, from a conservatives view: ...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 16 months ago
Obama "care" for the most part has been a disaster. Premiums keep rising & for many, it has become exorbitantly expensive. According to the latest news, steps to repeal Obama"care" has been defeated. Trumpcare as it was proposed would have...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|